The obvious answer is that he is correlating his friends #'s with the lot # that are having adverse reactions so he can warn his friends of possible problems they might have.
If he has been doing it for 6 months my guess is that the injection his friends got are safe.
It's roughly 5% of the shots that have nearly a 100% incident rate.
I haven't lost anyone close to the vax since not too many people I'm close to got it.
But I CHOULD have looked up #'s to show them why they shouldn't get another one and filled in their card for them for their 2nd dose / booster. Not that I would do something like that for someone I care about....
About 95% of people got "safe" doses, while almost all of the reactions and deaths have been reported from about 5% of the vaccine lots. A lot is 1,000 vials which contain 6 doses per vial for a total of 6,000 doses per lot.
Knowing whether you have one of the bad lots and whether it might better explain why you are particularly sick is important. I'm concerned they have all given themselves lifelong autoimmune conditions that will lead to a host of issues, but in the short-term, the lot numbers can help provide clarity.
My mother suffered from vertigo and had long periods of being able to barely stand after her Pfizer double-tap. She got a bad lot. My brother did as well but seemed to miss the most severe effects- out of 4 total lots from different places, they received 4 bad lots, and given the 95% chance to get a good lot, those odds are almost impossible. My father just retired from a 45-year career in medicine and didn't get it and told everyone else not to get it, but after a year of "be very afraid" and "trust the experts" my mother and brother folded, even when they had an expert living in their house.
What your mother and brother did seems like it was from duress and panic. It is something that's difficult to explain people's responses in this regard. But, we see it occurring repeatedly in our lives. It always reminds of a story that I'm still haunted by to this day of an American model by the name of Ginger Faye Meadows who was taken by a large saltwater crocodile on March 29, 1987 in northern Australia. The story is tells us the inexplicable reactions to situations that cause duress and panic.
The story behind Ginger Meadows is equally as bizarre as what your friend did. I'll provide this link to an article written in 2017. I remember reading about this tragedy shortly after it occurred. The skipper's story has changed since the interview that occurred some 34 years ago. Now, he is saying he 'warned' Ginger Meadows not to "so much as dangle a foot in the water" because of the crocodile danger.
Cascade Falls south of Darwin is a beautiful scenic area with its cascading stream descending into a large pool of water. It looks like a great swimming area. It was originally reported that crocodiles were not in this area and was a concern. This was the reason why Ginger Meadows and her friend along with other members of the crew went swimming. At the time, it was purported the crocodile population had already been greatly reduced as a result of decades of over hunting. The Australian government even imposed a protected species protection on crocodiles.
I'll get to the point of this story and it goes like this. Ginger Meadows and her friend Jane Burchett swam to the falls and were positioned on a waist deep shelf under the falls. One of the crew members had already made the swim and scaled the staircase wall to the top of the falls. It was he who first saw the 3-meter crocodile approach and called out --"crocodile!". The women standing on the shelf saw it too. And it was rapidly approaching them. They were panicking and couldn't climb out up the wall. Burchett even took her shoe off and threw it at the croc. It didn't help. On the boat, a crew member saw the croc too. He frantically started the yacht's motor, but didn't have time to maneuver the boat, so he revved the motor hoping to scare the croc away. The croc continued moving straight at the girls.
Jane Burchett then tells this incredible puzzling piece of information. She said--
"'It swum right up to us and had its mouth open,'" she said.
"'Then I took my shoe off and threw it at it and hit it on the top of its head and it closed its mouth."
"The crocodile then went under the water and Ms Meadows jumped into the water in an apparent attempt to reach safety."
"'She [Ginger Meadows] let go of my arm, jumped off the ledge took two strokes and it grabbed her around the waist and pulled her right under the water."
"'Then he pulled her up out of the water right in front of me – I looked her right in the face she had her arms in the air and she was looking right at me."
"'Then it pulled her back under the water.'"
For better than 30 years I have been horrified by this story and I keep asking myself -- "Why would she jump off the shelf to swim? Her chances would have been better if she only would have remained where she was.
The young woman's body was recovered the next day – which would have been her 25th birthday.
Was it irrational behavior due to panic and stress? Why do people do act irrationally under duress?
Is there a '100th monkey effect' that works against a person's better judgment? In other words, everyone else is doing it, I should too?
