Different angles, positions, perspectives, and cameras. The video shot looks like it was done with a telephoto lens, as the tan cement wall in the background looks much closer (a telephoto artifact). Same wall in background of both versions. The still pic is much better focused and has much better color saturation and was taken from a very low position (crouching) while the video was taken from a standing position. Same scene, same day.
Once you develop an eye for photoshopped pics, you can spot them almost instantly. In this case, let your eye follow the outline of the man in the middle esp around his neck and head. The lighting is off
The guy's neck and ear do look to be edited. But why the deception? What is the point of it? And why would people be downvoting if true? If you have a fucking theory let's hear it in plain English.
Yeah, this thing has a very "photobashed" quality to it. The lighting is all over the place. They're not casting shadows, either.
EDIT: Ah, I think I figured out why it feels so weird - everything is in focus. The frontmost male, the awning, the trashcans (?), the woman's arm... all very sharp. Durham is only slightly out of focus. Cameras don't work like this.
Look up Tone mapping. It's a real technique in photography and its built into many modern phones (which by the way have tiny sensors, easy to keep everything in focus).
Ah, tone mapping could explain at least some of the lighting issues, but I'm not convinced that the sharpness is simply a matter of a type of camera sensor. Assuming parts of this image weren't just bashed together in PhotoShop, it could be that there's some sort of AI-assistant feature in the camera software - I'm not sure, there's just something off about this image.
I saw the continuous video of Durham getting out of the car, grabbing his bag, and walking to the door. This suppressed smile happened. This just happens to be a better shot of it than the video was.
ELA analysis of this picture looks to good to be photoshopped.
In images that are edited Error Level Analysis can detect even the slightest differences in jpg compression ratios in pictures. If this was photoshopped there would be significant white marks in the ELA version.
This was probably taken at a high (f16 or higher) aperture for the clarity of the background, a lower shutter speed which causes the slight blur of moving objects and then tone mapped by a complete dolt. The guy in front of Durham is over tone mapped. His hands and face gives it away.
So technically this photo is edited (poorly), but all of the elements were in the frame when it was taken.
Pretty much my thoughts exactly. I might even go a step further and propose this is a picture taken on a phone with automatic tone mapping. That would also explain the deep focus (caused by the small sensor).
Many phones automatically do what is called "dynamic tone mapping". They snap a quick succession of photos at several various exposures, then combine the best parts while removing the under/overexposed areas. So there technically is no "Photoshop" per se, it is all happening inside the phone's capture software. This is why both the sky is nicely exposed, and the fine details on the lawyers dark suits.
Watching the video version from another comment, this moment clearly happened, so I'd recommend you stop with the "it's photoshopped" mantra, because it only highlights your knowledge gap regarding photo capturing techniques.
It does raise the question though. Is tone mapping an image modification technique that could affect evidence used in court? Sometimes the tone mapping process can introduce color artifacts that were not in the original images. It messes with the overall integrity of brightness levels in an image, which can create an oversaturated fantasy kind of effect on an image.
The first man, definitely something off, but honestly I first noticed his blood ring. In fact I couldn’t notice anything else but the blood ring on his hand.
Ok I'm curious. I read the comments and don't feel comfortable clicking the link but I would like to hear it in your words. I noticed the 3 classes of people point so that part interests me. If anything I wanna know what you are thinking.
all i can say is, the photo in the OP is obviously photoshopped. i showed it to a few people "in real life" and they also agreed.
you can make of that what you will.
generally speaking, if someone is trying to deceive me, i consider them to be a bad guy.
here is another photo, hosted at the new york times, that is obviously photoshopped.
you can tell by looking at the 3 people on the left, and 1 lady on the right.
the "people" are just cut-out images, pasted onto a background. the images appear to be "layered' meaning there is a background image, with images of people laid on top.
the easiest way to see this, is to look at their feet, and then focus your eyes back and forth from foreground to background, and the front layer will POP off the page at you. once you "see" it, its impossible to NOT see...
