I bet Oprah and the big losers are wondering what happened to them as well... where were their people that should've warned them..... 😂, a den of thieves has no frens.
In Europe, they passed "Bail In" laws after 2008, meaning if a bank went under, the bank customers funds were used to absorb the losses, rather than a public bail-out.
I can't help notice that many of those names attached to SVB are Deep Staters. If they were held liable for bail-ins, they're gonna take a massive financial hit.
It's all a show to take your eye off the ball. You already forgot about j6, Ohio, and the fact our gov used tax dollars to engineer co19. Don't feel bad for the billionaires there all in on it don't let them fool you. Oprah lost millions? She is a billionaire
The bank had already been dinged for improper reserve levels months back.. It is likely that the bank was unable to unwind it's investments fast enough to keep up with the withdrawals... (Just Checked back: they had something like 98 Billion locked up in investments with a 6.5 year maturity in which they were already down 16 Billion at the close of 2022 as a result of rising interest rates plus another 2.3 Billion loss on their short term holdings. The sixteen billion loss would likely have resolved it self as the long term investments (bonds) were paying out about 3Billion a quarter so by 2029 they would have been alright.) Perhaps investments in Big Tech were underwater and the bank could not afford to take the loss??? The investors who recommended that their portfolio companies move their money accentuated the problem... I am curious as to how many of the 37,4xx out non insured (>250,000) account holders (per close of 2022 data) got their money out..... The deposits over the insured level represented something like 159 Billion of 176 Billion in total deposits..
So here's what I think. The money sent to Ukraine and the train explosion in East Palestine Ohio had us saying "They should use money to save us here in the US! Not overseas!!" So now that SVB has fallen, they will use our cries against us and use the money to bail out SVB. When we complain, they will say "You wanted us to use money to help people in our own country, now we are. Why are you still crying???"
They were too busy planning which cocktail parties they would attend.
Do you think "official" government regulators have ANY fucking idea what they are doing?
Hahahahahahahaha.
Do you think Fauci has a god damned idea of how to use an electron microscope?
They have the guns behind them. They can force taxpayer money be used to solve their problems, and hide their incompetence.
When you have the guns and control of the tax money, you can focus your time on more important things, like being seen at the right cocktail parties -- and taking your orders from your puppet masters.
Then its probably a good thing if they blame Trump. They have done that since 2015. Blaming Trump IS a red pill IMO.
The normies (which is not the same thing as "dems" as you imply) are literally being shown how DS lied straight to their face re: J6. Other narratives like COVID origin, VAX injury/excess mortality, election fraud, and more ... all falling apart.
IMO, what we can do is reinforce the truths coming out.
Let them blame Trump, they can keep destroying themselves.
He's not wrong. The bots, dogbrains, NPC's, and shills are out in full force on Twitter today blaming Trump for the collapse because he removed regulations that would have in no way prevented this collapse, but that won't stop them from lying about it.
Yea it's exactly the same scenario as the Ohio train derailment they're latching onto this one narrative, and gaslighting their idiot followers into believing it.
The regulators were busy causing the crash. Sure took the news focus away from Tucker Carlson though, didn't it?
I bet Oprah and the big losers are wondering what happened to them as well... where were their people that should've warned them..... 😂, a den of thieves has no frens.
They were focused on getting their own money out.
COULD THIS BE A WHITE HAT ATTACK?
In Europe, they passed "Bail In" laws after 2008, meaning if a bank went under, the bank customers funds were used to absorb the losses, rather than a public bail-out.
I can't help notice that many of those names attached to SVB are Deep Staters. If they were held liable for bail-ins, they're gonna take a massive financial hit.
Yes. I wonder if there is a list of “woke” depositors and loan recipients. Maybe just look at the flight logs for Lolita express? Hehe
Seizure of assets under grand jury indictment? Could have happened and no one would be the wiser…
EO 13818
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/DCPD-201700923
I think so. Pacwest took a similar hit, as well as mhau (mhua?) Both are suspicious.
Yes, SVB is where China and the Dems keep their cash holed up in venture funds like Sequioa etc.
Pfff, the Fed has better things to do.
Like coke off of an underaged hooker's ass. Or lesbian crystal dance therapy courses Stuff like that, you know, important shit.
