CBDC Rollout may require changing The Constitution - BIS - uh how bout no!
(bombthrower.com)
🤑 BANK CONTROL CBDC
Comments (47)
sorted by:
This is a good thing. This means they cannot just do it. It will be much more visible to the country.
My concern was the CBDC being pushed without us having a chance to fight it.
And this provides even more evidence that this thing is evil.
Why don't we join BRICS?
I like the idea of gold-backed currency.
This is a good question.
I don't think we will join. If Trump has a plan.
I think the US dollar will stand on its own.
Trump talks about being energy independent.
I wonder if Trump pushes some type of gold + energy-backed currency.
The value of Bitcoin. It's a store of energy that produces value.
If the U.S. Dollar is backed by gold (1:1) and BRICS is backed by gold (1:1) then are they really a different currency? The U.S. Dollar is defined as (in terms of silver) 0.7735 troy ounces silver. All of the worlds currencies at the time this definition was set were defined very close to that.
It wasn't exactly a 1:1 ratio between them, but it was close enough that the difference wasn't difficult to figure out. By this method, international exchange could happen with ease. Any sailor, with any country's currency, could go into any port and buy their food, or rum, or hookers without any difficulty.
In other words, it is irrelevant what the currency is called, or who prints it, if it is backed by an actual asset at a 1:1 ratio. The exchange rate is set, trivial to figure out, and exchange anywhere in the world also becomes trivial. A true one world currency.
Just like the Cabal intend, though perhaps not the currency the Cabal intend?
It all comes down to
If the answer is no to these questions. I feel a lot better about it.
I suggest there is more to the problem than that. Indeed, I don't think a "gold backed currency" will solve the problem at all. The way we got into this mess began by the creation of a gold backed currency. By that action, those who had the gold controlled and created our "modern economy." That they later went into a fiat currency was indeed, a furthering of the process into slavery, but it was already begun by the creation of gold as an intermediary of exchange for barter, and the subsequent creation of a monopoly on gold.
The only real escape from Cabal control of money magic is the creation of a system of true barter, whereby numerous "intermediaries of exchange" can be used in a reasonable way (company stocks e.g. can serve perfectly fine as an intermediary if they are tied to an NFT), and we relearn the skill of barter.
Having said that, I do think that a gold backed currency may work as a step in the right direction, just because it will help people see the fraud. I do not think it can act as a "final solution," on the contrary, it itself opens the door right back into where we are today.
When you say barter, are you saying?
If I have an apple and I want clothing.
I better hope the person who has the clothes I want will accept the apple in exchange.
We have been told that that is what barter is, because we are intended to not want a barter system. Our entire concept of "economics" has been created by the exact people who control us through our limited understanding of it.
If all you have in an apple, as in, it's your only worldly possession, and you need clothing, and there is only one clothing maker in the world, and they don't want apples, you're fucked.
If however you find out what the clothes seller wants, and you take your apples and try to get what the clothe seller wants in the broader marketplace, then turning your apples into clothes becomes pretty simple. The key word there is "broader marketplace," and of course the skills required to utilize it.
But there is more to it than that. There are plenty of things that can serve as "universal desires." Like, not everyone wants apples, or needs them at any one time, but there are things that are more universally desired, or that can hold value indefinitely. Grain used to be money, for example. Grain can last for years if stored properly. It is infinitely divisible (basically). There are many types of grain. So even if you don't have wheat, you might have rice. Maybe you have gold, or can get gold for your apples. Then you can trade your apples for wheat, gold, or rice, and all will serve perfectly fine as an "intermediary of exchange" between your apples and the clothes you need.
The key there is that there are multiple things that can serve as intermediary. When we rely on just one thing, then anyone who wants to fuck with the broader market can monopolize that one thing. That is exactly what you find when you dig into history, and how the world came to be controlled by the Cabal.
Personally, I'm a big fan of putting all stocks on NFTs. Every single business then would become such an intermediary. You could trade your apples for APPL stock. Then trade your APPL for clothes as easily as we currently swipe our credit card. Easy peasy. You can also have gold, silver, copper, platinum, nickel, etc., all serving perfectly fine as stores of wealth, serving as intermediaries. You can trade art (stores value), or property (stores value), etc. Anything that serves as a store of value for a longer time than your apples improves your ability to get clothes whenever you want.
