Elon is trolling the Free Masons... 😜
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (33)
sorted by:
I personally have faith in Elon...
This Elon, yes!
me too. he's a genius with a great sense of humor, so doubt he could be a liberal.
He's a Very intelligent man...
He's going from strength to strength. his appearance on the screen in 2022 with the Twit and all that has unfolded since seems too well orchestrated and coordinated (with other habbenings) to be random. Major plan vibes.
There are some who fear, who say "he's simply a dark lord waiting to emerge, appearing as an angel of light" etc, but imo, that's a fear-based concept.
Freemasonry hid Tartarian buildings/history, laying the foundation of lies of which our society is built on.
Looks that way to me. All those amazingly beautiful buildings (made of stone for the most part), destroyed for no reason that makes sense.
The Tartarians are just the Scythians. We call them the "Mongolians," and we think that they ruled for a short amount of time, then fell apart. THAT is the lie.
The Scythians ruled between 20-30% of the world (most of Asia and a great deal of Europe) for somewhere between 2500 to 5000 years (or more). The Scythian Empire was multicultural, and started from at least 800BC, though much more likely around 3300BC (Yamnaya/Corded Ware cultures were either precursors, or were just the same culture and system of government). Tartaria's final decline began with the Moscovy revolt (formerly a Principality of Scythia/Tartaria) in the 16th century, though it took quite a long time to die. It officially ended in the beginning of the 20th Century when the USSR finally squashed it and, with the aid of the rest of the worlds "experts" (the Ministry of Truth created by Rockefeller/Rothschild et al) purposefully hid their existence.
The Scythian Empire is hidden from "truthers" by mashing in evidence of giants and architecture that is irrelevant (not false, just not relevant), In many cases that evidence is falsely applied (has nothing to do with the Tartarian Empire). In other words, there is evidence of giants that is hidden, and there is evidence of architecture that is hidden, but neither of those things is directly related to the removal of the Scythians/Tartarians from history.
Forcing the evidence of giants and architecture into the Scythian history is a form of Controlled Opposition. By making Tartarian history "out there" (fringe), it hides their real history, which is that there was an Empire, called the Scythians, that FAR outshone the Roman Empire, even subjugating it at some points (the Romans paid tribute to the Scythians at some points in their history).
In other words, the evidence suggests that the Tartarian "giants/free energy architecture" myth is a lie to cover a much bigger lie from those who would investigate it.
never heard of the Scythians before/thanks. And do you know anything about giants in America? some tribes have stories of cannibal giants, and another race of little 'deveals' as Lewis and Clark called them.
crazy to realize HOW much TPTB have hidden from us.
I probably should have included some links in the above post.
Here is evidence that the Tartarians are just the Scythians given a new name:
Petes, 1722 (page 15)
Thomas Lanquet, 1549 (page 558, year 1395)
Denis Petau, 1659 (page 720)
Sir Walter Raleigh, 1560 (page 758)
There are many others. In fact, in order to believe that the Tartarians were not the Scythians, you must ignore every single historian prior to the 20th century.
"Official" history says the Scythians were wiped out in 200AD (without any meaningful event that could have done so), and then official history calls Attila the Hun a Scythian 300 years later. It's quite the pickle. As far as I can tell, the name "Tartarians" came about with Ghengis Khan ~1160AD, but who gave them that name I am not sure. Every single shred of evidence suggests that they were just the Scythians, and that the Scythians never went away at any point in between, on the contrary, there are numerous other historical events and leaders that mark them clearly.
Here is evidence that the USSR purposefully hid the existence of the Tartarians/Scythians:
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP78-02771R000200090002-6.pdf (page 10). (Note: you may have to copy/paste the pdf name into the search bar on that page, as direct links don't always work.)
Here is the reference that paper above uses, written by historian and Soviet expert Walter Kolartz (starts on page 31, relevant section on page 39). It shows that the Tartarian language was intentionally removed from existence through the First and Second Alphabet Revolution conducted by the USSR to purposefully separate the past and the present from those Tartarians that remained, wiping out their history from themselves.
As for Giants, I've seen many things, but I haven't written up anything on them formally, so my evidence is not as well compiled. It also really depends on what you mean by "giants." There is quite a bit of evidence of "Indians" (Catalina, Patagonia, etc.) that were in the 7-8 foot range, but are those really "giants?" We have otherwise perfectly normal and healthy people that are in that range today, if not an entire "race" of such. How tall does a group of people need to be to be called "giant" and not just "really tall?"
There is evidence for taller, in the 9 to 10 foot range. Those might be legitimately "giants," but to a 7-8 foot tall person, they are merely "really tall." I've seen evidence of 12, 16, 20 feet tall, but how good is that evidence? It gets a lot worse the taller you go. But evidence that "isn't that good" doesn't mean bad evidence. I really need to dig in deeper into those pieces of evidence, and that is something I just haven't had the time for.
There is substantial evidence that "really tall people" and "advanced people" has been hidden though, so who knows what the truth is.
Enjoy your offerings, Slyver, as always.
Not to derail, but wonder if "Tartarian" has any connection with Game of Thrones elites "Targaryen," kings so powerful they had dragons (Asian history connection).
Just a thought...
Very possible. Those "in the know," know. The Dothraki are a near perfect example of the Scythian horse lords (mobile troops); their culture, their "you keep what you kill" style of government, lifestyle, etc..
Scythians perhaps settled in Scotland. Also a lot of information that the welsh settled in North America (and a lot of misinformation too surrounding this).
https://www.historyisnowmagazine.com/blog/2019/3/3/the-origins-of-scotland-and-where-its-people-came-from#.Y_fSIy0RqLc=
Yes, I think the Scythians are likely the origin of almost all of the Asiatic and European cultures, the Chinese and Egyptians being the only exception (though they had substantial direct influence on the Chinese).
