If this were ACTUALLY a psyop and Trump were a turn coat, they would've just rammed through everything they've wanted to do in the senate with the help of the RINOs to overcome Manchin and Sinema. Literally 2 people basically control the Senate, and by extension the entire federal government.
Think about that. It's not hard to overcome the 2 person vote when you account for the RINOs. Romney, McConnell, Murkowski, Graham. Right there, with just those 4 high profile RINOs you have double the vote needed to overcome Manchin and Sinema and ram through every single corrupt bill they wanted.
The fact that they're all being leashed and forced to vote on party lines on the majority of the big bills that would destroy the US or change it permanently tells you they're not in control.
https://slagfa.substack.com/
Scroll to almost the bottom and see the long list of failures. All of this is excellent and I suggest you read it. You’re on the money.
Very nice list!
Read the part about Wrestlemania and while they were talking about the similarities between wresting fans and Trump's supporters as well as that act President Trump and Vince McMahon did, I was disappointed they didn't even mention Umaga's name.
I mean, come on! Look at his name!? UMAGA!!! MAGA!!!
But that was a good read. I actually was going to read "The Wartime President" but didn't have the time to, until I saw your link. Was trying to find where you were talking about on that link so I figured I'd read the whole thing. Now I gotta read Part 1 and Part 2 then re-read Part 3 and wait for Part 4 to come out.
Thanks!
I suspect the blackmail material the cabal has been using against world leadership, political, economic, and religious is in the hands of the whitehats and has been for a long time.
When they need someone turned they just show them what they have and tell them what they are going to do to absolve their guilt. Those with evidence of extreme crimes don't get an option. Those that committed crimes against humanity and treason will get their just rewards.
The WSJ article today about the Harvard guy collaborating with China Wuhan lab was referencing a bunch of people who were initially charged, but the charges were dropped. People out there are singing like birds.
https://archive.md/Pi44q
Sometimes the person didn't even need to do anything. They could fabricate the blackmail. They could hack and install the child porn onto your laptop and then have it seized. What could you do? Who would believe you?
It would sound idiotic to say, "I don't know how that got on my computer. Maybe the FBI put it there." No one would believe you. When the government wants to make you public enemy no. 1 they could do it.
Many who were "blackmailed" may be completely innocent, but knew they were up against the three letter agencies that could frame them and a fake news media that would fry them in the court of public opinion.
AWAN BROTHERS .....
What do you think they knew? Or even had in their possession? Did they have a bargain chip?
"We have it all"
https://qalerts.app/?n=577
u/#q577
I've been thinking about this. I think both sides have blackmail:
Deep state has limited dirt on folks. Limited ammo. And it isn't always raping kids. It's probably a lot softer than that in most cases. Bribes. Lying. Etc...
The Patriots have much of the same material and more, because they can reveal all the secrets the deep state needs to keep secret. So they have access to double the blackmail.
The difference is that the deep state needs to spend this ammo wisely. They only have so much of it. And they can't throw away these corrupt people, because there as only so many of them too. So they resort to threats vs actually doing most the time.
Compare that with the Patriots. If they win, they could potentially jail or even execute ALL of these people. They don't need to be reserved.
That's a big difference.
So when we think of Patriots in control, think about a split vote where both the deep state and patriots are competing for votes. Think about how much easier it is for the Patriots to squeeze like crazy - because they can afford to spend this ammo and have these people quit. That's actually almost as good as prosecuting them.
White Hats are not blackmailing people. The Q team went to great lengths to follow the law and create thousands and thousands of sealed indictments. NSA used FISA to surveil (but did so legally unlike the Obama administration). Trump was very clear that they are the party of law and order. They are not blackmailing.
However, they do have all the evidence. Durham has full control of the sealed indictments that are full of evidence that Bill Barr declassified to Grand Jury. Upon unsealing that evidence is declassed to the public. This can be triggered at any time.
A person is arrested and then the indictment is unsealed, not the reverse. After the trial (unless a judge orders otherwise) the evidence is then declassed to the public.
This is the white hats ammo. The timing is up to the Durham team. Sealed indictments hang over your head and the government can hold onto them for up to 5 years without unsealing.
That is not the same as black mail. It leashes many black hat figures because they could be arrested at any moment if the indictment is unsealed.
Black hats use illegally obtained and sometimes fabricated information to control people as well as death threats and MS to coerce people.
Completely different methods. White Hats are not blackmailing, coercing or use illegal methods to control others. People forget there is a LOT the government can do to you that is within the law. Usually the people suffer this, but right now its the black hats feeling the pain.
Good clarification on the language. It has the same effect either way, but I agree that it's a lawful process.
LEt me get this straight:
Blackhat: if you do this for me, these disgusting pictures and stories will stay hidden and you' ll have a lot of money, and the cherry on top, to secure your next election, dominion systems will be set to elect you.
White hat: if you do this for me, we' ll be able to work out a deal. Ok, you' ll have to resign and support our plan for the time being, and you will be able to retire and enjoy a couple of years with your family. If not, well ... leavenworth will be walk in the park for you. With these disgusting pictures and stories coming out, I do not value your life for 1 penny.
Now tell me. What is the difference? Blackmail vs Whitemail?
Your entire argument is based on your own hypothetical. It's just your opinion.
You are saying essentially, "What if hypothetically the white hats are telling people that they have to resign, support our plan... would that hypothetically be different than the Derp State blackmail?"
