(Context: Someone posted a Yutub clip about someone who suggested that politicians should be licensed, as a means to somehow prevent them from being corrupted, or not held accountable, or screwing up the country, etc., etc.)
TLDR: The following is a thinking out-loud fleshing out of ideas around the issues of licensing and what might replace such licensing and other systems in the future. Licensing systems are simply another means by which the Cabal lures in and then controls people by promising order and safety. The Post-Awakening world will be one where People will have to rise to the responsibility of self-governance at a more localized level, which will become the true basis for a healthy society.
Q2450
We are going to show you a new world. Those who are blind will soon see the light. A beautiful brave new world lies ahead. We take this journey together. One step at a time. WWG1WGA! Q
Are licensing systems a good idea?
Over the past century or two, more and more licensing systems have been put in place, to be run by govt. or govt designated bodies, adjudicated by the judicial system of judges and lawyers, to control what people can do what.
Seems like a great idea, right? I mean, otherwise, how are you going to ensure that people don't screw up, or make mistakes, or present themselves as competent when they aren't? Solution: sign over the means to regulate (control) activities (actions) to some unelected organization that decides who, what and where.
But no.
Under a common law system, communities and peoples are responsible to govern and regulate themselves. And in case you didn't know it, the US constitution is essentially a document that codifies the existing common law and common law principles of the time into a formal document in order to define how the US people govern themselves. It's based on common law.
Common law is rooted in the principle of people governing themselves and each other, under their inalienable rights that are created by God, not government.
As far as I can see, the only real way for humanity to coexist in harmony beyond the Great Awakening is for us to engage fully in an open, common law-based society where we govern ourselves, and never ever let 'government' become anything but us, governing ourselves - govt held accountable by the People, govt run by the People, and govt run for the People.
Licensing actually goes in the opposite direction. Licensing has become a means for the Cabal cult to control everyone and everything.
Want to drive a car? (Travel) You need OUR license. Want to practice medicine? (Healing) You need OUR license. Want to produce products that help people's health? (Make effective medicine) You need OUR license. Want to practice law? (Be involved in administering 'justice') You need OUR license. Want to be a stockbroker? You need OUR license. Wanna run a business? You need OUR license. Want to own a firearm? You need OUR license. Want to hunt? You need OUR license.
And who runs the licensing systems? People and organizations (not elected) designated by gubberment.
What does the word "license" mean?
At its basis, "a permission granted to engage in an activity". The action of licensing (verb) means to give someone official permission to do or have something.
More formally, "license" means formal permission from a governmental or other constituted authority to do something, as to carry on some business or profession.
Who grants the permission? Government, OR a government designated authority. Not God, but government and government-controlled bodies. And if you do not comply, then that activity becomes... wait for it....illegal and supposedly unlawful.
Two recent examples of the negative power of licensing
In Australia, the medical licensing system is run by AHPRA (Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency). Why? "to help protect the public by regulating Australia's registered health practitioners"
Hmmmm. "protect the public" is ALWAYS the rationale used to legitimize tyranny. Anyone with half a brain who lived through 2020/2021 now understands that. "For the public good" "keeping everyone safe"
So, during 2020 and 2021, the AHPRA regulatory (<ahem> "licensing") system was used to silence Australian doctors and nurses to prevent them from saying ANYTHING negative about the c19 mRNA injections.
Doctors were notified, officially, that they were NOT allowed to say anything to their patients that 'undermined' the government's stance of C19 or C19 "vaccines". Doctors who said anything LOST their license, aka the "permission" granted (not by God but) by government and bureaucrats to them to undertake the activity of ministering to, providing information to, and healing other human beings, aka their patients.
Let that sink in, because there is a really important lesson to learn here.
To 'qualify' as a physician in their system, you have to TOE the LINE, invest hundreds of thousands of dollars, many years of your life, and then GET permission from THEM to practice. To become a physician in their system means, basically, they own you. If you buck their control? You lose your career, your investment of wealth and life years.
