Let’s accelerate that process. Humanity awakening from its enslavement to allopathic medicine in a faster manner will shift the timeline forward such that we skip a lot of pain and suffering.
Indeed, the Global Cult agenda depends on this process being slowed as much as possible (since it is the nature of timeline dynamics that the awakening does occur; it’s not a matter of if; it’s when). The Global Cult is banking on keeping people brainwashed and thus easy to control and manipulate.
Spread this document. May not open in brave:
https://u1lib.org/book/17573423/2c377f
And then this:
https://book4you.org/book/5418297/958a07 What Really Makes You Ill?: Why Everything You Thought You Knew About Disease Is Wrong Dawn Lester, David Parker
I am happy to answer any questions.
I've tried digging deeper into the germ vs. terrain theories, but one of the things I can never get answers for are the various diseases (like smallpox) that the American Indians died from, following the arrival of the Europeans. This seems to tilt the scale back towards the germ theory side of the argument.
That said, I do get the fact that many outbreaks in past history were misdiagnoses, or due to other events. I've even read about possible influences from solar storms, dust from comets, etc., etc., but those seem far-fetched.
Most of the story about small pox and the American Indians is a "cover story" for the full-scale slaughter of them. The alcohol they were given was badly poisoned as well.
When the body's liver and kidneys become overwhelmed with detoxing, the body then moves to the lungs to expel toxins. If the body is so toxic that none of our normal detoxing mechanisms can handle the load, the body pushes the toxins out through the skin. This is especially true when the fluids (alcohol, liquid) are poisonous.
The so-called "small pox" outbreaks, especially in London during the late 1800s were largely related to poisoned wells. But most of the after-damage was caused by the vaccines themselves, as poisonous, if not more than today's variety. There are kinds of hard-to-find books from doctors and scientists in that era saying just this.
Today isn't the first time populations were culled. It's been going on all along under innumerable guises. For roughly the past 100 years, chemotherapy and radiation therapy have been their #1 culling tool.
Interesting...thank you. Lots to unpack here!
yepp. better idea for depopulation?
i guess we need two things: natural order and decriminalization of serial murder (spoiler: im a born serial killer)
I believe it was due to new environmental toxins arriving with the Europeans. They didn't arrive in North America empty handed, they brought their lifestyle with them.
Viruses exist but they are part of normal immune function. Under certain conditions, they are allowed to proliferate as part of a detox process. Under certain detox conditions, they correlate with illness but do not cause illness. Those conditions include one or more of the following:
• shitty stress levels
• shitty inputs (including via diet and lack of fasting, inhaled pollutants, and via transdermal absorption)
• shitty sleep
• shitty activity levels
• shitty direct sunlight exposure and/or vitamin D3 supplementation
This is the more nuanced explanation and is in fact the correct way of discussing it; I say viruses don’t exist in the title because most people do not think of a virus like you described.
To be most accurate, the correct statement is that viruses as exogenous contagious pathogens do not exist.
There's no reason to act like a shitty patronizing clickbait journalist. Instead, say something like:
Viruses aren't what you think they are.
Viruses don't actually cause disease.
Big pharma is lying to you about what viruses actually do.
etc etc. There are many ways to speak in simple language and still preserve accuracy and nuance.
The definition 99.99999% of people give to viruses is exogenous contagious pathogen, so for almost anyone you will speak to saying viruses don’t exist is true given their definition of virus.
No, the definition the vast majority of people have for viruses is much simpler. It's just "sickness" to them. So if I just tell them "viruses don't exist", it's like I'm telling them to deny their own personal experiences of being sick in bed with the flu or whatever. It feels hostile, like I'm calling them a liar. They reflexively resist me, making it much harder to convince them otherwise.
In contrast, the statement "viruses aren't what made you sick" is not only more accurate and nuanced, it doesn't sound like it's denying what happened to them (ie: getting sick). It's just bringing into question WHY it happened. People are much more willing to consider alternate viewpoints that don't feel like contradictions of their own lived experiences.
I don’t disagree with that. That’s a good way of putting it actually.
In defense of the semantical nature of the discourse, I don’t believe anyone of any opinion is denying that people get sick.
Indeed, quite the opposite. The pursuit of truth should be an understanding of WHY people get sick. We have been effectively blocked from having that conversation by big Pharma and institutional powers by the virus nonsense that all of allopathic medicine is based on.
👆Correct.
