checking my privilege on thinking.
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (65)
sorted by:
Bullshit. There are people who are dumb and just want to please people around them, and then there are normal people who understand what "truth" means.
Got nothing to do with women or low T men. There are plenty of women who are awake and plenty of high T men who are asleep.
God Bless them, but the exceptions prove the rule.
EDIT---. Too many of you are taking this personally. If you're here as a real anon you are high status. This meme is a statement on one of the many ways the normies are enslaved.
This does not mean what you think it means, and is very often misused. "The exceptions prove that the rule is true" is obvious nonsense, the refuge of people who make an assertion which is easily disproven with obvious counterexamples. What this phrase actually means is that the exceptions prove that the rule exists, because if there were no rule then there would be nothing for the counterexamples to be an exception to.
The rule is proven by simply looking at voter breakdowns. Or marketing strategies.
Correct.
True misogynists—deeply insecure beta males who must aggrandize their inadequate sense of maleness by viewing women as categorically inferior to men—are ultra rare in the wild.
It's pretty obvious that this guy is one of these critically endangered creatures, because he literally thinks no women have or use critical thinking or can parse new information through an "Is this true?" filter.
He is one sad excuse for a man.
This.
You did not read the meme. At all.
Are you kidding? Didn't you watch National Geographic as a kid?
The anon is describing basic herd mindset of animals that looks to others for confirmation of what to do. It's the lion hunting the gazelle.
The typical female mind isn't wired the same as males, that's a fact. They are built to process many different inputs at the same time and act quickly without wasting time to ask why or if.
The alpha male mind is a hunting mind and process on a single subject. It knows the strike must be swift and calculated or else the prey gets away. One wrong move and the hunt is over. Thus it must ask "if true" before they act.
And yes, we all fucking know there are plenty of butch ass women and faggoty ass low T males. There's no point in bringing that up and doesn't disprove anything the Anon said. We're talking typical and patterns here. The 4% outlier doesn't affect the 96% that fits the model. Failure to understand these patterns is why we're alone and weak while the ones who does understand this can control million of sheep.
Multi-tasking vs single-threaded mindset.
Both have their pros and cons.
Oh, you watched NG as a kid? Okay, you get 10 points.
Maybe true for gazelles, and maybe true in some deep parts in the Amygdala of our ancestors, but luckily we have evolved a much bigger neo-cortex since then.
So maybe there is an instinctual vestige somewhere deep in our psyche, but there are far more other factors that make us what we are, so Anon's claims dont match reality.
I bring it up exactly because it disproves what Anon said. If you like to ignore inconvenient truths and live in denial to fit your world view, be my guest. Thats exactly what the lefties do always.
But if you open your eyes and take just one look at any typical patriotic gatherings you will realise that these Anon claims have nothing to offer in reality. If anything, there are more women than men in these gatherings, for whatever reason.
No one is talking about butch ass women. Most women in our movement are very feminine (more than most lefty women). It just shows the depths of your ignorance that you have to rationalize any patriotic women as "butch ass women".
Open your eyes and you will see its 50-50 not 4-96. Hence the reason to bring it up.
Infact one thing I have time and again noticed is that women are more receptive to "conspiracy theories" in general than men. If you want to put a spin that pleases you, you can say women are more gullible. If that helps you accept the reality, go for it, no one here cares.
Study finds that the higher your testosterone level, the more likely you are to vote Liberal (Socialist Liberal): Testosterone Administration Induces A Red Shift in Democrats. Study shows injecting liberal men with testosterone made them less liberal
Study: https://archive.ph/DpWqG
These studies are nothing but confirmation biases with nothing scientific about them. Haveing learnt what we have learnt about these studies in the past 2 years (where they used it to prove whatever they wanted), we should be condemning these unscientific studies rather than trying to use them to make a point that goes against everything we see in real world.
And who leads the WEF? Male or female?
Who placed the globalist women in charge of their countries, as part of the NWO strategy to disassemble countries? That puppet master is behaving as if he is the global leader.
