1: If there is an ongoing investigation it limits what can be shown.
2: A trailer shows this.
3: They will be releasing a large data dump soon (that's what they say)
I have already called for there to be a community-wide effort when this comes out for us to divide the ping data and match them to the video footage. Basically, I would like the outcome to be a video showing the ping data map on 1 side, the drop box video on the other, with file names/timestamps and have 1 video per state show hours of footage of each mule in chronological order dumping ballots.
To reduce video footage time, we could even do a 4k video, and do a grid of 4 mules at once.
You say this as though nothing has happened, get out from under the rock and realize that all the change and "happenings" we have seen would have been "two weeks!" memed two weeks before they actually occurred. Why continue to troll when you know you are wrong.
I do know that the group that came up with all this info is working with numerous law enforcement agencies and that they have some mules as whistle blowers.
They may be limiting what Dinesh was given to use because of ongoing investigation.
The movie may have its set of issues but I think some are missing the point.
1 the movie put mules on notice
2 it is meant to get the public focused on the 2020 elections
3 people who were indicted for 2020 fraud has changed their plea to guilty in some cases
The answer to the question about the same mule stopping at multiple sites on video has been answered in Q/a sessions. There is not video because the government that setup the dropbox location did not put cameras up to observe all dropboxes even though it was required by law. A takeaway from this fact was how to organize people to directly record dropboxes where no government cameras are present.
Do not expect the government to move swiftly to correct this problem. For those benefitting from election theft, the absence of cameras in places is a feature, not a failure. Citizens need to do something about it directly.
Thanks, I misunderstood your question. The focus of the movie was to illustrate that there were a large number of mules. The movie is limited time and they wanted to show the variety of people, and how many there were all over the country. There are some videos posted on Truth Social by Philips team showing short clips of what you are asking about. Please recall though that the purpose of the video was to show how pervasive the practice is; not essentially to focus to much time on one mule.
The answer to your second point might well be they did this intentionally. As people try to debunk the movie and the investigation they will generate a list of reasons why they don’t believe it. If the answers to that list are kept in reserve, then it bolsters the credibility of the investigation when those answers are provided.
Bill Barr said this to the January 6th Unselect Committee when he panned the movie:
“If they have a lot of photographs of the same person dumping a lot of ballots in different boxes, you know that’s hard to explain.”
Now if they do, hasn’t he backed himself into a corner?
I don’t have an answer to the Moscow map question. Makes me think it might be comms.
Yeah, sure they can. How do you think infiltration starts, blatantly? No, innocently enough so that people accept it and then before you know it Biden's in the white house, the Constitution is under attack more than ever.
What do his questions matter? What difference does it make what map is used, the map isn't the point of the documentary. True The Vote/Dinesh didn't "film" the mules, it's publicly available drop box footage, so they may not have had it or may not want to expose it all on the fist release.
What's his purpose, is he trying to say it's a black hat movie, is he asking questions to debunk? That's the impression I get and why I'm calling him out on it. Right or wrong that's how I see it and way too many here just jump on the oh yeah bandwagon about anything and everything. This is how infiltration/normalization works.
This is the most important gripe I have with it. At no point in the movie does it show videos of the same mule going to multiple ballot boxes to drop in multiple mail-in ballots. Nowhere. Not once. The videos of them stashing multiple ballots are compelling, but it would have nailed it if they even included ONE video example of a mule going to multiple ballot boxes.
Dinesh has already made a short clip addressing this, after people like Shapiro made a big deal of it. He already had the smoking gun with some footage to corroborate the GPS data. Asking for more is redundant in a way. Sure, would be nice, but, the case is already very compelling without it.
I do have a little bit of sympathy for the filmmakers. Thay had a huge amount of information and needed to compress it into the length of the film. That always looks easier after you have done it than it does when you are doing it!
Also, you tend to make assumptions because you know stuff and sometimes your presentation does not present that clearly enough. Maybe if they had made the film and then stood back and looked at the whole thing they might have spotted some issues.
Having said that, I am with you. It would have been nice to see one person visiting more than one dropbox or even the same dropbox more than once. They made the point about missing cameras. I think that could have been expanded upon to show the scale of the failures.
There was so much more they could have included. We could have been told what the phone positioning data looked like, for instance, or how many ways there are of getting position data e.g. triangulation, apps, GPS etc, or the locations of the non-profits. There are lots of things they could have said so editing had to occur. It is just sad that they missed something that many users seem to have picked up on. "Seeing is believing" as they say.
Wow how many times did you watch?? Maybe watch with some friends and have this discussion?? Timestamped ad all you rock!! Maybe you could watch all of the Jan 6 footage and timestamp it for us. Looking forward to it.
I'm not saying this is the reason, but sometimes it's a strategy to reveal bits and pieces. One reasoning may be you get a bunch of people looking like fools when they point out stuff they think debunks the claim, and then more stuff is released which debunks the debunkers. Remember East Anglia climategate?
Why not take it all to court instead of charging people
$30 to see it? That is the only question to ask. I guess it’s hard to grift when there is a conclusion!
They are going to use that in the sequel 4000 Mules, will probably be out sometime in 2025.You know once they steal the election again, then we let them get away with it again, but hey, at least the meme's will be good, can't wait.
Okay troll, you probably didn't watch the movie. There is literally video evidence showing that they are coming election fraud. It's not guesswork, it's investigation. Good enough to have already created several arrests.
2 weeks!
You say this as though nothing has happened, get out from under the rock and realize that all the change and "happenings" we have seen would have been "two weeks!" memed two weeks before they actually occurred. Why continue to troll when you know you are wrong.