I'd still say yes even in your imagined scenario, but I don't agree with your imagined scenario. For one thing it leaves out people like Admiral Mike Rogers and Mike Flynn who fooled the Derp State and got into powerful positions within the Obama Administration. They might have looked like black hats, but they were white hats. We don't actually know those who have only been pretending to be black hats, but were white hats all along.
Q said "There are more good than bad" implying that white hats may be more numerous than we realize.
We also don't know if the Derp State is forcing out some of these out because they suspect they talked. Too many unknowns.
I disagree.
Trump was very clear that they are the party of law and order. Q went to great lengths to do the posts in a way that followed Natsec guidelines. Following the law seemed an absolute necessity to Q so I don't agree with your speculation. Whatever is going on with the white hats side is 100% by the law in my opinion.
But like you, I'm just speculating.
?????
Speculation? Wow, are you triggered or what?
I gave you two scenario' s. These scenario' s are real live scenario' s. As a matter of fact, Q mentioned that deals were made up to a point in time where the door to deals was shut.
Within this context, my scenario' s are playing out.
For you well educated common core smarties out here: goto qagg.news and enter in the search bar the word: deal. You will find 95 posts containing this phrase.
Q 2565 dated 12/10/18 and Q15 dated 10/31/17. The latter is first in line and details deals have to be made because of the level of corruption. Even reaching out to certain players have been done. The former post is the final no deals posts. The door is shut.
So, now you are starting to see what I wrote?
Be that as it may, my question was not about whether or not it happens. My question is: what is the difference?
It is a logical response to your exclamation claim:
Really? The process is exactly the same. In both cases a deal is proposed. A deal is commerce requiring both side to assess the advantage of the deal, to assess the value of the equity in question depending on the position of power they occupy in the, I almost would have said negotiation, but that would presuppose a negative state of being, so. ... I' ll maintain the idea of haggling to set terms to be agreed to.
Your disagreement is duly noted, yet totally unfounded.
O and one more thing: speculation. To speculate requires a tangible form from observation. Otherwise it is nothing than being an air-guitarist. Entertaining, but hardly substantial. As the Latin goes:
"Speculation? Wow, are you triggered or what?
Lol. Predictable. You immediately resort to try to make things emotional. If you can't win in ideas you resort to trying to get things emotional.
In what Q posts was it said word for word "Deals were made up to a point in time where the door to deals was shut." That was never said. You are taking out one phrase "No deals" and trying to wildly twist it to your own wild speculations and then claim those as facts.
Also you gave me two hypotheticals that you can't prove are facts, but you want to insist are the truth. Then you were like "See?! In my imagined scenarios that I can't prove I'm right."
Nope. Not even in your imagined scenarios are you right. But keep on imagining ~
No, it's not. You need to check what logic is. A logical response to the question "2 + 2 =?" is "4", not "blue is my favorite color!" or "You're trIGgeReD by me."
Nothing logical about your need to use personal attacks when you can't make your case.
Blackmail is not haggling. Black hats using blackmail and coercion is not them "haggling".
If you think White Hats are "haggling" then you already just proved the difference between the two. Well done.
"Your disagreement is duly noted, yet totally unfounded."
That's fine. I think your speculations are flawed. Let's agree to disagree.
You better read my post dispassionately. You are asking for the clear states road.
Hence, the rest of your peculiar reasoning falls apart as it is bases on a wrong premise.
Again, dispassionately. So before you respond. Think again. Do not use your kneejerk trigger
All I've been saying is I disagree with your premise and you resort to attacks.
Make a case for your theory or pack it up.
Excellent reading. Thank you sir 🙏
It's obvious to me for a while that the Cabal was not in charge. I remember the Obama era all too well and what happened to the Tea Party and the rinos. We had McCain undermining and sabotaging at every turn. Now the dems have Manchin and Sinema (Cinema) undermining and sabotaging them. They used to keep Manchin on a short leash. Now he freely does what he pleases even if its sinks the party. Someone lost his leash.
However, the DS is still alive and trying everything in their power to use fear and control to regain power. A lot of stuff happening is the DS, but it keeps blowing up in their faces. They used to be able to blackmail, threaten and arm twist people into complying. Without that power their schemes seem to end up falling short.
Exactly. What we are seeing is a screaming baby of an administration in its final days of "power" or rather what little of it they have left. They have nothing else to lose so like a child they are kicking, screaming, pushing and spitting at whatever they can in the hopes they score a hail mary.
What will likely happen is they will cause another Waco or Ruby ridge and this time there won't be an Oklahoma City false flag or misinformation campaign to paint the victims as pedophiles to quell the masses.
But until victory is official, we still gotta fight.
Interesting ideas. Could be on to something.
Q is definitely a psyop - it’s just the good kind.
Absolutely accurate - Q was definitely a psyop - I’m not saying the information wasn’t accurate, but it was designed to unite and get us off our asses for the next phase. The phase where the People were necessary to mobilize from the ground up, and accomplish the things that could never be done from the top down. It doesn’t matter how many times Trump is elected, he can’t replace precinct committees, school boards, etc. That could only be done by royally pissing us off
I think you're definitely on to something big, pede.
Excellent observation!
Excellent point. Adding it to my post I just made.
Senate is the key.
Why do they say 2 people are controlling the government? What about the other 50 people voting against the bill?
Lol. Who's breaking down what to achieve what you're suggesting, doomer? What do you see that we don't?
Hyperbole with speculation is not evidence, by the way.