Graphene-based “neuromodulation” technology is REAL: Press release from INBRAIN Neuroelectronics describes brain controlling biocircuits using AI-powered graphene.......
Funding enables company to advance first-in-human studies for its flagship product, a less-invasive neuromodulation device for treating neurological conditions using artificial intelligence and graphene electrodes
*To be clear, we are not in any way claiming that INBRAIN is involved in covid vaccines. Rather, they state their technology is being used, “for treating epilepsy and Parkinson’s disease.” The point of covering INBRAIN is to reveal that brain-controlling “biocircuits” based on graphene are, in fact, a very real technology.
*
So-called “fact-checkers” — which are nothing more than disinformation propaganda pushers — routinely claim that graphene isn’t found in vaccines and that graphene biocircuits are a conspiracy theory. INBRAIN Neuroelectronics shows that the fact checkers are lying.
Graphene is toxic, it is a chemical, a toxic chemical agent. Introduced in the organism in large quantities, it causes thrombi. It causes blood clots. We have all the scientific articles to back it up. It causes post inflammatory syndrome, it causes alteration of the immune system. And when the redox balance is broken, in the sense that there is less of the body’s own reserve glutathione than an introduced toxicant such as graphene oxide, it generates a collapse of the immune system and a cytokine storm. In other words, something very similar to the fashionable disease, isn’t it?
See the video here:
Brighteon.com/eaff4c87-eb1d-4abd-9f6e-6edeebe6fe59
Delgado goes on to state:
And given that all the people who are inoculated with the Pfizer vaccine, which was the one we sent for analysis, as well as Moderna, AstraZeneca, Johnson&Johnson, Janssen, Sinovac, and all types of vaccines acquire magnetic properties, we suspect with many indications that they all contain more or less doses of graphene, of graphene oxide
.…we know that precisely N-acetylcysteine or glutathione itself degrades graphene oxide. That is why we think that we probably hit directly on the causative or etiological agent of the disease.
I once believed like you, until I saw with my own eyes two jets flying right at each other with no vapor trails. The second they crossed paths, it was white smoke trails. Now answer me this. How can two planes flying in the same path, opposite directions, and very close to the same altitude not leave vapor trails until they pass by each other? They were spraying SOMETHING. You could clearly see how they started spraying right after they crossed each other.
It depends entirely on the air conditions. If the jets crossed paths, they would have crossed each other's downdraft wake, and that might have been enough to promote the condensation process. Or, if they were both in climbing flight, they might have simultaneously reached the altitude at which contrails form.
Have you ever seen a lenticular cloud capping a mountain? That happens when moist air is coming along the ground, rises over the mountain--and when that happens, cools down and condenses water droplets---and then flows down over the lee of the mountain, where the air warms again and the droplets evaporate and vanish. It seems like a stationary cloud, but it is really a transient effect in an airstream. Contrails are only clouds.
If you would rather believe your ignorance than someone who understands the phenomena, you are in a pickle.
And I wish you would provide evidence instead of supposition and assumption. Chemtrails are utter nonsense, a paranoid fantasy. Nothing is happening. All the data about weather and weather events indicate only that life is normal, within the natural variations of history (aside from certain recognized features like the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age).
If you question "everything," that is a description of insanity. Don't go there.
Research on what? Unicorns? There's no way to do research on what does not exist. You need to provide evidence to prove it to yourself. Otherwise, you are just getting caught up in an urban myth...going along to be One of the Guys. The Cool Dude who is "into" the sinister doings. I've seen the portentious videos of speculators who know nothing about atmospheric phenomena and are just convinced that their gut instinct is better than actual scientific knowledge. Do you call that evidence? I call it nonsense.
Just remember. Evidence is of what is, not of what one suspects. It does not rest on interpretation, but on facts that lead to only one conclusion. Calling a contrail a "chemtrail" is like calling a zebra a unicorn.
I'm the guy with the knowledge: 40 years in aerospace engineering of advanced systems, at a company that builds jetliners. Yeah, you have to prove yourself, because you don't know anything.
