What's amazing is all the AEs they list and the elevated percentages.
Under FDA rules, this "vaccine" should have never been approved. Yet it was. At this point, the cabal isn't even lying. They aren't even trying to hide it!
So is the fully approved shot available immediately or do they have the same situation as Pfizer, where it's not available until 2023-24?
Absolutely insane that FDA would approve this with so many deaths and adverse events.
Lovely name, almost like it's obvious what they are doing.
I'm wondering the same thing. The biontech/comirty thing.
And funny this just happened after folks in the military found a foolproof way to avoid the vax (under the eua stuff) But if this is truly approved, then they can push it.
Except now all the stuff has come out from DoD about how bad it is in the military, so who would take it? And how could they force it with all the damning evidence of adverse effects??
Is this the same as what they did with Pfizer where they "approved" the non-existent legal entity comniraty but then conflate it with the EUA shot to make people think they're both approved?
Say it with me folks. It is unethical to test a drug with unknown effects on a pregnant woman and her unborn child. We don't do that, except in cases where the disease itself is a disease of pregnancy, and then only after extensive animal testing. We get the data from surveillance of women who end up using the drug of their own choice who happen to become pregnant along the way. Hell, prior to 1990, we didn't test on women at all. All medical testing was done on men because we're the disposable sex, and women were to be protected, pregnant or not because so many women become pregnant without planning to be.
If you look at just about every drug approved in the last 5-10 years you will see that exact same statement in the FDA label. Only older drugs, for which we do have reliable long-term surveillance data will you see a more thorough statement, because by then we'll have accumulated enough surveillance data.
If you want to show conspiracy, find the documents that show Moderna knew there was a risk and then reported this "we don't know" statement anyway. Pfizer has such documents that recently got FOIA'd. Comirnaty's label still claims no ill effects despite their clear, internal data showing otherwise. Better yet, get that now-public DOD vaccine side effect data and send it to FDA demanding they update the labels of both mRNA vaccines.
It's one thing to make wild accusations. It's another thing entirely to actually be able to prove someone knowingly lied for profit.
So , Will “Spikevax” not be available in the US? Will the original Moderna jab still be under EUA? There is NO WAY they will expose themselves to liability. Also, if one vax is truly approved and available no others can be use under EUA. Let’s see how this plays out.
So they literally named it for what it does as an in-your-face fuck you?
Wonder if NOW the vaxtards will wake up...
...or am I being prematurely hopeful? Again?
What's amazing is all the AEs they list and the elevated percentages.
Under FDA rules, this "vaccine" should have never been approved. Yet it was. At this point, the cabal isn't even lying. They aren't even trying to hide it!
They never really tried to hide it.
This event was in papers at meetings years before covid. They publish it. Just like the 2030 you will own nothing and you will be happy.
The cult always tells you what they do.
They simply think it's good, because their daily dose of obfuscated "SCIENCE" tells them so
Can’t upvote you enough! Was my thought too!😡
I wonder if the booster will be called CLOTSHOT.
Spikevax as in spike proteins?
https://greatawakening.win/p/141YDsfwWK/13122--fda-press-release-fda-tak/
Here is my thread with links to the fda press release and the insert.
Is this the EUA?
No, it's full approval.
So is the fully approved shot available immediately or do they have the same situation as Pfizer, where it's not available until 2023-24?
Absolutely insane that FDA would approve this with so many deaths and adverse events. Lovely name, almost like it's obvious what they are doing.
I'm wondering the same thing. The biontech/comirty thing.
And funny this just happened after folks in the military found a foolproof way to avoid the vax (under the eua stuff) But if this is truly approved, then they can push it.
Except now all the stuff has come out from DoD about how bad it is in the military, so who would take it? And how could they force it with all the damning evidence of adverse effects??
they openly call you sheep
Absolutely sick people doing this.
Is this the same as what they did with Pfizer where they "approved" the non-existent legal entity comniraty but then conflate it with the EUA shot to make people think they're both approved?
Say it with me folks. It is unethical to test a drug with unknown effects on a pregnant woman and her unborn child. We don't do that, except in cases where the disease itself is a disease of pregnancy, and then only after extensive animal testing. We get the data from surveillance of women who end up using the drug of their own choice who happen to become pregnant along the way. Hell, prior to 1990, we didn't test on women at all. All medical testing was done on men because we're the disposable sex, and women were to be protected, pregnant or not because so many women become pregnant without planning to be.
If you look at just about every drug approved in the last 5-10 years you will see that exact same statement in the FDA label. Only older drugs, for which we do have reliable long-term surveillance data will you see a more thorough statement, because by then we'll have accumulated enough surveillance data.
If you want to show conspiracy, find the documents that show Moderna knew there was a risk and then reported this "we don't know" statement anyway. Pfizer has such documents that recently got FOIA'd. Comirnaty's label still claims no ill effects despite their clear, internal data showing otherwise. Better yet, get that now-public DOD vaccine side effect data and send it to FDA demanding they update the labels of both mRNA vaccines.
It's one thing to make wild accusations. It's another thing entirely to actually be able to prove someone knowingly lied for profit.
Wow.
The name. Spike proteins in your face.
So , Will “Spikevax” not be available in the US? Will the original Moderna jab still be under EUA? There is NO WAY they will expose themselves to liability. Also, if one vax is truly approved and available no others can be use under EUA. Let’s see how this plays out.
Correct. Same game they played with Pfizer. Only the EUA shots will remain available and the FDA says they are interchangeable.
MODERNA
MOD ERNA
MOD (e)RNA
Modify RNA?
Mod yer rna
This is insane, how are they approving this garbage?!