Nobody has pointed out the method in which a camera correctly displays blue, then arbitrarily changes eye colours from blue to brown, while perfectly maintaining all other blue hues.

"Lack of sauce". What, do you want a birth certificate with an eye colour on it?

And that still doesn't provide any sort of explanation as to why a camera would selectively alter a specific colour in a specific region on-screen.

Now, okay, if you google this topic, you can see old news sites with dead image links that purport that in 2003 Hillary started wearing contacts to go from brown to blue. Images have been scrubbed, but articles remain including references to an original Drudge article prior to whatever happened to Drudge.

And yet, in this video we see brown eyes in 1985.

Thus, either Hillary started wearing contacts far earlier, and the media was lying in 2003. Or there have been multiple Hillaries for decades, and communist infiltration is best achieved with a rotating cast of unstable stablemares.

Either scenario indicates that somebody was lying somewhere. I never even mentioned the possibility of doubles in my original post. Just that the eyes were different.

However, from the kneejerk reaction I got, it's clear that the subject makes people feel uncomfortable, and so there's something here that needs to be dug on further.