• shitty stress levels • shitty inputs (including via diet and lack of fasting, inhaled pollutants, and via transdermal absorption) • shitty sleep • shitty activity levels • shitty direct sunlight exposure and/or vitamin D3 supplementation.
would love to see a scientific journal talk like this!
Nope, they don't exist. There's no NEED for "immune function" and there's no such thing as an "immune system". Those words didn't appear in medical textbooks until 1972, right at the start of the US "financializing" medicine by making it a "part of the economy" and requiring 5% YoY annual growth.
You're speaking of bacteria, which don't CAUSE dis-ease as you say They are there to repair/reconstruct tissue. Sometimes their waste product is putrefied which is what makes us "feel sick" during the restoration/healing process.
There's literally not a single study in the history of modern allopathic medicine demonstrating human-to-human transmission of any "virus" or bacteria. Not a one.
See this video which is a good "normie-friendly" explanation about the non-existence of viruses: https://www.bitchute.com/video/rloCSmKl8b4l/
Just Vit D is natural, D3 is symthetic has rat poison in it.
False. Lmao.
Are you a shill?
What's false? And who would I shill for with that, the non big pharma people? Anyway it's cholecalciferol; anyone can look into it.
The book I linked has an entire chapter explaining the American Indian history.
Thanks for that info. I've added the book to my list. I just started reading "Virus Mania" and have "The Real Anthony Fauci" lined up next. I also need to spend 23 hours a day following the trucker drama. So much to do.
They used animal diseases. They contaminated water supplies. Not much different today, using animal borne diseases. Guess our God given immune systems worked so well, they resorted to alternative methods, mfp, pushing fear & manufacturing scarcity to cause a lot of people to seek out the jabs.
So what do you call the stomach flu or the common cold? You can't honestly use Covid as a reason to say "Her der viruses aren't real", that's a level of stupidity that's on par with "the earth is flat" and "Birds aren't real".
No, it’s not.
Read the info I linked. This requires research.
Colds and stomach flus are not caused by imaginary invisible particles that make people sick. They are caused by toxicity of the system, almost always explained by the fact most people are poisoning themselves from the moment the wake up until the moment they go to bed by the “food” they eat.
You realize we have electron microscopes, right? And that we can see things smaller than an alleged virus? Yet a virus has never been demonstrated to exist. Thus the $1.5 million prize to show a Covid virus remains unclaimed.
It only sounds retarded because we've been taught this our whole lives. This scientific paper can't be explained with germ/virus theory: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection/article/an-outbreak-of-common-colds-at-an-antarctic-base-after-seventeen-weeks-of-complete-isolation/1D3A49463583D06CEACE1CCF9C1A25B4
Thank younfor link.
Nobody has ever found a "virus". They were theoretical all along. There are explanations for every so-called "viral ailment" under the sun. But that's a tangential, downstream discussion. Doctors Stefan Lanka (virologist), Andrew Kaufman, Tom Cowan & Sam Bailey have all proven the non-existence of viruses, well over a year ago. Nobody has yet stepped up to counter their claims. It's only a matter of if, not when this massively suppressed truth spreads.
There's not even a debate to be had. The good doctors simply use all the scientific papers ever produced by the medical cabal to demonstrate the deception. A debate would be over in 10 minutes.
Here's Dr. Tom Cowan redpilling Dr. Lee Merritt. The "virus story is beyond ludicrous. Once you know, you'll see how insane it really is. https://www.bitchute.com/video/rloCSmKl8b4l/
Oh yeah, if you believe in the NASA/GLOBE/SPACE story, than you believe you're standing on giant rock magically floating in space by a "force" (gravity) that's just as THEORETICAL as viruses, rotating at 1000 MPH, magically orbiting a giant ball of gas that somehow defies all laws of physics going 66,600 MPH, further orbiting a theoretical Milky Way galaxy at MACH 666 (all those triple 6's - 666 - are no accident - they're laughing at you), while also moving at 2.5 million MPH away from the onset of the "Big Bang THEORY".
This is just a tiny fraction of the lies you have to believe to believe in the globe earth.
It's all 100% THEORY - viruses, gravity, floating rocks, dark matter, dark energy, relativity...on and on and on.
Your common sense tells you you're standing on a non-rotating plane and you can't be "attacked" by invisible boogeymen (viruses) that aren't even alive.
Why do bio warfare labs spend money researching viruses?
Maybe the same reason NASA spent billions to pretend to go to the moon. Now they're preparing to pretend to go to Mars and they need more money. Every dollar spent/taken goes on our collective credit card.
