Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

259
Possible Twitter scenarios. No matter which one, we win. (media.greatawakening.win)
posted 4 years ago by Factfiler 4 years ago by Factfiler +259 / -0
50 comments download share
50 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (50)
sorted by:
▲ 18 ▼
– Factfiler [S] 18 points 4 years ago +18 / -0

From The Real Great Awakening.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– Tim_Drake 17 points 4 years ago +17 / -0

"When something is important enough, you do it even if the odds are not in your favor." -Elon Musk

permalink save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– VicariousJambi 14 points 4 years ago +14 / -0

Theres also the

they refuse the offer and then nothing happens after that and we forget about this in 2 weeks when something else happens

permalink save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– ILearnedToCode 19 points 4 years ago +19 / -0

If they refuse the offer, Musk sells off his 9.1% stake and the stock plummets.

He directly told them this in his letter to the chairman. He will "reconsider his position as a shareholder" if the offer is refused.

It is a checkmate

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– AReckoningIsComing 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

He's just shitposting but in real life

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Jacurutu99 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

He actually gave them a generous deal per share, and I do suggest they take it, or he can let it burn and THEN buy it at 1/10 of that price. And it is in CASH....so, you either want to take the money or not.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– VicariousJambi 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

You're trusting elon, the guy who makes electric cars to keep people locked in their cities, the guy who wants to make the mind control metaverse technology, to keep his word.

aaaaaaannnnndddddd

why didn't their stock plummet when elon bought it? I don't think he'd undersell it and take a loss.

Why does it matter if their stock plummets, anyways? Who cares? They can just manipulate the market and put it to wherever they want it too, anyways.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 22 ▼
– ILearnedToCode 22 points 4 years ago +22 / -0

makes electric cars to keep people locked in their cities

Elon has never once said that we need to transition entirely to electric. He is vocal against the woke Climate Change movement, and supports the oil industry. He (the man running the EV company that you fear) called for the United States to resume all oil production immediately, calling it highly irresponsible to stop production of oil. Another large venture of Tesla is creating large battery farms to help stabilize our power grid.

the guy who wants to make the mind control metaverse technology

He founded a company that is building brain implants, with the intent of curing/treating debilitating mental disorders. He is very vocal about the dangers of this technology, as well as AI, which is why he's involved himself in both ventures (he fears the technology as much as we do, and he wants influence over the inevitable furtherance of the technology).

Why didnt their stock plummet when he bought it

Why would it? A billionaire purchasing 10% of a stock will only ever raise the price of that stock.

Why does it matter if their stock plummets, anyways? Who cares

The millions upon millions of shareholders that the board have a fiduciary duty to, care, deeply.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– VicariousJambi 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Why would it? A billionaire purchasing 10% of a stock will only ever raise the price of that stock.

So why would selling it matter? He bought it from someone, someone else will buy it. And we're arguing about fake numbers on a screen anyways. They can set the stock price to whatever they want.

And it looks like you still think these people play by the rules and tell the truth about what they're doing and why they do it. lol

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– ILearnedToCode 12 points 4 years ago +12 / -0

Him purchasing it makes it go up because people see his purchase and buy. Him selling makes it go down because people see him sell and get scared and sell too.

Whales influence the market far more than you think

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– lkjsdf9845 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

Him selling makes it go down because people see him sell and get scared and sell too.

It's worse than that. If he has announced an intention to sell, then it motivates other shareholders to dump their own shares BEFORE the price drops from his sale.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– VicariousJambi 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Oh is that how you think it works?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– StormSailor 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Holy shit dude you're insanely ignorant. Just quit embarrassing yourself.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– VicariousJambi 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

no u

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– jackrotten 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Neurolink is keyword optional. Electric cars are keyword, optional. How does that keep people locked in their cities?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– VicariousJambi 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Optional for now! Cali is moving towards 100% electirc cars!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– jackrotten 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Yea but Elon isn't the one doing that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Bgtholt88 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Im on your side.. but Elon could be padding some wallets to make things happen and he would never tell you about it.

