There is a difference in the width too. I thin this trick relies on lack of a standard for comparison, and people generally ignoring the borders, which don't have a human meaning.
What I'm guessing what happened as I'm extremely good with computers is that whoever was printing the ballots legally and knows what they are doing, printed the right size. Someone without knowledge of the scale and print margin, or even to double check the print settings scale would be someone trying to cheat/unauthorized access and such a stupid mistake that they will get caught doing it. When you print a document, on any printer, they can trace where it came from, and also which printer was used by forensic methods due to the printing head alignment, etc..
This alignment issue is almost a honeypot bc it's such a stupid mistake, only a dumb person would mess up the print scale.
Only other alternative would be two ballot print files/variations, and I will try to find the highest quality image and compare the two and will report back on here.
tumbleweed: You are stupid and don't understand the point he's making, so have someone more intelligent than you spell it out for you:
When you are handed the ballot on the left, you would not be able to see that it was an improper ballot because you do not have the ballot on the right to compare it against.
When you see the side by side, of course it's obvious.
When you see it in person, you are seeing just the one. Not the other. There is no side by side comparison for you to make. You aren't able to see other ballots unless presented with the legitimate one.
Sounds good. How does one get away with printing ballots incorrectly/ deliberately?? Hobbs needs to be escorted out and to jail. She is supposed to be the one in charge right? She can find herself in violation of state laws and refer herself for charges.
That's exactly what happened with ballots in 2020. The little diamonds made up of four hyphens were printed in ever so slightly the wrong place. Shown in several videos during the hearings.
Do you honestly need to be told? They had a heat map on the wall of the election center showing the voting centers with the highest concentration of Republican voters from the last election. Nothing for Democrats or Independents, only which locations Republicans would be voting at.
They're not on trial for witchcraft, but for treason. While increasing their carbon footprint may sound fun, it probably would stink up the whole area. Environmentally safe and sustainable hemp rope or arrows, unless they want to pay up front for bullets and the metals cleanup.
Done on purpose so the scanners couldn't read them and ballots would have to be spoiled .... So if the machines didn't take these ballots and they were spoiled what ballots were the people who had this happen to do then? Did they get a provisional ballot to fill our or were they given the same wrong size ballot (which still wouldn't be read by a scanner) and told to stick it in box 3? If the latter than their ballots were never counted if they used a scanner later to try and count them.
The affidavits and videos say they were told to put them in a box to be scanned later. No proof they were ever scanned, or whether they were adjudicated for the other side.
So, you really can't tell just by looking at them.
Lol @ snap downvote. Yes you couldn't tell without comparing to a valid ballot. This is quite clever, and really evil.
These were shared in AZ after the 2020 election. On Vernon Jones’s Twitter iirc. Fully expecting the military to come in to testify about it tomorrow.
Correct, anyone with a fake ballot would not know unless they were told, and had a real one next to them.
This guy can discern what people are implying :D
Correct, Other people cannot discern and need to be spoon fed.
Look at the gaps at the top and bottom of the ballot on the left.
There is a difference in the width too. I thin this trick relies on lack of a standard for comparison, and people generally ignoring the borders, which don't have a human meaning.
Unless you had a ballot to compare it against, which you wouldn't, you would just assume that's the ballots this year.
What I'm guessing what happened as I'm extremely good with computers is that whoever was printing the ballots legally and knows what they are doing, printed the right size. Someone without knowledge of the scale and print margin, or even to double check the print settings scale would be someone trying to cheat/unauthorized access and such a stupid mistake that they will get caught doing it. When you print a document, on any printer, they can trace where it came from, and also which printer was used by forensic methods due to the printing head alignment, etc..
This alignment issue is almost a honeypot bc it's such a stupid mistake, only a dumb person would mess up the print scale.
Only other alternative would be two ballot print files/variations, and I will try to find the highest quality image and compare the two and will report back on here.
Yes, and the scanners can't read them.
Pby1000: You are blind and stupid.
tumbleweed: You are stupid and don't understand the point he's making, so have someone more intelligent than you spell it out for you:
When you are handed the ballot on the left, you would not be able to see that it was an improper ballot because you do not have the ballot on the right to compare it against.
When you see the side by side, of course it's obvious.
When you see it in person, you are seeing just the one. Not the other. There is no side by side comparison for you to make. You aren't able to see other ballots unless presented with the legitimate one.
This is BS. Bring charges or hold another election.
Sounds good. How does one get away with printing ballots incorrectly/ deliberately?? Hobbs needs to be escorted out and to jail. She is supposed to be the one in charge right? She can find herself in violation of state laws and refer herself for charges.
Runbeck does the printing.
If you don't do the first, what the fuck do you think is the benefit of the second?
That's exactly what happened with ballots in 2020. The little diamonds made up of four hyphens were printed in ever so slightly the wrong place. Shown in several videos during the hearings.
Wow, that wasnt 19" moved to one side or the other it was reformatted for 20" paper
Yup, so the scanners couldn't read them. This was intentional.
Statement by Jovian Pulitzer—
“OH REALLY!”
He talked all about this after 2020. Same story different day. Will we have different results?
Where's the rope
Did they say which party the messed up ballots belong to?
Do you honestly need to be told? They had a heat map on the wall of the election center showing the voting centers with the highest concentration of Republican voters from the last election. Nothing for Democrats or Independents, only which locations Republicans would be voting at.
https://www.uncoverdc.com/2022/12/12/update-maricopa-had-a-democratic-heat-map-too-that-makes-it-worse/
That story was updated - it appears there was a Dem heat map as well. But doesn't explain why they would have either map.
My question was did they provide proof these were primarily Republican ballots in court as it happened and was brought up in court in 2020.
Yes. Check out the GP article.
Thanks fren!
IT WAS INTENTIONAL
IT WAS MALICE
IT WAS TREASON
BURN THEM ALL AT THE STAKE
They're not on trial for witchcraft, but for treason. While increasing their carbon footprint may sound fun, it probably would stink up the whole area. Environmentally safe and sustainable hemp rope or arrows, unless they want to pay up front for bullets and the metals cleanup.
Yes
The one with more white space around it is the reduced one.
Done on purpose so the scanners couldn't read them and ballots would have to be spoiled .... So if the machines didn't take these ballots and they were spoiled what ballots were the people who had this happen to do then? Did they get a provisional ballot to fill our or were they given the same wrong size ballot (which still wouldn't be read by a scanner) and told to stick it in box 3? If the latter than their ballots were never counted if they used a scanner later to try and count them.
The affidavits and videos say they were told to put them in a box to be scanned later. No proof they were ever scanned, or whether they were adjudicated for the other side.
More than likely the were not done at all
Most likely, as they had the count and already diverted the votes, now they could insert whatever they wanted.
Looks like someone who copy/pasted the template to print and didn’t properly resize it.
Should an election official be copy/pasting templates and formatting ballots locally?
I would say no
95% reduction. Easy to set. Hard to read.
They lookthe same....
That's what the frauding fools get for outsourcing the printing of fake ballots to Chy-Na