Responding to an NPC is not futile, as there are often countless silent lurkers reading your posts. Here are some responses to common attacks to the Q movement.
(media.greatawakening.win)
💊 HANDY RED PILL 💊
This is one of the best posts here in a long time
Clear, concise, powerful.
Than Q!
I forgot to add an argument of "Q makes failed predictions" as i hear that a lot. My response would have been "There are numerous times when Q seemed to accurately know the future, like when he said (Senator McCain) would make headlines, exactly 30 days before his death...to the minute! I would mention that this may be a ten year plan. These types of statements are consistent with the various times when DJT has also made statements that don't seem to have happened or make sense yet. ("Like I caught them all!")
Any chance you could trim this into frames so it could be shared on FB? Facebook doesn't play well with long images.
Hopefully you have an original with a higher rez and crisper text too!
You can use the snipping tool on your computer if you have Windows, that's what I would do. Takes like 3 seconds and you can take whole segments of your screen like making a selection in a paint program.
Yeah that would work but the text is pretty bury so hoping he has a higher res version.
Agreed. I regret I only have one updoot to give.
I was thinking the exact same thing, brilliant post. Much needed for people that have a hard time articulating the movement .
wow, thanks! Bookmarked this post 👍
and for the accusations of complacency, post 3748 specifically said, "Do not mistake this backchannel [tool] as a means to be complacent."
u/#q3748
Very good. Thank you
So good. Well done.
Very good… well written. Saving this.
Excellent post Anon. This is exactly what Q is about if only people would research it themselves. So for those who don’t take the time to do that your outline gives them a quick review
My thoughts exactly. When I am debating a person I know will refuse to wake up, I switch my focus in my heart to those watching the exchange. I play for them, not the person I'm debating.
Excellent post, saved!
Wait! This isn't a cult? Damn! I was hoping for koolaid at the end of this thing. KEK
Powerful infographic, nice work. 1 quibble, no mention of 4chan.
So the better course would be not to wake up? Not to see the truth? Not to resist for fear of losing? It wouldn't be the ultimate torture to persist in slavery or worse? They don't just want us dead, they want to kill us and eat us?
Curious how the only rational course of action corresponds to your fearful theory.
As a professional theorist, I will let you in on a few things.
First, a useful theory must explain not only the things we think we understand, but also the things we heretofore have not understood. Your theory would serve to explain only things that are imagined, And it cannot be verified.
Second, a useful theory must enable the prediction of events described by the theory, or it is only a post facto theory (from the present to the past).
Your theory (that "they" are trying to get us to awaken and see the truth) implies that we must get on board with their project and hasten it along. If they are performing evil, how can that be so? Your theory arrives at an ethical contradiction: we must assure that those who mean us harm are successful---so we can defeat them. "They," of course, are completely unaware of these considerations.
All of which indicates to me that this is not a useful theory. I know every theory has a proud father, but some are Ugly Babies, nevertheless.
No need for theories when you can look back at the playbook. They are trying to run back the same ideological battle that justified WWII. Communism vs the Nazism they’re hoping to provoke. And whether you like it or not, Operation Trust was a thing, a trap posing as anti-communists for the singular purpose of being able to identity the anti-communists so that they could be rounded up and gulaged and/or exterminated.
That’s a legitimate concern surrounding the motive of Q and it won’t be disproven until this whole fantasy is resolved one way or the other.
Well said. it’s a worthy threat worth contemplating.
You can only disprove an affirmation, not a negative. What do you think you would be proving? Theories cannot be proven, only used or rejected for being useless. But it is a step forward that you are swearing off theories.
Operation Trust involved a large population of known figures who had been turned in their loyalty in order to lure others. I don't see that pattern in the Q movement. Who is Q? Nobody knows. Has anyone been lured on the strength of personal trust? I doubt it. Do we trust Donald Trump? I think so, and for good reasons.
Also, Operation Trust resulted in a hall of mirrors, where the Soviet government lost track of the ball. Just as seems to be happening with you.