Licensing systems are so very easily used as a cudgel to beat people into submission. Sadly, it's something that, as life became more complex with the development of technology and increased social interaction, the idea of licensing has crept in and taken an almost deadly grip over many of our societies.
Another example: In AUS, the TGA (Therapeutic Goods Administration - who <ahem> is funded by the corporations they give licenses aka "permission" to) decided that HCQ and Ivermectin, etc, could NOT be prescribed for C19 treatment.
They could be prescribed for other conditions, but if a doctor tried to prescribe them for C19 patients, they lost their license.
From what I have learned in the last two years, the legal "profession" is essentially the same. Lawyers are controlled via a licensing system, a system that regulates and keeps them under control in the system. Is it any wonder the whole system is so corrupt, when it is essentially founded on control and coercion? Buck that system? Lose your license.
What are the alternatives?
If licensing is such a bad system, vulnerable to so much corruption and abuse and concentration of unelected power, what should we, the People do?
A common law system, not licensed by a corrupted legal establishment aka not controlled by judges & lawyers who control the system, but by common law courts and people keeping themselves and each other accountable, is essentially sufficient to keep people in check.
Healer hurts a patient? They can be held accountable. Someone drives a car like an idiot? They can be held accountable.
When one considers the facts about how our governments have been corporatized, and the Cabal cult has been using maritime law to undermine and gain control over our societies via "law", debt and slavery, the need for true common law systems becomes clear and obvious.
Common law is the law of the land. It is rooted in and reflects God's law, not laws created by some corporatized legal body. And the Cabal hates it because without their legalized slavery system, they have no control over us. Remember, the US Constitution is in essence a codification of common law principles. The Common Law foundation is that powerful.
Under common law principle, the only permission you require to engage in an action is the permission from others who you engage with and affect. Mutual agreements are sufficient to establish businesses. The only permission you require to practice medicine or heal is the permission from those you treat.
But also, under common law, you are accountable when you violate or injure others. You are accountable to them, not to some faceless government or unelected bureaucrat. As long as you don't harm others, you are free to do as you will.
It seems to me that licensing systems were created within the maritime law framework to be used as one means among many to control the population. On the surface, they may look like a good idea, but in the long run, they undermine our God-given sovereignty.
Standing on common law won't be easy. It will mean stepping up to be responsible and to govern ourselves. We won't be able to play video games for hours, watch TV all the time, ignore our neighbours and let others run our community and country for us.
The licensing system seems very attractive. Let some "competent authority" make the decisions for us, and ensure other human beings don't screw us over. However, like all such temptations, the licensing systems give people a false sense of security, herding them into thinking that they didn't have to govern themselves or each other, but that they could let someone else - some 'authority' - do all the work.
Trust a doctor? Talk with your neighbors and community or friends to find out who is a good doctor and who isn't? Nah. Forget that. Just trust the Licensing Agency. Easy Peasy.
But most of us know that the easy path is usually NOT the path to happiness or well being. The easy path is most often one that offers convenience or ease now at the sacrifice of the future. Easy now, but in the future, unhappiness, dissatisfaction and regret.
Licensing signs over the process of keeping ourselves (our communities, and societies) accountable to unelected "authorities" who then rule over us, so that we ourselves don't have to do it.
Fast track to 2020 where Klaus and the gang say, "Hey, let us control everything. You sit back, and enjoy owning nothing. Life will be great. We promise." Do you see? Licensing systems are essentially part of the same philosophy and same demonic direction.
And in 2020? Wanna open your business during lockdown? We'll pull your license.
The Future is Ours to Build.
Today, city life is typically one where people do not know each other very much, or rely on each other or serve each other, but instead buy foods, goods and everything else from corporations. Non-city areas are primarily administered by government corporations and their cronies.
