Yes it did, exactly where the data was held on the missing trillions, along with all the other buildings like WTC7 which held the data on the Enron scandal and the banking scandal.
That area of the Pentagon had also literally just had so called "strengthening work" finished in it, either that morning or the day previous.
if it was an airliner, where is the shattered debris from the wreckage? even if it was blasted to little bits, shouldn't that have rained down all over the place there?
I was totally asleep in 2001. And yet even I could see back then that the Pentagon hit was all wrong, made zero sense, and there was no wreckage. That might have been the first tiny bit of my awakening...
Anyone know how to analyze the measurements of what can be seen in the video? Clearly, the object moving towards the wall appears far smaller than an aircraft. But can we estimate its size with photo forensics?
looks like a missile incoming....plane on ground could not go fast enough to penetrate 5 layers of steel walls. when you line the 'said' plane up with the hole in the building, the nose cone would hit much higher. And no wing debris. Stoopid.
Absolutely a missle. The plane in question would have had VERY little distance, especially traveling at speed, to be perfectly parallel to the ground, and so close to the ground, after having immediately cleared the highway and the tree line (look at pentagon on maps) all the while being piloted by beginner level pilots.
I see it. I think that's your brain seeing what it expects. Guided missiles can have weird-looking fins, and scale is hard to see here. My two cents. But I agree, I stopped the vid at 0:24 and it looks like a small plane with overhead wings.
That’s what I see as well. I have no idea what all different types of missiles there are. I also don’t know what AA 77 was supposed to look like either. Doesn’t appear to have caused a huge amount of damage though.
Rough numbers, and with a crappy as hell image, the scale looks like it could be 757-200 using numbers from net sources. Plane about 155 feet long...fuselage vertical diameter about 13 feet...pentagon about 75 feet tall... several hundred feet of travel and already explosion in one second. Seems about right. Doesn't look small to me given height of Pentagon in comparison.
Yeah, the special edition "disintegration" model with a depleted uranium fuselage that can penetrate through reinforced walls making perfect punch outs of circular areas that are significantly smaller than the diameter of the main body of the plane claimed to have hit?
I dunno. Nothing adds up from the official story of 9/11.
Not to mention the literally impossible approach path of the plane prior to hitting the building perfectly level to the ground. Highways, electrical infrastructure, lights, trees, etc.
Not to mention the literally impossible approach path of the plane prior to hitting the building perfectly level to the ground. Highways, electrical infrastructure, lights, trees, etc.
This needs to be stressed more. Especially considering these were "beginner" pilots.
Exactly this. I have driven and biked by the Pentagon for years and although plausible to perfectly fly a plane that big and not hit surrounding obstacles or the ground prior to the building, would take a mastery of flying, that no way, no how, a terrorist/hijacker would ever possess.
That grey squiggle you are referencing has in actual fact been cut and edited. Someone ran the footage through a software program, and found from (IIRC) frames 23 - 27 had been cut and reversed. The theory being that grey squiggle is in fact some type of exhaust gas from the incoming missile, so they swapped it to appear in front to confuse people.
If you actually impose a 757 into that video, at the correct scale, it is clearly not an aircraft that we are seeing.
Personally, I think it's great Tom Fitton posted this. He's a good place to start.
737 flying full speed 20 feet off the ground…. Yeah ok… Cruise missile or drone strike
757
The Pentagon is 77’ tall. A 757 is 44’ tall. It is 2/3 the height of the Pentagon. You would have clearly seen it’s fuselage.
Didn’t it hit the exact portion of the Pentagon where the accounting of the missing trillions was being performed?
Yes it did, exactly where the data was held on the missing trillions, along with all the other buildings like WTC7 which held the data on the Enron scandal and the banking scandal.
That area of the Pentagon had also literally just had so called "strengthening work" finished in it, either that morning or the day previous.
if it was an airliner, where is the shattered debris from the wreckage? even if it was blasted to little bits, shouldn't that have rained down all over the place there?
