Growing up I was a Titanic enthusiast. I even read a book on the international investigation and court proceedings as they were sorting out who was at fault.
I seem to remember that while the ship was sinking, one or more people were shot. The official "story" was that people were desperate and fighting for the life boats (the movie with DiCaprio illustrated that narrative also), but something didn't add up when discussed in court.
This is simply untrue, the ship swap theory has been thoroughly debunked by titanic historians. The two ships were NOT identical. There were actually significant alterations between the fittings of titanic and Olympic. While I do believe the ship was intentionally rammed into an iceberg for insurance purposes, that and to kill the opposition to the federal reserve, the ship that sunk was 100% the titanic.
This could be huge. Praying that it is. 11.11 (11/11). Everything in this drop lines up to today, and the heat is rising in Maricopa County, which is becoming the epicenter of obvious fraud.
Is there an easy way of looking this up? CO just has a retain/not-retain vote on judges and I had to go on who appointed them if zi couldn’t find obvious cases.
I can't remember the source, but I had a listing of the judges on my ballot with a summary of whether their past decisions were by the Constitution, or if they were making up law.
I did some research on the income tax several years ago. 1913 was the year they enacted the "individual" income tax. However, it was an amendment to the corporate tax act of 1909, as part of the Tariff act of 1913. It is my contention they were regulating foreign commerce.
Thus, there had already been an "income tax" enacted before 1913. It was not a new tax, per se. However, they twist words and the meaning of words to try and fool everyone. They've done a good job. And yes, I do participate in their extortion scheme.
Something a lot of people don't seem know is that it was a relatively small tax (like 1% if I recall right) that only applied to people making like the modern equivalent of $75,000.
1913 Habbenings [bad year for the US]:
It's also related to the Titanic. 3 very rich men who were against a central US bank died at sea that night. It was not an accident.
Titanic
followed by WW1 in 1914. All related events.
The rule "women and children first" was unheard of. This novel rule only appeared once and only existed on one side of the Titanic.
I thought it was an iceberg... /s
Ready for the true history to come out on all this corruption.
At this point, I wouldn't rule out explosives inside the ship. 🤔
Growing up I was a Titanic enthusiast. I even read a book on the international investigation and court proceedings as they were sorting out who was at fault.
I seem to remember that while the ship was sinking, one or more people were shot. The official "story" was that people were desperate and fighting for the life boats (the movie with DiCaprio illustrated that narrative also), but something didn't add up when discussed in court.
The Titanic Never Sank.
This is simply untrue, the ship swap theory has been thoroughly debunked by titanic historians. The two ships were NOT identical. There were actually significant alterations between the fittings of titanic and Olympic. While I do believe the ship was intentionally rammed into an iceberg for insurance purposes, that and to kill the opposition to the federal reserve, the ship that sunk was 100% the titanic.
“Historians” have been known (paid) to lie. They literally rewrite history. From the Bible to school books.
Relevant to this drop and to today's date:
u/#q1357
The 17th Amendment was passed by Congress on....WAIT FOR IT...
MAY 13th 1912.. Same day as this Q post.
mindblown
This could be huge. Praying that it is. 11.11 (11/11). Everything in this drop lines up to today, and the heat is rising in Maricopa County, which is becoming the epicenter of obvious fraud.
Kari Lake herself said she's not expecting a big drop until Monday
I know my county in NC went red on judges this year, in spite of being a mostly blue area. We also went red on the House and Senate.
Is there an easy way of looking this up? CO just has a retain/not-retain vote on judges and I had to go on who appointed them if zi couldn’t find obvious cases.
I can't remember the source, but I had a listing of the judges on my ballot with a summary of whether their past decisions were by the Constitution, or if they were making up law.
In Utah we only vote to retain judges. Do you vote for which judges you want to take the bench in NC?
Yes we vote our judges in. I live in NC.
Yes.
I did some research on the income tax several years ago. 1913 was the year they enacted the "individual" income tax. However, it was an amendment to the corporate tax act of 1909, as part of the Tariff act of 1913. It is my contention they were regulating foreign commerce.
Thus, there had already been an "income tax" enacted before 1913. It was not a new tax, per se. However, they twist words and the meaning of words to try and fool everyone. They've done a good job. And yes, I do participate in their extortion scheme.
Something a lot of people don't seem know is that it was a relatively small tax (like 1% if I recall right) that only applied to people making like the modern equivalent of $75,000.
We have am individual income tax law that doesn't define "individual." You have to go to the regulations to find a definition of individual.
2.Or Trump can define individual as anyone who consents to be taxed.