I didn’t mean to misgender ;). You can see how little all the shitbags are followed even though we’re told they’re a “ big deal” I watch dudes in their garage building shit out of scrap wood that have 3x as many subscribers
Yep been able to see this pattern for along time, can do it on literally any leftist channel. Large, large follower/subscribers counts next to no actual channel engagement views etc...
In marketing it’s all about engagement and less about audience count as you stated. I believe the massive Fortune 500 Cabal companies help support leftist propaganda and degeneracy by paying them top dollar for ad space on low engaged content.
Google is valued at $1 trillion so I don't see that happening. I could however see Google's assets being seized by white hats and taken over by white hats.
This graphic would have actually been effective if all the uploads featured weren't uploadeded within the last few hours of being screen grabbed. All uploads on youtube show the view count capped under a couple thousand for the first 12 to 24 hours.
You could have found videos with view counts to actually back this up but that would have taken another 15 mins of work so you just said fuck it instead. Who am I kidding, OP didn't even make this. They just reposted this low effort shit without looking at it for more than 30 seconds.
She got more views in an hour with less subscribers than NYT did retweets in more time with supposedly more subscribers. If that makes sense. I think that's what they are pointing out.
But that's such old news. Most people stopped "following the stars" around 2016/2017. So irrelevant right now to the movement. It's like trying to point out that there's a Deep State. No shit.
The channels I'm subscribed to that have half as many subscriptions will have thousands of views within the first hour. One right now, which has only 48k subs, uploaded a video 10 minutes ago and has 204 views. Another, which has roughly the same sub count at 413k subs, has a video pending premier and won't go live for another 6 hours has 101 people 'waiting' (whatever that means).
"Drew Blythe Barrymore was born in Culver City, California, to American actor John Drew Barrymore and aspiring actress Jaid Barrymore (born Ildikó Jaid Makó),[6] who was born in a displaced persons camp in Brannenburg, West Germany, to Hungarian World War II refugees.[7][8]"
I didn’t even know she had a channel
He
I didn’t mean to misgender ;). You can see how little all the shitbags are followed even though we’re told they’re a “ big deal” I watch dudes in their garage building shit out of scrap wood that have 3x as many subscribers
Guys working bushcraft and building dugouts are awesome.
Yep been able to see this pattern for along time, can do it on literally any leftist channel. Large, large follower/subscribers counts next to no actual channel engagement views etc...
It seems most everything about the Left is fake and manipulated. Nothing they claim can be believed.
Just wondering why the view counts aren't faked?
In marketing it’s all about engagement and less about audience count as you stated. I believe the massive Fortune 500 Cabal companies help support leftist propaganda and degeneracy by paying them top dollar for ad space on low engaged content.
May be their fame faded or they were popular in a different industry/media format and it did not transfer.
But we know that those numbers are fake regardless.
Why the fuck everything has to be fake.
Elon, buy Google next!
That's the one I want to see next. Give us all a search engine that just searches fairly and doesn't manipulate the results.
Google is valued at $1 trillion so I don't see that happening. I could however see Google's assets being seized by white hats and taken over by white hats.
Drew Barrymore has always looked like this to me my whole life:
https://hotcorn-cdn.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2018/06/18164850/Mask_cher.jpg
Who is that dark haired tranny behind Cher??
I'll never unsee her as Cher now.
she was pretty cute when younger. but then years of weinsteinin' will do that to any woman (or man for that matter).
This graphic would have actually been effective if all the uploads featured weren't uploadeded within the last few hours of being screen grabbed. All uploads on youtube show the view count capped under a couple thousand for the first 12 to 24 hours.
You could have found videos with view counts to actually back this up but that would have taken another 15 mins of work so you just said fuck it instead. Who am I kidding, OP didn't even make this. They just reposted this low effort shit without looking at it for more than 30 seconds.
She got more views in an hour with less subscribers than NYT did retweets in more time with supposedly more subscribers. If that makes sense. I think that's what they are pointing out.
I did not see one REAL METRIC that a REAL CONTENT CREATOR would use to substantiate your point.
Do you even VidIQ?
Too lazy to SocialBlade?
And lastly, what the fuck does this have to do with Q?
Can anyone tell me what kind of low level comment generator this script is using?
I have a great forum I am trying to kill off.
I'm thinking it's the "they believed you would follow the stars" angle.
But that's such old news. Most people stopped "following the stars" around 2016/2017. So irrelevant right now to the movement. It's like trying to point out that there's a Deep State. No shit.
It would be funny if politicians wouldn't get any likes, shares or comments on social media. Let them feel like they are talking to themselves.
Look at when the uploads happened. 3 or 4 hours earlier. Not enough time to gain traction yet.
The channels I'm subscribed to that have half as many subscriptions will have thousands of views within the first hour. One right now, which has only 48k subs, uploaded a video 10 minutes ago and has 204 views. Another, which has roughly the same sub count at 413k subs, has a video pending premier and won't go live for another 6 hours has 101 people 'waiting' (whatever that means).
Wikipedia lists her father but does not say who her mother is. Very odd. Maybe she's a test tube baby.
"Drew Blythe Barrymore was born in Culver City, California, to American actor John Drew Barrymore and aspiring actress Jaid Barrymore (born Ildikó Jaid Makó),[6] who was born in a displaced persons camp in Brannenburg, West Germany, to Hungarian World War II refugees.[7][8]"
maybe we should read a little further down?
Drew Barrymore? Heh more like Jew Barrymore.
I read the chart at the top of the page. I'm having a hard time today. It's been a day.
they still have to gestate in a woman i believe? XD
Trust the science, you biggot!!