I have suspected this from my reading for a long while now. This is the proof why some ppl are fine, and others not so much ! They can’t have everyone drop dead at once as it would send off alarm bells, so gradual is the method. More shots over time is gradual wider dispersement. These fuckers are diabolical! This is the most clear, concise data set I’ve seen to date. I mean we all know via vaers that ppl are dying and people are having adverse reactions, but this is going far beyond that!
Exactly! They wouldn't be able to get as many people to take the shot if initially, people were dropping dead all over.
I'm thinking that every shot from here on out,, will gradually kill more. Everyone I know that got a booster, got really sick. Worse than the first and second one.
What happens if we find out there are two vaccines. The one Trump developed and is standing behind and another that they are using to experiment on people without telling them?
Or what if we find out that these lots were not taken care of correctly and that the side affects should be extremely low if done right?
Both of those possibilities seem more likely than Trump attaching his name and legacy to a death jab.
My (thankfully unvaxxed) Uncle died of cancer last week. 90 yr old, 20 yrs my Mom's senior...lifetime meat-cutter; could crush your hand with a handshake up to a few months ago. Long, lean, salt-of-the-earth solid Christian. Was riding his bike 5-10 miles 2-3 times a week thru last Summer. Not necessary to add this info above, but God Bless him.
The popular local cemetery could NOT accommodate his Thursday funeral. Internment will be Friday afternoon, 20 hours after the funeral. "Too busy".
This is a long-term, 100 yr old cemetery that's quite popular in these upper-middle class suburbs....
Why too busy? "We have a ton of burials, can't hire enough to keep up".
The link doesn't work for me, but it sounds like bullshit. This isn't about the batches - the vaccines are GMO death shots anytime they aren't saline. The deaths, disabilities, and illnesses will only be reported accurately in certain places. It doesn't mean those batches are worse, it just means they got reported!
anomalous data is anomalous. The only real question is WHY is it anomalous. is it really bad batches? Or is it merely sampling error? I dont know. But at the end of the day, the shots are dangerous.
Moderna has a way that you can get the lots by date. Sort by this and you'll see the time pattern.
There is no bad lot floating around that appears to be available right now. The deadliest lots are the older ones and they keep adding deaths to them. (VAERS updates don't appear to be FIFO)
If you have any queries you'd like run on VAERS feel free to message me. I have it all setup on SQL to pull on demand.
I have been considering this point. I know a lot of people who live in afluent areas who are well off and on the upper midddle/high class band. They don't seem to be as affected as others I know who are worse off socially and economically and living on council estates (UK). This has led me to think that it's an analytical cull based on different demographic factors. Pure eugenics in action.
That would jive perfectly, makes sense to me. None of the elite seem to be affected. So they are either being injected with saline, or have the cure , but lord help you if your are low on the food chain. It could even come down to a much finer selection.
This interesting work by Craig Paardekooper is sufficient grounds for a formal investigation. We need much more transparency by the manufacturers regarding lot sizes and distribution patterns. Furthermore, I just downloaded the expiration data and found that 19.5% of the 354550 rows in the US VAERS data that have expiration data have RECVDATE > Expiration Date. This appears to be grounds for lawsuits for administration of expired product: approximately 1 in 5 vials being injected and reported in VAERS are expired.
Not sure how this could possibly be tracked. If relying totally on VAERS reports, it could be far greater because a substantial amount are NEVER reported or are wiped from VAERS.
LOL @ "Hackers"
This data is easy to see on the VAERS data CDC website.
They just downloaded and sorted it.
I've been looking up lot #'s for friends / fam for 6+ months
How is this helping them out?
The obvious answer is that he is correlating his friends #'s with the lot # that are having adverse reactions so he can warn his friends of possible problems they might have.
If he has been doing it for 6 months my guess is that the injection his friends got are safe.
Shooting the messenger usually refers to the guy bearing bad news. I don't think I'd want to be there. I guess he's been lucky.
It's roughly 5% of the shots that have nearly a 100% incident rate.
I haven't lost anyone close to the vax since not too many people I'm close to got it.
But I CHOULD have looked up #'s to show them why they shouldn't get another one and filled in their card for them for their 2nd dose / booster. Not that I would do something like that for someone I care about....
Knowing which people I should buy life insurance on mostly.
About 95% of people got "safe" doses, while almost all of the reactions and deaths have been reported from about 5% of the vaccine lots. A lot is 1,000 vials which contain 6 doses per vial for a total of 6,000 doses per lot.