Lots of information, fine. So what? There is even talk of how to recondition planets to be more like Earth (or otherwise). Even a topic of science fiction movies. But it is all talk. No implementation. HAARP is only an experiment. Chemtrails are urban myth. Speculation is not fact.
As for contrails, you are the one who is no expert. I have seen jet contrails since I was a child out in the back yard, sitting among the dandelions. I have lived under the approach/departure corridor of an international airport for the past 40 years. I have the appropriate degrees and professional experience. There are no "small, marginal" atmospheric conditions. It is purely a matter of altitude, pressure, and temperature. ANY engine, piston or jet, will leave condensation trails at higher altitude---they exhaust water vapor as a combustion product. It condenses from the cold environment. They "act" exactly as we see, because that is what they are. You are a fool to think they are something rare. (If the air is warmer or below saturation density, the vapor will not condense. This is why the phenomenon is dependent on weather conditions.) That is all there is to it. I've seen them extend from one end of the sky to the other.
The reason you have to point me to a video is because you don't understand the argument. And you believe the video because you don't understand the argument. You don't even know why I should see the video. What is the key insight? I saw a hoax video one time that purported to show an airplane equipped for chemtrailing. It was bogus, just a pirated video of Boeing test aircraft ballast manipulation. I saw another video by a guy all impressed with himself and amazed at contrails. It's like trying to get sense out of a guy who never saw grass and insisted it was unusual. With videos like this nonsense, what do you expect me to think? That it's not nonsense? That's why the onus is on you. You can sink into your paranoid fantasies, or try to touch reality.
Documented nowhere. No evidence whatsoever. No one following a contrail close enough to take credible chemical samples. No chemical assay of the contrail materials. No discovery of spraying equipment in the airplane being followed. All you have are photos of contrails with scoffing amazement in the commentary about them. There is one video that purports to show tanks and tubing internal to a Boeing airliner for "chemtrail" purposes, but that video is a knowing hoax, because what is being shown is a developmental airliner equipped with a water ballast control system to adjust the center of gravity in flight by pumping water forward and aft in the airplane. The person who got that video had to have known where he got it and what it really was. One good piece of hoax pretty much condemns your whole notion.
That would be true only if it were true, which it isn't. Something does not become true because it could be interpreted to illustrate a favorite story. (Or maybe we should all be rushing to find the pot of gold at the end of any rainbow that appears.)
Condensation trails, however, have been known since aircraft could fly high enough for them to form, which was easily by the 1940s. I've seen footage of the sheets of contrails behind bombers in formation. It does not even require jet engines, just hydrocarbon combustion.
I worked in this industry for 40 years and sat in on top management reviews of developmental programs. There is no such bullshit as chemtrails. Cloud seeding was tried in the 50s and 60s with some success, but it required special aircraft and was not conducted by commercial airlines. To my recollection, the seeding material was not visible.
I don't have to "try" to explain that Boogeymen don't exist. You have to prove they do. And you have no proof at all, when everywhere you point is a perfectly natural phenomenon that has been observed for 80 years.
The most amusing thing about this topic is that there were some REAL chemtrails that were commonplace for decades, out in the open, without question, and you guys don't even mention them. I am referring to the exhaust clouds from solid-propellant boosters used with ICBMs and SLBMs, space launch vehicles, and the former Space Shuttle. Thousands of tons of propellant being burned to generate aluminum oxide ash and huge quantities of hydrogen chloride (mixing with water vapor becomes hydrochloric acid).
You guys are pathetic: getting frantic about ordinary water clouds and not even being aware of the real chemical exhaust dumps taking place. Your credibility is zero.
I’d call it a bitch-slap from God.
Biblical FAFO.
I'm certainly willing to try it.
Should I go to the local mall with a bunch of strong neodymium magnets and a radio frequency generator and see what happens?
hit 85 mph before going through mall door. i heard that was the key
Don't forget to overcharge your capacitor to 1.21 gigawatts.
your frequency generator is the key
Welcome to my headspace
You might find this interesting:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Z9nAbvS05837/
That drop was caused by a God, as she mocked Jesus..
I doubt even if its possible they would drop someone who is obviously praising the vaccines.
