GW remaining in the school should be a red flag to anyone. The full extent of the attack was not known but they were perfectly happy to leave the Commander in Chief alone so he could read books to children. Really?
Shouldn't he be taking an active part in the response? Were nukes on the way? It was almost as if he already knew what was going to happen and he had just been told that it was going according to plan.
This is what makes me think Bush Jr. wasn’t actually in on it, but they did it behind his back. Otherwise why would he sign off on this? Rumsfeld was out on the Pentagon lawn helping victims like a hero. That sounds like the kind of set up someone might choose for themselves.
But zoning out in front of a classroom of children while holding a storybook in my hands? Why would anyone choose that? Especially as The President? Wouldn’t you choose something badass and cool?
Instead they infantilized him and humiliated him. So odd. To me it feels like a parent giving his kid a spanking and then a time out and telling him to go sit at the kid’s table and think about who’s in charge.
If true, this could explain the theory that Bush Jr. flipped and that’s why the nod after Jeb! received the letter.
OK, but if I had been President and my country had just been attacked, as per GW's announcement, then I would want to know exactly what was happening and have some influence over the response. A quick word in my ear would not have cut it.
I think he was in shock and trying to figure out if he was set up. To me it looks like he is playing back conversations he had with Cheney and Rumsfeld and Bush Sr. and suddenly seeing how it all fit. And it looks like he is also realizing that he’s the patsy of his own administration and he isn’t running shit. So there’s no rush to do anything because he’s irrelevant.
If he was in on it, then he would have known it was coming, and he would have worked out beforehand how he was going to respond. To me it doesn’t make sense that he would have intentionally chosen to zone out in front of children. Is there any explanation why he would choose to humiliate himself like that?
His cousins were at the security firm working on the elevator shafts, etc. in the months leading up to 9/11 (it’s in this documentary). He knew, he even let the word “bomb” accidentally come out of his mouth at the White House. His daddy promised we’d be in the NWO…
Right, but my theory is that Bush Sr. was behind it, along with Cheney and Rumsfeld and Saudi Arabia and Mossad. So Bush Sr. talking NWO fits because he was in on it. Those cousins would fit because of Bush Sr. Cheney fits because of where he was placed on the day. Rumsfeld fits because of where he was placed on the day. The Saudis fit because that’s where the hijackers were from. Mossad fits because of the Dancing Israelis.
But Bush Jr. looking like a dope as part of a plan he was in on? That doesn’t make sense to me. It actually reminds me of e-mails in the DNC Leaks where Chelsea Clinton is looking at the books for the Clinton Foundation and telling people that the numbers don’t make sense, which tipped me off that at that point she really thought it was a charity, not a money laundering front. And that would mean the Clintons, when raising her, didn’t reveal that they were criminals, but instead pretended to be philanthropists. Based on that, I suspect many corrupt people in Washington hide their corruption from their children, and Bush Sr. might have done the same with Bush Jr.
I think Bush Jr. zoning out on 9/11 was him figuring out that he had just been set up.
Avoid scaring the children? Please. As if they care. Even if they did, they could have just said, "The President has to leave on urgent business." Might have confused the kids for 5 minutes and then they would have gotten on with their day and forgotten about it by recess. Take it from me, I'm an elementary school teacher.
I do think this was a reasonable point. However, I lean towards sun_wolf's observation that they did it behind his back. There was a bit of a "holy shit, they really did it" look on his face.
It is so very confusing. That day changed a lot for me. My now husband got called up and for two weeks, it was trips to the armory every day and then he left on my birthday. I drove to my friend's house and got really drunk that night and not in a fun way. More sitting in the chair and staring at the ground.
I drank it too. The good news is I fell down the rabbit hole because I defended the Patriot Act to a former colleague and friend right after 911. She - a far far left leftie - said they'd start spying on us for sure. I said "No this is to keep us safe. There are built in safeguards! Thank God for W!" LOL.
When I started to read about FISA database abuse at CTH I realized just how wrong I was. There was a great deal of cognitive dissonance at first because I couldn't stand that the leftie was right!
AND then, I started thinking about the fact that there was a 100 page FISA database abuse court opinion that no one in the MSM was talking about. I couldn't believe it, this was Pulitzer Prize winning stuff and no one would touch it? That's when it dawned on me that the MSM was totally controlled and I would have to start looking into this stuff myself. Open rabbit hole, enter, fall. Down and down and down we go.
So, my liberal friend was right about Patriot Act and I was wrong. Ironically, she probably things those abuses are no big deal because it was Obama/Hillary. I wouldn't know because she stopped talking to me when I told her I wasn't vaxxed. LOL. Life is funny.
Right there with you.
Initially when a young guy (can't remember who) put out the first "truther vids", I was furious. At the time I thought it was grifting of the highest order and completely un-American. Not to mention completely insulting to the people who died. Boy was I wrong. Hard to believe it took so many years for me to wake up. But that goes to show how all encompassing the cabal's power is(was) and why this movement is not happening as quickly as we'd all like. So, in hindsight, it's easier to see that what is coming has been planned, is working, is going to be biblical and NOTHING can stop it.