I'm with you on the NASA moon mission and I'm sure there is a lot of grift in bio weapons research as well but I don't see a viable replacement theory for contagious viruses.
This requires research and I suggest you start by reading the short pdf I linked and then you will want to know more and can read the longer book.
look into Bechamp
I had a tough time with it too. I really recommend the Dr. Sam Bailey videos.
Because toxins and poisons exist. Those are not viruses. See for example the aluminum and formaldehyde they put in all injections including the ones given to infants, the metals the spray the sky with, the fluoride in water, etc.
What are the contagious diseases which are currently attributed to viruses?
Well obviously a lot - many are the exercise to inject infants with formaldehyde and aluminum, two extreme toxins that exist in all injections which is no “conspiracy theory” - the Pharma companies don’t deny this. They deny they no longer contain mercury, but when pressed further they admit they still contain mercury, just not in “harmful amounts”.
The great thing about the longer book I linked is that it goes through each of these “contagious diseases” and explains them.
So are you saying that formaldehyde and aluminium are contagious? That doesn't make sense.
There is contagion, yes? When one child in a class get a stomach bug or a cold and passes is around. How does this happen without viruses?
Maybe u/krzyzowiek or u/grandeformaggio are willing to jump in here.
I linked the info that will answer all your questions. I appreciate your enthusiasm and I was the same way when u/JustSayIt started telling me this last fall, and I was very fortunate that he took the time to answer all my questions.
Let me just say this: correlation is not causation. You’ve been indoctrinated to believe that contagion is caused by invisible particles. This is the same as if I told you contagion is caused by aliens cloaked in our atmosphere beaming waves at specific areas causing the people there to all get sick. In that, there is no proof for either.
Science is the demonstration of provability of one’s theory, in this case germ theory. We have electron microscopes. A virus has never been isolated. Isolation would be possible if they existed.
There are lots of electron micrographs of viruses. Are you suggesting they are fake?
https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffsb&q=virus+electronmicrograph&ia=web
I'm not sure what this work "isolation" means in terms of viruses. Why would someone want to isolate viruses (presumably in a bottle of nothing but viruses) when you don't need to isolate them in numbers to study them. In fact, they are most interesting when they are with or in cells.
I think viruses have been studied and sequenced without isolating them in a virus-only colleciton. I don't see the point of purifying them scientifically.
Notice the lack of a reply to this. Viruses exist. End of discussion.
They're fake. They're just pictures of a wide variety of particles found in vesicular fluids.
The point of "purifying" them would be to demonstrate a morphologically UNIQUE "organism" that can then be shown to CAUSE dis-ease. Like we can demonstrate a lion or a shark are morphologically unique, right?
It's all a sham, beginning to end. Virology is a pseudo-science designed to put fear in the hearts of humanity. Dr. Stefan Lanka destroyed virology years ago, and he continues to do so.
The word "isolation" has been rendered meaningless by virologists. If a viral isolate includes a toxic soup of decayed green monkey cells, aborted calf blood, a wide variety of anti-biotics (which kill the monkey cells) and human piss/snot/blood, then we can safely conclude that the word "isolation" is ludicrous in virology, used only to deceive the uninitiated.
You’re very confused about the whole situation.
My only suggesting is to read the material I linked. I’m not interested in debating this.
I've followed the "toxin" theory in vaccines for 20 years. I've come to think that the REAL DAMAGE is done by all the foreign animal and human products mixed in that our bodies VIOLENTLY REJECT.
I have no facts to back up my theory, but I've been leaning in this direction for the past 2-3 years.
They're making poisons which become components in vaccines. Simple
They are certainly doing that, although I argue that they use viruses as a part of that process.
Okay. You'll have to prove "viruses" exist for starters then. This is the crux of the arguments made by Dr. Stefan Lanka, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr. Tom Cowan and Dr. Sam Bailey.
They have all definitively demonstrated that there's no proof of the existence of "viruses" by deconstructing all the scientific medical papers claiming otherwise. These good doctors aren't "making a claim" themselves. They're REFUTING the claim of establishment allophathic (Rockefellerian) medicine.
Viruses were theoretical up until the late 1930s after the appearance of the electron microscope. In the 1940s they looked for them but couldn't really find them. So in 1954, a laboratory expert (Jon Enders) invented a new technique alleged to be able to "find viruses". He did this for measles. In his experiments, he actually ran a control experiment (which virologists never did again) where he left out the so-called "Infected fluids" of a sick person and concluded that the results of his novel "viral culturing" method were INDISTINGUISHABLE from the control experiment. Astonishingly, everybody appears to have just ignored that sentence.