Churches and places of worship have traditionally been an important key venue for building localized community. Sadly, however, many, if not most churches today have become highly corporatized, thus 'licensed' to practice in a certain way. If they refuse to comply with government, they lose their license, their permission to not pay taxes.
How Many churches in Australia complied with lockdown mandates, masking and social distancing mandates, and essentially bowed down to government instead of God? A lot, if not most, I can tell you.
The new world we create post-Great Awakening is going to be very, very different. It has to be. And, I think we have to get used to the fact that it's not going to be simply 'easy', but it will be good.
The main thing is that, under God's guidance, we will have to work hard on the things that matter, aka our relationships with God, with ourselves, and with each other, primarily to become truly self-governing people.
Our societies will need to grasp that there is no real freedom without responsibility, and then actually practice that truth starting from home and in our local communities. No more outsourcing all the hard work to career politicians, to bureaucratic boards and 'officials', to massive corporations, or to licensing bodies.
As far as I can see, in the future, our societies will become much more localized. Government is a beast that must be tamed and limited, restricted from thinking IT is the ruler. Likewise, instead of highly centralized systems, like cities, healthy and prosperous societies will be much more grounded in the local level, rooted in decentralized communities that live and work together.
I know some people think that when all this tribulation and chaos in the world is resolved, that Christ will wave a magic wand and make everything good for us. But has that EVER been the case? Is believing in Christ and following Christ the EASY way, or is it something we have to work hard at, every day?
In my opinion, the Kingdom of Heaven is not something that God will simply grant to us. Rather, the Kingdom of God on Earth is something we will build, one relationship, one service, one day at a time.
Like a good marriage or a healthy family, building the Kingdom will take painstaking effort, diligence, responsibility and love.
The Grace of our Father is that He will open the door, through salvation. Christ will show us the way and give us the strength to truly rise to our full potential as his children; as individuals, as families, as communities, as societies, and as a world. But the work will be ours, and we'll reap the rewards. And the only permission we will need is God's.
I think this applies to all kinds of governmental regulations, not just licensing.
Yes, I agree, basically.
Yep, I call it the tyranny of bureaucracy, regulations, rules, codes “health & safety” and “guidelines” are used to stifle free enterprise or self reliance and innovation
Don't Forget...Those who WRITE THE CODE are the ones DOING the CONTROLLING!!!...
I am of the mind that if the governing body instills "their" view on the rest of us then that code is done away with.
ITERATIVE enhancements, like in engineering, go along way in providing a solution...
Take out the "middle managers"!!!
Absolutely agree. The amount of times I’ve heard management used as an excuse to carry out instructions that people know to be wrong…
I like this.
It is posts like this that keep me coming here. But they few and far between. Great ideas to work from. My wife and I were married but never got permission from government. We just did it. Who do they think they are to be on the same level as God?
Love this. "Marriage license" is a contract with the state. But true marriage is a covenant with God.
Licensing is stupid! I live in California and what do you think lead to Cabal control of education and the “Elite” fields that control social outcomes?! Licensing! And every Blue State has copied the same educational outcome. No longer is just work/life experience given ANY merit. So licensing has destroyed teaching, and all human/social services, even partially the medical field, only allowing those that had enough money/financing to weather the long storm of not only getting a Masters, PHD, or MD, but then 3+ years more just to be licensed! And then these people get to make all the policy decisions based on their own “professional” bias, not on true life/work experience that most front-line employees seem to have over their Managers and Directors. Nope. I would personally work hard to stomp out that idea.
No our Congress should be 40% professional, and 60% directly from the common people as long as they have some College Education, are of age to run, and are chosen by their peers/constituents to represent them. And I’ve always felt it should cost near $0 to run to be a public servant. It needs to return back to being of We The People’s Choice only for that area/constituent base. Not the media’s favorite choice Ever! I’m not knocking them but too many doctors and attorneys control our current Congress because they’re the only ones that can afford to run. And we are in the mess we’re in over greed and only wealthy people’s desires, not for the good of the majority of We The People.
