Known as TONA-"Title of Nobility Amendment", it is first found in the Articles of Confederation (MAR01, 1777), then the US Constitution as Amendment XIII (MAR12, 1819), then in the Constitution of the Confederate States of America (MAR11, 1861)
TDLR: This Amendment was never repealed, just hidden. It is still active and usable in Article III courts (Federal District, Circuit, and Supreme). When referencing it call it Amendment XIII rather than 13th Amendment (anti-slavery), or call it TONA, 1819 or Titles of Nobility Amendment, 1819.
CORRECTION: TONA 1836 as 76% of states ratified with Arkansas, 1836. It is 2/3 to get out of Senate and House, but 3/4 of states required. With Maine "ratification by publication" it is 19/25 states ratified by 1836 including South Carolina vote "for" that occurred prior to 1836.
VA Const. (1819): h.https://republicfortheunitedstatesofamerica.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Missing-13th-Amendment-1819-Laws-of-Virginia.pdf
MAINE Const. 1820 (slide 46/49): https://www.mainememory.net/media/pdf/101558.pdf
The young United States was continuously dealing with the British infiltrating and interfering with Commerce and Banking, especially after the inauguration of Thomas Jefferson in March 1801.
Jefferson becoming President unleashed a ramp-up of attempted British interference that culminated in War of 1812 after the 1st Bank of US was dissolved in 1811 after expiration of its 1791, 20 year charter (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Bank_of_the_United_States). The big push for the Amendment XIII started in Dec 1809 (first proposed). Senate and House approved it in 1810, and MD ratified in 1810, then 8 more states ratified in 1811, and 2 more in 1812, making it 11/17 with 13/17 needed.
Then British attacked on June 18, 1812 in an attempt to prevent both Virginia and Louisiana State Assemblies (18th state) from ratifying it due to "state of war". The final war trigger was the APR30, 1812 Louisiana (slave state) to the Union which gave another "for" vote along with Virginia (interrupted) and S. Carolina (delayed) to get to 14/18 votes for full ratification of TONA. At the time of British attack in 1812, 11 of the 14 ratification votes needed already in hand, and only 3 more were required to reach the 3/4 for full ratification. It was finally fully ratified on in 1836 with Arkansas vote AND it also appeared in the Confederate States Constitution in 1861.
THE 3 KEY LOCATIONS OF TONA WITHIN CONSTITUTIONAL DOCUMENTS
1777-DERIVED DIRECTLY FROM ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION 1777
ARTICLE VI, PARAGRAPH 1, parts 2 and 3
...;nor shall any person holding any office of profit or trust under the United States, or any of them, accept any present, emolument, office or title of any kind whatever from any King, Prince, or foreign State; nor shall the United States in Congress assembled, or any of them, grant any title of nobility."
1810-AMENDMENT XIII IN ITS FINAL FORM AS APPROVED BY US SENATE ON APRIL 26, 1810 WITH A VOTE OF 26-1 WITH 7 ABSENT OR NOT VOTING (FOR THE 17 STATES).
PRESENT IN BILL OF RIGHTS PUBLISHED WITH ALL STATE/TERRITORY CONSTITUTIONS 1819-1867
If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.
Reference Constitution of the United States of America printed in 1825 in Portland, Maine: COPY OF 1825 MAINE & US CONSTITUTION WITH AMENDMENT XIII (see slide 46/49): https://www.mainememory.net/media/pdf/101558.pdf
1861-CONSTITUTION OF THE CONFEDERATE STATES OF AMERICA-RATIFIED MAR11, 1861
SECTION 9 (LIMITS ON CONGRESS, BILL OF RIGHTS), ITEM 11
No title of nobility shall be granted by the Confederate States; and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.
Ratified by SOUTH CAROLINA, GEORGIA, FLORIDA, ALABAMA, MISSISSIPPI, LOUISIANA, AND TEXAS in 1861
The obvious connection here is if LOUISIANA, MISSISSIPPI, AND ALABAMA all voted for this Constitution with AMENDMENT XIII present in it, why are their ratification votes in 1815, 1817, and 1819 still "disputed" per below data? The "slave states" were all voting against British interference, control, and corruption in state affairs, and eventually had to form the Confederacy to implement TONA fully to get rid of the British scourge, and this is why they were attacked and destroyed.