Don't assume that only the cabal has the tech.
who should they drop to send the message better?
Graphene-based “neuromodulation” technology is REAL: Press release from INBRAIN Neuroelectronics describes brain controlling biocircuits using AI-powered graphene.......
Funding enables company to advance first-in-human studies for its flagship product, a less-invasive neuromodulation device for treating neurological conditions using artificial intelligence and graphene electrodes
*To be clear, we are not in any way claiming that INBRAIN is involved in covid vaccines. Rather, they state their technology is being used, “for treating epilepsy and Parkinson’s disease.” The point of covering INBRAIN is to reveal that brain-controlling “biocircuits” based on graphene are, in fact, a very real technology. *
So-called “fact-checkers” — which are nothing more than disinformation propaganda pushers — routinely claim that graphene isn’t found in vaccines and that graphene biocircuits are a conspiracy theory. INBRAIN Neuroelectronics shows that the fact checkers are lying.
Reference: NaturalNews.com
https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-19-graphene-based-neuromodulation-technology-is-real-inbrain-neuroelectronics.html
Graphene is toxic, it is a chemical, a toxic chemical agent. Introduced in the organism in large quantities, it causes thrombi. It causes blood clots. We have all the scientific articles to back it up. It causes post inflammatory syndrome, it causes alteration of the immune system. And when the redox balance is broken, in the sense that there is less of the body’s own reserve glutathione than an introduced toxicant such as graphene oxide, it generates a collapse of the immune system and a cytokine storm. In other words, something very similar to the fashionable disease, isn’t it?
See the video here: Brighteon.com/eaff4c87-eb1d-4abd-9f6e-6edeebe6fe59
Delgado goes on to state:
And given that all the people who are inoculated with the Pfizer vaccine, which was the one we sent for analysis, as well as Moderna, AstraZeneca, Johnson&Johnson, Janssen, Sinovac, and all types of vaccines acquire magnetic properties, we suspect with many indications that they all contain more or less doses of graphene, of graphene oxide
.…we know that precisely N-acetylcysteine or glutathione itself degrades graphene oxide. That is why we think that we probably hit directly on the causative or etiological agent of the disease.
Look like the Matrix is pulling the plug on people..crazy
The body cannot live without the mind.
Yes, that's it. It seemed familiar.
Total bullshit. Nothing is being "sprayed in the air behind jets." Don't confuse your fantasy fears with reality.
I once believed like you, until I saw with my own eyes two jets flying right at each other with no vapor trails. The second they crossed paths, it was white smoke trails. Now answer me this. How can two planes flying in the same path, opposite directions, and very close to the same altitude not leave vapor trails until they pass by each other? They were spraying SOMETHING. You could clearly see how they started spraying right after they crossed each other.
It depends entirely on the air conditions. If the jets crossed paths, they would have crossed each other's downdraft wake, and that might have been enough to promote the condensation process. Or, if they were both in climbing flight, they might have simultaneously reached the altitude at which contrails form.
Have you ever seen a lenticular cloud capping a mountain? That happens when moist air is coming along the ground, rises over the mountain--and when that happens, cools down and condenses water droplets---and then flows down over the lee of the mountain, where the air warms again and the droplets evaporate and vanish. It seems like a stationary cloud, but it is really a transient effect in an airstream. Contrails are only clouds.
If you would rather believe your ignorance than someone who understands the phenomena, you are in a pickle.
And I wish you would provide evidence instead of supposition and assumption. Chemtrails are utter nonsense, a paranoid fantasy. Nothing is happening. All the data about weather and weather events indicate only that life is normal, within the natural variations of history (aside from certain recognized features like the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age).
If you question "everything," that is a description of insanity. Don't go there.
Research on what? Unicorns? There's no way to do research on what does not exist. You need to provide evidence to prove it to yourself. Otherwise, you are just getting caught up in an urban myth...going along to be One of the Guys. The Cool Dude who is "into" the sinister doings. I've seen the portentious videos of speculators who know nothing about atmospheric phenomena and are just convinced that their gut instinct is better than actual scientific knowledge. Do you call that evidence? I call it nonsense.
