The OP is mistaken. It is easier to compare PPM numbers.
At 150 PPM and lower, plant growth shuts down (not at 200 PPM as in title).
During the last ice age, which peaked approx.18,000 years ago, CO2 got down to 180 PPM. That was a close one...
Most CO2 is stored by the oceans. Once temperatures started to warm up in the interglacial starting around 11,000 years ago (give or take the Younger Dryas period), CO2 went up to 280 PPM from the warming oceans... one of the strange characteristics of water is that cold water is able to absorb and store more CO2 than warm water.
The fact that it is now approx. 400 PPM is a very good thing. Greenhouses keep their CO2 at around 1100 PPM to maximize plant growth. That is something to shoot for...
Well it is considered beyond the precipice by some climate change scientists by crossing over 400 PPM or the "no point of return" aka "uncharted" territory for humanity.
But we all know that the last time 400 PPM of carbon gas happened the earth was very lush green.
You are hitting the nail on the head. We want more CO2, not less. Always do the opposite of what the democrats are pushing. The democrats have only been right one time in history. That was the crusades against cigarette smoke. But they only did it because big tobacco was giving big bucks to the Republicans.
It is known that the additives are the main carcinogens in cigs. Tobacco from cigs or cigars may cause cancer but so can excessive eating of plants, fruits, or meats.
Our bodies are designed to take anything in with moderation and balance. Our bodies need periods of rest and fasting to recover.
Obviously when we are older recovery is longer and harder which is unavoidable.
Yes. But like everything they have tried to stamp out ALL tobacco when there may be positive benefits to unadulterated tobacco. Idk just throwing it out there
On nicotine, I have found some of that research from a couple years ago......the only reason this stuff is connected to cancer now, is the other shit they put in them. Jamestown was founded on the tobacco plant. They didn't all die from cancer. Lol. Also the most sane people I know are smokers; not only from the guaranteed calming effect, but also the neuroprotective properties. Essentially prevents apoptosis of different types of cells (brain, rbc, wbc, etc). Problem is the other shit in cigarettes. Now vapes are fucking horrible for you lol. Cough up a lung because it crystallizes inside.
There are more trees on earth right now than there has been since they started keeping track of trees. Climate change retards are in a cult. The earth is amazing.
Carbon is in everything, pretty close. By saying net zero carbon is the goal, you're literally trying to destroy all creation lol. Also carbon footprint? They prey on people who don't understand the chemical properties of carbon, let alone how absolutely necessary it is to feed the plants with carbon emissions. By restricting that, you're fucking up the whole ecosystem. Gas guzzlers, here we come! Lol. That's if you can afford the luxurious trip to the gas station
Isnt it weird how its not the toxic chemicals that cause various diseases and birth defects, its not the toxic smog that causes cancers and breathing issues, its not the acidic and caustic chemicals that cause acid rain and unbalance the ph of the enviroment, its not the manmade hormones that make amphibians change their sex, and its not the heavy metals that cause animals to start exhibiting homosexual behaviors, its the perfectly natural carbon that plants breath in and basically starts the cycle of life that makes the enviroment happen.
.04% is the total amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. Percent of atmosphere that can be attributed to man-made CO2? 0.000009% - that's 9 MILLIONTHS !!!
Man could cease to exist today and the change to the Earth's atmosphere would be next to immeasurable.
Reminds me of George Carlin's stand up. Mankind is so arrogant that we think we actually make a difference.
Green = Death.
Soylent Green = Death FTFY
Wow
I thought it was taking over! Like 40% or something!
.02?? That’s just dumb.
The OP is mistaken. It is easier to compare PPM numbers.
At 150 PPM and lower, plant growth shuts down (not at 200 PPM as in title).
During the last ice age, which peaked approx.18,000 years ago, CO2 got down to 180 PPM. That was a close one...
Most CO2 is stored by the oceans. Once temperatures started to warm up in the interglacial starting around 11,000 years ago (give or take the Younger Dryas period), CO2 went up to 280 PPM from the warming oceans... one of the strange characteristics of water is that cold water is able to absorb and store more CO2 than warm water.