RATIFICATION PROCESS AND ANALYSIS DATA
PROPOSED___US SENATE___JAN18, 1810
YES_________US SENATE___APR26, 1810___VOTE OF 26-1, 7 ABSENT
YES_________US HOUSE___MAY01, 1810___VOTE OF 87-3, 18-3 VA DELEGATION
___
NOW 3/4 OF THE 17 STATE ASSEMBLIES NEED TO RATIFY, THIS IS
13/17 STATES TO GIVE 0.76 (0.75 REQ'D)
___
ST# ___RATIFIED#__RATIO_ENTITY__________DATE__NOTES
___
_1_____1-YES_____0.06___MARYLAND_______DEC25, 1810
_2_____2-YES_____0.12___DELAWARE_______1811
_3_____3-YES_____0.18___PENNSYLVANIA____1811
_4_____4-YES_____0.24___NEW JERSEY_____1811
_5_____5-YES_____0.29___GEORGIA________1811
_6_____6-YES_____0.35___NORTH CAROLINA_1811
_7_____7-YES_____0.41___VERMONT________1811
_8_____8-YES_____0.47___KENTUCKY_______1811
_9_____9-YES_____0.53___TENNESEE________1811
10_____10-YES_____0.59___MASSACHUSETTS_1812
11_____11-YES_____0.65___NEW HAMPSHIRE__1812
___
START OF WAR OF 1812 ON JUN18, 1812; WAR ENDS FEB17, 1815 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_1812 ; 4-30-1812 LA added (14th vote)
___
ST# ___RATIFIED#_RATIO__ENTITY___________DATE__NOTES
___
12_____NO INFO___0.65___VIRGINIA_________1812__SESSION INTERRUPTED BY BRITISH NAVY
13_____REJECT____0.65____NEW YORK_______1813__FREE STATE
14_____REJECT____0.65____CONNECTICUT____1813__FREE STATE
15_____REJECT____0.65____RHODE ISLAND____1814__FREE STATE
16_____TABLED____0.65____SOUTH CAROLINA__1814__SLAVE STATE; NOT VOTED ON
17_____REJECT____0.65___OHIO_____________1814?__FREE STATE; ADMITTED MAR01, 1803
___
ABOVE 17 STATES WERE PART OF THE UNION ON MAY01, 1810 WHEN AMEND XIII PASSED HOUSE. State date of admission to Union: https://www.britannica.com/topic/list-of-U-S-states-by-date-of-admission-to-the-Union-2130026
___
ST# ___RATIFIED#_RATIO__ENTITY______DATE_NOTES
___
18_____12-YES____0.67___LOUISIANA___1815__SLAVE STATE; ADMITTED APR30, 1812
19_____REJECT____0.63___INDIANA_____1816__FREE STATE; ADMITTED DEC11, 1816
20_____13-YES____0.65___MISSISSIPPI__1817__SLAVE STATE; ADMITTED DEC10, 1817
21_____REJECT____0.62___ILLINOIS_____1818__FREE STATE; ADMITTED DEC03, 1818
21_____14-YES____0.67___VIRGINIA_____1819__SLAVE STATE; MAR12, 1819 REVISED CODE NOTICE
___
FIRST SERIES OF ATTEMPTED RATIFICATIONS BY LOUISIANA 1815 (DISPUTED) AND THEN VIRGINA 1819 (DISPUTED)
VIRGINIA SPENT 1817-1819 DOCUMENTING VA REVISED CODE TO PROVE THEY RATIFIED IT PREVIOUSLY; PUB MAR12, 1819
The General Assembly of Virginia authorized the distribution of the Revised Code of 1819 with ten copies designated for the executive branch of Virginia, five copies for the Clerk of the General Assembly, and four copies for the Secretary of State of the United States; one copy each for Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and President James Monroe; one copy each for the federal Senate, House, and Library of Congress, and one copy for every judge in the courts of the United States in Virginia. Thus was the Federal Government notified of the actions of the Virginia General Assembly ratifying the Thirteenth Amendment.
SEE VA Const. Link above underTDLR
___
ST# ___RATIFIED#_RATIO__ENTITY_____DATE__NOTES
___
21_____15-YES____0.71___S. CAROLINA__1819?___SLAVE STATE
22_____16-YES____0.73___ALABAMA_____1819___SLAVE STATE, ADMITTED DEC14, 1819
23_____17-YES____0.74___MAINE_______1820___FREE STATE, AMEND XIII IN ME CONSTITUTION
24_____18-YES____0.75___MISSOURI____1821___SLAVE STATE, ADMITTED AUG08, 1821
SECOND SERIES OF ATTEMPTED RATIFICATIONS BY MISSOURI 1821 (DISPUTED); Digging into 1821 Missouri Constitution to re-verify.