first, you must understand that every image in the world is fake,
in the sense that an image is merely a 2D representation of a 3D-4D world,
an image is like the shadow.
a horse is 3D-4D, but his shadow is only 2D
your brain must be programmed at a very young age, in order for you to be able to "see" images.
researchers found a boy, who was raised in a culture where images were forbidden, and showed the boy a picture of a horse,
and the boy could not "see" the horse, because his brain had never been trained to look at a shadow or image, and "see" a horse.
when they asked the boy, why he couldn't imagine the horse, the boy replied, that was is not able to walk around the other side of it.
images beget idolatry.
one of the 10 commandments, forbids the making of graven or carved images.
The Ten Commandments (Exodus 20:2-17 NKJV)
1 “I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. You shall have no other gods before Me.
2 “You shall not make for yourself a carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; you shall not bow down to them nor serve them. For I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and fourth generations of those who hate Me, but showing mercy to thousands, to those who love Me and keep My Commandments.
3 “You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain, for the Lord will not hold him guiltless who takes His name in vain.
4 “Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord your God. In it you shall do no work: you, nor your son, nor your daughter, nor your male servant, nor your female servant, nor your cattle, nor your stranger who is within your gates. For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested the seventh day. Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it.
5 “Honor your father and your mother, that your days may be long upon the land which the Lord your God is giving you.
6 “You shall not murder.
7 “You shall not commit adultery.
8 “You shall not steal.
9 “You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
10 “You shall not covet your neighbor's house; you shall not covet your neighbor's wife, nor his male servant, nor his female servant, nor his ox, nor his donkey, nor anything that is your neighbor's.”
so, because we live in a world, that is awash in images, our minds are constantly "interpreting" images, created by others, and mistaking them for realty.
we live in a made-up reality, that was made-up by... someone else.
we do not live, in our own reality.
our reality is created for us, to consume.
because the very nature of imagery, is evil,
those who create images, are evil.
the image of the beast is 666
we live in a world of smoke and mirrors.
we live in an empire of lies.
we live in a world where you can go to jail for hate speech, just for saying that men can't get pregnant.
i will share a bible verse with you.
its from the Book of Revelation, which is the very last book of The Bible.
if this verse speaks to you, please read the entire book of revelation, which is short, and can be read, in one sitting.
Just remember life is a mirror. Im trying to understand what your purpose in sharing this picture on the first place was. I want to know why you feel it is important like what you think the goal is. At this point I just believe you are trying to be deceiving because you will not elaborate your idea about the photoshopped picture. I will hear you out but I will not be told how to think. So I am interested in knowing what you think the goal of showing the public a this photo shopped picture and would love to have a mindful chat.
i think was was once like you, in the sense that i thought if i could ask a tough question that someone was unable to answer, it somehow meant that i was right, and they were wrong.
your question of, "the goal of showing the public a this photo shopped picture"
is a legitimate question, for sure.
the fact that i don't know 100% why they did it, ... is irrelevant to the fact that the picture is photoshopped.
example: a witness says he saw a man shoot another man. witness doesn't know 100% why the man shot the other man, only that theres a dead body laying there now.
but generally speaking, the reason that they keep telling you lies, is to keep you misinformed to the point of helplessness.
When Ronald Reagan became President, he had a Cabinet meeting, where he asked everyone, to go back to their respective departments, and figure out what it is that each department does, and then report back to the President,
Later, when the head of the CIA reported back to the President, on the role of the CIA, he said, quote,
"we will know our disinformation program is complete, when everything the american public knows is false"
I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm trying to have you elaborate for me so I can see it in your point of view because my brain tells me the picture is not false. But it's like you are refusing to give me that respect by refusing to answer any of my questions that I am asking in the most respectful manner. So because I am being denied an actual conversation to a person who made a statement where I assume the person wants me to think like them the best way you are going to convince me is to answer my questions but leaving me in the dark instead has my brain telling me something different and so it's unkind not answering the questions especially on a topic you are bringing up.
