I clearly remember the first time I ever heard the word Twitter.
I was visiting my two older sisters. They were sitting round the TV watching CNN or MSNBC or some of the other Lib stations, laughing at the fun being broadcast on these stations with some new computer app. All of the lib stations were apparently broadcasting cute messages sent from one celeb or famous person to another. When they could settle down enough to breathe, they told me this PC app was called "Twitter."
Without thinking at all, these are the words that popped out of my mouth:
"Oh that's the Government."
I was so accustomed to Propaganda Campaigns by Government Social Engineers at that point that the conclusion didn't even need to get fact checked by my brain. It popped out involuntarily.
I knew it was true the first second I heard of it.
All the proof from that time to the present confirms it.
If you go back there was a period of time where there was a lot of discussion of how Twitter was ever going to monetize anything and get to profitability. One day, those conversations just vanished and were never to resume. Actually Facebook had similar issues (would ads ever work on mobile, etc.).
I think Big Tech didn't really need the government to scale so much as to give them a steady flow of guaranteed revenue. They participate in government run tracking/censorship/narrative systems in exchange for perpetual solvency and protection from competition.
It's why the board was totally indifferent about the company until Musk made a bid.
Clowns certainly set it up, and control the funding, but perhaps what's going on is that it's funds are being actually funneled via so-called 'legit' (if clandestine) government funding.
that's just a conspiracy theory. Next you'll be saying the governments of the world will be forcing people to take a vaccine or no longer have the right to travel or go in public.
That's as crazy as saying there's a laptop that shows the president's son frolicking naked with prostitutes and getting a "foot job".
That's just like saying the vaccines aren't safe or effective, what's next, healthy young people dropping dead on soccer fields after taking the jab? Never gonna happen.
That's as crazy as saying there are nazis and biolabs in Ukraine.
No shit Sherlock. Me an ordinary housewife / entrepreneur figured out ages ago that fuckerberg and woosey were not geniuses. Just mere figurative creations of the cabal with darpa et al behind them. As happy as I am that Elon is exposing them he is seemingly cut of a similar cloth. Just saying. But i am so optimistic by nature I think he is a good guy. Waiting for the tell all movie.
This has been confirmed by many posts last week. Twitter has a portal that is used by various govt's around the world to censor anyone they deem a threat. It wasn't Dave who figured this out. Dr Shiva has an existing lawsuit in regards to this and he discovered the portal. In the US, there is a team in the DHS who handles this. Trump knew this all along as well.
They had a playbook how to interfere w/ election. Partner portal aka ban hammer city.
It assumes Jack Dorsey got secret funding to launch and keep twitter running. If you have any basic knowledge of start ups you'll know exactly where that funding comes from.
These start ups don't just have magical funds out of nowhere, you can track them all and see exactly where they came from.
Twitter started back in 2004 before social media existed, and it was a huge novelty where tons of people saw dollar signs. So, a bunch of rich dipshits dumped money hand over fist into the company hoping that it would become hugely popular and they could run ads on it and everyone would get rich.
Since 2004 you can look down a LONG list of dipshits who have dumped money into twitter, in fact there's been 4.4 BILLION dollars invested into the company since it launched and they have made almost nothing in profits because they always wanted to focus on growth over profitability.
It's gotten to the point now that users will revolt if they see ads. Unlike Youtube which integrated ads very early on and trained their users. YouTube only cost 11.5 Million to build, but was bought early on by Google for 1.6 Billion. They invested heavily in the ad structure and in 2021 made 28 BILLION in ad revenue.
It doesn't take the CIA to build a social media platform, just a bunch of greedy fucks. In Twitter's case, they're also morons because they ignored ad revenue for too long and now they don't know how to monetize without fucking up the platform.
I guarantee if Elon bought Twitter, which the only reason he has interest is because he knows Tesla isn't posed to compete with the Big Three going 100% electric in the next few years and he needs a new monetization platform, but if he just integrate ads and declare himself the winner, then watch the user base split over to Instagram and LinkedIN.
In this article, Sundance is trying to use his own experience with his site vs Twitter.
theconservativetreehouse.com is using database technology and is not a true cloudbased technology like that of Twitter. You can't compare the 2 at all, and Sundance is wrong in regard to the cost of Twitter as we know it.
There is another aspect, and that is management over Twitter to be able to control the narrative by funneling activity to real user oversight while also providing real-time Bot responses.
Twitter ($100s millions)
vs
Twitter Control ($ billions)
Exactly THIS! 👆
Is the Federal Reserve private?
Yes. It's an independent corporation
Maybe Trump can acquire it?
Facebook, Amazon and Google as well.
I clearly remember the first time I ever heard the word Twitter.
I was visiting my two older sisters. They were sitting round the TV watching CNN or MSNBC or some of the other Lib stations, laughing at the fun being broadcast on these stations with some new computer app. All of the lib stations were apparently broadcasting cute messages sent from one celeb or famous person to another. When they could settle down enough to breathe, they told me this PC app was called "Twitter."
Without thinking at all, these are the words that popped out of my mouth:
"Oh that's the Government."