MAINE, MISSOURI, AND S. CAROLINA (UNKNOWN DATE) WERE CRITICAL HERE. S. CAROLINA HAD TABLED IN 1814 DURING THE WAR, BUT EVENTUALLY VOTED FOR IT. NOTE S. CAROLINA ALSO VOTED FOR IT IN 1861. BY INCLUDING IN ITS CONSTITUTION in 1825 (similarly to VA in 1819), MAINE DEMONSTRATED DEFACTO RATIFICATION as the 18/24 vote after MISSOURI's 17/24 in 1821, making it 3/4 of the states approving it.
SEE ME Const. Link above under TDLR.
___
ST# ___RATIFIED#_RATIO__ENTITY___________DATE___NOTES
___
25_____19-YES____0.76___ARKANSAS________1836___SLAVE STATE; ADMITTED JUN15, 1836
___
THIRD SERIES FULL RATIFICATION BY ARKANSAS 1836, NOT DISPUTED AS NEXT 13 STATES ALL COPIED AMENDMENT XIII INTO THEIR CONSTITUTIONS EVEN AS TERRITORIES, EFFECTIVELY RATIFYING BY PUBLICATION (CO INCLUSIVE, 1876); South Carolina did eventually ratify it sometime prior to 1836, but unknown date.
The admission of ARKANSAS was overseen by Andrew Jackson in his last full year of office, 1836. The 2nd US Bank Charter expired FEB01, 1836, so admission of ARKANSAS was a poke in the eye of the British for good measure, and right in the face of the British. The British were attempting to force renewal of the Bank Charter to force debt interest payments directly, and the presence/full ratification of TONA made it very difficult for them to operate. Ever wonder why ARKANSAS was targeted for takeover/destruction by the cabal via CIA drug running, Clintoncidation, and Wal-mart sponsored human trafficking? This is probably why. Digging in to the 1836 Arkansas Constitution to re-verify.
WAR OF 1812 and 1815-1816 BRITISH ACTIONS MAY HAVE BEEN PREPARATION FOR ELECTION OF 1824
The British burned in 1812, 1. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, 2. CAPITOL BUILDING, 3. WHITE HOUSE attempting to destroy all copies and records of Amendment XIII along with documentation of their infiltration into high levels of the US government.
One of the key things that needed to be destroyed at this time was the evidence of British control and/or close association with John Adams (2nd President https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Adams) and his son John Quincy Adams (elected in 1824). There is a reason they were both 1 TERM Presidents. If you understand what happened in the rigged election of 1824 in order to keep Populist Nationalist and Patriot Andrew Jackson out of office, then you get it. It appears that the British helped rig/steal the election of 1824 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1824_United_States_presidential_election) for the benefit of their cabal stooge JQA (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Quincy_Adams).
The British leaned heavily on the United States from the end of the war in 1815 until the 2nd Bank charter was approved in 1816. The British were actively sabotaging the American economy until they agreed to the Bank Charter (and as a false narrative of 'economic collapse' for why the US needed the Bank).
Another source with lots of historical dates/details one may verify with the official state records: https://themillenniumreport.com/2017/04/confirmed-the-original-thirteenth-amendment-was-ratified-and-then-improperly-removed/
Fantastic post, Anon.
ty. I'm hoping we have some legal anons here that can put this to use with some ProSe action. I believe one would have standing to use this Amendment XIII if any officer of a STATE CORPORATION or STATE BAR CORP (or member) takes any action against you, including violation of Constitutional rights.
Here's your SCOTUS case to hit the 3 requirements to get STANDING:
https://constitutionallawreporter.com/2020/02/25/lujan-v-defenders-of-wildlife-decision/
[this perspective assumes one is the Plaintiff, the one bringing the suit in a ProSe filing]
Ever noticed (they) want us to imagine for ourselves that the Monarchy one day just up and quit fucking with us and now we are bested buddies in the whole wide world?