There has to be more cameras in that vicinity.
Unfortunately they forgot to turn them on that day. It was part of their terrorist drills they were running that morning.
That is a pretty small plane.... Was it Marvin the Martian driving it or Alvin?!?!
I was totally asleep in 2001. And yet even I could see back then that the Pentagon hit was all wrong, made zero sense, and there was no wreckage. That might have been the first tiny bit of my awakening...
Anyone know how to analyze the measurements of what can be seen in the video? Clearly, the object moving towards the wall appears far smaller than an aircraft. But can we estimate its size with photo forensics?
OMG!!
drone...
At the 25 second mark- is that a crop dusting type of plane?
looks like a missile incoming....plane on ground could not go fast enough to penetrate 5 layers of steel walls. when you line the 'said' plane up with the hole in the building, the nose cone would hit much higher. And no wing debris. Stoopid.
Absolutely a missle. The plane in question would have had VERY little distance, especially traveling at speed, to be perfectly parallel to the ground, and so close to the ground, after having immediately cleared the highway and the tree line (look at pentagon on maps) all the while being piloted by beginner level pilots.
I thought so too, but did you see the plane at the 25 second mark?
I see it. I think that's your brain seeing what it expects. Guided missiles can have weird-looking fins, and scale is hard to see here. My two cents. But I agree, I stopped the vid at 0:24 and it looks like a small plane with overhead wings.
See my comment, it was cut and edited, that grey squiggle is in fact the rear of the missile, with exhaust gas and the rear stabiliser fins.
My brain is totally broken. It sees an angry red monster face made of fire at 28 seconds glaring off in the direction the projectile came from.
Cannot unsee.
i can't really see it bro
It's a lot like this, but without the horns and looking the other way.
https://wallpapersden.com/david-harbour-hellboy-movie-2018-promotional-art-wallpaper/
That’s what I see as well. I have no idea what all different types of missiles there are. I also don’t know what AA 77 was supposed to look like either. Doesn’t appear to have caused a huge amount of damage though.
Rough numbers, and with a crappy as hell image, the scale looks like it could be 757-200 using numbers from net sources. Plane about 155 feet long...fuselage vertical diameter about 13 feet...pentagon about 75 feet tall... several hundred feet of travel and already explosion in one second. Seems about right. Doesn't look small to me given height of Pentagon in comparison.
Yeah, the special edition "disintegration" model with a depleted uranium fuselage that can penetrate through reinforced walls making perfect punch outs of circular areas that are significantly smaller than the diameter of the main body of the plane claimed to have hit?
I dunno. Nothing adds up from the official story of 9/11.
Not to mention the literally impossible approach path of the plane prior to hitting the building perfectly level to the ground. Highways, electrical infrastructure, lights, trees, etc.
WTC #7 enters the chat.
Oh hai! Did you fall over again for no reason?
This needs to be stressed more. Especially considering these were "beginner" pilots.
It was a missle
Exactly this. I have driven and biked by the Pentagon for years and although plausible to perfectly fly a plane that big and not hit surrounding obstacles or the ground prior to the building, would take a mastery of flying, that no way, no how, a terrorist/hijacker would ever possess.
No. It was a tiny object relative to a commercial airliner.
That grey squiggle you are referencing has in actual fact been cut and edited. Someone ran the footage through a software program, and found from (IIRC) frames 23 - 27 had been cut and reversed. The theory being that grey squiggle is in fact some type of exhaust gas from the incoming missile, so they swapped it to appear in front to confuse people.
If you actually impose a 757 into that video, at the correct scale, it is clearly not an aircraft that we are seeing.
Oh good point! I forgot that digital cameras were low quality in 2001...
I see a silver tubular shaped "airplane"
And there is this video of the BBC reporting collapse of WTC-7 before it happened --> https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&feature=youtu.be&v=677i43QfYpQ