This is how Stefan Lanka was able to challenge the world to produce a paper that scientifically demonstrates the existence of viruses offering a 100,000 Euro prize. One clown tried to collect on it and ultimately failed. Lanka kept his money, because viruses are nothing more than a fairy-tale.
Well, I believe in a contagious agent for things like the cold, let's call hat a "virus" for argument's sake if it isn't a bacterium or fungus etc.
There are lots of things which can't be seen, like individual molecules and atoms. They exist in that they are a good working model for chemistry even though they are too small to handle. That's how I see viruses.
I believe that viruses as an infectious agent must be self replicating within the host or they would not propagate because the numbers would reduce by attrition. in this way, they are like other parasites such as parasitic worms, insects, fungi, bacteria.
So here I'm defining virus as the parasite which self replicates and transmits colds and other "viral" diseases. Such a thing exists yes? or there would have to be a better explanation for contagion in these cases. I'm saying nothing about it's nature at this point.
If medical tests can distinguish cells of infected people from uninfected people which have extra code in then I would make the assumption that the code is from this parasite.
For me, the concept of a virus is the placeholder for infectious disease by a miniature (much smaller than a cell) self replicating parasite that is the cause of a disease like the common cold or smallpox. Can you tell me that such a thing does not exist or are we just arguing about it's precise nature?
Point 1: Bacteriophages and Exosomes can all be seen under the microscope and are of the same nano-scale size as so-called "viruses". Seeing them is not a "technical" issue.
Point 2: Electonrs/Protons/Neutrons are also a lie, but that's a chat for another day
Point 3: "Infectious agents" is just an "idea", as so called "Pathogens" or "Contagions". No such "agent" exists. Bacteria aren't "infectious/contagious", nor are fungi (or parasites for that matter). Bacteria repair/rebuild/remove necrotic tissues --- bacteria are not the CAUSE of necrotic tissue.
Point 4: There's no such thing as "self-replication", especially by any so-called chunk of dead RNA/DNA (which is also a lie). It's all a fairy-tale of grand proportion designed to strike fear into the hearts and minds of humanity. No such "self-replication" has ever been demonstrated. All scientific papers stating such are nothing but childish experiments where they inject toxic foreign substances into helpless mice and guinea pigs.
Point 5: Colds/Flus aren't "transmitted" by anything MATERIAL in nature. No such evidence has ever been demonstrated. We've found, after heavy deep-dive searching about a dozen experiments attempting to demonstrate human-to-human transmission of dis-ease (allegedly via either virus or bacteria) and all failed miserably. The reason they're hard to find is because they don't support the dominant narrative. I hesitate to explain what the REAL "agent of transmission" is, because until people realize the big "Contagion myth", their minds simply aren't ready for the actual explanation. This has been my experience virtually 100% of the time.
Point 6: Parasites are not contagious/infectious/pathogenic either. Parasites are symbiotic organisms that feed on toxic waste stored in a body that is overly toxic due to poor life habits.
Point 7: No, "viruses" do not exist. Doctors Lanka, Kaufman, Cowan and Bailey have been demonstrating for well over a year this very fact.
Point 8: The only thing scientists ever "find" in a sick person is the evidence of cellular damage, which indicate the presence of the so-called "antibodies", which are nothing more than globulins that act as cellular glue to keep decaying tissue in tact. There are no such thing as specific "antibodies" for certain dis-eases. See Dr. Lanka's paper on the subject. https://truthseeker.se/wp-content/uploads/Stefan-Lanka-The-Misinterpretation-of-the-Antibodies-English-Translation.pdf (Dr. Lanka on antibodies)
Point 9: Contagion/Pathogenicity/Infectious agents are a lie, beginning to end. Hopefully the above comments demonstrate this. Viruses don't exist but could be "seen" if they did. Bacteria/Fungi/Parasites are not infectious. All assist the body to return to homeostasis in their particular ways.
Point 10: The story of "Small pox" is truly all about poisons - air, water supplies, food and of course, the most poisonous of all, vaccines. See my other comment in this thread about it. "Colds" are largely a re-balancing event, typically brought on by lack of connection to nature, sun, fresh air, which all work to keep our electrical body in harmony and balance. When we lose our connection to the natural world, we get sick in a variety of ways. "Colds" are the mildest form of said "sickness".
A bacteriophage is a virus as I understand it. It's the version of a virus that affects bacteria. It's going to be the same order of scale as a virus.