The crazy British are even joking that we belong to UK and They are spreading their stupid propaganda. WE ARE FREE FROM THEM. Thank you so much for the info memetodeath
Saying we are part of the UK is fight'n words if you ask me
Agreed 💯
Like I imagine a dog beaten into submission and having two teeth knocked out stops biting you? /s
Would it be accurate to say that this amendment bars any one who is a BAR member from holding office?
Guess who never attempted to pass the BAR (British Accredited Registry)?
President Donald J. Trump
🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸
The problem is that we cannot prove at this point that the American BAR is actually a entity foreign to the United States (Union, per 1789 Constitution). We can only prove it is foreign to the sovereign states unless we get discovery and/or subpoena to see the Articles of Incorporation corporate paperwork. If we prove that Washington DC is in fact a "foreign power" via it being a corporation domiciled in England, then we're getting somewhere.
Whoever is in charge of the British Accredited Registry or International Bar Association have scrubbed their tracks so well that there is no trace left that I can find. It is possible that the 1st Edition Encyclopedia Britannica (circa 1755?) may mention it, but it appears to be scrubbed from the 3rd edition (1797).
I have PDF's of the 1771 Enclopedia Britannica, neither BAR or the International Bar Association are mentioned in there.
Is there an online source for such a pdf anywhere?
I'm a brit-pede who would really like to see how much of our history has been modified. In the UK they are pretty difficult to find, let alone afford.
Here were are.....
Volume 1: https://files.catbox.moe/zp2w06.pdf
Volume 2: https://files.catbox.moe/zp2w06.pdf
Volume 3: https://files.catbox.moe/majc0u.pdf
fyi...volume 1 and volume 2 are same file here (both volume1, in fact); volume 3 looks correct
Sorry about this, here is #2.
https://files.catbox.moe/clfz51.pdf
Thank you, that's very generous.
You mean all the Cabal had to do was encourage young Donald to pass BAR ? Oh boy, wait until they finally realise this...
Correct. The BAR is a foreign entity to all states since it is domiciled in Washington DC and all state bars are franchises of this entity. I don't yet have the sauce showing the ownership of the British Accredidation Registry ownership of the DC-based BAR, but I might have an opportunity to get discovery in some upcoming legal cases.
Everything start to make sense now. That is why we have Gavinuseless and all his family of Pelosi’s in that state. If you have noticed, those states in the north are taking over too by the criminals.
Hard to swallow, but true. A Corporate gov't does not have to abide by the Constitution and may serve its owners and its own interests.
But this is also why it is unconstitutional in violation of Article IV, Section4. A "corporate form of gov't" is not a "Republican form of gov't" guaranteed. All state CORPS are in breach of contract, and the contract is the 1789 Constitution with the guarantee.
I believe we were free from the British when I saw President Trump walking ahead of the Queen. Do you remember that video?
People here in tehe UK were calling him an idiot, as well as disrespectful for being late to the show, but I saw it for what it was: a show of power and who the boss really is.
That was all the proof I needed at the time. Such things don't happen by accient.
Yes. Loved that sooo much. That may have been a Queen body double even way back then? Seems likely to me. Not sure if we will even find out details like that in a verifiable way (other than breadcrumbs).
My mom is almost 89 and i have showed some of the videos and told me yesterday that DeSantis is done. I can’t believe she said it, anyhow she can’t see all the videos I am watching, they are too strong and my sister doesn’t cuz she has thyroid problems and doesn’t want to worry, but she will be when she realizes the big problems we have with the cops, I don’t know what is going to happen but hopefully black hats will be eradicated soon. This war is getting too long.,
Splendid!
Also any previous BAR members. Once they join the BAR, they lose their citizenship automatically.
I believe I had read there once existed and amendment specifically barring attorneys (esquires) from holding office...EDIT : missing 13th amendment is what pulls up - sounds like the TONI law
Yep. This is it. The American BAR Association has so far managed to hide their ownership by a British entity (British Accredited Registry or International Bar Association), but all STATE BAR CORPS were created between 1871-1932, are incorporated/domiciled in Washington DC, and were used to setup all the STATE CORPS in 1933 that are now sitting on top of California State (Union, 1850) for example.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA (1933) is a CORPORATION created by STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA CORP (1927), and then a "municipal corporation service contract" was created in violation of Article IV, Section 4 in 1933. They were even arrogant/dumb enough to put it into the CA Constitution, Article VI in 1966, making ALL of CA gov't UNCONSTITUTIONAL as of Nov 8, 1966: https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZE4cVfi5/proof-that-the-state-bar-of-cali/
It appears that the STATE BAR CORPS needed to wait for the 1871 DC Act before they could incorporate in DC to be outside the sovereign state and Article III courts jurisdiction, basically.
