(also note - I did post this last night but it was late - I expect easily missed - not trying to postfag here)
Edit: BTW - the money quote from the Prologue:
"In this Reconstitution series we will be demonstrating with historical facts, not conjecture or theories, but with documented proof of Trump’s plan to return the EOP and our government back to the constitution (Reconstitution). There is no need to guess whether or not some Presidential Emergency Action Document (PEAD) exists or if Trump enacted some other secret actions to remain the Commander in Chief (CIC). Biden is, in fact, fully the President of the United States and fully the Commander in Chief. However, the President-King’s throne that we have all grown so accustomed to, has been removed. Biden stole an office that doesn’t want him, doesn’t need him, and is very different than what he was expecting."
Ok, looking forward to reading the whole thing but wanted to comment that based on your comment it reminded me of what I was thinking at the time Trump stepped down. That it was a giant game of musical chairs and while they were preoccupied stealing what they thought was going to be THE chair, Trump changed the game and the chair they occupy is meaningless once the music stops.
Biden is, in fact, fully the President of the United States and fully the Commander in Chief. However, the President-King’s throne that we have all grown so accustomed to, has been removed. Biden stole an office that doesn’t want him, doesn’t need him, and is very different than what he was expecting."
That then implies Trump is head of nothing and is doing nothing, letting other people do whatever they want.
Really good contribution here. Don’t apologize for posting it twice. Do a daily update until it breaks through the noise. Deport yourself and request a sticky.
You need a better title. If you hadn't posted again, I was going to repost the link with the post title "Better than Patel Patriot's Devolution. Click it. Don't thank me, thank Q."
Congress has used its constitutional power to declare war five times in the nation’s history: the War of 1812, the Mexican-American War, the Spanish-American War, World War I, and World War II. Since World War II, the United States has never actually declared war, despite our being at near-constant war since the days of the Truman administration.
The WOII never ended as no peace treaty is in place with the German Reich. Even the unconditional surrender is not de jure, since it was signed by, if memory serves me well, Jodl, while the head of the State: Adm. Dönitz should have been the signee. So, the war continues ....
Declare victory and go home ... is not the same as a peace treaty. The phrase merely indicates a cessation of hostile hot war.
Also note that subtle difference: we are not at war with the people of country X, but with it's regime.
I think you are confused. The final instrument of surrender was signed by the allied powers, the Soviet Union, and Field Marshal Wilhelm Keitel as representative of the Flensburg government headed by Doenitz. Jodl succeeded Keitel after Keitel's arrest. No peace treaty? Splitting up Germany and supervising its future life is a reasonable approximation. The NATO treaty is a peace treaty. Splitting imaginary hairs is pointless.
It is not about hairsplitting. It is what it is, read the book on the Control Authority. That is the source. Not some outside narrative.
BRD is an administrative corporation that still has to fulfill its prime objective namely a democratic election in which the German explicitly can choose a Constitution. For that to happen, de admin Corp must be dissolved. That is the reason why the German Reich institutions are still alive. Furthermore, BRD is treated AS an expression of sovereign will of the people, whereas it is not in a sovereign state. (See: Kanzler Brief).
So, there is no peace-treaty and the soil is still occupied territory.
The fact the BRD was incorporated into NATO was just a geopolitical move.....
Deep within the Archives of the Bundestag, concerning the unification of the two admin corps: BRD and DDR, is a doc with the real situation: BRD has not a real State, the so called nationality is fake, and the Bundesgerman nationality is not a nationality, as Germans are still Nationals of the German Reich
Well, I don't know. I've been pondering this very thing. PP's research does basically depend on an axiom - essentially that with all this stuff put into place, surely something has resulted from it. All of it is (an admittedly vast amount of) documentation of things in place that COULD lead to an outcome, not actual "here we see Trump is doing this" "the military is doing that" etc.
These guys are saying they have the evidence/documentation for a contrary take on how this is actually going - things that are apparently actually happening. I suppose we will see if one or the other ends up right, or elements of both (or potentially, of course, neither).