Didn't Klaus brag about placing the leaders of countries into their positions? Globalists use election fraud, civil war, weaponized, partisan law enforcement, pandemics, open borders, etc, to put their puppets into leadership positions.
Gender doesn't matter...evil vs good matters...conscious vs asleep matters.
I don't think gender is the issue. Any leader working towards a tyrannical, globally-centric government is weak spiritually, whether the leader be male or female.
I agree with what you wrote overall, just one point regarding sex (I hate the made up word gender):
Forcing women (and men) into roles they are not naturally suited for, is one of the standard techniques for breaking down a society. Even as we speak, for example, there is a huge government drive in Australia to "bring more women into construction labour work". These things make no sense until you realise the real purpose.
So sex does matter - not in absolute terms, but relative terms.
Yea. I agree, regarding physical jobs. For instance, I never thought women should be firefighters, unless they could carry 220 lbs on the shoulder easily. Hiring should always be decided based on ability as it relates to job duties...always.
I am an athlete, who could run 3 miles at a faster pace than 30% of the boys on the cross-country team, and I am tall and strong, but even then, I chose a career that was within my physical ability. (I worked in physical therapy.)
But, that is a different topic completely than the claim that, because women are weaker, they need to be accepted by the normal community, so they are therefore more likely to be brainwashed. Right?
Absolutely. I already made a comment explaining why this post is such bullshit and obvious disinformation to try and divide us. But you know what? Anons are disinformation-proof. Yes, we have a few weaklings (as shown in this thread) who fall for some of this crap, but over all Anons see through this rubbish.
Here here. (That was a toast.) 😃
Yea...to me, sex is biological, and so is gender. They are one in the same. But, you are right...The world doesn't see it that way. So, I will be careful to call it "sex", also. 👍 Thanks.
John Money and the co who perpetuated the entire Trans hoax did so very carefully, seeding the ideas of gender (making people think they are the same initially) but later on arguing they are different.
This is a great video for those who haven't watched it yet.
Thanks. Saved.
This. I see the above as a sly move to continue the divide and conquer strategy used forever. While there may be a element of truth to it, as you pointed out, it doesn't matter. Look past it and focus on the real fight at hand.
Eighty million citizens voted for Trump, despite the 24-7 relentless brainwashing by the media and the shaming by their liberal friends and family. The factors forming the thinking of those 81 million do not include gender.
The anecdotal evidence disputing your theory is too emense to be discounted. How many women voted for Trump and went to DC to encourage their Senators to contest the stolen states on Jan 6th? How many refused the jab, despite emense pressure? Some of our bravest warriors in this information war are women, like Katherine Austin Fitz, Dr Simone Gold, and the leaders in my own community against medical tyranny. (They are women who led our community to not comply.) I am surrounded by groups of women who research, share links, and invest their time going door-to-door canvassing to fight election fraud...just to name a few examples. They are leaders.
In humanity's past, before agriculture drew people to each other (forming towns), the occasional despot alpha male was able to dominate females, because the communities had not yet agreed upon a set of acceptable behaviors, nor had they decided to enforce them with laws. Women were not given choices, as a result. Once they were protected by the law, they began fighting for their rights. Their previous vulnerability is all the more reason they are alert today. They need to fight to keep our Constitutional laws intact. They have a lot to lose, if they don't.
I, personally, debate regularly with many of my brainwashed, male college friends, and they are the liberal, brainwashed ones, not me. They use the "shame and blame" media technique on me all the time, but I just come back at them with facts and links to open-sourced documents. I don't get emotional, like they do, with their programmed, fearful, angry rhetoric. I figure they will learn the truth, eventually...so I just keep repeating truthful facts and logic, hoping it will be easier for them to accept the truth when truth is finally allowed on the media.
anecdotal. evidence.
Don't take it personally, be proud to the exception. You're able to fight the propaganda tailored to your gender. Can you honestly say that most of your fellow females don't operate on emotion? Most I know do, including the ones I love and protect. There's plenty of propaganda aimed at males like me, to appeal to our weaknesses. I fell for the rino show for many years, supporting the controlled opposition which hurt human freedom almost as much as the left.
Well, I enjoy the conversation. I don't take it personally. I just think that the globalist leaders chose that path because they have been brainwashed, bribed, blackmailed, or threatened, not because of their gender. Their moral center is off.
But, on the blackmailing and threatening topics...you do make me wonder. It would be an interesting study...to see how women politicians handle being threatened or blackmailed, versus the response by males.
In the case of blackmail, it would be better to fess up and own the punishment and shame than it would be the aid in the destruction of our country. At least that bravery would help regain some semblance of honor.
I think in the case of a threat, I would pretend to sucumb, while I gathered evidence, meanwhile getting my family to a safe place. Since I am more physically vulnerable than a male, I may be more likely to go for help, which could be good.
I don't think women love their families any more than the men do. Would they help cover up an election steal like Kemp did, in order to protect the family from harm? The question is...would they fold and endure it, giving in to the threat, or would they run for help, exposing the threat for the sake of the country? I always wished these threatened leaders and lawmakers would go for help, rather than succumbing. The whole country depends on them.
But, in the case of brainwashing and bribery, I see no logic or evidence whatsoever that a woman leader is more likely to sucumb.
Is that why all the butthurt in here, they think the high status males mentioned are the globohomos running things now? Hell no, that's Trump. Mean tweets and $2 gas ftw.
Yay. I like the idea that he is running things. Lots of evidence of devolution gives us hope.
The fact that the NZ leader resigned is a great sign.
Meh. I'm a woman and have a pretty strong truth and common sense filter. Not buying this.
Yeah, think of this post as a practical example of "How Anons handle obvious disinformation that is put out to divide us". Overall, you will notice that most people here can see through this bullshit.
We ourselves are not reliable self judges. Ask around to friends and family, they will describe you better than you describe yourself.
Me too. I grew up with a based father and mother.
Women who can spot the truth are not necessarily autistic. What is wrong with you?
So get this, in the Godly arrangement of man and woman, woman is supposed to be able to trust her husband to make the same decision she would. So with healthy relationships built on trust, democracy is still democracy, through trust of relationships. Since they've destroyed woman's ability to trust man, women think they need to have a word in on everything.
Are you married? I’m married and my husband I come to decisions together because we are unit. My husband would never disrespect me by saying “I’m the man God put me in charge”. He trusts my opinion and experience as I trust his, we don’t ever do anything that one or the other doesn’t agree to because we are a team. There are some women who don’t feel this way and some men who don’t. To say “women’s ability to trust” has been destroyed is untrue. We are individuals and to lump us all as frail creatures who have no choice but to follow society is biased and hurts our cause. There are many many patriot, conservative God fearing women working hand in hand with their spouse as a team. I know many amazing women doing just this raising the next generation to hopefully survive this war spiritually intact. I have been married twenty years and have 6 kids, one about to graduate high school. None of them are liberals
I am married, and I do not mean to be general. I assume most on this site don't lump themselves with general statements, but I still sounded one sided. We also make decisions together, but what I am saying is that in a setting away from me, I would trust my husband to make a decision for me if I weren't present, no matter what the matter is, because he has my well being/etc in mind. Sorry
Gotch! Text on a forum does not always convey tone, actually often misconstrues. I do the same thing far too often.
Woman here, married to what you’d call a manly man compared to many today and I was the one who saw the truth first. He took some time to come around and still isn’t convince it’s some huge millennia long conspiracy although he is religious. My sister, right with me who saw it all before our brother who is like public enemy #1 right now…ex military, over 6 foot gun toting white guy, called me yesterday saying ATF is trying to make him a felon. He isn’t a globalist, never took the jab but he isn’t fighting it like my sister and I because he doesn’t see it the way we do. Don’t discount women and lump them with these crazies. Study history, the female founders, daughters of liberty etc were absolutely vital in the construction of this country. Men and woman are a team, don’t be like them and try to divide us. God made us in his image male and female…a unit to raise God fearing freedom loving children. We need each other.
Manly man does not equal I intellectually gifted. On the extremes you will observe extremely intelligent trying to control the masses. This is our nerd overlords who try to dictate to the rest what we can and can’t do. Then you have your high testosterone males who are slightly more intelligent vs those who are not. The slightly more intelligence normally go for service type of Careers because they desire to protect the weak. You usually see them in EMS, Law enforcement or military careers. The second less bright but equally manly side is usually the criminals and people with no regard to consequences. This does not exclude the elite from being criminals, they are just much better at hiding it and using pawns. Then you have your low T submissive males. These often group think and care way too much about what other people think of them, because they are so unsure of who they are and constantly have to shift opinions to fit with the crowd. On the aspect of women the only thing I’m aware of is, on average more women are likely to agree with the highly intelligent male, if that male is wealthy, because women tend to be more materialistic on average. Probably why we see so many females in support of these globalist wealthy people. Women want to serve the powerful because their sight is on now, and tomorrow. Not 30-40 years ahead.
Same here, I had to drag my husband to the truth quite a ways.
It’s been fun and frustrating! I do have 6 kids and all but one understands (youngest is special needs). They’ve had fun teasing me saying “you’re going to become a flat earther” but as time has gone on and I’ve learned more they come to me with questions. My husband called me from work because he wanted me to explain something to a coworker. I’m sahm so I have the time to research a tad more than they do.
hahahah yes yes yes, sounds very familiar. You are awesome!
Not true. All men whether they are low or high status have a danger radar in operation, we are all way looking out for trouble coming our way. We have this whether we realise it or not, even the big kahunas amonst us.
Sigma; the one true man.
Back to life in Athens, 500 BC.
The key principle is to value objective truth, not subjective truth. It has nothing to do with physical ability, but the mental commitment to objective truth. Our culture has been infiltrated and degraded to value virtuosity and "their truth", and they reject objective truth as hateful.
I am a "aneurotypical" woman and this IS truth. I did have some trouble with the "high status" males as I know many low status males that are the clearest thinkers. Perhaps you didn't mean status in the social construct sense.
There is a bit of truth here because as a defense mechanism -- fight or flight -- some do gravitate to what they perceive as prevailing opinion through their own weakness and insecurity. There is safety in the group.
But the generalizations ruin the thought because there are truly brave women out there and some "low T" men do find the courage to act in the moment. At the same time, many "high T" men are nothing more than bullies whose physical strength has dampened any introspection or freedom of thought.
High status males and high status anuerotypical females.
The weak are top-heavy on the ‘group’ survival dynamic. Nietzsche flamed exoteric Christians extremely hard as a herd of the weak sticking together for survival. Try telling an average Christian that Christianity is anything other than the generally accepted mainstream view - it can’t be done.
Nietzsche went insane.
Nietzsche spent the last ten years of his life in an asylum.
Some philosopher. Look where it led him.
More than the time he went insane, look at the time he was spouting his theories.
He was a God sent (pun intended) for the hose pushing atheism and wanting to deconstruct christianity. I still dont understand why so many people, even here, glorify him.
Whether wittingly or unwitting, Nietzsche did more for pushing the Globalist agenda than any military contractor has done.
It will become more and more difficult to hide from the truth behind deflections like that. ‘The person went insane so what they said can’t be true’, LOL.
His own beliefs led him to insanity, so
So you’re safely protected from considering what he said because it can be dismissed as insane-causing. You know, many Christians also went insane throughout history - we can just dismiss everything they thought, right? Furthermore, others have thought the same as Nietzsche and not gone insane.
None of whom were the founder of the movement, thus defeating himself.
It's one thing when a follower goes insane. It's another when the leader does.
Dude, just hold the L.
Jeez... The fact that you think going insane invalidates an idea presented by the person is so absurd. I wish you could understand it. But... I guess you can't.
Either he followed his own rules and went insane, or he didn't follow his own rules and he's a hypocrite.
Well?
Which is it?
You describe Islam.
The mainstreams of all 3 of the Abrahamic religions, as I see it.
lol