Award-winning research, I'm going to be busy for a while.🙏🏻
Here's another document I found that has a nice summary. It gets into some tangents, but has much of the ratification information that I have found elsewhere. fyi...the ratification info got pulled from the State Assembly official records from those time periods. Note that there is an ongoing effort to destroy all traces and eliminate it from history completely. http://thematrixhasyou.org/13th-amendment/Original-13th-Amendment-History.pdf
Note who makes " a deal you can't refuse". Same mafia tactics, same mafia results.
-Don Corleone (in the Godfather, if he was less subtle)
Full mechanism is not known, but it likely was "a good deal" that could not be refused by some of the landowners. The true data on number of Southern landowners that actually used slaves is likely much lower than promoted by the cabal-media.
Remember that the South had a thriving economy of sharecroppers who were getting paid in gold/silver issued by the states for their labor. And this arrangement added significantly to the productivity and wealth of the South. My theory is that because the individual landowners in the South refused to Corporatize the assets like in the North, they get targeted with lots of misinformation about how widespread slavery really was.
One could argue that slavery was more trouble than it was worth, and it clearly was against the strong Christian Bible values held by most large and wealthy Southern landowners. They were wealthy because they owned the land, not because they owned the slaves, imo.
sure they were, who would be the best slaves on the planet, but the newest economy and who could enslave better using the banks than the brits ?
"old news" in the sense that we know the Brits were up to no good. But this info is important for 2 reasons:
Amendment XIII was never repealed and it is ACTIVE right now in Article III, Federal Courts; They just hid it, and then put the 13th Amendment to abolish slavery on top of it. Do you see how devious this was? Put an amendment abolishing slavery on top of Amendment XIII which was ratified to prevent enslavement of America by the British.
This is part of the "real" explanation for the South seceding. It is because the North had been completely co-opted by the British and after the 1861 bankruptcy, the North was trying to force the Southern states to sign up to pay for the national debt owed to the British Crown
I knew it wasn't about slavery, that was the cover sham. But any story that the South was working on emancipation was deep sixed.
How about this one, The South is a scam term, because the people who owned the slaves were a minority and the rest of the people down South are like, WTF are you whipping people for to work on your farm ?
Correct. "Slavery" was intentionally used to compromise enough landowners in the south in order to use it as a weapon against them later. People in the North only knew what the newspapers told them and all newspapers were cabal controlled.
And we all know who owned 90% of the slave ships and trafficking business.
Most people are not aware of most of the facts of emancipation. In order to gain support Lincoln left slavery as legal in Northern states. He also freed slaves in DC but paid the debts of the slave owners to gain support. The South was the only region affected and since landowners had mortgaged their land to pay for slaves it meant they would all lose their land once the slaves were free since few had money to pay off the debt.
Your observation is brilliant. It may turn out that there were "bankers" financing the purchase of slaves using land as collateral, and then when the slaves get freed (asset purchased with the "mortgage loan" to produce crops to sell to then pay the mortgage) many of the landowners probably couldn't make the payments on the loan they took out to buy the now free slaves; and they got foreclosed on (i.e. the bankers/slave traders that tricked them into taking out a loan, ended up with all the land).
That is what I thought too. How brilliant.
Yep. "Civil War" was straight up land and asset grab by the North to collateralize the national debt.
yess...
That's antisemitic
u/#howdareyou
Global temperature went up by a degree.
Only 1? 😱
How do you boil a frog?
Whaaaaaaaaaaaaat? Don't even know wut u talkin' about Willis! /s
You’re not supposed to notice that Kanye
I think this is very possible.
Sounds like that never stopped
So basically red states blue states today
Brief history:
This 👆👆👆
Van Buren was a traitor and Andrew Jackson was the last REAL president
Absolutely fascinating. Thank you for this!
Lincoln was from a cabal family, but he didn't do what he was told. It looks to me like he got taken out for failure to institute a new Central Bank, and was doing things to free the currency from the International Bankers. It is possible that he refused to Re-collateralize, and was just going to write-off all the debt, screwing the bankers. And of course, they don't like getting screwed.
