Brian Cates. Has kept tabs on Durham since beginning, has good, insightful previews in his substack, posts on Telegram and Truth Social. Best legalese-to-human interpreter I know! And Patric Gunnels loves to read his articles, too.
I agree. Video format is the worst for me too. I just don’t have hours and hours every day to stare at a screen. I wish some of these citizen journalists would narrate the words they show.
Thank you! I do need a QRD on Russiagate considering I know few connections between perpetrators. I was in hardcore TBI recovery and college when it went down, so I wasn’t really able to stay up to date.
RH is the only one who REGULARLY pays for the transcripts and goes through them bit by bit. Lawyer IRL which is helpful for explaining legal system.
--
Viva & Barnes
also on Rumble
V&B usually don't go through the filings OR the transcripts (they do sometimes) BUT their expertise as as actual lawyers themselves who've worked on similar cases makes their analysis VERY unbiased - they're excellent at telling you how things are proceeding, how normal they are or aren't, if the law is being followed in their opinion, and they are very good at AVOIDING HYPE or hopium which makes them pretty unique.
--
Just Human
on Rumble or Substack
JH is good too - he usually just downloads the filings w/o transcripts (transcripts are expensive!) and I wouldn't call him unbiased at all - though he is very good! and will show you the case through the Q lens which the 1st two suggestions won't.
--
Brian Cates
on Rumble or Twitch
Probably the most biased. I'm only including him because he's mentioned alot in this thread and he IS very informed - but he tends to look at events through a lens of already having an idea about what it means - he's often right! - but since you asked for unbiased coverage I thought I'd include a warning. Don't count him out though!
--
edit: looks like @realtoriabrooke on TS is providing up-to-date almost real time reporting on the Danchenko case as well ! We have THE BEST journalism!
I enjoy having both an outsider and an insider perspective!
Everyone HAS some kind of bias and 80% of people I meet are in complete denial of what their bias is or rarely they DO know but severely underestimate it's effect on their analysis or conclusions.
Best to not try and avoid others bias - it can't be done.
Instead try to incorporate a wide variety of DIFFERENT biases compare their strategies of thinking and ultimately their conclusions.
I do not think of sheep as "mere sheep" ... I consider it my purpose to awaken the ready, and many "mere sheep" have deep unconscious sight of reality that CAN rear it's powerful head from out of the dark.
Not that you should wait around and cater to the sheep until that day - I think we both probably agree that's a huge waste of time and very dangerous.
I just think it's important to say both parts out loud.
That being said I COMPLETELY agree with your perspective on Brian - he's great! :-)
I know. And THAT is the difference between me and the them they are at least for now. I do not think of them this way PRECISELY because it is the way the think of me, and I want nothing to do with that kind of thinking.
For after hours analysis like a few others I really like Robert Gouveia too but I'll catch his Rumble channel instead of the tube which i won't link. He is a defense attorney and gives a great breakdown. Just remember, this is a trial in the swamp of a swamp creature so don't expect a conviction. But I bet a lot of juicy details of illicit behavior will be exposed during it
This guy is a lawyer from Scottsdale, AZ he will probably cover the trial the same way he covered the Sussman trial. He uses a great software called, "Mind Map" - he covered the Sussman trial most excellently - sorry for the screwtube but that's what he's on
https://www.youtube.com/c/RobertGouveiaEsq/videos
Check in on Legal Insurrection here and there. They haven't written anything lately about Danchenko or Durham for a few months, but when they do cover topics, they do a thorough job.
Brian Cates. Has kept tabs on Durham since beginning, has good, insightful previews in his substack, posts on Telegram and Truth Social. Best legalese-to-human interpreter I know! And Patric Gunnels loves to read his articles, too.
For start, take his Danchenko quiz https://briancates.substack.com/p/the-durham-quiz
PS. Just Human is also engaged. He digs up tons of info, but does not translate it for humans, and presents it in videos, worst format for me. Daily Rumbles, his today's Danchenko: https://rumble.com/v1ne1ic-ive-got-a-theory-about-why-danchenko-tried-to-contact-millian-and-why-he-li.html
I agree. Video format is the worst for me too. I just don’t have hours and hours every day to stare at a screen. I wish some of these citizen journalists would narrate the words they show.
He does his videos as an audio podcast too. He reads all the documents out loud
Thank you! I do need a QRD on Russiagate considering I know few connections between perpetrators. I was in hardcore TBI recovery and college when it went down, so I wasn’t really able to stay up to date.
Brian Cates on Telegram says he will be following and posting throughout the trial.
Thanks!
Brian Cates and JustHuman are my go-tos for all things Durham.
https://t.me/drawandstrikechannel
https://t.me/realjust_human https://rumble.com/c/JustHuman
Thanks!
just human rumble but at 1.5 speed lol
Second that.
https://fightwithkash.com/articles
Kash is covering it.
TechnoFog on Twitter too. And he has a substack
I came here to say that. Here is the substack sauce.
Great source as well.