I see electrons / protons as a model for chemistry, I don't suppose they exist as objects. Maybe they could be thought of as waves or charge density distributions. i don't know. Anyway, as a useful model they exist. You can count how many electrons there are on a carbon atom and how "heavy" a proton is. it depends on how you define "exist".
Yes, infectious agents is just an idea, but it's the best we have to explain contagion, which exists. how else could a disease be transmitted.
Why should a bacterium or a fungus repair us when they can attack us instead. What would the bacterium gain? THere are cases where there is a gain for each entity, like symbiosis of bacteria in the gut, but most will be opportunistic jsut in teh same way as animals eat each other. Imagining bacteria don't attack us is the same as saying animals don't attack each other. It's in their interest to attack us. Parasitism exists because it suits the parasite.
5 .
If I'm going to stop believing in parasites and infectious disease, you'd better tell me now what the better explanation is, and it had better be good because right now you are wasting my time.
Why should a parasite restrict itself to being helpful and not plunder the host body for resourses. Yes I agree parasite infections will be worse in unfit people and there may be certain benefits in special circumstances, but in the main, parasites are out for themselves and have no duty to keep people healthy or to punish an unhealthy lifestyle, they are just out for themselves.
i can't see how anyone can demonstrate that viruses don't exist.
of course you can find parasites or bacteria in sick animals. i mean liver flukes, worms, MRSA, chiggers, bots, lice, whatever. There are specific and non specific antibodies which help a body fight of the next infection. That's why people become more immune.
Argh! parasites are there to help? nonsense!
10 you have a lot of magical thinking. Colds are there to rebalance? makes no sense I guess all injuries are there to rebalance too by that kind of thinking, because we heal.
I am not at all convinced. You seem to see the microbiotic world as there to help and rebalance humans. That's a really anthropocentric view. Isn't it more likely that we are not the centre of the universe and that microbiotic life is just out for itself, fighting us for space and resources?
This is just a sneaky way to maintain the virus fairytale. Why can't a bacteriophage just be a bacteriophage, the end?
Agreed
"Contagious agents" is far from the "best" way to explain things. But it's an absolute NECESSITY if you're a materialist, which is the dominant narrative (which is a massive lie). Bacteria and Fungi both arise from the REAL BASIS of all life, which is not the "cell". It is the Microzyma/Protid/Bion/Somatid (BeChamp/Enderlein/Reich/Nassens) all named differently by all these scientists. This Microzyma is the indestructible BASIS of all life, which morphs into our "cells" as well as morphing into all bacteria and fungi. Thus, cells, bacteria, fungi are all TEMPORARY "forms" of the microzyma, which itself cannot be destroyed - the "God Particle" was found long ago. This activity is called either "Pleimorphism" or "Polymorphism" which has been MASSIVELY suppressed by the establishment institutions. And yet, it was first seen and described, quite clearly in the 1870s by BeChamp - Louis "the liar" Pasteurs unknown nemesis, who was right about everything at the same time Pasteur was literally wrong about everything. And who is today's rockstar?
In what other way can I say it's all a lie? The "spike protein" is literally the onset of cellular destruction. The "spikes" are the visualization of the cell beginning to die. There is LITERALLY NO-THING else "there" but the "Cell" itself. "The vax" is nothing but poison that causes cellular damage and destruction (the toxic batches anyway, not the saline placebos).
Well then hang on to the lies then. There are a kajillion different so-called "dis-eases". The fundamental problem lies in the way we've all been TAUGHT TO THINK. Until you're ready to perceive "reality" in a different way, you'll violently reject the actual explanation. It's a 180-degree shift from "victim consciousness" to crystal clear self-awareness. The vast majority aren't ready for this....yet. The masses are fully and completely brainwashed into the former, which is how the cabal gets away with what it gets away with in the first place.
Simple. Parasites eat toxic waste. This is their only food supply. They are TREMENDOUSLY symbiotic with living organisms. But if the body is too toxic, not even they can help maintain life.
You've got things backwards my friend. The question to ask is, has anybody ever demonstrated that they DO exist - with provable, repeatable experiments using the scientific method? If I make the claim that the moon is made of blue cheese, is the burden of proof now on you to prove I'm wrong?
Read the paper from Stefan Lanka and think it through a bit. Are you really walking around with dormant antibodies for umpteen different unicorn viruses and bacteria, just lying there somewhere in your lymph nodes or who-knows-where, just waiting to spring into action when your body gets "ATTACKED"? Once again, you're going to have a problem PROVING this, because there's no such proof of this - anywhere in the medical literature. It's yet another fairy tale that fully engenders fear and victim consciousness - the PRIMARY tools of the cabal!