"It is possible that he refused to Re-collateralize, and was just going to write-off all the debt, screwing the bankers."
Would this have been the purpose of his "greenbacks"? I remember reading about them in school and have always felt that they had something to do with the real reason he was killed.
Yes. That is a good place to start with that rabbit hole. I believe they were silver-backed, but they certainly were not being issued by the International Bankers. I don't recall what was going on with the debt at that time, but if you want to understand what was happening follow the debt. It is the key to understanding everything since at least 1489 AD.
Benjamin Franklin was most definitely a White Hat 💕
Ben Franklin was a rebel, indeed. 😂
My entire relationship with politics. Kek
Holy Kekkeddy KEK, that was hilarious.
old Ben might have been an OG anon...hehe; with all his electricity from the sky, and understanding the weather (Almanac) to grow your own food conspiracy theory stuff. /s
Wow, amazing information. Thank you. This type of information NEVER gets taught to us.
I used a timeline analysis overlaid with a "free-state" vs "slave-state" dig that got triggered by" "What the hell was that Missouri Compromise, really all about?" It initially started as a War of 1812 dig, but then transformed once I found that 1825 State of Maine pdf document.
Note that I had been digging into Election of 1824 rigging and Andrew Jackson vs the Central Bank before that.
Info on "debt collateralization": https://greatawakening.win/p/15JUCbSJWq/a-brief-history-of-united-states/
WOW! I taught US History for 30 years and I never knew any of this!! Amazing research you've done.
Please don't take this the wrong way, but our "History" department is, at best, an abject failure where all curiosity has deceased, or is a complete psyop
At this point, I agree with you!
Interesting. As a Canadian youth, I was taught that the War of 1812 was started because of American aggression, trying to expand their territory as it was their "Manifest Destiny" to annex all of North America.
I think that's how they try to explain the attack on Louisiana/New Orleans by the British. If one looks at the big picture one comes to this question:
They really had no legitimate business with any of the states, except, of course, the interest payments on the debt owed to the Crown after the 1st Bank was dissolved. So they had to invent other stories to cover this up since they apparently did not want it known that the Crown had bought the debt from the French sometime between 1783 and 1791.
"... 11 of the 12 ratification votes needed already in hand, and only 1 more was required to reach the 2/3 for full ratification."
Full ratification of an Amendment requires 3/4's of States.
https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/constitution
"The Constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures. None of the 27 amendments to the Constitution have been proposed by constitutional convention. The Congress proposes an amendment in the form of a joint resolution....
"A proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by three-fourths of the States."
You are correct. It is 3/4 once it gets sent to the states. This is probably why the 1836 Arkansas ratification was so critical. With South Carolina's vote 'for' sometime prior to 1836 and Arkansas's vote for in 1836, the score is 18/25 = 0.72 according to my count, excluding Maine. With Maine, which appears to have ratified by publication via inclusion in its own Constitution in 1820, that would make it 19/25 = 0.76 states ratifying. But it also looks like Missouri put it over the top with 0.75 in 1821. I suspect this is why Maine published their Constitution in 1825 to show they had ratified it in 1820, thus the "official" full ratification in 1836 with Arkansas and the subsequent inclusion in the next 13 states Constitutions.
Thanks for correction. I think I got the final date of full ratification right, despite this error, and this makes Arkansas and Andrew Jackson even MORE important that I thought.
This makes me wonder if "Remember the Maine" was more than war propaganda, and maybe a message to the American People to go back and look at their Constitution publication?
u/MemeToDeath2021
Somebody posted up an old History Book of Lincolns that had Amendment XIII TONA. I can't find it anymore but I was wondering if it was you or would you know where to find it?
Here a few posts you might be referring to:
1825 Military Laws of United States: https://greatawakening.win/p/16aTa2w00Z/checkmate-deep-state-bitches-mil/c/
Amendment XIII TONA 18 of 24 states Re-ratified by January 31, 1824: https://greatawakening.win/p/16b690DoWm/preview-confirmation-of-amendmen/
Lincoln-era document: Army Regulations 1861: https://greatawakening.win/p/16b6IGjO23/possible-insight-into-how-lincol/c/
Thank you!
LINK NOT WORKINGNVM YOU HAVE A TYPO IN YOUR POST FOR THE LINK
VA Const. (1819):
https://republicfortheunitedstatesofamerica.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Missing-13th-Amendment-1819-Laws-of-Virginia.pdf