We are taught that barter is between "two people" and thus we get confused. But barter is not, nor has it ever been limited to two people. That is why we invented "markets" in the first place. Creating a single intermediary took the "marketplace" and gave it a god. From there the high priests of that god ruled the world.
We need to kill that god, but first we need to learn why we should.
BRAIC. Yeah.
We are the cause of BRICS , Biden weaponized the USD and they didn't like it.
I think BRICS is a distraction, to be honest. The current member countries and the countries waiting in line to join ALL have Rothschild Central Banks except for maybe Russia. Any one thinking that the BRICS economic trade coalition won't adopt a CBDC are fooling themselves. ALL member countries and their waiting list also have their leadership firmly entrenched in WEF, too. Even Putin.
And if there's one thing I know about Putin, it's that he'll ALWAYS do what he feels is best for himself first and Russia second. And a CBDC is something that mainly benefits the rich, even moreso than the current financial system because this next currency iteration is solely being written by the rich members of WEF.
Did you forget Putin threw out the central banks / bankers from Russia years ago?
Yes...first term as he stepped in.
I would be honored to play Hockey with him someday.
I live in a desert and I'd have to learn how to skate....but I'd do it.
Except it doesn't really mean that. This thought comes from a lack of imagination by those considering it.
I've been researching this for a while. The US probably won't do it the straightforward way. They will raise taxes to egregious levels, and then the IRS will offer "tax credits" back to us. These tax credits will be in the form of a CBDC. Think what they did with stimulus checks. And as SCOTUS ruled with Obamacare, this will be deemed legal because Congress has the explicit power to raise taxes. No Amendment will be necessary.
Officially, there will still be a constitutional USD, but nobody will use those in commerce. Egregious capital gains on ridiculously inflated currency and other transaction fees will make them irrelevant. Eventually, after a decade or two, once people accept the new reality, then they will push the Amendment in order to "simplify" everyone's life. And by this point, there will be no resistance left.
Do you really think expanding the IRS was just to go after a few tax cheats?
I see your point.
But half of the country is already aware of this.
It's not about whether can they put it in place. Can they KEEP it in place?
How many people are going to lie down and accept it?
Yes, they can via UCC.
Totally against CBDC. No one should be able to control your spending.
Hell no.
According to a BIS paper from seven central banks (including the US, Canada & the ECB), CBDCs may require changes to banking charters, legislation and possibly the constitution itself. In the course of reading this paper I came across another one of those harmless sounding WEF-style euphemisms "tiered remuneration", sounds boring, right? Boy are they sneaky fucking criminals...
Wow .... normally one would be forgiven to think that re-numeration relates to income or other advantages,
re = again; numerat = to count/name, ion = making noun
This is what re-imagining human rights are all about.
Sticky for the interesting and informational article. Thank you Anon.
So they just admitted it was unconstitutional?
Changing the Constitution may require Constitutional Delegations of the States.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/about-the-white-house/our-government/the-constitution/
THEREFORE CBDC may require Constitutional Delegations of the States.
Maybe we can sneak in term limits, no insider trading, paper ballots, while they at it lol
This paper highlights why certain States like FL, TX, and others (ho many so far?) have written and passed legislation making the use of so-called CBDCs effectively illegal to use as "official" currency.
As we are getting closer to the so-called "precipice," but aren't there yet, I believe these "CBDCs" will need to be enacted so The People can see theEXACTLY just how bad Central Banks and [their] near infinite ways are and just how bad it can get, before we can actually have any real, long lasting, and permanent worldwide change for the better.
There's still WAY TOO MANY Normies and Sheeple who are still WAY TOO COMFY in their existence to see any real, long lasting, and Permanente worldwide change for the better...at this time. Way too many people seem to be content with giving up their freedoms and liberties right now. That all changes, however, once their piggy banks and, as such, their lives become affected by these policies and laws.
But like Q has said, they need to be shown first. And there's no better way to show them all than by them experiencing the pain personally.
So, continue stocking up on precious metals and gems, as well as your daily use supply items, because this only gets worse before it gets better.
It's always darkest before dawn. And we're still in the middle of this long night.
Not may, but needs C amendment. That is why, like in the case of South Dakota, they want to introduce it via UCC = admiralty law.
She, Christie Noem, came on Tucker some months ago raising the alarm about this.