Something to consider: we call ourselves "pede's". With so much focus about to be brought onto those we call "pedo's", it might be wise to stick with the other monikers, as the words are very similar, and normies could make the same mistake I did at first and interchange the two.
Pede from centipede. The insect is a nimble nagivator like Trump and is able to maneuver around the traps and tricks the deep state has planned for him. It started on TheDonald and carried over from there.
Anon from Anonymous, the default name assigned to all who posts on 4Chan image boards. Since the roots of TheDonald, GreatAwakening, Gamergate, and associated movements came from that place, it is natural that many lingo from 4Chan carried over as well.
I like anons. We are a community working together for the good of us all - not the glory of a few. We each play a part, some more than others, but everyone working together is greater than the sum of the parts.
First time I heard the term "pede" here pedophile was the first thing I thought of. It's really not obvious at first what "pede" is supposed to mean.
Concerning the term "QAnon", I really think way too big a deal is made out of outsiders using that term. This is the only Q forum I've ever been to, but I know there are others out there. It's not like we own the rights to the Q community.
And unless you're part of a group that uses all of those terms "frens, pedes,autists, whatever" how are you supposed to know what the group likes to be called?
By controlling the dialect and word choices, the media hijacks movements and narratives. “Q” and “anon” are separate. All of their news articles put the two together, “qanon” so when normies hear about it for the first time, they google “qanon” and what do you think pops up? The true q and anons or the mainstream spin?
Media and Hollywood does this often with books, tv show, and movie titles. So when you go to look up information about a certain operation it’ll pop up pop culture stuff or slander articles first, and bury the truth.
Oh, I fully understand the MSM is critical of Q and Anons, but whatever term that they collectively use for us is going to eventually wind up with exactly the same results, I think.
I can understand how re-branding would stop the knee-jerk reaction people would automatically have and prevent the algorithms from burying more positive, or even just neutral, search results. At least temporarily. Then whatever new name is given will eventually have the same results.
But what sense does it make to get angry with outsiders for not calling us frens or pedes, when they have zero reason to know what we call each other?
It makes as much sense as an obviously biological female getting angry that we don't use her preferred pronouns of "them/they" when we first meet.
Pointing out why the media call us "QAnon" is perfect to point out to any outsiders who have even a hint of intellectual curiosity. Show them how it's used as slander and make them question why the media would lie to them.
In the end, it's not about expecting people to magically know stuff, but we certainly shouldn't use their terms ourselves and should kindly point out to outsiders using them that they know not what they speak of.
The short of it is the conflation of nonsense theories with what Q actually said. This allows them to drive normies away from something they think is crazy, when in reality Q never said any of that shit, it was anons.
Due to the psycological warfare angle its best to not use the common vernacular "red pill". Many will see that and turn tone deaf.
The mission here is truth and enlightening people on the truth of the world we live in. So they can better understand WHY things are so messed up and show them that NO, they are not alone and not crazy and not a conspiracy theorist.
That works as well. Works best in most cases. Just pointing out thatusing terminology they have been trained to be dismissive of will close a lot of ears before you get started.
Its like a salesman telling you the minute they meet you "Im gonna sell you a car".
When in truth, we arent selling anything. Just dropping truth bombs with some meme magic.
I think culture of the community can change a lot about how people perceive it though. With all the showmanship of "meme warfare" and "redpills" and "pedes" and autists and pepe and everything, it can be tougher to gain universal attention. By presenting the facts as is, black and white, with supporting information and no big fireworks behind it demanding attention, you are more likely to get people with higher intellects on board
yes, and also, the use of too much group-oriented slang can be cliquey, and could alienate outsiders who are earnestly seeking information. if the object is to wake up normies with facts in order to create a broader freedom-fighting patriotic community, the overuse of insider club-words can be counter-productive. while it's nice to know when one is talking to a fren, code-slang can create a daunting wall for the sheeple who truly want to learn more.
I remember the bots saying over and over, "I'm getting hungry hombre."
there was so much spam, interference, the mods were always sleeping. Voat was bad at the end. Gaw was great. It still is. Thank you mods! Thank you to all the pedes, frens, etc. I love you guys and gals. Something in my eye...