Jack maxey has it!
I do know that the group that came up with all this info is working with numerous law enforcement agencies and that they have some mules as whistle blowers.
They may be limiting what Dinesh was given to use because of ongoing investigation.
A lot more info to come.
The movie may have its set of issues but I think some are missing the point. 1 the movie put mules on notice 2 it is meant to get the public focused on the 2020 elections 3 people who were indicted for 2020 fraud has changed their plea to guilty in some cases
The answer to the question about the same mule stopping at multiple sites on video has been answered in Q/a sessions. There is not video because the government that setup the dropbox location did not put cameras up to observe all dropboxes even though it was required by law. A takeaway from this fact was how to organize people to directly record dropboxes where no government cameras are present.
Do not expect the government to move swiftly to correct this problem. For those benefitting from election theft, the absence of cameras in places is a feature, not a failure. Citizens need to do something about it directly.
Have a great day
Thanks, I misunderstood your question. The focus of the movie was to illustrate that there were a large number of mules. The movie is limited time and they wanted to show the variety of people, and how many there were all over the country. There are some videos posted on Truth Social by Philips team showing short clips of what you are asking about. Please recall though that the purpose of the video was to show how pervasive the practice is; not essentially to focus to much time on one mule.
https://truthsocial.com/ you can create an account.
As for videos, I will need to find and see if they can be copied elsewhere. That will take me a while as I am not so skilled working with videos.
Here ya go fren: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/06/hey-bill-barr-breaking-surveillance-video-shows-man-wearing-street-clothes-exiting-passenger-seat-post-office-truck-detroit-dumps-stack-ballots-dropbox-twice-video/
Mail trucks drive on the right side, so mail carriers can deliver mail without getting out of the car.
The answer to your second point might well be they did this intentionally. As people try to debunk the movie and the investigation they will generate a list of reasons why they don’t believe it. If the answers to that list are kept in reserve, then it bolsters the credibility of the investigation when those answers are provided.
Bill Barr said this to the January 6th Unselect Committee when he panned the movie:
“If they have a lot of photographs of the same person dumping a lot of ballots in different boxes, you know that’s hard to explain.”
Now if they do, hasn’t he backed himself into a corner?
I don’t have an answer to the Moscow map question. Makes me think it might be comms.
https://qposts.online/?q=3836&s=postnum
the movies just the snack to get your brain thinking. your brain thought it was the entree.
Well well well, looks like we got us a real live "debunker" right here among us!
With people posting garbage like this we don't need glowies or shills. Infiltration from within, sowing the seeds of doubt. Not blooming here pal.
Ok captain ‘with us or against us’. People can ask logical questions and not be shills fucker
Yeah, sure they can. How do you think infiltration starts, blatantly? No, innocently enough so that people accept it and then before you know it Biden's in the white house, the Constitution is under attack more than ever.
He is asking the right questions, this is what we do.
What do his questions matter? What difference does it make what map is used, the map isn't the point of the documentary. True The Vote/Dinesh didn't "film" the mules, it's publicly available drop box footage, so they may not have had it or may not want to expose it all on the fist release.
What's his purpose, is he trying to say it's a black hat movie, is he asking questions to debunk? That's the impression I get and why I'm calling him out on it. Right or wrong that's how I see it and way too many here just jump on the oh yeah bandwagon about anything and everything. This is how infiltration/normalization works.
Dinesh has already made a short clip addressing this, after people like Shapiro made a big deal of it. He already had the smoking gun with some footage to corroborate the GPS data. Asking for more is redundant in a way. Sure, would be nice, but, the case is already very compelling without it.
I do have a little bit of sympathy for the filmmakers. Thay had a huge amount of information and needed to compress it into the length of the film. That always looks easier after you have done it than it does when you are doing it!
Also, you tend to make assumptions because you know stuff and sometimes your presentation does not present that clearly enough. Maybe if they had made the film and then stood back and looked at the whole thing they might have spotted some issues.
Having said that, I am with you. It would have been nice to see one person visiting more than one dropbox or even the same dropbox more than once. They made the point about missing cameras. I think that could have been expanded upon to show the scale of the failures.
There was so much more they could have included. We could have been told what the phone positioning data looked like, for instance, or how many ways there are of getting position data e.g. triangulation, apps, GPS etc, or the locations of the non-profits. There are lots of things they could have said so editing had to occur. It is just sad that they missed something that many users seem to have picked up on. "Seeing is believing" as they say.
Wow how many times did you watch?? Maybe watch with some friends and have this discussion?? Timestamped ad all you rock!! Maybe you could watch all of the Jan 6 footage and timestamp it for us. Looking forward to it.
Now you what not to do when you produce your film.
Are you on TS? Or could anybody else here who is on TS ask these questions to Greg or Dinesh?
The hell you "ain't", lol. Just teasing!
My thought is that they are limiting the information disclosed in order to bait the perpetrators into "debunking".
I'm not saying this is the reason, but sometimes it's a strategy to reveal bits and pieces. One reasoning may be you get a bunch of people looking like fools when they point out stuff they think debunks the claim, and then more stuff is released which debunks the debunkers. Remember East Anglia climategate?
Why not take it all to court instead of charging people $30 to see it? That is the only question to ask. I guess it’s hard to grift when there is a conclusion!
They are going to use that in the sequel 4000 Mules, will probably be out sometime in 2025.You know once they steal the election again, then we let them get away with it again, but hey, at least the meme's will be good, can't wait.
Okay troll, you probably didn't watch the movie. There is literally video evidence showing that they are coming election fraud. It's not guesswork, it's investigation. Good enough to have already created several arrests.