The fact that it is now approx. 400 PPM is a very good thing. Greenhouses keep their CO2 at around 1100 PPM to maximize plant growth. That is something to shoot for...
Well it is considered beyond the precipice by some climate change scientists by crossing over 400 PPM or the "no point of return" aka "uncharted" territory for humanity.
But we all know that the last time 400 PPM of carbon gas happened the earth was very lush green.
400 parts per million is exactly 04%
I am not wrong. Those are equal.
Everything you repeated can be found in article I supplied.
Because it is a scam AND they want to depopulate. They want energy and food crisis galore because that's how tyranny operates.
Hunger. It's what their real plan is. Over 100 food processing plants destroyed, 2 of which had direct airplane hits. Obviously an agenda.
Two airplane hits that occurred in one week of each other
Nothing to see here.
You are hitting the nail on the head. We want more CO2, not less. Always do the opposite of what the democrats are pushing. The democrats have only been right one time in history. That was the crusades against cigarette smoke. But they only did it because big tobacco was giving big bucks to the Republicans.
Still not sure there aren't good reasons to smoke
WHY ELSE would they claim that smoking one cigarette per day is as dangerous as an entire pack?
Could it be that the American tendency to do things to excess may be part of the issue.
Perhaps cigarettes are safe if consumed responsibly. Moderation in everything...
Just muh thots
Sauce for my post:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7912116/#:~:text=Nicotine%20has%20been%20shown%20to,(POCD)%20%5B79%5D.
https://www.jneurosci.org/content/32/12/4156#:~:text=Nicotine%20improves%20cognitive%20functions%20by,cortical%20excitability%20in%20nonsmoking%20subjects.
https://actaneurocomms.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40478-018-0625-y
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7320263/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10882095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7767126/#:~:text=They%20concluded%20that%20their%20results,be%20protective%20against%20COVID%2D19.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33420786/
Just a few proofs for the downvoting-ass bitches crying bc MuH CiGgYs aRe AlL bAd
It is known that the additives are the main carcinogens in cigs. Tobacco from cigs or cigars may cause cancer but so can excessive eating of plants, fruits, or meats.
Our bodies are designed to take anything in with moderation and balance. Our bodies need periods of rest and fasting to recover.
Obviously when we are older recovery is longer and harder which is unavoidable.
Yes. But like everything they have tried to stamp out ALL tobacco when there may be positive benefits to unadulterated tobacco. Idk just throwing it out there
On nicotine, I have found some of that research from a couple years ago......the only reason this stuff is connected to cancer now, is the other shit they put in them. Jamestown was founded on the tobacco plant. They didn't all die from cancer. Lol. Also the most sane people I know are smokers; not only from the guaranteed calming effect, but also the neuroprotective properties. Essentially prevents apoptosis of different types of cells (brain, rbc, wbc, etc). Problem is the other shit in cigarettes. Now vapes are fucking horrible for you lol. Cough up a lung because it crystallizes inside.
Right. Artificial vs natural, God created vs man made
There are more trees on earth right now than there has been since they started keeping track of trees. Climate change retards are in a cult. The earth is amazing.
The more, the better.
Carbon is in everything, pretty close. By saying net zero carbon is the goal, you're literally trying to destroy all creation lol. Also carbon footprint? They prey on people who don't understand the chemical properties of carbon, let alone how absolutely necessary it is to feed the plants with carbon emissions. By restricting that, you're fucking up the whole ecosystem. Gas guzzlers, here we come! Lol. That's if you can afford the luxurious trip to the gas station
Isnt it weird how its not the toxic chemicals that cause various diseases and birth defects, its not the toxic smog that causes cancers and breathing issues, its not the acidic and caustic chemicals that cause acid rain and unbalance the ph of the enviroment, its not the manmade hormones that make amphibians change their sex, and its not the heavy metals that cause animals to start exhibiting homosexual behaviors, its the perfectly natural carbon that plants breath in and basically starts the cycle of life that makes the enviroment happen.
If CO2 levels in a human fall below normal, it results in hyperventilation.
Well what did you expect from a bunch of reptilians?
since when has the left ever let Facts get in the way of their narrative?
zero carbon, the Green movement = killing you, then taking your money