I feel ya. 9/11 truthers were for the most part loony lefties. People I knew that I frequently sparred with politically. People that were anti-war, anti establishment, anti big pharma. All are now establishment boot licking sycophants and I'm sounding like they did 10 years ago. It's the craziest thing to come out of the last 10 years. Never saw that coming.
I know! The same leftie friend of mine wondered 15 years ago if her kid being on the "spectrum" was related to the vaccines. I thought, "well that's kinda crazy." Talk about Freaky Friday.
NORAD had put out no scramble orders that day, claiming all telemetry coming from airports was part of a simulation war game. No jets were scrambled until it was far too late.
A few months previous, professional golfer Weber Paine had his private Jet go off course from it's registered flight plan and had two F-16 escorts within minutes directing the plane to change course to their heading or be blown out of the sky.
Many, including me, couldn't fathom our own government doing this to us. My red pill moment was pizzagate(2016) from which everything else became clear. I knew at that moment that all of these things were done by our government to us, pure evil.😤🤬
Col. Tony Shaffer Intel officer was following the 19 terrorist till August 2020, as was abruptly stopped with no explanation by Deputy As General Jamie Gorlick. Gorlick was appointed to the 9-11 commission, Col Shaffer wanted to testify since he was the one following the terrorist for 2 years prior. Gorlick prohibited Shaffer from testifying to the commission. Gorlicks reward for being a team player was a four year appointment to the New York Federal Reserve, Shaffer got the shaft. Shaffer has a book outlining the whole story about the terrorist, he also explains the reason Canada doesn't like the USA today is the terrorist spent time in Canada, the US kept it from them, therefore the bad blood between Countries ever since.
Interesting. I’ll have to read his book ‘cause this is news to me. The more information, the better.
I was working in the media at the time of 9/11. What a PILAVA that time was. What I remember, which made me pissed off with the US, was Bush Jr saying at the onset, something along the lines of the planes took off from Canada and thereby Canadian planes attacked New York. As if CANADA had anything that could attack the US! L’il Bushy then went on to say that if any one went against what he said about the planes, than they were against the US. He almost declared war on Canada! Thank God that Chrétien gave him the finger and effectively called him a liar and told him to f-off, which made L’il Bushy reverse his nonsense. Whatever anyone says about Chrétien, he had a big pair of kahoonas! I was very proud, for the first and only time, of Chrétien that day.
9/11 was fishy to me, even being as Asleep as I was. Way to many lies and cover-ups. I saw a heck of a lot of misdirection then, and if I commented on it, was reprimanded for not being emotional enough/“sensitive to the feelings of the New Yorkers” by the Execs at the company, and persecuted by their nepotism toadies, my fellow employees. It began, again, a dark time in my life.
I was just a teen and I didn't buy the story. Wtc7 was too unbelievable. The squibs on wtc1 and 2 were suspicious. Grew up watching controlled demolitions on cable tv.
Jets may be fragile but a skyscrapers are massively heavy. Its not outside the realm of reason that a single point of weakness could lead to cascading failure .
GW remaining in the school should be a red flag to anyone. The full extent of the attack was not known but they were perfectly happy to leave the Commander in Chief alone so he could read books to children. Really?
Shouldn't he be taking an active part in the response? Were nukes on the way? It was almost as if he already knew what was going to happen and he had just been told that it was going according to plan.
This is what makes me think Bush Jr. wasn’t actually in on it, but they did it behind his back. Otherwise why would he sign off on this? Rumsfeld was out on the Pentagon lawn helping victims like a hero. That sounds like the kind of set up someone might choose for themselves.
But zoning out in front of a classroom of children while holding a storybook in my hands? Why would anyone choose that? Especially as The President? Wouldn’t you choose something badass and cool?
Instead they infantilized him and humiliated him. So odd. To me it feels like a parent giving his kid a spanking and then a time out and telling him to go sit at the kid’s table and think about who’s in charge.
If true, this could explain the theory that Bush Jr. flipped and that’s why the nod after Jeb! received the letter.
OK, but if I had been President and my country had just been attacked, as per GW's announcement, then I would want to know exactly what was happening and have some influence over the response. A quick word in my ear would not have cut it.
I think he was in shock and trying to figure out if he was set up. To me it looks like he is playing back conversations he had with Cheney and Rumsfeld and Bush Sr. and suddenly seeing how it all fit. And it looks like he is also realizing that he’s the patsy of his own administration and he isn’t running shit. So there’s no rush to do anything because he’s irrelevant.
If he was in on it, then he would have known it was coming, and he would have worked out beforehand how he was going to respond. To me it doesn’t make sense that he would have intentionally chosen to zone out in front of children. Is there any explanation why he would choose to humiliate himself like that?
You're talking about george dubya.. he's about as sharp as a marble. Even a retard can be psyop'd.