Knowing whether you have one of the bad lots and whether it might better explain why you are particularly sick is important. I'm concerned they have all given themselves lifelong autoimmune conditions that will lead to a host of issues, but in the short-term, the lot numbers can help provide clarity.
My mother suffered from vertigo and had long periods of being able to barely stand after her Pfizer double-tap. She got a bad lot. My brother did as well but seemed to miss the most severe effects- out of 4 total lots from different places, they received 4 bad lots, and given the 95% chance to get a good lot, those odds are almost impossible. My father just retired from a 45-year career in medicine and didn't get it and told everyone else not to get it, but after a year of "be very afraid" and "trust the experts" my mother and brother folded, even when they had an expert living in their house.
What your mother and brother did seems like it was from duress and panic. It is something that's difficult to explain people's responses in this regard. But, we see it occurring repeatedly in our lives. It always reminds of a story that I'm still haunted by to this day of an American model by the name of Ginger Faye Meadows who was taken by a large saltwater crocodile on March 29, 1987 in northern Australia. The story is tells us the inexplicable reactions to situations that cause duress and panic.
The story behind Ginger Meadows is equally as bizarre as what your friend did. I'll provide this link to an article written in 2017. I remember reading about this tragedy shortly after it occurred. The skipper's story has changed since the interview that occurred some 34 years ago. Now, he is saying he 'warned' Ginger Meadows not to "so much as dangle a foot in the water" because of the crocodile danger.
Cascade Falls south of Darwin is a beautiful scenic area with its cascading stream descending into a large pool of water. It looks like a great swimming area. It was originally reported that crocodiles were not in this area and was a concern. This was the reason why Ginger Meadows and her friend along with other members of the crew went swimming. At the time, it was purported the crocodile population had already been greatly reduced as a result of decades of over hunting. The Australian government even imposed a protected species protection on crocodiles.
I'll get to the point of this story and it goes like this. Ginger Meadows and her friend Jane Burchett swam to the falls and were positioned on a waist deep shelf under the falls. One of the crew members had already made the swim and scaled the staircase wall to the top of the falls. It was he who first saw the 3-meter crocodile approach and called out --"crocodile!". The women standing on the shelf saw it too. And it was rapidly approaching them. They were panicking and couldn't climb out up the wall. Burchett even took her shoe off and threw it at the croc. It didn't help. On the boat, a crew member saw the croc too. He frantically started the yacht's motor, but didn't have time to maneuver the boat, so he revved the motor hoping to scare the croc away. The croc continued moving straight at the girls.
Jane Burchett then tells this incredible puzzling piece of information. She said--
For better than 30 years I have been horrified by this story and I keep asking myself -- "Why would she jump off the shelf to swim? Her chances would have been better if she only would have remained where she was.
The young woman's body was recovered the next day – which would have been her 25th birthday.
Was it irrational behavior due to panic and stress? Why do people do act irrationally under duress?
Is there a '100th monkey effect' that works against a person's better judgment? In other words, everyone else is doing it, I should too?
Sorry, my Power Glove™ is broken. :(
Oh, right: Power Glove™ is for hacking time.
To hack the planet, you need a copy of Wipeout for PS1.
Groan... xD
Ummm who cares? It’s good shit.
Just checked my moderna batches.
I wasn't lucky, I was blessed with the least dangerous one. Yet my true blessing came in the form of this community waking me up.
It's like Jesus said - "GO NOW and sin no more."
Amen. Here's hoping for the pathway FAR AWAY from boosters for me and my family as we prepare for the upcoming years.
I think it now stands for anyone who can do something besides launch an app, on a computer.
Or someone that coughs a lot
Hillary on the 2016 campaign trail?
Side of beefer
Welcome to the hack side.
I don't believe this was hackers.
I've watched quite a few of Craig's videos on the "bad batches", they were all using VAERS.
And it looks like he has some for non-US countries now too.
WTF was I just looking at?! That data is horrible! How do we speed up the trials and executions?! These sick Cabal criminals must all go bubye.
Hackerman
Is that not the guy that played Freddie Mercury?
Yeah, that's from Mr. Robot, a show about hackers. Fun fact: this dude is a Coptic Christian Egyptian.
