Word NOW on the street with leftists is Ron Watkins is Q - they WERE saying it was Austin Steinbart. What changes?
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
They cannot find Q. Anywhere.
No arrest.
No charges.
No subpoena.
No back-trace.
No intelligence of who "Q" actually is.
No (successful) attempt to locate and "bring to justice" someone the Federal Government considers a cult leader.
Why not?
How Government handles an actual threat: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/un-sounds-alarm-over-extrajudicial-killings-in-the-talibans-afghanistan/ar-AAROisN?ocid=uxbndlbing
How Government handles a perceived threat: https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/10/politics/list-january-6-subpoenas/index.html
How Government handles an online troll: https://www.justice.gov/usao-az/pr/defendant-sentenced-online-threats
How Government handles Q: ... "Evil QAnon!!!"
Not just some autistic dweeb on 4chan, is it?
Ron Watkins as q 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
This, that guy is not very smart
To his credit, he knows how to milk an audience.
That's what the leftist Reddit moderator that posts on this site thinks.
That’s not actually true. I don’t know who Q is, nor do I really care. All I want to know is if he has the ability to credibly make the claims he does. That would likely require someone of the appropriate clearance in the military or intelligence community.
Who Q is matters less to me than the credibility of the person(s) behind the account. I can’t really establish that without knowing Q’s background or currentish capabilities in gathering intelligence.
And what you said just 4 days ago:
Considering you believe there is "evidence" that Ron Watkins is Q, and every piece of evidence being circulated by leftists out there is likewise accusing Ron Watkins of being Q, my statement is actually true, you dumbfuck.
Now proceed elsewhere, troll. Or we can bring up your constant shit-talking about the people here on your little www.libreddit.com and how you're so proud of infiltrating us ;)
What I said is that evidence apparently exists. I don’t know the veracity of it because I don’t really care. I know he apparently wiggled his eyebrows on an HBO documentary or something, but I did not watch it, because… why would I? I don’t need a documentary to tell me about Q stuff.
This was in a discussion about why the government wouldn’t take action against a LARP. Watkins was a useful example of that. I wasn’t suggesting it was something I believed.
And I’m not infiltrating. Infiltrators hide. I have not. I have always been respectful here. Being a Q researcher isn’t the same thing as being a Q believer. Just like you can still research a vaccine that you believe is fake.
Research needs multiple perspectives. Otherwise, it’s theology.
Then you can count yourself as the exception to corporations that currently make a profit off of 'telling people about Q stuff' with their slant.
You hide most of your hostility to us. Thus, you walked through an open door, hiding your hostility, in a place where you ordinarily wouldn't be welcome, except for the fact that people (moderators) thought you cared about their perspective as anything other than a delusional curiosity to be studied (and then scoffed at on outside channels). Hence, infiltration. You know it's true, buddy.
Keyword being "here," and "always" is still incorrect- u/Zeitreise called you out pretty well, didn't he?
Do you think we have a problem with 'perspective,' when some of us are Jewish, while others would probably gas everyone who is Jewish if they had a chance? Anti-semitism is anti-Q btw, Nazis are the bad guy in Q Lore (in case you missed it). You must be ignoring the diversity of this movement if you think we're cookie-cutters that see #17 in everything and think that it's important.
What has your infiltration been for, anyway? It has been 238 days so far that you've had an account here, what could you possibly be learning about the people in this movement that you shouldn't already know? The one thing you could've learned - the driving force behind people that follow "Q" - is still lost on you. You still lump all of us in with the idiots saying they see "#17" everywhere, so what's the point of your perspective if that's your opinion of us? It's like the contribution of a sweat bee to a group of dogs - a minor annoyance that keeps landing on your paw.
We'll just wait and see what happens as far as "the storm" goes, but you're not really achieving anything here for yourself or others.
I think “the driving force of Q” is actually fairly complex, and different for different people. GAW is the largest public community of Q people, but certainly not the only one. Independent Facebook networks, work buddies, and church groups all have different ideas of what the Q movement is.
Which, I think, explains the JFK Jr people out in Dallas and other odd beliefs attached to “QAnon.” Without access to GAW, the Q-inspired belief that you can’t trust the media or authority or anything else opens up a lot of possible truths, and some communities apparently found truth that GAW mostly rejects.
I fully recognize that you can’t generalize a set of beliefs to any particular believer in Q. I can only observe popular beliefs. There is always a post here remaking when 17 is in the news. You may find it silly, but not everyone does.
So why do you accept their presence here despite their different perspective? Because they’re fellow researchers looking for the truth about Q. You can forgive some faulty beliefs.