It wasn't their defense, I stayed, I had many discussions with those nazi types. They are not on our side, they want chaos. Most of them had low IQ as well, couldn't logically defend their positions.
In all our discussions here frenz let’s remember we all want the same thing, we just disagree on how to arrive there. But wanting the same goal is what unites us.
They would LOVE to find Qanon and give them a piece of their minds, also that 4chan hacker, I bet they have some very strong words for him in return for ruining the easy lives they had.
That's all good and swell, but what I have a problem with is:
"ensuring the safety of the population"
versus:
"letting the plandemic unfold".
If the white hats are indeed in control, somewhere along the way they had to decide whether "a few naive people dying" was ""worth"" the great awakening.
If I remember correctly, I heard about our group here from someone that came on Newsmax as a speaker right before stolen 2020 election. Can’t remember who it was but I want to say Rudy Guiliani and it seemed quite urgent to check out.
Something to consider: we call ourselves "pede's". With so much focus about to be brought onto those we call "pedo's", it might be wise to stick with the other monikers, as the words are very similar, and normies could make the same mistake I did at first and interchange the two.
i prefer anons or pepes
Fren for life.
Yeah I never liked pede and don't use it myself.
Where did the term "pede" for "anons" come from anyway?
Pede from centipede. The insect is a nimble nagivator like Trump and is able to maneuver around the traps and tricks the deep state has planned for him. It started on TheDonald and carried over from there.
Anon from Anonymous, the default name assigned to all who posts on 4Chan image boards. Since the roots of TheDonald, GreatAwakening, Gamergate, and associated movements came from that place, it is natural that many lingo from 4Chan carried over as well.
That video is the one.
Ok, thanks. (centipedes are pretty nasty creatures, especially the house centipedes here in NY!)
I like anons. We are a community working together for the good of us all - not the glory of a few. We each play a part, some more than others, but everyone working together is greater than the sum of the parts.
First time I heard the term "pede" here pedophile was the first thing I thought of. It's really not obvious at first what "pede" is supposed to mean.
Concerning the term "QAnon", I really think way too big a deal is made out of outsiders using that term. This is the only Q forum I've ever been to, but I know there are others out there. It's not like we own the rights to the Q community.
And unless you're part of a group that uses all of those terms "frens, pedes,autists, whatever" how are you supposed to know what the group likes to be called?
It wasn't always like this, but currently QAnon is used by the media for the express purpose of slandering the movement and Q.
How?
By controlling the dialect and word choices, the media hijacks movements and narratives. “Q” and “anon” are separate. All of their news articles put the two together, “qanon” so when normies hear about it for the first time, they google “qanon” and what do you think pops up? The true q and anons or the mainstream spin?
Media and Hollywood does this often with books, tv show, and movie titles. So when you go to look up information about a certain operation it’ll pop up pop culture stuff or slander articles first, and bury the truth.
Oh, I fully understand the MSM is critical of Q and Anons, but whatever term that they collectively use for us is going to eventually wind up with exactly the same results, I think.
I can understand how re-branding would stop the knee-jerk reaction people would automatically have and prevent the algorithms from burying more positive, or even just neutral, search results. At least temporarily. Then whatever new name is given will eventually have the same results.
But what sense does it make to get angry with outsiders for not calling us frens or pedes, when they have zero reason to know what we call each other?
It makes as much sense as an obviously biological female getting angry that we don't use her preferred pronouns of "them/they" when we first meet.
Pointing out why the media call us "QAnon" is perfect to point out to any outsiders who have even a hint of intellectual curiosity. Show them how it's used as slander and make them question why the media would lie to them.
In the end, it's not about expecting people to magically know stuff, but we certainly shouldn't use their terms ourselves and should kindly point out to outsiders using them that they know not what they speak of.
Also for search engine purposes, they popularize the word so that the top results all point to hit pieces when a normie tries searching for info.
Read the Q posts and you'll know.