And if the disinformation program is complete by you knowing this picture is fake without being able to articulate your point of view then wouldn't that mean the objective is complete?
Ok this will be my last attempt to have a mindful conversation with you then I will just assume you are one of the sheep's instead. What do YOU think in YOUR own words, what the goal would be to show us this deceitful picture. I asked this same question multiple times now.
FWIW, there's a 10 second video leading up to the moment in this photo. 🤔
https://nitter.net/Suzy_NotSuzy/status/1531661408466878464#m
Nice work.
The sky is white in one, blue in the other
Different cameras.
One is a vid, the other a still.
Different shutter settings, lenses.
awesome. lets find out who the supposed photographer is, and ask them why they are photoshopping their photos.
Any actual proof the photo is shopped?
Other than just constantly repeating the claim that it's shopped?
Got any actual evidence that its a real photo?
Oh you saw it on the internet so it must be true?
Nope. I have no proof either way.
Don't particularly care.
I just noticed the timing on all the shills suddenly cropping up doing shill shit.
The guy in front does look odd in the photo. He reminds me of the "G-Man" from the old game Half-Life.
Might be from a different day?
The two men are the same, but, the background looks different in the video (and not just the sky).
Different angles, positions, perspectives, and cameras. The video shot looks like it was done with a telephoto lens, as the tan cement wall in the background looks much closer (a telephoto artifact). Same wall in background of both versions. The still pic is much better focused and has much better color saturation and was taken from a very low position (crouching) while the video was taken from a standing position. Same scene, same day.
Its photoshopped.
What would be the point in photoshopping this photo?
To show you what you want to see, when what you want to see doesnt really exist? Hopium?
https://i.redd.it/bmnkrh5gmjsy.jpg
Downvotes. Must be over the target
So Durham doesn't exist? Why even put the other guy in the photo? The photo does look off but I don't understand the point of creating it.
Prove it or gtfo op
"there are 3 classes of people.
those who see,
those who see, when shown,
those who cannot see"
Leonardo Da Vinci
https://i.redd.it/zpifbbumcmmz.png
Agreed. Completely photoshopped.
My heck these posts are a cancer.
Says the guy with no post history
Hey, don't knock Lurkers ! Lurkers gonna lurk.
It straight up looks photoshopped but the video leading right up to it seems to strongly suggest otherwise.
The lighting does look screwy like a shoop but now think it is not one.
Well I did say I don't think it is shooped.
What mistake? Regarding the lighting?
How so? Not disagreeing with you, but just want to see what you are seeing..
Once you develop an eye for photoshopped pics, you can spot them almost instantly. In this case, let your eye follow the outline of the man in the middle esp around his neck and head. The lighting is off
Tone mapping can explain this. See my other comment for a longer explanation.
The guy's neck and ear do look to be edited. But why the deception? What is the point of it? And why would people be downvoting if true? If you have a fucking theory let's hear it in plain English.
Yeah, this thing has a very "photobashed" quality to it. The lighting is all over the place. They're not casting shadows, either.
EDIT: Ah, I think I figured out why it feels so weird - everything is in focus. The frontmost male, the awning, the trashcans (?), the woman's arm... all very sharp. Durham is only slightly out of focus. Cameras don't work like this.
Look up Tone mapping. It's a real technique in photography and its built into many modern phones (which by the way have tiny sensors, easy to keep everything in focus).
Ah, tone mapping could explain at least some of the lighting issues, but I'm not convinced that the sharpness is simply a matter of a type of camera sensor. Assuming parts of this image weren't just bashed together in PhotoShop, it could be that there's some sort of AI-assistant feature in the camera software - I'm not sure, there's just something off about this image.
I saw the continuous video of Durham getting out of the car, grabbing his bag, and walking to the door. This suppressed smile happened. This just happens to be a better shot of it than the video was.
Link?