But I would say it’s likely Elon isn’t a bad guy.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– StormzAComing 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

That's Gruesome for you.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Greekish 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Look again - it's grue some more.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– YourMother 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

This option ^ and option 3 are the only 2 real options. DWAC isn’t buying Twitter and Twitter isn’t going bankrupt. It boggles my mind how many people are running with this DWAC/Twitter merger based on literally not one piece of evidence or even a solid lead. Just pure speculation.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– StormSailor 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

A lot of people here are retired boomers with nothing better to do than waste their time coming up with baseless theories for the fun of it without taking into account any evidence or logic. They want to will it into existence. Either that or we've been infiltrated by glowie shills who do things like datefag and spread lies so that the MSM runs with it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Bgtholt88 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Not to mention I don’t even think they can legally buy an existing public company.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– 50StateLandslide 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Musk intends to take Twitter private but yeah, they'd never merge. Twitter is way ahead on the infrastructure front and has way more users. TS offers nothing in a merger other than the presence of Trump

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– Radian_333 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

Check and mate

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– jimmityjimjimjim 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

The last won't happen. DOJ won't do a fucking thing.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Tim_Drake 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Ohhhh yes it will.

I guaranfuckingtee it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Wrez77 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

A cheap toaster from Walmart has a better guarantee

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Tim_Drake 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Guess we'll find out.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– YourMother 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

DOJ is a dumpster fire. Every 3 letter agency is complete trash. Please don’t put any of your faith in them as you’ll only be let down by their complete and utter inability to bring any resemblance of real justice to its people.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Tim_Drake 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

I have no faith in them in their current format.

I do, however, have faith they will all be defunded, cleaned out, and reorganized with proper controls put in place.

I have faith that Americans will be empowered to police ourselves as well by that time.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– StormzAComing 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

A two year warranty for burnt toast.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– StormzAComing 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Any option would be amazing

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– apricorn 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

A win/win/win scenario. Cadet Kirk would be proud.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Bgtholt88 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

DWAC is not going to buy twitter.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– libtards_r_stoopid 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Why do you say that

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Bgtholt88 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

The purpose of DWAC is to merge/buy out a private company and take it public. There’s hundreds of acquisition companies just like it..(SPACs). This isn’t some special operation deployed by trump to buy up companies. I honestly do not know why so many people that are very intelligent have done zero research on what DWAC is, and hear them say ridiculous thing like “Trumps acquisition company might buy Twitter or CNN!!”.

I’ve heard the X22 guy say it a few times as well. He probably needs to talk to someone who is an expert in SPACs, because what he id saying makes him sound silly.

I’d bet that DWAC can’t even legally buy twitter or any public company for that matter.

Now.. Trump Media could. But I highly doubt that as well. And I’d be willing to say Twitters board would deny any such offer..

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– libtards_r_stoopid 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Ok thanks for your reply

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– ErOsion9o 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Good theory if Twitter wasn't an unofficial extension of the government. They'll prop them up no matter the cost via vanguard, balckrock laundering

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ThomasMaker 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Looks like it will be number 1...........................

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– BasedCitizen 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

To the degree it helps; the latest news:

  • Here is Elon stating that he has a plan B if his offer is rejected (and it was): https://t.me/TommyRobinsonNews/34625

  • And in related news, here is Trump saying F*** Twitter (essentially): https://nypost.com/2022/04/14/trump-says-he-wont-return-to-twitter-if-elon-musk-buys-it/

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Bedminster 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Lets just say I would be (and have been) buying DWAC.....

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– R3tro 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

You forgot moving headquarters to Texas and turning SanFran office into a homeless shelter…

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AReckoningIsComing 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

What if 3 but Elon does fuck all afterwards cos he's just a rich guy who like flaunting his money?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– freedomdude508 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

also another strong possibility is Elon makes offer, stock pumps... board rejects the offer, elon liquidates at a premium.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ImaSueDeNym 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Not trying to be a downer here, but I think the most likely is;

Musk never makes an official offer. Nothing changes on Twitter.

I don't know if people have short memories or are only now paying attention to him, but Musk has consistently engaged in this type of thing (announcing some huge thing he intends to do) and never follows up on it.

Going to take a guess and say most people here won't even remember this latest attention whoring from him 6 months from now.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Crusty_Bungus 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

DOJ...LOLOLOLOLOL

permalink save report block reply

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 5 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy