One of the multiple meanings of 11.3 - the original meaning - is podesta getting arrested.
There is no reason for Biden to bring in Clinton's people when he is running Hussein's show. So looks like a change of guard is happening.
Why would they bring Clinton faces now? I am guessing for exposure.
Putting those two together, what better way than to expose Clinton Foundation via exposing Podesta on the day much connected to him by Q, just before Midterms ?
Been a long damn movie, but the plot keeps deepening. I am soooo glad I am not in DC anymore. Tons of people are going to be crushed when the hammer comes down.
What time did Washington Post publish their article? The Guardian? Countless other media sources? Why should their timing matter less than the New York Times? Seems like trying too hard to find signals in the noise.
What I'm getting at is: The connection made in the truth/tweet was insignificant.
I don't doubt that the New York Times posted it at 1:13, and that that time does line up as he says. My issue is that if you cherry-pick one specific time among many because it works for your purpose, you're only finding what you want to see. I thought that was clear in my comment.
Honestly I didn't think it was necessary because if they were significant they would have been noted by the person who made the NYT connection. Unless that happened to be the only article he read, and he doesn't strike me a NYT fan.
As far as proving my point, I think it's up to people to research for themselves before accepting something as significant just because it gives them warm fuzzy feelings.
But if this helps anyone, here's a random sampling of article publish times
The NYT didn't even claim to break it in the provided snapshot, so it looks like it was an attempt to give more significance to the coincidence. I wouldn't trust that source anymore.
Aren't you the same anon who posted this in defense of Alan Dershowitz?
To be fair, it wasn't a flight to lolita island, so it's not nearly as damning as some make it out to be. On the other hand, the fact that he ever even took a ride on that plane shows a familiarity between them.
Why are you trying too hard to exonerate pedos in the most ambiguous ways possible?
Now if this article is a "nod to people paying attention" what does that operation look like? Who would the author be connected to that would tell her to post at exactly that time?
Lol I'm starting to wonder if THINK MIRROR means everything we thought was going to happen is actually in reverse and this is the Democrats playbook inverted
(I'm joking but this is starting to get depressing)
I have a feeling something will happen with Podesta, very publicly on Nov 3rd
Just a simple deduction.
One of the multiple meanings of 11.3 - the original meaning - is podesta getting arrested.
There is no reason for Biden to bring in Clinton's people when he is running Hussein's show. So looks like a change of guard is happening.
Why would they bring Clinton faces now? I am guessing for exposure.
Putting those two together, what better way than to expose Clinton Foundation via exposing Podesta on the day much connected to him by Q, just before Midterms ?
To claim Podesta is one of “Clinton’s people” is a little short sighted.
Tony Podesta was paid a very large sum of money by Huawei to lobby the Biden White House to remove Huawei from the blacklist.
John Podesta was Obama’s senior advisor starting in 2008 when he was the Obama-Biden transition chair.
Wake up time for normies! 😱
Is this the best movie ever or what!?! 💥
Been a long damn movie, but the plot keeps deepening. I am soooo glad I am not in DC anymore. Tons of people are going to be crushed when the hammer comes down.
Yes, glad you're outta there fren! Praying for all of our family in harm's way! Stay safe everyone!
Maybe the reason they’re reintroducing his name back into the public.
If Huma comes to light 11.6 might mean something as well. Is Huma in the news yet?
u/#kekekekek
u/#oaoeiei
Just don’t let him get his hands on that kind of money. These people are sick. God please protect the Children!
u/#q4388
this seems significant.
What time did Washington Post publish their article? The Guardian? Countless other media sources? Why should their timing matter less than the New York Times? Seems like trying too hard to find signals in the noise.
Instead of saying "it could be wrong", why don't you find the evidence to support your doubt?
What I'm getting at is: The connection made in the truth/tweet was insignificant.
I don't doubt that the New York Times posted it at 1:13, and that that time does line up as he says. My issue is that if you cherry-pick one specific time among many because it works for your purpose, you're only finding what you want to see. I thought that was clear in my comment.
Not at all.
I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm saying you've yet to prove it.
Why not find a collection of articles with times that prove your point?
Honestly I didn't think it was necessary because if they were significant they would have been noted by the person who made the NYT connection. Unless that happened to be the only article he read, and he doesn't strike me a NYT fan.
As far as proving my point, I think it's up to people to research for themselves before accepting something as significant just because it gives them warm fuzzy feelings.
But if this helps anyone, here's a random sampling of article publish times
Politico - 12:08 PM EDT
WaPo - 1:42 p.m. EDT
CNN - 1:54 PM ET
Fox - 4:08pm EDT
NBC - 7:17 PM UTC
There's no sources. Strange that you would go through the trouble and not include the hyperlinks.
Stranger things have happened.
If you were hoping to "gotcha" me by showing that the NYT article "broke" the story as the truth/tweet indicated, then sorry to disappoint.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/02/gina-mccarthy-climate-adviser-00054677
The NYT didn't even claim to break it in the provided snapshot, so it looks like it was an attempt to give more significance to the coincidence. I wouldn't trust that source anymore.
Aren't you the same anon who posted this in defense of Alan Dershowitz?
Why are you trying too hard to exonerate pedos in the most ambiguous ways possible?
God no
Has anyone seen him alive lately?
No.
Now if this article is a "nod to people paying attention" what does that operation look like? Who would the author be connected to that would tell her to post at exactly that time?
Also adds up to 1:13=14
14 fish pic anyone?
Podesta the molesta'.
This doesn’t mean anything, it’s a coincidence guys. 😏
ELI5 what does this mean? What do you predict will happen?
Lol I'm starting to wonder if THINK MIRROR means everything we thought was going to happen is actually in reverse and this is the Democrats playbook inverted
(I'm joking but this is starting to get depressing)
As in q is a psyop by the DS! Now that would be depressing lol