It does look photoshopped.
I thought the same thing when I first saw it- the 1st man in the picture where his head meets the awning looks like he was photo shopped.
You are correct. Dont let them gaslight you
ELA analysis of this picture looks to good to be photoshopped.
In images that are edited Error Level Analysis can detect even the slightest differences in jpg compression ratios in pictures. If this was photoshopped there would be significant white marks in the ELA version.
This was probably taken at a high (f16 or higher) aperture for the clarity of the background, a lower shutter speed which causes the slight blur of moving objects and then tone mapped by a complete dolt. The guy in front of Durham is over tone mapped. His hands and face gives it away.
So technically this photo is edited (poorly), but all of the elements were in the frame when it was taken.
Pretty much my thoughts exactly. I might even go a step further and propose this is a picture taken on a phone with automatic tone mapping. That would also explain the deep focus (caused by the small sensor).
Holy Shit! Photo Fagging! I prefer Ship Fagging, but this new one is awesome.
Durham looks alright, the guy standing to the right, near his head, seems a bit off.
Weird camera flash effect
Many phones automatically do what is called "dynamic tone mapping". They snap a quick succession of photos at several various exposures, then combine the best parts while removing the under/overexposed areas. So there technically is no "Photoshop" per se, it is all happening inside the phone's capture software. This is why both the sky is nicely exposed, and the fine details on the lawyers dark suits.
Watching the video version from another comment, this moment clearly happened, so I'd recommend you stop with the "it's photoshopped" mantra, because it only highlights your knowledge gap regarding photo capturing techniques.
It does raise the question though. Is tone mapping an image modification technique that could affect evidence used in court? Sometimes the tone mapping process can introduce color artifacts that were not in the original images. It messes with the overall integrity of brightness levels in an image, which can create an oversaturated fantasy kind of effect on an image.
100% shopped coffee guy is dead giveaway
The first man, definitely something off, but honestly I first noticed his blood ring. In fact I couldn’t notice anything else but the blood ring on his hand.
Ok I'm curious. I read the comments and don't feel comfortable clicking the link but I would like to hear it in your words. I noticed the 3 classes of people point so that part interests me. If anything I wanna know what you are thinking.
all i can say is, the photo in the OP is obviously photoshopped. i showed it to a few people "in real life" and they also agreed.
you can make of that what you will.
generally speaking, if someone is trying to deceive me, i consider them to be a bad guy.
here is another photo, hosted at the new york times, that is obviously photoshopped.
you can tell by looking at the 3 people on the left, and 1 lady on the right.
the "people" are just cut-out images, pasted onto a background. the images appear to be "layered' meaning there is a background image, with images of people laid on top.
the easiest way to see this, is to look at their feet, and then focus your eyes back and forth from foreground to background, and the front layer will POP off the page at you. once you "see" it, its impossible to NOT see...
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/blogs/thelede/posts/suspect-number-2.JPG
Interesting. What do you think the goal would be to show us this fake picture?
first, you must understand that every image in the world is fake,
in the sense that an image is merely a 2D representation of a 3D-4D world,
an image is like the shadow.
a horse is 3D-4D, but his shadow is only 2D
your brain must be programmed at a very young age, in order for you to be able to "see" images.
researchers found a boy, who was raised in a culture where images were forbidden, and showed the boy a picture of a horse,
and the boy could not "see" the horse, because his brain had never been trained to look at a shadow or image, and "see" a horse.
when they asked the boy, why he couldn't imagine the horse, the boy replied, that was is not able to walk around the other side of it.
images beget idolatry.
one of the 10 commandments, forbids the making of graven or carved images.
The Ten Commandments (Exodus 20:2-17 NKJV)
1 “I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. You shall have no other gods before Me.
2 “You shall not make for yourself a carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; you shall not bow down to them nor serve them. For I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and fourth generations of those who hate Me, but showing mercy to thousands, to those who love Me and keep My Commandments.