The short of it is the conflation of nonsense theories with what Q actually said. This allows them to drive normies away from something they think is crazy, when in reality Q never said any of that shit, it was anons.
being a 'pede (short for centipede) comes from the days of r/the_donald on reddit. I get your point, but I kind of like it.
agreed
Noticed in the comments that qagg.news is offline.
Due to the psycological warfare angle its best to not use the common vernacular "red pill". Many will see that and turn tone deaf.
The mission here is truth and enlightening people on the truth of the world we live in. So they can better understand WHY things are so messed up and show them that NO, they are not alone and not crazy and not a conspiracy theorist.
Why not just share the truth/facts, no bells or whistles about it?
That works as well. Works best in most cases. Just pointing out thatusing terminology they have been trained to be dismissive of will close a lot of ears before you get started.
Its like a salesman telling you the minute they meet you "Im gonna sell you a car".
When in truth, we arent selling anything. Just dropping truth bombs with some meme magic.
I think culture of the community can change a lot about how people perceive it though. With all the showmanship of "meme warfare" and "redpills" and "pedes" and autists and pepe and everything, it can be tougher to gain universal attention. By presenting the facts as is, black and white, with supporting information and no big fireworks behind it demanding attention, you are more likely to get people with higher intellects on board
yes, and also, the use of too much group-oriented slang can be cliquey, and could alienate outsiders who are earnestly seeking information. if the object is to wake up normies with facts in order to create a broader freedom-fighting patriotic community, the overuse of insider club-words can be counter-productive. while it's nice to know when one is talking to a fren, code-slang can create a daunting wall for the sheeple who truly want to learn more.
100%, especially considering a lot of the in-words revolve around insults.
Yeah, I don't think talking about datefagging with people outside the group would go over particularly well.
Bring back VOAT. They were the absolute greatest at figuring things and disseminating information.
When the Q posts were running hot. Nothing to figure out anymore were just waiting for end game
Good point
Stormfags and FPH, voat is trash
I dont know, I remember being bombarded by nazi antifa types.
I remember the bots saying over and over, "I'm getting hungry hombre." there was so much spam, interference, the mods were always sleeping. Voat was bad at the end. Gaw was great. It still is. Thank you mods! Thank you to all the pedes, frens, etc. I love you guys and gals. Something in my eye...
I browse the front page of talk.lol. I love how the language is unrestricted.
what is talk.lol? I did enjoy the lack of pc on voat. But, did not enjoy the forum sliding nazis.
Just search "voat" and it should be top 3 search results.
That was their defense in action. Vile freedom of speech to run off the weak.
It wasn't their defense, I stayed, I had many discussions with those nazi types. They are not on our side, they want chaos. Most of them had low IQ as well, couldn't logically defend their positions.
No. They sniffed you out and played you
ok faggot.
A few are concerned about the words we use so we don't offend the people who wanted us quarantined and locked out of society. Fuck em
In all our discussions here frenz let’s remember we all want the same thing, we just disagree on how to arrive there. But wanting the same goal is what unites us.
Fren! the japanese Q people can call themselves tomodachi :)
Sharing everywhere
They would LOVE to find Qanon and give them a piece of their minds, also that 4chan hacker, I bet they have some very strong words for him in return for ruining the easy lives they had.
That's all good and swell, but what I have a problem with is:
"ensuring the safety of the population"
versus:
"letting the plandemic unfold".
If the white hats are indeed in control, somewhere along the way they had to decide whether "a few naive people dying" was ""worth"" the great awakening.
Not everything can be clean.
Just gave your 17th retweet!
I follow this guy; love what he puts up. Delightful to know that he's on here.
Love it.
If I remember correctly, I heard about our group here from someone that came on Newsmax as a speaker right before stolen 2020 election. Can’t remember who it was but I want to say Rudy Guiliani and it seemed quite urgent to check out.
I always spell PEDE on all caps just so it’s more noticeable and doesn’t look like the pedo
We are Keksperts
Have many of you seen this video? https://rumble.com/embed/v1oomgc/?pub=4