Notice how this "fact check" doesn't mention in any way shape or form how said children which are trafficked across international borders are snatched up in the first place.
Could they have been, oh, I don't know, snatched by a stranger off the street? I mean that's certainly one way that happens.
Indeed, a large body of research shows that many child trafficking victims are LGBTQ or gender nonconforming youth who have been kicked out of their homes and forced into the sex trade by someone close to them.
So the problem isn't the groomers who gayed up the children in the first place, it's actually the parents fault when the groomers steal the kid.
The end point of the grooming is that the kid leaves home to be with the groomer. That's why they do it. The entire process is the "steal".
Also, parents don't get to just kick out their child because they're gaying up the place. This narrative that the bolsheviks at rolling stone are trying to propagate is just them covering for the groomers, like the whole article is.
What do you mean parents don’t get to kick their kids out? That’s an unfortunate reality for many kids, not just gay kids, who get kicked out of their home
I'm sympathizing with children who fall victim to human trafficking, which seems to prey on youths who are abandoned from their families and have nowhere to go.
I wonder if Albright would like to tell us how the majority of child trafficking really takes place? Please tell us the methods used by the cartels (C_I).
It doesn't matter if they are sold by family, grabbed from the streets, taken while crossing the border alone, or Taken during a modeling tryout.
My guess these anti-trafficking experts are a bunch of guardians of the pedophiles.
This article is a reaction to the backlash caused by their previous article. They're backpedaling from their criticism of the notion that child trafficking exists. Here, they're like "Ok ok it exists, but not how those Q-tards say it does." Cowards.
Rolling stone is anti slavery. What % of children trafficked are non-white? My guess would be more than 50%. They are also racist. Trash propaganda rag
Correct, the majority are just swept up during and after they enact some tragic humanitarian event like a hurricane or a war. Some also get snatched off the street. Thanks rolling stones.
How dare parents worry that a stranger might snatch their child from the street. That would never happen!!! They need to let their children roam free, right into the government's hands!!
Right now this very moment in the city of Cleveland there is an epidemic of children disappearing off of the city streets, and the politicians and police are baffled by it.
27 children ages 12 to 17 were reported missing in Cleveland in only the first two weeks in May with no comment from Cleveland police nor information on where investigations into those cases stood.
Rolling Stone publishers, staff and writers can go back to their child porn and buggering boys.
Notice how this "fact check" doesn't mention in any way shape or form how said children which are trafficked across international borders are snatched up in the first place.
Could they have been, oh, I don't know, snatched by a stranger off the street? I mean that's certainly one way that happens.
Or grown in underground human farms (for example)
They do mention it, in the full article. OP's picture is just a bit of it:
https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/sound-of-freedom-child-trafficking-experts-1234786352/
So the problem isn't the groomers who gayed up the children in the first place, it's actually the parents fault when the groomers steal the kid.
Weimar logic.
Well it’s not stealing. The kids are kicked out of their homes. It’s not as if the kids are being taken in the middle of the night
The end point of the grooming is that the kid leaves home to be with the groomer. That's why they do it. The entire process is the "steal".
Also, parents don't get to just kick out their child because they're gaying up the place. This narrative that the bolsheviks at rolling stone are trying to propagate is just them covering for the groomers, like the whole article is.
What do you mean parents don’t get to kick their kids out? That’s an unfortunate reality for many kids, not just gay kids, who get kicked out of their home
Not children they don't. Try again.
Why are you sympathising with the alphabet people, btw?
I'm sympathizing with children who fall victim to human trafficking, which seems to prey on youths who are abandoned from their families and have nowhere to go.
It's in the article that OP u/purkiss80 posted
"You can’t make it up. These people are an absolute laughingstock." https://twitter.com/patri0tcontr0l/status/1679181526221615105?s=46&t=yH_YwZotlm6m-dfwNvYx3Q
https://twitter.com/patri0tcontr0l/status/1679181526221615105
Delete the question mark and everything after it to prevent Twitter from knowing you're the one who shared the link.
This is tracking info.
That's good information thanks.
I don't seem to be able to view replies to tweets any more, just the tweet itself
All you have to do is replace Twitter.com. with nitter.net in the URL and you will be able to access the comments...😉
thanks, I forgot it was .net rather than .com :)
😁👍
Surely not Madeleine who didn’t regret taking half a million Iraqi kids lives?
I wonder if Albright would like to tell us how the majority of child trafficking really takes place? Please tell us the methods used by the cartels (C_I).
Being an insider Albright should know.
It doesn't matter if they are sold by family, grabbed from the streets, taken while crossing the border alone, or Taken during a modeling tryout. My guess these anti-trafficking experts are a bunch of guardians of the pedophiles.
“Anti-Trafficking Experts“?
Are these even real people? Or are these ominous, faceless entities completely made up?
Knowing RollingStone, Laura Silsby is one of the experts they consulted.
This article is a reaction to the backlash caused by their previous article. They're backpedaling from their criticism of the notion that child trafficking exists. Here, they're like "Ok ok it exists, but not how those Q-tards say it does." Cowards.
Rolling Stone still thinks they're relevant. 😂
Do they even realize how cluelessly stupid they sound?
Maybe they know about the humans farms?
Can they enlighten us as to how the abductions actually take place?
Exactly as shown in the movie.
Those clips were real surveillance footage of actual abductions. This article was 100% written by a mental defective pedo.
Rolling stone is anti slavery. What % of children trafficked are non-white? My guess would be more than 50%. They are also racist. Trash propaganda rag
"Experts say"
Correct, the majority are just swept up during and after they enact some tragic humanitarian event like a hurricane or a war. Some also get snatched off the street. Thanks rolling stones.
well you can't blame them, they expected a giant CG Coyote trafficking kids like baby possums.
I totally get why they hated the movie..couldn't spare some budget for CG Coyote
Does this mean we have a 300k pedovores?
Pathetic argument just to put a headline out there...
How dare parents worry that a stranger might snatch their child from the street. That would never happen!!! They need to let their children roam free, right into the government's hands!!
Right now this very moment in the city of Cleveland there is an epidemic of children disappearing off of the city streets, and the politicians and police are baffled by it.
27 children ages 12 to 17 were reported missing in Cleveland in only the first two weeks in May with no comment from Cleveland police nor information on where investigations into those cases stood.
Rolling Stone publishers, staff and writers can go back to their child porn and buggering boys.
May everyone who has defended human trafficking, been a part of it, or blocks the truth from coming out, rot in hell!
Who actually reads Rolling Stone ? Old school rock n rollers maybe. Im surprised this magazine still exists.