Elon is Based! He's not afraid to state the truth..he doesn't tip toe around those in corruption/are woke..he's one of the very few willing to expose the fact that there ARE side affects to the vax,(like death). That there WAS/IS massive amounts of misinformed spread by the media abt covid/masks.
(media.greatawakening.win)
WWG1WGA
What's the funniest part is where Elon winds up interviewing BBC and squirrel couldn't even find his own tail! He's even trying to DISCLAIM any of his knowledge of his puppet masters! Mr. Musk did it all completely off the cuff, straight from mind to mouth, no coaching or teleprompters.
He neutered the guy in 5 minutes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqJKAnN0-gM
I felt second hand embarrassment for that tool 😂
Brilliant!
Thank you so much for the link!
Do you honestly believe President Trump would endorse anything that could KILL you? Not a single soul keeling over where I'm to... Hope you're ready for the (fake) vax-strain bolognavirus lockdowns, there's a big election coming up next year.
Yes, he had to. But I think he mitigated the vaxx damages as much as he could. There have been vaxx deaths - look up "died suddenly." News stories and the documentary. Look at the statements by morticians about what they are finding in autopsies. Hopefully they were only 5% of the batches that were deadly as has been reported.
upvoted for bolognavirus
Yea I do think he misled too
This was FABULOUS!
Starts off a little slow then gets better and better, WOW.
Communists heavily depend on group think and shame. They try to make you embarrassed to answer their questions to conform with their group, but if you don't get embarrassed like Elon, you can cut right through them like a hot knife through butter.
The emperor's new clothes.
I suspect most interviews by the BBC go pretty much like this one with Mr. Musk. But, BBC has always had the editing room to make sure it all came out sunshine and roses for BBC and stank and stupid for the interviewee. This was a rather serious trap and bullet in the mouth to the "journalist" industry. The script is flipping and you no clothes having emperors are gonna get paraded in the streets.
You said the B**sed word. I have to report you to the feds. Nothing personal. But, I'm behind on my quota and want to keep my banking and grocery access privileges.
That was just lovely. I like Elon more and more, too bad he took Doge off!
"Let's just talk about something else..."
What a disaster for the BBC
Elon plays his part well but he is not based and is indebted to Barack Obama. Musk would not be the man he is today if he never received the $500 millions loan from Obama in 2010. Go check for yourself, Musk has never done anything but PRAISE Obama. Wolf in sheeps clothing.
Sleepers everywhere. You can't (ok, you can, but you shouldn't) make absolute statements these days. If you trust the plan and in what Q laid out, research who met with POTUS during his presidency. It's a confusing list in retrospective, but it begins making sense in regards of what's habbening day by day.
Blanket ridiculous comments like these are useless. What happened? What didn't go well exactly? You must be an insider. Tell us all what happened?
I dont have feelings on the matter. I dont need videos on the internet. I've seen them launch and return, directly, in person. And evaluate the condition on return and the repair maintenance required for return launch.
Almost all satellites (including the Space Station) and Manned (or unmanned) Rockets fly into and stay well within Low Earth Orbit (1200 miles up).
That's it. No higher.
For comparison, [they] tell us the Moon is roughly 238,000 miles away.
Fact check me.
From Wiki:
Huh. Isn't that odd. If we want to populate Mars, then don't you think we should be flying back and forth to the Moon as much as we possible can?? But, alas, we've only been once! Over 60 years ago!
Artemis 1. Answers your first demonstrably incorrect statement.
Cherry picked quotes from Wiki as a source should answer your next statement.
Mars and populating the planet wasn't even a discussion point. You conveniently injected that into the commentary. Have no idea what the attempt of portrayal is here, but it's not hard to dissect the loaded premise for which is being attempted as an argument.
Artemis 1 was unmanned.
Why? Why don't we just send our modern Actornauts to the moon in the same tin can we sent them in 60 years ago? What's the hold up?
Wiki is [their] own source.
I know it's unmanned.
"Almost all satellites (including the Space Station) and Manned (or unmanned) Rockets fly into and stay well within Low Earth Orbit (1200 miles up)."
Perhaps read your statements or remember the context of what you copy and pasted.
Since you like Wiki and other general search tools.
"Artemis 1's journey took it 450,000km to the Moon, where it orbited 400km above the lunar surface, before continuing approximately 64,373 km beyond into deep space. After a mission length of 25.5 days, the module splashed down in the Pacific Ocean near California on 11 December."
Quite contrary. Where are you getting your "facts"? You are searching terms and not even understanding what DRO refers to lol.
Super based.