I concur, Brian Cates is on top of it. Besides Telegram, he's on Truth Social as well.
Cool, I follow him on Truth so I guess I’m already partially set! Thanks!
Robert Gouveia, Esq on YT. He's great and can decipher the legal mumbo-jumbo stuff. https://www.youtube.com/c/RobertGouveiaEsq/videos
The Real Toria Brooke provides awesome coverage on TS
Robert Gouveia
on Rumble or YouTube
RH is the only one who REGULARLY pays for the transcripts and goes through them bit by bit. Lawyer IRL which is helpful for explaining legal system.
--
Viva & Barnes
also on Rumble
V&B usually don't go through the filings OR the transcripts (they do sometimes) BUT their expertise as as actual lawyers themselves who've worked on similar cases makes their analysis VERY unbiased - they're excellent at telling you how things are proceeding, how normal they are or aren't, if the law is being followed in their opinion, and they are very good at AVOIDING HYPE or hopium which makes them pretty unique.
--
Just Human
on Rumble or Substack
JH is good too - he usually just downloads the filings w/o transcripts (transcripts are expensive!) and I wouldn't call him unbiased at all - though he is very good! and will show you the case through the Q lens which the 1st two suggestions won't.
--
Brian Cates
on Rumble or Twitch
Probably the most biased. I'm only including him because he's mentioned alot in this thread and he IS very informed - but he tends to look at events through a lens of already having an idea about what it means - he's often right! - but since you asked for unbiased coverage I thought I'd include a warning. Don't count him out though!
--
edit: looks like @realtoriabrooke on TS is providing up-to-date almost real time reporting on the Danchenko case as well ! We have THE BEST journalism!
I enjoy having both an outsider and an insider perspective!
Everyone HAS some kind of bias and 80% of people I meet are in complete denial of what their bias is or rarely they DO know but severely underestimate it's effect on their analysis or conclusions.
Best to not try and avoid others bias - it can't be done.
Instead try to incorporate a wide variety of DIFFERENT biases compare their strategies of thinking and ultimately their conclusions.
Then think for yourself!
Cheers -
WWG1WGA
Brian Cates always gives you what should be, not what will be. The justice system is fubar, and not meant for mere sheep.
I do not think of sheep as "mere sheep" ... I consider it my purpose to awaken the ready, and many "mere sheep" have deep unconscious sight of reality that CAN rear it's powerful head from out of the dark.
Not that you should wait around and cater to the sheep until that day - I think we both probably agree that's a huge waste of time and very dangerous.
I just think it's important to say both parts out loud.
That being said I COMPLETELY agree with your perspective on Brian - he's great! :-)
You might not, but I assure you, you are "mere" from their perspective.
I know. And THAT is the difference between me and the them they are at least for now. I do not think of them this way PRECISELY because it is the way the think of me, and I want nothing to do with that kind of thinking.
Know thy enemy. I am with you.
<insert nodding Jack Nicholson>
FUCKKKKKme.
My apologies. I think you're right. Well they're both great haha
I feel dumb I've confused the two of them before I'm pretty sure.
Brian Cates Telegram, will be information aggregator of all things Durham. Spectacular!
https://twitter.com/JFHaughey58/status/1579878124904648704
Robert Gouveia on You Tube and Rumble is excellent. He reviews cases every evening. Hopefully he will cover this one
https://twitter.com/JFHaughey58/status/1579878124904648704
As others have suggested, Toria Brooke on Truth Social is a must follow for play by play as she is onsite for big trials like this to give us details.
https://truthsocial.com/@therealtoriabrooke
For after hours analysis like a few others I really like Robert Gouveia too but I'll catch his Rumble channel instead of the tube which i won't link. He is a defense attorney and gives a great breakdown. Just remember, this is a trial in the swamp of a swamp creature so don't expect a conviction. But I bet a lot of juicy details of illicit behavior will be exposed during it
https://rumble.com/c/RobertGouveia
TechFog: https://technofog.substack.com/
Brian Cates on Telegram https://t.me/drawandstrikechannel
The justice league on telegram.
https://t.me/THEREALTORIABROOKE/26596
https://t.me/THEREALTORIABROOKE/26597
https://t.me/THEREALTORIABROOKE/26598
This what has been posted so far.
https://fightwithkash.com/articles/kash-spells-out-the-significance-of-the-igor-danchenko-story short video (6m37) with Dinesh and Kash discussing this very topic.
This guy is a lawyer from Scottsdale, AZ he will probably cover the trial the same way he covered the Sussman trial. He uses a great software called, "Mind Map" - he covered the Sussman trial most excellently - sorry for the screwtube but that's what he's on https://www.youtube.com/c/RobertGouveiaEsq/videos
I think the prosecuting starts tomorrow (Tuesday)
Correct, I think today is just jury selection and possibly opening statements.
Check in on Legal Insurrection here and there. They haven't written anything lately about Danchenko or Durham for a few months, but when they do cover topics, they do a thorough job.
Seconding everyone else's suggestions.