On that basis, I’m not certain that my mere disinclination to believe in Q the way you do makes my research any less viable than anyone else’s.
Whether or not you believe in Q is irrelevant - Q is simply the personification of an assumption ('with some evidence') that there are actually a handful of good people left in Government with the power to actually change things for the better, against all odds. If you don't assume that, fine, I could care less.
I, and most of the other people here - willing to admit it or not - would hold hands with Marxists if it meant eradicating the sick, Fascistic merger of power between Corporatists and the US Government.
If you think there is a problem with Biden throwing shit from Blackrock and other Corporations into his cabinet, then we have common ground. If you think there is a problem with the Covid narrative being used to generate record profits for the Pharmaceutical Industry and control political dialogue across the world that weakens the political power of the people of every nation, then we have common ground.
Every single person in the Q movement believes in holding Democrats and Republicans, who are both corrupt - along with every other "leader" in the world who has enabled Western society to collapse in on itself, accountable. Many of us are more than willing to link hands with whoever else believes that. Is that your "contribution" here, or not?
It seems to me that you think you're engaging in ground-breaking diplomacy with a pack of 'delusional freaks' that could actually be hiding in plain sight on Reddit because the only thing that makes them 'delusional freaks' is their belief in "Q" as a legitimate operation. Suppress that, and what's the difference between us and r/stupidpol? r/libertarian? r/superstonks? "Q" is the only difference.
Based on everything I know about you, you would willingly put someone like Biden in charge of this country if it meant keeping Trump out of power - that makes your perspective dog shit, along with whatever "research" you think you're contributing to us.
If I'm wrong, it means you'd lock Trump, Biden, Hillary, Pelosi, and every other politician in a prison, in favor of maybe a more competent Bernie style outsider who has no intention to dismantle our liberties, strip us till we're defenseless, or cave like a coward to Establishment demands.
Worth noting that some of us here do not blindly trust and instead see for better or for worse, there is a direct link between Trump and Q that lends legitimacy that has been reinforced repeatedly via "proofs", even if it's just for viral ARG style marketing.
I sincerely hope that it is legitimate as things are heading to a bad place and all of us I'm sure would like to avoid Civil War. It is also clear via Epstein & Maxwell that many elites and platforms like Reddit are compromised and favorable to pedophilia. Combined with many that seem to have occult and/or luciferian ties.
My trust is in Jesus Christ alone.
Q is a team.
Yes. I know. Which is why I'm highlighting the fact that leftists are morons who think it is Ron Watkins;
https://www.vice.com/en/article/v7m58a/q-accidentally-outed-himself-but-qanon-followers-dont-care
why are people downvoting this post? OP seems to be saying if Q wasn't military intelligence he would be caught and made an example of. Why the downvotes?
This has been word on the street for like a year
They can subpoena Scavino himself over nothing -
But they haven't even lifted a finger against "Q."
Biggest QProof out there, is the fact that they can't prove who Q is.
If he’s Q, we’re all fools.
Lmao don't worry, Watkins can't even emulate Q's sentence structure properly.
Everything spouted as "evidence" from the "Ron/CodeMonkey is Q" crowd comes from that HBO Q: Into the Storm documentary miniseries. To a one.
Imagine how much they'd know if they watched the doc AND stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night.
Lmao so true. Such a fucking mess, they need maids from that Holiday Inn to clean it all up.
"I AM SPARTACUS !!!!"
And Watkins started this rumor himself via the anti-Q documentary by HBO.
Which is why I personally find him to be a grifter, milking the Q/8kun fame for all its worth.
I'm aware.
Like I said - Word NOW on the street with leftists
I know. There's nothing I posted here that disagrees with your post.
That isn’t new... they were floating the Ron Watkins is Q theory right after Q started posting on 8kun.
They were saying that shortly after the HBO special. Normies I talk to that have seen the special also came to the same conclusion.
You make good points, Mr_House.
And we all know they'd have Q in a roach-infested cell at a black site if they could find him. Or them, more realistically, although continuing to talk about Q as being an individual -- the deranged leader of a cult -- suits their narrative better.
Leftists can't wrap their head around a Self Organizing Collective (SOC = Q). They think the collective has to be coerced.
We should really throw them for a loop, and start saying
"I am Q"
everywhere. (i got this idea from the walking dead where everyone was saying "I am Negan")
Ego Sum Q
Give it up already. No one knows, but he Shadow knows.
It's an old 1930s radio show called -- "The Shadow Knows".
https://odysee.com/@FiresideFrens:2/Commit+Thy+Work+To+God+-PaulRevere11+-AdamAugustine-vA3iEq1LWbw:2
Selected copy paste for the video.