If there are no toxins present, they just pass right through our systems. Very, very simple. That's why most of us who are healthy don't "have parasites". Considering they're EVERYWHERE!!! It's the same nonsense with germ theory. There should be MASSIVE localized "parasitical outbreaks" in a community if they are really ATTACKING anyone and everyone indiscriminately, right?
Colds are detoxing/rebalancing an electrically disconnected, unabalanced body. As mentioned above, we will need to change the way we think --- ENTIRELY --- to come to terms with what "dis-ease" actually is. It's a paradigm shift of epic proportions. And one you're obviously not prepared to entertain just yet if you believe we are victims of germs, pathogens, contagions, carcinogens, metastasis, etc., then you believe in the cabal-curated world of "victim consciousness". And this is precisely the problem we're up against - lifetimes after lifetimes of brainwashing. It can't all unwind at once with mega short-circuiting. The vast majority of dis-ease, not caused by poisons or malnutrition (which are rare), is a return to homeostasis. We've been taught to THINK of dis-ease precisely BACKWARDS. I'll leave it at that.
Watch this video. Kind of a normie-level summary of the findings of Lanka, Kaufman, Cowan and Bailey. Tom red-pills Lee Merrit, doctor and former-believer (we all were) in "viruses".
https://www.bitchute.com/video/rloCSmKl8b4l/
Please go get bit by a bunch of ticks and get infected with Borrelia, Babesia, and Bartonella and report back. I can't wait to see how you handle it.
I'll do so right after you produce the scientific paper demonstrating this is what happens -> Tick has said bacteria in mouth -> tick bites person -> bacteria spread into bite victims blood -> resulting in dis-ease.
Thousands of us have been looking for such a scientific paper for the better part of two years now.
Although, I've never heard of any of these things. Are those the names of dis-eases or so-called bacteria?
Good post OP. Shared this video in a couple replies below. This is a pretty normie-friendly explanation with Dr. Tom Cowan redpilling Dr. Lee Merritt. And as an added bonus, he also talks about the lies we've been taught about cells, RNA & DNA as well.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/rloCSmKl8b4l/
Thanks for sharing; I’ll check out. This is the video that originally started me down this path:
https://www.brighteon.com/08e2ac4b-461e-4852-b8cf-2c2bded2a1ea
Yes, Dr. Kaufman is by far the most articulate of the group. His talks with David Icke right at the onset of the plandemic sucked me in.
Here's a list of channels of the 4 good doctors as well as links to a few of Dr. Lanka's seminal papers of viruses and antibodies (also a lie). There are literally hundreds of interviews and videos made by all of them for your continued education.
https://odysee.com/@DrAndrewKaufman:f (Dr. Andrew Kaufman) https://odysee.com/@DeansDanes:1 (Friend of Stefan Lanka with regular interviews) https://odysee.com/@katie.su:7 (Russian researcher who regularly interviews Stefan Lanka) https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c (Dr. Sam Bailey) https://www.bitchute.com/channel/CivTSuEjw6Qp/ (Dr. Tom Cowan)
http://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/wissenschafftplus-the-virus-misconception-part-1.pdf http://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/wissenschafftplus-the-virus-misconception-part-2.pdf
https://www.bitchute.com/video/cRT95DpkQece/ (Dr. Lanka’s 3rd control experiments on the “cytopathic effects” as well as comprehensive list of resources in comments)
https://truthseeker.se/wp-content/uploads/Stefan-Lanka-The-Misinterpretation-of-the-Antibodies-English-Translation.pdf (Dr. Lanka on antibodies)
Thanks. How long should be wait until we drop on the normies that the heart isn’t a pump?
Haha, nice. Actually this would be a lot easier as most people don't have any investment in this Steiner-Cowan red-pill.
But everybody has a story about chicken pox or when everybody in the house or office all "caught the flu at the same time". These are the personal experiences that are hard for people to believe in an alternative explanation. And when I give them that explanation, they almost all react in the same disbelieving way. As such, I rarely discuss it now. People are DEFINITELY not ready to learn how powerful their thoughts are.
Herein lies the rub of the discussion. You are asking downstream questions and you've determined to ignore the UPSTREAM question. This is the whole point of doctors Kaufman, Cowan, Lanka, Bailey assertions.