You have to ignore all the reasons not to trust Donald Trump though. The possible tactic being deployed here is that the MSM go way overboard in their criticism of him knowing that there are those who will have an automatic, Pavlovian response to what they say and take up the opposite position with extra zeal.
In this manner, they can shepherd you into holding mindsets and beliefs you might otherwise not adopt.
Also, I reject your general demeanour of positioning yourself as someone more knowledgable than others on this topic when you just aren’t. You have no idea either but you are closed off to certain possibilities and appear to have a certain condescension in your writing.
Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are related don’t forget. All president of the United States come from European royal bloodlines. Donald Trump is supposed to be an outsider president, one who broke the stranglehold, but we know that he is related to John of Gaunt, just like his 19th cousin Hillary.
From the perspective of US Presidents and other leaders around the world all being members of the same family, Trump was very much business as usual. You need to contend with that.
There is also Donald Trump immediate response to the fall of the twin towers being to boast about him now having the tallest building in New York. Quite a tasteless remark no matter how much you love him. As in to that that his personal lawyer was Rude Giuliano whom a lot of people reasonably expect was something to do with it and it really gets a bit murky.
Also, Donald Trump famously sought to preserve only the Albert Pike statue from the destruction of BLM. This was Pikes statue in DC commemorating his exalted position in Freemasonry, rather than his confederate generalship and what did Pike predict about 3 works wars? (Actually, saying it was ‘predicted’ makes it sound like a guess rather than a plan). Two of those wars have come to pass and we appear to be approaching the brink of a 3rd. And what else did Pike say about Freemasonry controlling both sides? Something like ‘whether hero or villain, we have them both’ referring to the fallacious nature of world events.
It doesn’t matter whether the Soviets lost control of Operation Trust or not because these people are capable of learning from their mistakes of history and correcting for next time whereas it would appear the layman is not. The layman seems barely to have any concept of history. And not just the layman, but a lot of the so called awakened too.
I've been following presidential politics since 1960. I've paid my dues.
We are all descended from Adam, too. Remote descent means nothing. Matters of taste are...matters of taste, also meaning nothing. Albert Pike? Famously sought? Haven't heard of it until now. Trump was concerned over the statue being the only one to commemorate a Confederate general---regardless of whether he had been a Freemason. Pike was something of a colorful figure, and Trump admires them when they have a life of accomplishment. Pike's Freemasonry also means nothing.
If it doesn't matter whether the Soviets lost control of Operation Trust, then it doesn't matter whether it was successful---because you cannot have success without control. That's a signal lesson not to go down that road. When they are acting so stupidly (as averred by Q and evident in the Ukraine situation), why should you think they would be mentally dexterous enough to "learn and correct"? You are trying to bend together mutually contradictory premises into a pretzel.
At some point, you have to decide whether the Sun is real or it is only a light bulb in the sky. When it does only the things that a Sun can do, there is only one rational conclusion.
Theories are not to be liked or disliked, but used for explanation and prediction. Your explanations explain only your fantasy suppositions and fears---which somewhat begs the question of whether anything is being explained. The only prediction is for an immense betrayal and doom. I don't see the utility of this theory, unless it is to justify giving up and walking away. Who benefits by that? Which makes me wonder where this theory really comes from. (Sorry, but you opened Pandora's Box.)
(Full disclosure. I have limited time resources and simply could not respond to your full-length exposition. This forum is not designed for such things and we will have to put this all in the hands of God---and Wait and See.
You know, it’s when people start responding to things with a party line/lines to take/stock responses that you know independent thinking has been abandoned.
I get what you’re trying to do but you might want to consider whether your advice here disproves the cult allegation or lends it more credibility, especially if it’s lurkers you’re hoping to convince.
Certainly when I see people from any kind of movement parroting each other with the same off the shelf script their credibility vanishes in my eyes.
Perhaps for all of the above accusations asking them to expand on their charge and listening intently to what they are saying in an earnest attempt to understand would be the best option.
If they are talking shit and don’t know what they’re on about then it will soon become apparent - to both of you!