It is and isn't. Part of community living means having some community standards. The concept makes sense, but in present state is better to be abolished.
I agree my friend. That’s why having some college education and being of a certain age is in our constitution. But licensing in my bias book here in Cali is a big F-you to just college and especially good old life experience merit. I’ve been supervised by dunces straight out of Masters college with a fancy license from that only 3 years total work experience to be licensed. And they think they know it all over front line employees with just Masters but 20plus years field experience. And they got passed over for those “supervising” jobs just because 1 the dunce had a license, and 2 the dunce was willing to be a “Yes Man/Ma’am”, instead of having solid years of experience to make decisions.
It’s like the life expectancy of a 1st Lt. in combat vs a 1st Sgt. It’s rarely the 1st Sgt. That gets the platoon killed.
But here is the thing. Community standards have been superseded by govt, both at the local, state and federal levels. Communities do not get together to decide what is good for them or what suits them. They are ruled over by others who are not engaged on their level.
But the blame lies primarily with US. When we, the People disengage and think, let someone else run the show, then the servants begin to embezzle, and the stewards usurp their masters.
Very good. Licensing is waaay out of control.
The idea makes sense, but at this point in time, all regulations need to be rescinded. There is wisdom in establishing medical standards and other standards, but you are right that those standards need to be accountable and so too are those administering them.
I think one fix will solve all these issues: regulations must be simple to follow and understand. If it's more than one side of 8 1/2 by 11 in paper 12pt double spaced, it's automatically unconstitutional.
If people on Twatter can communicate with 250 characters, government can govern with small, easy laws. Oh and all laws go through judicial review before taking effect.
If the standards are administered by the People through accountable representatives, then its OK. I think, however, a lot of standards could be managed on the local level. Is this area Ok for framing? Community decides. Is it cool to hun there? Community decides. Etc.
Localization was skipped over, and people jumped straight from the lower levels (Clan, community, ethnic community) of engagement and responsibility to the higher levels (society, nation, world).
This is why the United Nations is to corrupt. The idea is solid: nations getting together to support each other and work together.
But it was implemented without the foundations of local, community, ethnic community, social, and national-level unity and cohesion. This, it is hijacked.
Everything starts from the individual and the family. The higher levels of interaction will never function properly unless the lower levels are secured.
Totally agree. With hindsight I wish we had just let the "gay" community have a marriage license as long as we didn,t have to. WOW that would have set a few cats amongst the pigeons.
Government ordained marriage is unconstitutional.
Yeah, I recommend doing you do. Ot co tract with the government by getting a license. Get married in a private ceremony and contract with each other through your vows.
Yes, this is the way to run cities & the way they have been run for millennia, have our own networks - ask around for who does what. BTW my plumber or more than 20 years just retired, I got him by word of mouth & he was NOT LICENCED! Every now & then he may need a buddy who has a license for something but I don't think that happened more than once in a quarter century. He's a great guy, always fixed everything & sometimes when I called him up to tell him about the problem. We'd discuss it some & more than once he told me what to do so he didn't need to come. He always had more work than he could handle & I guess he was cheap. I had to replace a water heater lately & it cost me more than double what he used to charge!
But yes, this is the way to run things. It is the natural way. You use the connections you have & ask around. Police & fire too, you know. Everyone is a police person, likewise with fire. If you see a problem you don't walk away cold hearted you do something about it & call for others who can as well. This is how society has run itself since we have had society.
Very good point
I think you've got it. This is where I see our future societies headed. Once the insanity of the corporate cabal system is dismantled, we'll have to build new things and new ways, by drawing on historical foundations but with a new sense of vision.
They should workndorecy for heir states and BE PAID BY THEIR HOME STATE.
they also should get a public review for recall every year.
If they do stupid shit in the mean time they can be fired and a new person replaces them by vote.