All of them have PROVED that no scientist has ever actually demonstrated the existence of any virus. The only thing virologists ever do is kill monkey cells and take pictures of particles of their cell debris and then call them "viruses". This is quite literally, the entire field of virology.
To add insult to injury, these virologists then claim that they cannot harvest any viruses out of a sick person's bodily fluids. One esteemed Yale virologist even claimed you can't find any viruses in the bronchial fluid of 10,000 sick people presumably having the same dis-ease - TEN THOUSAND samples!!! While on the other hand, you're told that when you're sick, you can cough/sneeze/breathe-out BILLIONS Of viruses, only one tiny minute particle of which can be inhaled by one of your family members and make them sick. Bwahahahaha!!!
And if that wasn't enough, thousands of us have researched the annals of medical and scientific experiments around attempting to demonstrate HUMAN-TO-HUMAN transmission of these viruses (and alleged bacterial infection too). We've found about a dozen thus far. All failed MISERABLY in transmitting a dis-ease from a sick to healthy person. They tried with "Spanish flu", polio, small pox, and a host of others including influenza. It appears the scientific community gave up even trying to do this in the 1950s, right around the time they invented the fraudulent "viral culturing" method of poisoning monkey kidney cells.
The virologists are now INVENTING viruses for the past 25 years, using software to randomly assemble fragmented RNA found in a single sick person's bronchial fluids. They did EXACTLY THIS from a single sample of a dead Wuhan man alleged to die of this "new mysterious dis-ease". They didn't find one single intact, whole "Coronavirus" in his bronchial fluid. They casually stitched together 10,000 tiny chunks of RNA (which was 100% his human RNA), while ignoring 20,000 other chunks that they claimed were "likely human in origin" into a pattern they invented out of thin air, all on their computers. The "in silico" virus was born. Can you not see this is nonsense?
A woman in Canada has been sending out FOIA requests to every health agency around the world asking them if they any evidence or samples of an actual "coronvirus" (SARS-COV2 specifically). She's had over 184 responses, including from the CDC/NIH, and none claim to have a sample.
There's a $1.5 million reward being offered to anybody that can come forward with an actual physical sample of SARS-COV2. No takers thus far.
In 2015, Dr. Stefan Lanka (a former virologist) challenged the world to produce any paper demonstrating proof of the measles virus offering a 100,000 Euro reward. Not a single virologist, immunologist, biologist or epidemiologist showed up to claim the money. And to wit, all of virology is based on the seminal 1954 Enders scientific paper for the measles virus, having invented the poisoning of the green monkey kidney cell (vero cells) "viral culturing" process. This is why Dr. Lanka chose the measles virus. Every "proof" that viruses exist today is based on the Enders viral culturing method.
John Enders did in fact run a CONTROL EXPERIMENT in his "breakthrough" 1954 measles viral culturing experiment. In it, he skipped the part where you're supposed to add the sick person's bodily fluids. which PRESUMABLY contain the "virus" itself, and simply went through the process of dousing the monkey kidney cells with POISON (aka "anti-biotics" --- "against-life"). And what did he find and write in his paper for all to see? That the results of the control experiment were INDISTINGUISHABLE from the primary experiment that included the human bodily fluids. Let that sink in. The so-called "Cytopahtic effect" (fancy word for death of tissue/cells) happened in both cases and one could not be distinguished from the other. Dr. Lanka ran the same experiment last summer, perfectly matching what Enders found. And yet, Ender's findings was completely ignored by the entire scientific community. Strange, no? And nobody since Enders has bothered to run any control experiments since for all the kajillions of "brand new viruses" that have been "discovered" since then. Even stranger, wouldn't you say?
Louis Pastuer admitted in his private diaries that the very public "anthrax" experiment that he became globally famous for, that he actually used his much-maligned veterinarian competitor's own "vaccine formula" instead of his own, as his was killing more than 50% of the sheep he tested it on. He went on to castigage, defame and berate his competitor, ruining his career, as he himself was lifted up as the great savior of mankind by the public. Pasteur also made-up all his results for his so-called "rabies vaccine", twisting figures, eliminating vaccine recipients for up to 14-days after their last round of painful rabies shots, as they were dying in droves. Further, whether or not a dog/animal had rabies was entirely up to the subjective opinion of the great doctor Pasteur. If somebody was bitten by a dog/animal and lived without getting Pasteur's toxic nostrum, then the dog/animal "didn't have rabies" according to Pasteur. And if a person died after getting Pasteur's nostrum (beyond 14 days), they were either "too late" or the bites received by the patient were "too damaging" and they were said to have really died of advanced infections or sepsis.