3 “You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain, for the Lord will not hold him guiltless who takes His name in vain.
4 “Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord your God. In it you shall do no work: you, nor your son, nor your daughter, nor your male servant, nor your female servant, nor your cattle, nor your stranger who is within your gates. For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested the seventh day. Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it.
5 “Honor your father and your mother, that your days may be long upon the land which the Lord your God is giving you.
6 “You shall not murder.
7 “You shall not commit adultery.
8 “You shall not steal.
9 “You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
10 “You shall not covet your neighbor's house; you shall not covet your neighbor's wife, nor his male servant, nor his female servant, nor his ox, nor his donkey, nor anything that is your neighbor's.”
so, because we live in a world, that is awash in images, our minds are constantly "interpreting" images, created by others, and mistaking them for realty.
we live in a made-up reality, that was made-up by... someone else.
we do not live, in our own reality.
our reality is created for us, to consume.
because the very nature of imagery, is evil,
those who create images, are evil.
the image of the beast is 666
we live in a world of smoke and mirrors.
we live in an empire of lies.
we live in a world where you can go to jail for hate speech, just for saying that men can't get pregnant.
i will share a bible verse with you.
its from the Book of Revelation, which is the very last book of The Bible.
if this verse speaks to you, please read the entire book of revelation, which is short, and can be read, in one sitting.
the verse is Revelation 1:3
Blessed is he who reads aloud,
and those who hear,
the words of the prophecy,
and who keep the things which are written in it,
for the time is near.
https://biblehub.com/revelation/1-1.htm
pass it on....
Just remember life is a mirror. Im trying to understand what your purpose in sharing this picture on the first place was. I want to know why you feel it is important like what you think the goal is. At this point I just believe you are trying to be deceiving because you will not elaborate your idea about the photoshopped picture. I will hear you out but I will not be told how to think. So I am interested in knowing what you think the goal of showing the public a this photo shopped picture and would love to have a mindful chat.
i think was was once like you, in the sense that i thought if i could ask a tough question that someone was unable to answer, it somehow meant that i was right, and they were wrong.
your question of, "the goal of showing the public a this photo shopped picture"
is a legitimate question, for sure.
the fact that i don't know 100% why they did it, ... is irrelevant to the fact that the picture is photoshopped.
example: a witness says he saw a man shoot another man. witness doesn't know 100% why the man shot the other man, only that theres a dead body laying there now.
but generally speaking, the reason that they keep telling you lies, is to keep you misinformed to the point of helplessness.
When Ronald Reagan became President, he had a Cabinet meeting, where he asked everyone, to go back to their respective departments, and figure out what it is that each department does, and then report back to the President,
Later, when the head of the CIA reported back to the President, on the role of the CIA, he said, quote,
"we will know our disinformation program is complete, when everything the american public knows is false"
I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm trying to have you elaborate for me so I can see it in your point of view because my brain tells me the picture is not false. But it's like you are refusing to give me that respect by refusing to answer any of my questions that I am asking in the most respectful manner. So because I am being denied an actual conversation to a person who made a statement where I assume the person wants me to think like them the best way you are going to convince me is to answer my questions but leaving me in the dark instead has my brain telling me something different and so it's unkind not answering the questions especially on a topic you are bringing up.
And if the disinformation program is complete by you knowing this picture is fake without being able to articulate your point of view then wouldn't that mean the objective is complete?
how to spot a sea lion
https://greatawakening.win/p/15IEOaZSTM/they-have-eyes-yet-they-cannot-s/
Ok this will be my last attempt to have a mindful conversation with you then I will just assume you are one of the sheep's instead. What do YOU think in YOUR own words, what the goal would be to show us this deceitful picture. I asked this same question multiple times now.
Awesome! Im getting tired of your shit, tbh.
Judging from the floor tiles which appear to be about 18 inches in length, the man close in front of Durham must be a fricken giant.
It appears the coffee man might be a giant. His pants seem a little short at his ankles.