This was my ‘excuse’ for not getting it, if I ever got asked about having the shot or if I planned on it. I would tell people the issues other women were having. Small red pills were definitely given / taken!!
When you run an every day propaganda operation with doctors and politicians all spreading their lies in cooperation with the media, the vaccinated are all victims.
They are the directly affected victims. Worn down, torn down into not knowing what the truth was anymore, but only knowing they wouldn't be able to support themselves or their families.
I empathize with any who don't start their statements with "I'm not an anti-vaxxer, I'm fully vaccinated and booster, but..." and then launch into a series of complaints, only to end the post with "I'd do it again".
I don't empathize with those, and they are definitely much lower in the ladder if actual victims because they would willingly and actively allow themselves or their children to be victimized again.
And then those who survive this toxic sludge will be given who knows how many harmful vaccinations. The combination of the two may kill a bunch and the rest will likely have all sorts of problems.
This is crap. In the field of chemistry there is a very clear definition of the terms "organic" and "inorganic," "Organic" pertains to any substances incorporating the element carbon in its molecules. So-called, because the substances formed by living beings fall into this category. "Inorganic" pertains to any substance that does not incorporate carbon in its molecular structure. So-called because they correspond to normally non-living material (e.g., salt).
If this machine is making an automatic database comparison, it is most likely failing to make a pattern match with anything in its library and defaults to "inorganic" as an output. But it hasn't actually identified anything. A further chemical analysis is needed to specifically identify the unknown substance. (The mother should have pursued this further. And paid attention during high school chemistry class.)
Automatic determination of toxicity or nutritional value is at best an estimate based on the assumption of some basic chemistry.
This does not mean that there is nothing wrong with the breast milk, but only that there is something unknown going on. Calling it "inorganic" or "toxic" is unjustified and incorrect without a specific identification. Food value? One wonders what would happen if you fed it a French fry.
The death shots were a genocide program. Is this part of the plan? Collatel damage in a world wide war? Is there a treatment/cure/solution for this or is humanity permanently maimed by these fuckers?
Breast milk is 87% water. H2O is an inorganic compound so breast milk can therefore be said to be 80% inorganic. Nothing strange or nefarious about that. Be critical of all media also those that seem to confirm your own biases.
Inorganic matching the toxicity level is probably not a coincidence. From what I've read, the organic vs. inorganic % is based on the volume of contaminants in the milk itself. My assumption (not a tittie doctor) is that this means that out of 100% of the milk (minus water content), 80% of the volume is tainted with a non-organic substance.
Toxicity = 8/10 would indicate to me that the total volume of toxic/foreign material is not only synthetic, but also toxic.
Yes, I know. A person who has taken an mRNA "vax" is a genetically modified organism, a GMO, and thus while he or she is still a carbon-based lifeform ("organic" in the scientific sense of the term), he or she is ALSO "non-organic" in the most common use of the term today (and to the USDA, of course).
Ok, if we’re using USDA classifications for humans and human-based foods, we can probably agree that something can be either organic (unmodified) or not organic (modified).
What do you think the dr/scientist/woman in this video means when she refers to milk as being just 80% inorganic.
I’m betting it’s the 80% H2O content, but I’d love to hear your thoughts.
I don't know and neither does Dr. Madej (the woman speaking, I assume); she asks "What does that mean?" right in her presentation.
My guess is that, assuming it's not something someone made up, is that roughly 80% of the DNA has been modified in some way and to some extent, leaving only about 20% of the DNA in the milk to be natural and unmodified.
But without more detail than provided in the video, I'm skeptical.
That is so sad. God, please save the babies. In Jesus' name I pray. Amen.
Amen.
To be fair, breast milk at least 80% water and water is inorganic by definition.
This was my ‘excuse’ for not getting it, if I ever got asked about having the shot or if I planned on it. I would tell people the issues other women were having. Small red pills were definitely given / taken!!
Respectfully, I salute you.
If the baby of a jabbed woman dies from this, I’d almost call it murder.
Almost?
It IS murder.
Premeditated, mass murder. Genocide.
But does that make the mother an accessory? She should have known better.
Actually, I'd say if her doctor pushed it, then the mother is a victim and the doctor or other medical personnel are the perpetrators.