It's all a show to take your eye off the ball. You already forgot about j6, Ohio, and the fact our gov used tax dollars to engineer co19. Don't feel bad for the billionaires there all in on it don't let them fool you. Oprah lost millions? She is a billionaire
The bank had already been dinged for improper reserve levels months back.. It is likely that the bank was unable to unwind it's investments fast enough to keep up with the withdrawals... (Just Checked back: they had something like 98 Billion locked up in investments with a 6.5 year maturity in which they were already down 16 Billion at the close of 2022 as a result of rising interest rates plus another 2.3 Billion loss on their short term holdings. The sixteen billion loss would likely have resolved it self as the long term investments (bonds) were paying out about 3Billion a quarter so by 2029 they would have been alright.) Perhaps investments in Big Tech were underwater and the bank could not afford to take the loss??? The investors who recommended that their portfolio companies move their money accentuated the problem... I am curious as to how many of the 37,4xx out non insured (>250,000) account holders (per close of 2022 data) got their money out..... The deposits over the insured level represented something like 159 Billion of 176 Billion in total deposits..
They were in diversity training.
Maybe the fed has reached their ceiling for rate hikes for the time being.
"Cool, in denial
We're the cruel regulators smoking
CIGARO CIGARO CIGAR
We're the regulators that de-regulate
We're the animators that de-animate
We're the propagators of all genocide
Burning through the world's resources, then we turn and hide"
It's called oversight for a reason..
Moment, memeing this
So here's what I think. The money sent to Ukraine and the train explosion in East Palestine Ohio had us saying "They should use money to save us here in the US! Not overseas!!" So now that SVB has fallen, they will use our cries against us and use the money to bail out SVB. When we complain, they will say "You wanted us to use money to help people in our own country, now we are. Why are you still crying???"
They were too busy planning which cocktail parties they would attend.
Do you think "official" government regulators have ANY fucking idea what they are doing?
Hahahahahahahaha.
Do you think Fauci has a god damned idea of how to use an electron microscope?
They have the guns behind them. They can force taxpayer money be used to solve their problems, and hide their incompetence.
When you have the guns and control of the tax money, you can focus your time on more important things, like being seen at the right cocktail parties -- and taking your orders from your puppet masters.
They saw it happening but NCSWIC.
Working on the next scheduled crisis
I thought I read the CEO of the bank was also on the SF Fed Board or should say was. He resigned on Friday for unknown reasons. LOL
It was a Ponzie scheme right under their elitist's noses. It's simply delicious.
Isn't it fascinating though how they achieve thar?
Again your yourTDS is showing.
Dems are blaming this on Trump for rolling back banking regulations. You know that, right?
So asking where the regulators were for this is kind of making their point, isn't it?
Instead of asking questions why don't you show some specific information to back it up?
And explain how Trump is to blame for this specific failure.
TDS.
Yes, it's TDS to be against something that makes it look like the dems are right in blaming Trump for rolling back bank regulations. 🤷♀️🤦♀️
Show some sauce not just drool.
You want me to show sauce that Trump is guilty for the SVB collapse?
I don't think he's guilty. But dems do.
They already think he's guilty for rolling back bank regulations.
What do you think their reaction will be when you say that a lack of regulations is what cause the SVB collapse?
It doesn't matter what they say. I believe that McCarthy is being controlled by Trump.
Why should we care what Dems think? Why should anyone care if they balme Trump AGAIN?
Why should we care what Dems think?
Isn't one of our main goals to red pill normies? Of which millions and millions are Dems?
Or are we all just here for a giant circle jerk?
Then its probably a good thing if they blame Trump. They have done that since 2015. Blaming Trump IS a red pill IMO.
The normies (which is not the same thing as "dems" as you imply) are literally being shown how DS lied straight to their face re: J6. Other narratives like COVID origin, VAX injury/excess mortality, election fraud, and more ... all falling apart.
IMO, what we can do is reinforce the truths coming out.
Let them blame Trump, they can keep destroying themselves.
He's not wrong. The bots, dogbrains, NPC's, and shills are out in full force on Twitter today blaming Trump for the collapse because he removed regulations that would have in no way prevented this collapse, but that won't stop them from lying about it.
Yup.
And Im not wrong either. Let them blame Trump. History shows it will backfire eventually.
Good point that the Dems had two years to fix it. And they didn't.
Like I said before, tired of trying to convince Anons using this argument is a bad idea. So I'm not going to argue with you about it. You do you.
✌️
✌️
Yea it's exactly the same scenario as the Ohio train derailment they're latching onto this one narrative, and gaslighting their idiot followers into believing it.
Yup.