That’s how it is in most civil cases. In criminal cases it’s beyond a reasonable doubt. In civil cases it’s preponderance of evidence which is basically more than 50% sure.
The case is still a load of shit and the hag should be paying Trump, just saying the burden of proof isn’t unusual.
I mean thats a distinction without a difference...they are going to vote based on what they think after having heard the evidence. This is how preponderance works. This is why civil cases outcomes can be wonky sometimes
This is an illustration of the way in which statistical concepts are introduced into matters that are not at all statistical. If a statistic is to be invoked, it must be capable of being CALCULATED. If not, it is totally bogus.
I have seen this happen in otherwise technically educated environments (industrial corporation management), where people seriously talk about "Pwin" (probability of winning a contract award) and throw numbers around. They don't recognize they are merely gambling, and are using a purported statistic as an index of their subjective confidence.
The Judge should never have instructed the jury in that manner. He should have asked if they agree with the defendant or not. Let the jury in conference decide what to do with the votes. I should think there would be a strong case in appeal.
Sorry about that. I did not check to make sure. I was so pissed that the judge told the jury if they think there is a 50% or more chance that was good enough. I was just focused on that and not the rest of the story.
And the whole thing is laughable. What moron would believe Trump would rape a woman in a dressing room in a public business? Why did she never do anything about it? Because it is all BULLSHIT. Kavanaugh 2.0
Anybody else more than 50% sure this judge will be proven to be a pedophile.
That’s how it is in most civil cases. In criminal cases it’s beyond a reasonable doubt. In civil cases it’s preponderance of evidence which is basically more than 50% sure.
The case is still a load of shit and the hag should be paying Trump, just saying the burden of proof isn’t unusual.
The judge just said if you think there is better than a 50% chance. He did not say if you think the evidence points to a better than 50% chance.
I mean thats a distinction without a difference...they are going to vote based on what they think after having heard the evidence. This is how preponderance works. This is why civil cases outcomes can be wonky sometimes
In today’s climate if you looked at her that’s 50% rape right there
If he farted in her direction, that's literal assault.
The fucking 2020 election was more than 50% fraud though.
Impeach that judge!
Appeal will make this case obsolete. Another crazy judge against Trump . There will be more.
the more absurd it is; the more potent a red-pill it is.
bring it.
is that all you got?
tell her to get it from Stormy...winning is one thing collecting is another
This is the point they only care about tarnishing Trump and trying to turn people against him.
Just Us
That's how civil law works
Did the prosecution establish that the people concerned had actually met?
This is an illustration of the way in which statistical concepts are introduced into matters that are not at all statistical. If a statistic is to be invoked, it must be capable of being CALCULATED. If not, it is totally bogus.
I have seen this happen in otherwise technically educated environments (industrial corporation management), where people seriously talk about "Pwin" (probability of winning a contract award) and throw numbers around. They don't recognize they are merely gambling, and are using a purported statistic as an index of their subjective confidence.
The Judge should never have instructed the jury in that manner. He should have asked if they agree with the defendant or not. Let the jury in conference decide what to do with the votes. I should think there would be a strong case in appeal.
Were those rigged questions to tell the jury? if you ask me, it is.
Manhattan courts are AI controlled. This includes jury selection and desired outcome. It's the "Magic Wheel" developed with ur tax dollars by James Clapper. This woman is on it like nobody else: https://tore-says-show.simplecast.com/episodes/wed-05-apr-ai-world-indictment-software-stacked-pool-saveorslave-magic-wheel-time-travel-method-is-key
This is the troll they chose to say trump raped her? This? Are they running out of choices that badly lol
If there is ANY chance (or percent) that he did not do it, they MUST vote not guilty.
Sorry about that. I did not check to make sure. I was so pissed that the judge told the jury if they think there is a 50% or more chance that was good enough. I was just focused on that and not the rest of the story.
And the whole thing is laughable. What moron would believe Trump would rape a woman in a dressing room in a public business? Why did she never do anything about it? Because it is all BULLSHIT. Kavanaugh 2.0
I identify as speeding 50% less at next traffic court. And a murderer only 50% killed someone.
That is the standard of "proof" in civil courts.
Whatever you do, stay out of the legal system. It's just another massive money laundering operation.
Well, it’s not THE truth, but it’s HER truth. Certainly he should have to pay for her fantasy, right?