I think the reason the Scythian Empire lasted so long was because of ease of movement. They were "horse lords," though not exclusively (they also had numerous cities). They created all the "ancient" roads (Silk Road, Amber Road, etc.). Beyond the roads however, they were based primarily on the Asiatic Steppes, which provided a natural path, with amazing mobility all across Asia and Eastern Europe for their horses and wagons and "gypsy" style mobile homes (they were also the origin of the gypsies). This natural highly mobile path was perfect for trade and control of such a large Empire with their unmatched, elite mobile horse troops (more recently called the Cossacks).
There were natural boundaries however (mountain ranges, seas, etc.) and along those boundaries, exchanges (trade, culture, genetic mixing, tribute) between the outposts and Central Authority was reduced. So while they may have been the seed of all those far flung civilizations, the ones that were too far away from that central path (the Steppes) tended to be less likely under their direct control as time went on. "Direct control" means Tributaries AKA Principalities that paid Tribute to the Central Authority and were "on call" for any war effort some Khan of Khans decided to embark on (there were many more than just Attila and Ghengis).
Events like Attila the Hun, or Ghengis Khan were reconquests of these principalities that fell away, not conquests. The Goths, the Gauls, the Scots, the Irish, the Welsh, the Vikings, the Moscovites, the Slavs, the Greeks, the Macedonians, the Romans, the Iranians, the Arabs, the Indians (in India) etc. were all Scythian outposts. The ones furthest away from the Steppes spent the least time under control of the Central Authority. So, for example, the Scots were pretty far removed from the Scythian roots, and thus just a Scythian seed, where as the Moscovians, being very near the Steppes were almost always under direct control, until they declared independence and began breaking away in the 16th century.
I've written over a hundred pages on the Tartarians/Scythians. At some point I will finish it and publish it.
OPs image was actually a 2 meme reply by Elon. He trolled illuminati and also Freemasons.
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1628440536305795072?s=46&t=1a2t3I5yiqcrBxIG4FzZDg
He also posted “Kek”
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1628667176902352896?s=46&t=1a2t3I5yiqcrBxIG4FzZDg
I joined the Freemasons 10 years ago. I joined to find out what the hell was going on. I lived in a very very small town. They were nice guys. Kind. Respectable. Decent people.
However when I asked questions about our role in politics and statecraft I could get no answers. If they had answers it was only at the highest levels and they would not talk.
Last year I demitted and said a prayer. I did not know I was involving myself with Satan but I can say that Freemasons acknowledge the light and the dark and that individual masons and lodges can be maligned good or evil.
There are 5 million masons and most have no idea.
Of course I was in Canada at the time so it could be different.
I believe the evil in the Freemasons uses the good people who join to do good works for their community and humanity, as camouflage. Not all Freemasons are evil or even aware of the evil but the organization as a whole is beholden to Satan. I think the same of other secret societies like them such as the Shriners or Rotarians and even the Knights of Columbus.
Exactly.. Growing up I knew many and they lived, died, without scandal or shameful anything. Good people.
America was founded by Freemasons.
I believe the bad guys use the good nature of the organization the same way they co-opt social justice movements.
Anyhow im back to being alone and trying to build my relationship with Christ.
Politics and religion are not talked about in the lodge….
I never asked inside lodge.
That was of course not allowed.
Usually one on one conversation with trusted older brothers.
Some whom were 33rd degree. They genuinely did not appear interested in politics.
One told me once. If you roll in mud with the swines your gonna get dirty.
That was the most I got.
That and I had access to an interesting library. All of which can be found publicly online.
Glad you got out fren...🙏
Kek. Interesting also that there is a drama series on BBC called The Gold which is about the Brinks Mat Good robbery in 1983. The story features a lot of references to Freemasons and the corruption within the Metropolitan Police as a result of officers being involved with the masons. It also outlines the money laundering set up to clean the gold that was stolen and how it was used to fund developments like London Docklands. I kept thinking that it was possible soft disclosure?
LMAO
Is he saying theyre done?
Strings cut maybe. But I honestly think he trolling.
From what I understand of the origins of Free Masons, were that during the days of Castle Building, since castles were in high demand all through Europe. That Masons, if good enough to be in demand by contactors, had the right to freely travel between different lands and kingdoms to fulfil the requests of those they built for (such as kings, dukes, Lords... Etc). And thus the brotherhood began. Making connections.
Now this could be just the history they feed us on the origins, but as for doing their work for free. I do not believe that was the case.
However, I still like Elon trolling.
If you were a king, you obviously had an interest in making sure your masons and architects would be able to build the strongest fortifications, and the grandest display of artistry. A King would also employ chemists (alchemists) to determine the strongest metal for swords, etc. All stone masons (pre 17th century or so) were employed by the monarchy, as the building of stone buildings (cathedrals and castles) was a secret art. It would be dangerous if the enemy got full access to your secrets as it would ruin your advantage.
They had the full understanding of Gods workings via many many years of observing the stars, agriculture, building, maths, philosophy.
This is the original freemasonry, passing down and preserving the secrets that allow for the building of a great Cathedral (amongst many other things). The knowledge has probably been preserved from Ancient Greece, Egypt and perhaps Sumeria before that. These are the true founders of Christianity (before Christianity was turned into a limited hangout by Rome).
These original freemasons sought (and some may still seek) to give knowledge to the world in a safe manner. Just giving ALL this knowledge to humanity instantly without the full understanding would lead to chaos, so it has to be trickled out.
u/#mikeyep
he's not trolling, he's literally one of them going to World Economic Forum, the World Government Summit, he wore a "novus ordo seclorum" jacket. He's literally one of them.
Trump went to Davos
Does anyone want to tell Elon?
Whoaaaaa lmao