"Viruses" were theoretical all through Pasteur's career and well into the 1930s after the invention of the electron microscope. After scientists could see smaller particles for the first time, which "viruses" were theorized to be, they spent the next decade trying to isolate them as well as attempting to follow the very simple "Koch's Postulates" by giving these particles found in a sick person's bodily fluids to healthy people. After all these attempts failed miserably in the 1940s and early 1950s, we got the Enders experiment listed above.
Now, if you're not interested in understanding all these very simple FACTS, like it appears the majority aren't, then I can only ascribe this to you being trapped in your brainwashing. And I'm not saying that to offend you. I want you to look and see this, acknowledge this must be the case if you find nothing that I've said compelling or satisfactory to your inquiry.
Every single possible piece of UPSTREAM EVIDENCE suggests that there is no such thing as "viruses".
The only possible conclusion that can be drawn from all of the above is that there MUST BE SOMETHING ELSE going on. Wouldn't you agree?
People are responsible for their own research, and we just need to provide the way.
100%. Appreciate your post today. Sometimes I think I'm one of only 3 or 4 peeps on this board that have researched germ theory. Glad to see our numbers growing!
Thanks for opening up this discussion.
Dr. Sam Bailey is another source of information regarding the myth of virology:
https://drsambailey.com/articles/
https://www.amazon.ca/Virus-Mania-Hepatitis-Continually-Billion-Dollar/dp/3752629789/ref=sr_1_1?crid=1CZRB9IBFP7CU&keywords=%22virus+mania%22&qid=1644677418&sprefix=virus+mania%2Caps%2C928&sr=8-1
Thank you for the source!
I want to accelerate this timeline. This information getting out is what the Global Cult is truly afraid of. And, it’s starting to happen - people are waking up. This is why they’re frantically trying to create alternative narratives of Chinese labs, gain of function, etc to provide an acceptable alternative narrative to the mainstream to trap those that have questioned the official narrative and make them feel smart.
That makes sense. But, unless I’m mistaken, gain of function is generally discussed as a method they used to create “the virus”, i.e. it’s used to promote the myth of Covid existing to begin with, not as a method of improving injection poison delivery systems.
Yes - I agree with you, and in fact, consider your theory to be quite significant. In that, they are using the falsity of viruses to cloak their research into other weaponry, which quite frankly is likely extrapolated as well into electromagnetic and other wavelength function manipulation.
If HIV doesn't exist then why do so many faggots die of HIV after contracting the virus through butt-sex?
AIDS is literally the same playbook as Covid run by the same guy - Fauci - The disease is caused by the treatment.
You can be on either side of this virus debate and agree on that.
This video explains the AIDS scam. Would you believe Fauci was heavily involved?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/GUEXDEQBaG5C/
Says the guy who hasn’t researched it at all yet.
I didn't do any of this and didn't get "Covid" or any other cold and flu....
Also, did it ever occur to you what hand sanitizer does to your liver? Your body is already toxic, then you apparently dumped a bunch more chemicals onto it.
Cool story bro.
In a similar vein to this, electricity also does not exist. What we call electricity is actually an artefact of a conjunction of two orthogonal fields, which can only manifest simultaneously in certain exotic materials, we call the exotic materials conductors (metals mostly)
More to this but, offtopic.
I’m interested in this. The electric universe by talbott as well as the invisible rainbow by firstenberg are at the top of my reading list.
Thoughts?
Essentially we have a missing field in our understanding. The dielectric field, orthogonal to the magnetic, this is the real meaning of charge. Maxwells equations do use this model but it never propagated and seem now to be obscured by a "charged particle" model. At speed-of-light interactions the idea of a particle fails but the model persists. I really think when this is really understood we will see a step change in technology.
Thanks; I haven’t researched this yet so I admittedly don’t follow what you are saying.
Let me know if you have any articles/books/documentaries you recommend about this.
What do you think of the books I replied with?
Just managed to find invisible rainbow as pdf, and another "electric universe" by a Wal thornhill I will give them a read, but from the skim, yes, these are very similar
The dielectric field is unusual as it projects a theoretically infinite distance (in the same way a ball never stops bouncing, as the bounces only reduce by a proportion of the last bounce so there is always a bit more to go)
I will check them out.
I’ll try to come back To this thread when I read them.
I have so much to read; I should finish the “4th phase of water” before I move on to electricity.
Are you familiar with the exclusion zone?