The true face of the devil
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (152)
sorted by:
I identify as a Catholic even though I don't respect the Vatican. I'm not aware of any fellow Catholics who respect the false pope.
You must not live in FL, then. Because I know tons of Cat-Licks that do follow and hang on every single word of his. They also "trust the science," hate Archbishop Vigano, and also believe the MSM.
That's a shame. I would have expected the fake pope's claims that puppies go to heaven would have raised some red flags for them. It did for me because then I wondered if my favorite pots and pans would be waiting for me in heaven too. /s
EDIT: I would love it if dogs go to heaven. Nobody knows true love unless they've owned a dog.
I think people became suspicious when he said there is no hell.
and that gays will go to heaven
Just as there are reports of people seeing loved ones say goodbye (often times after the person died and the receiver of the goodbye had no idea about the death) many report similar things with their dogs.
Dogs have the breath of life and certainly know love. Who knows where they go after death?
God knows, and something tells me that He wouldn't keep us apart from them forever.
Not the false pope, I suspect.
I woke up in my RV after my dogs had apparently been eating the couch while we slept. I do hope they go to heaven and i almost just sent mine there. I was raised catholic. My mom is an uber catholic. Even on a retreat as we speak w her church ladies. She NEVER responds when i send Vigano's stuff. A dang Archbishop, whom she would simply always blindly trust w them being an Archbishop, doesnt care what he says. Still thinks I am a loon for saying the exact stuff he's saying! Im like how.....im showing u someone i KNOW youd adore bc youre uber catholic and it STILL doesnt even make them 2nd guess
Isaiah 11:6 gives me hope.
Ha ha ha that's nice.
I just had the vision of introducing Harry the dog (died in 2016) to Cooper the dog (my childhood pet) so they can play together. Max (the old cat from my first apartment who'd come in through my balcony window to say hello each day and was schizophrenic so if he became too happy then his brain would fritz and he'd attack which was funny to watch when strangers would pet him as he sat outside the front of the apartments because he seemed cute and friendly) and Peppers the cat might be there too, but it's difficult to know if they loved me or just tolerated me for my company and food.
Yep, lots of liberal "Catholics". Biden, Piglosi, etc. I remember years ago meeting a Franciscan Monk whose mission was to travel between churches giving weekend retreats and teaching the meaning of the Mass. He was distraught to see all the gay priests, the changing litergy, the destruction of all things holy. He told me that the devil was in the church. Shortly after he told me this he came down with a medical condition that destroyed his ability to speak. Coincidence? I think not.
Yep lot of libtard Satanic Catholic in name only. You ought to see the shitload of demonic Satanic liberal protestant heretics running around.
Vigano for Pope. The Tribulations will not be for long, if they were no one would be saved. Read that in a book about the coming hard times.
In Orlando there’s a huge Catholic Church called, Mary Queen of the Universe not a parish but a pilgrimage 🤣
There's also a yuge Satanic temple complex called Disney World
Iiiiiiiiinteresting. I live in FL now.....might have to pilgrimage to ol orlando lol
I still identify as Catholic, but I no longer respect the Catholic Church. While I have always wanted to go back to the pre-Vatican II church, this guy makes me want to leave or overthrow the whole church.
I think a slightly more nuanced adjustment helps …
The Catholic Church, as in the Vatican, is not THE Church.
It is an Organization … a Corporation, and in it’s current form, it’s a Nation State, with it’s own Central Bank and Political Structure masquerading as Holy Men.
What you’re saying is you do not respect the ‘Vatican Corporation’ .. and even pre-Vatican II, it wasn’t as rosy as we think it was.
Totally agree. The Catholic Church had issues before Vatican II, but arguably better than it is now.
Look into Orthodoxy. You will find what you are looking for. And no Pope!!
I have begun to do so and enjoy the Orthodox channel on Gab. When you say Orthodox, are you specifically referencing Eastern or Greek Orthodox or something broader?
I completely agree. Notice how they changed stuff after Vatican II that they didn't have to change (priest facing parish, all prayers in English and dumbed down, etc.) but did nothing when it came to the things that really mattered like allowing priests to marry. My father had a great idea, priests should be chaste until the age of 33, the age Christ died. Then afterward allow them to marry like normal people. That would have reduced the number of gays and increased the number of normal men that had first hand experience with issues of marriage, raising children, etc. making them more relatable to the congregation.
Why not just identify as Christian...simpler and you can ditch the devilish symbolism.
For me, it's complicated because I respect the Catholic Church as the church that Jesus Christ created and much of their ceremony correctly honors the requirements of the New Testament.
However, I also identify as a Red Letter Christian because I am NOT a Muslim and I don't believe our scripture is the perfect, verbatim word of God.
I believe our scripture was written by fallible humans and should be respected and understood in terms of human culture and context.
I'm less worried about "simpler" and more concerned with being honest.
That was a good question and thank you for it.
True. Peter never went to Rome. Paul did.
Christ said Peter was a tiny pebble and that he, Christ was The Rock. Petra v. Petros.
I'd argue none of their ceremony honors the requirements of the New Testament. Even their baptisms are done by sprinkling rather than immersion and they are performed on infants who have no say in the matter.
Great example is the Feast of the Assumption of Mary, Queen of Heaven.
First off, nowhere in the Bible does it say Mary was assumed into heaven.
Secondly, the Bible has nothing but bad things to say about the "queen of heaven."
Thirdly, crowning a statue of "Mary" with roses is worshipping a graven image. Now I know Catholics claim there's a difference between "worship" and "veneration", but the only difference is semantics.
Exodus 20:4
Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.
And I understand points 2 and 3 are based on the Old Testament, but in the New Testament, Yashua said the following-
Matthew 5:18
For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
There was no New Testament when he said this. The law = the Torah.
2 Corinthians 6:17
Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you.
The Roman Catholic Church did the opposite of this instruction. They incorporated pagan symbolism and rituals into Christianity, including the Spring, Summer, Fall and Winter equinoxes. The feast days of the gods and goddesses were replaced by feast days of the saints.
Protestants banned the celebration of Christmas at one point, but they now have done the same thing the Catholics have in many aspects. A Christian child should never be taught lies about Santa Claus or the Easter bunny...
Christmas trees are pagan symbols as well.
Jesus said the baptism would be by spirit. Water went out on pentecost. Immersion or sprinkling.
that would explain why I've never wanted to set up one by dad says to so :shrug:
Lots of great points here. Over the centuries, we see many instances of syncretism happen within the churches.
I think there is a debate or potential path of discernment on how should Christianity, and to keep it simple, assume this is back in the day of the Apostles… how should Christianity be adopted into a far away culture beyond the Middle East and Eurasia? Does it ‘replace’ the culture? Or maybe there is room for both, but where idol worship, false gods, are rooted out, etc.
IMO, Jesus’s teaching is actually quite simple… it goes to the very heart of the matter, of any matter. Then from there we, as humans, will then have to ‘live it out’ (obviously not easy).
And I find there seems to be a fine line between idolatry and ‘pure’ worship.
I would argue that many Christians today of all denominations idolize ‘The Bible’, or a Symbol / Object .. unintentionally. It spirals into debates and discussion on the ‘letter’ as opposed to the Message.
As for me, it’s simple… who do you follow? Jesus OR (fill in XYZ).
Same here
Correct.