Just remember. Evidence is of what is, not of what one suspects. It does not rest on interpretation, but on facts that lead to only one conclusion. Calling a contrail a "chemtrail" is like calling a zebra a unicorn.
I'm the guy with the knowledge: 40 years in aerospace engineering of advanced systems, at a company that builds jetliners. Yeah, you have to prove yourself, because you don't know anything.
Lots of information, fine. So what? There is even talk of how to recondition planets to be more like Earth (or otherwise). Even a topic of science fiction movies. But it is all talk. No implementation. HAARP is only an experiment. Chemtrails are urban myth. Speculation is not fact.
As for contrails, you are the one who is no expert. I have seen jet contrails since I was a child out in the back yard, sitting among the dandelions. I have lived under the approach/departure corridor of an international airport for the past 40 years. I have the appropriate degrees and professional experience. There are no "small, marginal" atmospheric conditions. It is purely a matter of altitude, pressure, and temperature. ANY engine, piston or jet, will leave condensation trails at higher altitude---they exhaust water vapor as a combustion product. It condenses from the cold environment. They "act" exactly as we see, because that is what they are. You are a fool to think they are something rare. (If the air is warmer or below saturation density, the vapor will not condense. This is why the phenomenon is dependent on weather conditions.) That is all there is to it. I've seen them extend from one end of the sky to the other.
The reason you have to point me to a video is because you don't understand the argument. And you believe the video because you don't understand the argument. You don't even know why I should see the video. What is the key insight? I saw a hoax video one time that purported to show an airplane equipped for chemtrailing. It was bogus, just a pirated video of Boeing test aircraft ballast manipulation. I saw another video by a guy all impressed with himself and amazed at contrails. It's like trying to get sense out of a guy who never saw grass and insisted it was unusual. With videos like this nonsense, what do you expect me to think? That it's not nonsense? That's why the onus is on you. You can sink into your paranoid fantasies, or try to touch reality.
Chem trails are real and we’ll documented. Now as far as vax-trails? I have doubts.
Documented nowhere. No evidence whatsoever. No one following a contrail close enough to take credible chemical samples. No chemical assay of the contrail materials. No discovery of spraying equipment in the airplane being followed. All you have are photos of contrails with scoffing amazement in the commentary about them. There is one video that purports to show tanks and tubing internal to a Boeing airliner for "chemtrail" purposes, but that video is a knowing hoax, because what is being shown is a developmental airliner equipped with a water ballast control system to adjust the center of gravity in flight by pumping water forward and aft in the airplane. The person who got that video had to have known where he got it and what it really was. One good piece of hoax pretty much condemns your whole notion.
Cloud seeding.
You’re not trying hard enough.
That would be true only if it were true, which it isn't. Something does not become true because it could be interpreted to illustrate a favorite story. (Or maybe we should all be rushing to find the pot of gold at the end of any rainbow that appears.)
Condensation trails, however, have been known since aircraft could fly high enough for them to form, which was easily by the 1940s. I've seen footage of the sheets of contrails behind bombers in formation. It does not even require jet engines, just hydrocarbon combustion.
I worked in this industry for 40 years and sat in on top management reviews of developmental programs. There is no such bullshit as chemtrails. Cloud seeding was tried in the 50s and 60s with some success, but it required special aircraft and was not conducted by commercial airlines. To my recollection, the seeding material was not visible.
I don't have to "try" to explain that Boogeymen don't exist. You have to prove they do. And you have no proof at all, when everywhere you point is a perfectly natural phenomenon that has been observed for 80 years.
The most amusing thing about this topic is that there were some REAL chemtrails that were commonplace for decades, out in the open, without question, and you guys don't even mention them. I am referring to the exhaust clouds from solid-propellant boosters used with ICBMs and SLBMs, space launch vehicles, and the former Space Shuttle. Thousands of tons of propellant being burned to generate aluminum oxide ash and huge quantities of hydrogen chloride (mixing with water vapor becomes hydrochloric acid).
You guys are pathetic: getting frantic about ordinary water clouds and not even being aware of the real chemical exhaust dumps taking place. Your credibility is zero.