Edit: Interestingly, it was brought up in thread here:
High quality writing. Trying to work out what to make of that. I think it is a good thing, it certainly talks of proper editorial processes (use of editors and sub-editing or maybe verification processes). It'll be interesting to see if that is maintained or if that is just high polish for the first post. Overall, compelling and gives me hope. But then I am up and down on hope like a crack whore hitting the pipe after every BJ. So that doesn't necessarily mean anything.
Just finished reading all 3 parts. I admit, I'm rather pissed off at the crap that has been pulled over on the American people. Eager to continue reading the series. It's easily laid out in simple language. I do question the use of "wikipedia" so many times as a source.
I noticed that too - I think WP is generally reliable on topics like they are referencing - dry, factual, obviously someone with knowledge had to create them and probably watches/maintains them. It's the ones where you can tell there's a leftist slant that are more bothersome.
And yeah, the subtle erosion over the years...infuriating...yet this is what we're up against, the DS has always known if America falls that's it, and so how do you do that? Well we're ostensibly allies with Europe (possibly actually controlled by Britain), we basically defeated USSR by finally letting it collapse, and China is a huge country with world-domination ambitions (it's even in their culture - they view China as the "middle kingdom" - between earth and heaven so better than everyone else). So build THEM up and have them infiltrate this country, and "you are here."
Edit: here I mean DS like we normally do, the long-running cabal, not as they are using it more in the "inside the US gov't deep state."
Part 1: https://17sog.substack.com/p/the-47-ronin
(also note - I did post this last night but it was late - I expect easily missed - not trying to postfag here)
Edit: BTW - the money quote from the Prologue:
"In this Reconstitution series we will be demonstrating with historical facts, not conjecture or theories, but with documented proof of Trump’s plan to return the EOP and our government back to the constitution (Reconstitution). There is no need to guess whether or not some Presidential Emergency Action Document (PEAD) exists or if Trump enacted some other secret actions to remain the Commander in Chief (CIC). Biden is, in fact, fully the President of the United States and fully the Commander in Chief. However, the President-King’s throne that we have all grown so accustomed to, has been removed. Biden stole an office that doesn’t want him, doesn’t need him, and is very different than what he was expecting."
Ok, looking forward to reading the whole thing but wanted to comment that based on your comment it reminded me of what I was thinking at the time Trump stepped down. That it was a giant game of musical chairs and while they were preoccupied stealing what they thought was going to be THE chair, Trump changed the game and the chair they occupy is meaningless once the music stops.
Apparently a potentially very perceptive thought indeed.
That then implies Trump is head of nothing and is doing nothing, letting other people do whatever they want.
United States Inc.
Yes, the corporation of the United States of America.
The first sentence does, yes. The other two, on the other hand, contradict this.
Sounds like an oxymoron.
Really good contribution here. Don’t apologize for posting it twice. Do a daily update until it breaks through the noise. Deport yourself and request a sticky.
I dunno, self-deporting is like "This is God. Quit touching yourself"
If you want to deport, I'd appreciate it of course :)
You need a better title. If you hadn't posted again, I was going to repost the link with the post title "Better than Patel Patriot's Devolution. Click it. Don't thank me, thank Q."
Done.
For the devolution folks out there, this is your “why”, from a historical perspective. I’m going to be watching this closely.
Just subscribed, will definitely follow!
+1 for the Real Genius reference!
Part Two now available:
https://17sog.substack.com/p/into-the-shadows?utm_source=email
Tons of sources, tons to chew on.
Ha, just got the update email as it turns out - my Outlook was stuck on "send/receive error" which happens when the PC is asleep. Thanks!
Good read. Looking forward to other parts in the series. Thanks for sharing!
The WOII never ended as no peace treaty is in place with the German Reich. Even the unconditional surrender is not de jure, since it was signed by, if memory serves me well, Jodl, while the head of the State: Adm. Dönitz should have been the signee. So, the war continues ....
Declare victory and go home ... is not the same as a peace treaty. The phrase merely indicates a cessation of hostile hot war.