I have suspected this from my reading for a long while now. This is the proof why some ppl are fine, and others not so much ! They can’t have everyone drop dead at once as it would send off alarm bells, so gradual is the method. More shots over time is gradual wider dispersement. These fuckers are diabolical! This is the most clear, concise data set I’ve seen to date. I mean we all know via vaers that ppl are dying and people are having adverse reactions, but this is going far beyond that!
Exactly! They wouldn't be able to get as many people to take the shot if initially, people were dropping dead all over.
I'm thinking that every shot from here on out,, will gradually kill more. Everyone I know that got a booster, got really sick. Worse than the first and second one.
What happens if we find out there are two vaccines. The one Trump developed and is standing behind and another that they are using to experiment on people without telling them?
Or what if we find out that these lots were not taken care of correctly and that the side affects should be extremely low if done right?
Both of those possibilities seem more likely than Trump attaching his name and legacy to a death jab.
My (thankfully unvaxxed) Uncle died of cancer last week. 90 yr old, 20 yrs my Mom's senior...lifetime meat-cutter; could crush your hand with a handshake up to a few months ago. Long, lean, salt-of-the-earth solid Christian. Was riding his bike 5-10 miles 2-3 times a week thru last Summer. Not necessary to add this info above, but God Bless him.
The popular local cemetery could NOT accommodate his Thursday funeral. Internment will be Friday afternoon, 20 hours after the funeral. "Too busy". This is a long-term, 100 yr old cemetery that's quite popular in these upper-middle class suburbs....
Why too busy? "We have a ton of burials, can't hire enough to keep up".
The link doesn't work for me, but it sounds like bullshit. This isn't about the batches - the vaccines are GMO death shots anytime they aren't saline. The deaths, disabilities, and illnesses will only be reported accurately in certain places. It doesn't mean those batches are worse, it just means they got reported!
anomalous data is anomalous. The only real question is WHY is it anomalous. is it really bad batches? Or is it merely sampling error? I dont know. But at the end of the day, the shots are dangerous.
Warning. I did some followup review of this idea and I believe the bad lots are more related to time than lettering.
https://greatawakening.win/p/140vaMfeFT/followup-on-moderna-bad-batches-/
Moderna has a way that you can get the lots by date. Sort by this and you'll see the time pattern.
There is no bad lot floating around that appears to be available right now. The deadliest lots are the older ones and they keep adding deaths to them. (VAERS updates don't appear to be FIFO)
If you have any queries you'd like run on VAERS feel free to message me. I have it all setup on SQL to pull on demand.
Selection bias.
Random selection bias or maybe targeted selection bias by sending worse batches to specific areas !
I have been considering this point. I know a lot of people who live in afluent areas who are well off and on the upper midddle/high class band. They don't seem to be as affected as others I know who are worse off socially and economically and living on council estates (UK). This has led me to think that it's an analytical cull based on different demographic factors. Pure eugenics in action.
That would jive perfectly, makes sense to me. None of the elite seem to be affected. So they are either being injected with saline, or have the cure , but lord help you if your are low on the food chain. It could even come down to a much finer selection.
Like was done w hep c vaxx sent to where more latino blacks and gay people were sent? No doubt. They target groups first
Some areas report more than others, which in itself is a selection bias.
This interesting work by Craig Paardekooper is sufficient grounds for a formal investigation. We need much more transparency by the manufacturers regarding lot sizes and distribution patterns. Furthermore, I just downloaded the expiration data and found that 19.5% of the 354550 rows in the US VAERS data that have expiration data have RECVDATE > Expiration Date. This appears to be grounds for lawsuits for administration of expired product: approximately 1 in 5 vials being injected and reported in VAERS are expired.
Unsurprising but interesting fact is that Facebook have censored the domain from being shared for "misinformation".
My grandma dodged a serious bullet. Her Pfizer jab had 2500+ adverse reactions. She had none, thank God
This site can’t be reachedThe connection was reset. Try:
Checking the connection Checking the proxy and the firewall ERR_CONNECTION_RESET
Bitdefender is blocking this site as a threat. Just FYI
mirror: howbadismybatch.com
Not sure how this could possibly be tracked. If relying totally on VAERS reports, it could be far greater because a substantial amount are NEVER reported or are wiped from VAERS.
Thank you for this information. I will check on my jabbed loved ones' batches.
what is ADRs?
Guessing it's ADverse Reactions...