The popular conception of viruses and vaccines could be upside down. The virus is produced by animals, rather than being an animal. It could have a positive purpose, as an information expression and exchange, selective propagation may mean something useful. An example of a purpose could be behaviour modification, a signal to seek certain nutrition, environment, or a test/exercise of body functions/reactions useful for living-organism attacks, bacterial or amoeba attacks, wound infection resistance ability or something like that.

If a virus is an expression from an animal, then vaccines themselves might hobble the process, effectively weakening the animal particularly over generations, when compared to pure viral transmission.

Not exercising as much means your fitness goes down.

Most bad health situations are not caused by a virus perhaps, but the virus emerges from someone who dealt with a situation (like the exsomes theory) and the virus teaches other animals about this learning. A virus is rarely clearly the primary cause of death in healthy people.

Perhaps they never were worth worrying about, but are a co-evolved communication modality we do not understand.

The issue of those virus papers being published "on faith, not fact" is why the list of symptoms for "COVID 19" grew to include every infection/disease symptom known to man. [they] threw literal spitballs until some stuck.

Has any virus been fully isolated and sequenced?

Sauce pl0x?

don't forget the super cool artwork to make sure everyone knows what it looks like! reminds me of some other stuff I haven't seen good evidence of and they just paid an artist to make up some pictures...

But muh taste is gone!!! ReEeEeEeEeEe!

Germ theory made up

Great line right here: "We could not estimate the degree of purification because we do not purify and concentrate the virus cultured in cells."

The whole world is living in fear of their own shadow over nothing.

When virologists say -- "the virus is budding from the infected cell", the inference is misleading because the cell is dying or is already dead and is not infected. The "budding" is the observation of the internal gelatinous material of the cell oozing out through the ruptured cell membrane. It looks like a 'bud' under the microscope. Think of of it like jello pouring out when its container is punctured. This is what is being viewed and called a virus.

The very word 'virus' is Latin and means -- 'slime'; 'poison'. The reason 'Germ Theorists' chose this Latin word is because that's exactly what they saw. It is the same reason a virologist will admit a 'virus' is neither alive or dead. Everyone would agree that 'slime' and 'poison' can't possibly be alive or dead. This is why 'viruses' cannot possibly be alive. It's because it is simply 'slime' and 'poison' being viewed. The greatest of lies is Virology. The 'virus' is portrayed as being neither alive or dead, so it takes on a sci-fi portrayal of being 'un-dead' just like in the movies with zombies, Frankenstein, and vampires.

When a cell dies, the internal material within the cell starts to immediately ferment changing its chemical makeup. The cell membrane soon weakens and ruptures and the fermented internal material of the cell 'buds' or pours out of the cell membrane. This 'slime' and 'poison' is by nature's design and signals cleanup cells to clean up the mess and dispose of the cell carcass.

When many cells die at the same time, it is called necrosis. The cleanup operation in the body can become overwhelmed when more cells are dying than processed out of the body through excretory means. The toxicity builds up and illness results.

What was it that pastuer said on his death bed???