Doctors are licensed, it didn't stop them from poisoning millions of people. Govern yourself and take direction from Jesus, all will be fine.
Well, that's the point. The licensing was actually utilized as a weapon against doctors speaking out.
I was (I guess I still am) a Massage Therapist, and about 15 years ago the state introduced "licensing" as a "way to get rid of massage parlors" (sex massage). All the therapists around me were cheering!! YAY! They will clean up the businesses!!! I told them, no they won't. However now the government has control over what we do and how we do it. Plus it will be more expensive to be an MT, because we will have to pay the government to do what we do. "NO! NO! No!" they said. "It'll be worth the extra money to get rid of the massage parlors!!" they said. HA! Look who's right!! Now they all complain about the state requirements to be an MT, the money they have to pay to relicense (that keeps going up), and guess what? There are still just as many massage parlours as there were before. Probably more since there was a bunch of them busted before licensing came to be (so coincidental, right???) then after licensing... none. So weird.
Exactly.
Licensing is a system for increasing the power of the state and reducing the power of the individual and/or the people.
And logically, I think, yes, there would be MORE massage parlors because they have now been given the air of legitimacy via the licensing system.
Intellectual property does need to be protected to some degree.
But how? How can licensing, for example, be used to protect intellectual property?
Tesla had the right idea.
What was Tesla's view on it? Something like entertainment, like books, music, etc. should be protected. If I write and publish a few songs, I don't want someone else to easily be able to basically put their name on them and sell them, making a profit off my work.
I guess I was referring to Tesla who didn't patent his work, but gave it away free, for humanity.
Private licensing it something that would work. Like, you create a license to some who then on-sells your work, etc. Surely creative work could be handled in such a way. And copyright isn't licensing, is it?
The main problem, I think, government and other govt designated bureaucratic bodies issuing and controlling licensing for activities that by rights, humans are all free to do, as long as they do not harm or infringe on the rights of others.
I'm thinking hunting, for example. If a community that exists in and therefore oversees a particular area or region, they could be the ones to administer how hunting works in that area. Not state or federal govt.
I think Cryptocurrency governance will take over the stockholder governance that we see now, it is just a much better system.
I'm also hopeful that we could modify the house of reps to either peg to the population of the country (similar to how it was in the 1780s, about 1 rep per 50,000 people on average. We now have 750,000+ people per Rep.) and/or cut the power of the House of Reps on certain laws and allow people to vote on certain laws not (not pertaining to tax increases) through internet and Blockchain. Not everyone would be able to vote on these issues automatically but it can be obtainable in several ways and earned.
I think the problem I've seen in history and modern day is that tyranny only comes about when power is concentrated into the hands of a few. Whether it be the power of a small number of politicians or the power of an ultra rich few to manipulate the politicians and country.
Power concentrated in the hands of a few is bad but power decentralized and gradually handed over to people over time makes for a fairer system and one that is better governed.
The problem is the average person anywhere in the world is FUCKING STUPID when given power and they don't understand how to responsibly and wisely guard the use of that power. So it can't be given out to everyone all at once to people who don't respect power and don't responsibly use it. It has to be a gradual change that is still consistently becoming more decentralized and the power shared among more people.
A monarchy is only good if the person in power is the most capable to rule in the country. The problem is that families of monarchies are always in danger especially if their family falls from rule. So the monarchy is passed on from family members which leads to corruption and erosion of institutions over time as families take the power for granted and they become more incompetent. Not to mention court politics and having to worry about backstabbers stealing the throne.
A Republic is only good if you have a population that takes responsibility and shares the weight of power. If the population takes things for granted and shirks off their responsibilities like we see today, corrupt politicians and corporations are eager to grab up the power the people give away freely. This is what is happening now, this is the core of the problem in our society today. The people must take responsibility by wielding and sharing the weight of power struggle to create a better future.
Nice spiel. Irrefutably true.