Also note that subtle difference: we are not at war with the people of country X, but with it's regime.
I think you are confused. The final instrument of surrender was signed by the allied powers, the Soviet Union, and Field Marshal Wilhelm Keitel as representative of the Flensburg government headed by Doenitz. Jodl succeeded Keitel after Keitel's arrest. No peace treaty? Splitting up Germany and supervising its future life is a reasonable approximation. The NATO treaty is a peace treaty. Splitting imaginary hairs is pointless.
Thanks for the additions.
It is not about hairsplitting. It is what it is, read the book on the Control Authority. That is the source. Not some outside narrative.
BRD is an administrative corporation that still has to fulfill its prime objective namely a democratic election in which the German explicitly can choose a Constitution. For that to happen, de admin Corp must be dissolved. That is the reason why the German Reich institutions are still alive. Furthermore, BRD is treated AS an expression of sovereign will of the people, whereas it is not in a sovereign state. (See: Kanzler Brief).
So, there is no peace-treaty and the soil is still occupied territory.
The fact the BRD was incorporated into NATO was just a geopolitical move.....
Deep within the Archives of the Bundestag, concerning the unification of the two admin corps: BRD and DDR, is a doc with the real situation: BRD has not a real State, the so called nationality is fake, and the Bundesgerman nationality is not a nationality, as Germans are still Nationals of the German Reich
The difference between de jure and de facto.
Thanks PePeSee!
Great post. Looking forward to following this one. So not just another 4 year election? 😉
Thanks for sharing, but this just further cements in my mind that literally no one knows whats going on anymore
I agree with you on this. A lot of theories out there.
Does this throw a wrench in Patel’s Research ?
Well, I don't know. I've been pondering this very thing. PP's research does basically depend on an axiom - essentially that with all this stuff put into place, surely something has resulted from it. All of it is (an admittedly vast amount of) documentation of things in place that COULD lead to an outcome, not actual "here we see Trump is doing this" "the military is doing that" etc.
These guys are saying they have the evidence/documentation for a contrary take on how this is actually going - things that are apparently actually happening. I suppose we will see if one or the other ends up right, or elements of both (or potentially, of course, neither).
Edit: Interestingly, it was brought up in thread here:
https://truthsocial.com/@patelpatriot/posts/108830463668983381
High quality writing. Trying to work out what to make of that. I think it is a good thing, it certainly talks of proper editorial processes (use of editors and sub-editing or maybe verification processes). It'll be interesting to see if that is maintained or if that is just high polish for the first post. Overall, compelling and gives me hope. But then I am up and down on hope like a crack whore hitting the pipe after every BJ. So that doesn't necessarily mean anything.
ThanQ for posting this info. Makes sense that the deep state has been in the making for many years.
Just finished reading all 3 parts. I admit, I'm rather pissed off at the crap that has been pulled over on the American people. Eager to continue reading the series. It's easily laid out in simple language. I do question the use of "wikipedia" so many times as a source.
I noticed that too - I think WP is generally reliable on topics like they are referencing - dry, factual, obviously someone with knowledge had to create them and probably watches/maintains them. It's the ones where you can tell there's a leftist slant that are more bothersome.
And yeah, the subtle erosion over the years...infuriating...yet this is what we're up against, the DS has always known if America falls that's it, and so how do you do that? Well we're ostensibly allies with Europe (possibly actually controlled by Britain), we basically defeated USSR by finally letting it collapse, and China is a huge country with world-domination ambitions (it's even in their culture - they view China as the "middle kingdom" - between earth and heaven so better than everyone else). So build THEM up and have them infiltrate this country, and "you are here."
Edit: here I mean DS like we normally do, the long-running cabal, not as they are using it more in the "inside the US gov't deep state."
Looks like it will be worth saving for lifetime use!
Saving for later thanks
Hmm, random stuff pasted together to make this "article"
no real read line if you actually read it.
"Biden is, in fact, fully the President of the United States and fully the Commander in Chief. " - that made my day : )
i would love to see the name and the face of the anon who made it. Would make more sense.