I was so accustomed to Propaganda Campaigns by Government Social Engineers at that point that the conclusion didn't even need to get fact checked by my brain. It popped out involuntarily.
I knew it was true the first second I heard of it.
All the proof from that time to the present confirms it.
Glad someone brought this up.
There was a whole "Were you on Twitter before Oprah?!" spiel injected into the zeitgeist. Twit went to shit VERY soon after.
If you go back there was a period of time where there was a lot of discussion of how Twitter was ever going to monetize anything and get to profitability. One day, those conversations just vanished and were never to resume. Actually Facebook had similar issues (would ads ever work on mobile, etc.).
I think Big Tech didn't really need the government to scale so much as to give them a steady flow of guaranteed revenue. They participate in government run tracking/censorship/narrative systems in exchange for perpetual solvency and protection from competition.
It's why the board was totally indifferent about the company until Musk made a bid.
Guys, this isn't news.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/social-media-is-a-tool-of-the-cia-seriously/
Freaking CBS reported this outright back in 2011.
I think we all know that all social media is govt controlled. The specifics of the portal is what we wanted to know.
Yes, and no.
Let's not be too simplistic.
Clowns certainly set it up, and control the funding, but perhaps what's going on is that it's funds are being actually funneled via so-called 'legit' (if clandestine) government funding.
They have their ways.
that's just a conspiracy theory. Next you'll be saying the governments of the world will be forcing people to take a vaccine or no longer have the right to travel or go in public.
That's as crazy as saying there's a laptop that shows the president's son frolicking naked with prostitutes and getting a "foot job".
That's just like saying the vaccines aren't safe or effective, what's next, healthy young people dropping dead on soccer fields after taking the jab? Never gonna happen.
That's as crazy as saying there are nazis and biolabs in Ukraine.
Come on, man!
No shit Sherlock. Me an ordinary housewife / entrepreneur figured out ages ago that fuckerberg and woosey were not geniuses. Just mere figurative creations of the cabal with darpa et al behind them. As happy as I am that Elon is exposing them he is seemingly cut of a similar cloth. Just saying. But i am so optimistic by nature I think he is a good guy. Waiting for the tell all movie.
This has been confirmed by many posts last week. Twitter has a portal that is used by various govt's around the world to censor anyone they deem a threat. It wasn't Dave who figured this out. Dr Shiva has an existing lawsuit in regards to this and he discovered the portal. In the US, there is a team in the DHS who handles this. Trump knew this all along as well.
They had a playbook how to interfere w/ election. Partner portal aka ban hammer city.
Bing, Bing, Bing! Ah Ha! That's how they did it.
LifeLog was a DARPA project. It totally stands to reason that microblogging via Twitter might've been a CIA one.
This article is absolutely ignorant.
It assumes Jack Dorsey got secret funding to launch and keep twitter running. If you have any basic knowledge of start ups you'll know exactly where that funding comes from.
These start ups don't just have magical funds out of nowhere, you can track them all and see exactly where they came from.
Twitter started back in 2004 before social media existed, and it was a huge novelty where tons of people saw dollar signs. So, a bunch of rich dipshits dumped money hand over fist into the company hoping that it would become hugely popular and they could run ads on it and everyone would get rich.
Since 2004 you can look down a LONG list of dipshits who have dumped money into twitter, in fact there's been 4.4 BILLION dollars invested into the company since it launched and they have made almost nothing in profits because they always wanted to focus on growth over profitability.
It's gotten to the point now that users will revolt if they see ads. Unlike Youtube which integrated ads very early on and trained their users. YouTube only cost 11.5 Million to build, but was bought early on by Google for 1.6 Billion. They invested heavily in the ad structure and in 2021 made 28 BILLION in ad revenue.
It doesn't take the CIA to build a social media platform, just a bunch of greedy fucks. In Twitter's case, they're also morons because they ignored ad revenue for too long and now they don't know how to monetize without fucking up the platform.
I guarantee if Elon bought Twitter, which the only reason he has interest is because he knows Tesla isn't posed to compete with the Big Three going 100% electric in the next few years and he needs a new monetization platform, but if he just integrate ads and declare himself the winner, then watch the user base split over to Instagram and LinkedIN.
Fair points. Not qualified to weigh in on specifics, and we'll see if more comes out... But fair points.
Dr shiva exposed this in his lawsuit. You need to see his take on it. Dave is just commenting on something shiva knows more about.
It's becoming news now, slowly. "Real" news. Thanks Dave!
WWG1WGA
He explained in a recent interview that it has no significant meaning.
Nazi ism is corporatism.
This has been obvious for years. Amazon same way. Free postal service? Who gets to have that?
In this article, Sundance is trying to use his own experience with his site vs Twitter.
theconservativetreehouse.com is using database technology and is not a true cloudbased technology like that of Twitter. You can't compare the 2 at all, and Sundance is wrong in regard to the cost of Twitter as we know it.
There is another aspect, and that is management over Twitter to be able to control the narrative by funneling activity to real user oversight while also providing real-time Bot responses.
Twitter ($100s millions) vs Twitter Control ($ billions)