And no, there is no immunity.
No immunity for willful misconduct.
Bye, Pfizer!
Bye, Felicia!
When you run an every day propaganda operation with doctors and politicians all spreading their lies in cooperation with the media, the vaccinated are all victims.
They are the directly affected victims. Worn down, torn down into not knowing what the truth was anymore, but only knowing they wouldn't be able to support themselves or their families.
I empathize with any who don't start their statements with "I'm not an anti-vaxxer, I'm fully vaccinated and booster, but..." and then launch into a series of complaints, only to end the post with "I'd do it again".
I don't empathize with those, and they are definitely much lower in the ladder if actual victims because they would willingly and actively allow themselves or their children to be victimized again.
Definitely no almost. And the politicians who supported mandating it including potatus itself deserve to be ejected from this country permanently.
ejected ....yes ..... straight into the sun ....
Wow
And then those who survive this toxic sludge will be given who knows how many harmful vaccinations. The combination of the two may kill a bunch and the rest will likely have all sorts of problems.
Thanks for sharing Doc!
This is crap. In the field of chemistry there is a very clear definition of the terms "organic" and "inorganic," "Organic" pertains to any substances incorporating the element carbon in its molecules. So-called, because the substances formed by living beings fall into this category. "Inorganic" pertains to any substance that does not incorporate carbon in its molecular structure. So-called because they correspond to normally non-living material (e.g., salt).
If this machine is making an automatic database comparison, it is most likely failing to make a pattern match with anything in its library and defaults to "inorganic" as an output. But it hasn't actually identified anything. A further chemical analysis is needed to specifically identify the unknown substance. (The mother should have pursued this further. And paid attention during high school chemistry class.)
Automatic determination of toxicity or nutritional value is at best an estimate based on the assumption of some basic chemistry.
This does not mean that there is nothing wrong with the breast milk, but only that there is something unknown going on. Calling it "inorganic" or "toxic" is unjustified and incorrect without a specific identification. Food value? One wonders what would happen if you fed it a French fry.
The death shots were a genocide program. Is this part of the plan? Collatel damage in a world wide war? Is there a treatment/cure/solution for this or is humanity permanently maimed by these fuckers?
Yikes. So sad.
Breast milk is 87% water. H2O is an inorganic compound so breast milk can therefore be said to be 80% inorganic. Nothing strange or nefarious about that. Be critical of all media also those that seem to confirm your own biases.
Inorganic matching the toxicity level is probably not a coincidence. From what I've read, the organic vs. inorganic % is based on the volume of contaminants in the milk itself. My assumption (not a tittie doctor) is that this means that out of 100% of the milk (minus water content), 80% of the volume is tainted with a non-organic substance.
Toxicity = 8/10 would indicate to me that the total volume of toxic/foreign material is not only synthetic, but also toxic.
Perhaps they did? Didn't get to see the report results... but, yeah, agreed. Seeing the actual data would be helpful here!
Almost sounds like they are sensationalizing the actual composition of breast milk.
GMO's are not organic, by definition.
Organic when used to refer to label food products does not mean the same as organic when used in chemistry.
Inorganic is a chemistry term, and a food product would just be referred to as not being organic (unless it literally is entirely non-carbon-based).
Yes, I know. A person who has taken an mRNA "vax" is a genetically modified organism, a GMO, and thus while he or she is still a carbon-based lifeform ("organic" in the scientific sense of the term), he or she is ALSO "non-organic" in the most common use of the term today (and to the USDA, of course).
Ok, if we’re using USDA classifications for humans and human-based foods, we can probably agree that something can be either organic (unmodified) or not organic (modified).
What do you think the dr/scientist/woman in this video means when she refers to milk as being just 80% inorganic.
I’m betting it’s the 80% H2O content, but I’d love to hear your thoughts.
I don't know and neither does Dr. Madej (the woman speaking, I assume); she asks "What does that mean?" right in her presentation.
My guess is that, assuming it's not something someone made up, is that roughly 80% of the DNA has been modified in some way and to some extent, leaving only about 20% of the DNA in the milk to be natural and unmodified.
But without more detail than provided in the video, I'm skeptical.