His cousins were at the security firm working on the elevator shafts, etc. in the months leading up to 9/11 (it’s in this documentary). He knew, he even let the word “bomb” accidentally come out of his mouth at the White House. His daddy promised we’d be in the NWO…
Right, but my theory is that Bush Sr. was behind it, along with Cheney and Rumsfeld and Saudi Arabia and Mossad. So Bush Sr. talking NWO fits because he was in on it. Those cousins would fit because of Bush Sr. Cheney fits because of where he was placed on the day. Rumsfeld fits because of where he was placed on the day. The Saudis fit because that’s where the hijackers were from. Mossad fits because of the Dancing Israelis.
But Bush Jr. looking like a dope as part of a plan he was in on? That doesn’t make sense to me. It actually reminds me of e-mails in the DNC Leaks where Chelsea Clinton is looking at the books for the Clinton Foundation and telling people that the numbers don’t make sense, which tipped me off that at that point she really thought it was a charity, not a money laundering front. And that would mean the Clintons, when raising her, didn’t reveal that they were criminals, but instead pretended to be philanthropists. Based on that, I suspect many corrupt people in Washington hide their corruption from their children, and Bush Sr. might have done the same with Bush Jr.
I think Bush Jr. zoning out on 9/11 was him figuring out that he had just been set up.
The very reasonable explanation was to avoid scaring the children he was reading to.
Avoid scaring the children? Please. As if they care. Even if they did, they could have just said, "The President has to leave on urgent business." Might have confused the kids for 5 minutes and then they would have gotten on with their day and forgotten about it by recess. Take it from me, I'm an elementary school teacher.
I do think this was a reasonable point. However, I lean towards sun_wolf's observation that they did it behind his back. There was a bit of a "holy shit, they really did it" look on his face.
It is so very confusing. That day changed a lot for me. My now husband got called up and for two weeks, it was trips to the armory every day and then he left on my birthday. I drove to my friend's house and got really drunk that night and not in a fun way. More sitting in the chair and staring at the ground.
I drank it too. The good news is I fell down the rabbit hole because I defended the Patriot Act to a former colleague and friend right after 911. She - a far far left leftie - said they'd start spying on us for sure. I said "No this is to keep us safe. There are built in safeguards! Thank God for W!" LOL.
When I started to read about FISA database abuse at CTH I realized just how wrong I was. There was a great deal of cognitive dissonance at first because I couldn't stand that the leftie was right!
AND then, I started thinking about the fact that there was a 100 page FISA database abuse court opinion that no one in the MSM was talking about. I couldn't believe it, this was Pulitzer Prize winning stuff and no one would touch it? That's when it dawned on me that the MSM was totally controlled and I would have to start looking into this stuff myself. Open rabbit hole, enter, fall. Down and down and down we go.
So, my liberal friend was right about Patriot Act and I was wrong. Ironically, she probably things those abuses are no big deal because it was Obama/Hillary. I wouldn't know because she stopped talking to me when I told her I wasn't vaxxed. LOL. Life is funny.
Right there with you. Initially when a young guy (can't remember who) put out the first "truther vids", I was furious. At the time I thought it was grifting of the highest order and completely un-American. Not to mention completely insulting to the people who died. Boy was I wrong. Hard to believe it took so many years for me to wake up. But that goes to show how all encompassing the cabal's power is(was) and why this movement is not happening as quickly as we'd all like. So, in hindsight, it's easier to see that what is coming has been planned, is working, is going to be biblical and NOTHING can stop it.
It really does make the nothing cash so what’s coming thing make sense. All roads eventually lead to truth.
I feel ya. 9/11 truthers were for the most part loony lefties. People I knew that I frequently sparred with politically. People that were anti-war, anti establishment, anti big pharma. All are now establishment boot licking sycophants and I'm sounding like they did 10 years ago. It's the craziest thing to come out of the last 10 years. Never saw that coming.
I know! The same leftie friend of mine wondered 15 years ago if her kid being on the "spectrum" was related to the vaccines. I thought, "well that's kinda crazy." Talk about Freaky Friday.
I was a liberal back then. Alot of the liberals then became who we are here now. Liberals are not the same as we were back then.
NORAD had put out no scramble orders that day, claiming all telemetry coming from airports was part of a simulation war game. No jets were scrambled until it was far too late.
A few months previous, professional golfer Weber Paine had his private Jet go off course from it's registered flight plan and had two F-16 escorts within minutes directing the plane to change course to their heading or be blown out of the sky.
Payne Stewart
Many, including me, couldn't fathom our own government doing this to us. My red pill moment was pizzagate(2016) from which everything else became clear. I knew at that moment that all of these things were done by our government to us, pure evil.😤🤬
2007 Loose Change movie and Alex Jones was my awakening moment leading to Ron Paul, then Trump, then Q.
Been a wild ride.
ditto
Totally agree, by far one of the best. Here is the rumble link where one can speed it up a little if you choose.
https://rumble.com/v1xv9za-911-an-anatomy-of-a-great-deception.html?
Delete the ? and afterwards to remove tracking for sharing a clean link.
Thanks for this link - will be sharing it!
When Bush et al. began pushing The Patriot Act, just a little over a month after the attacks, I began questioning 911.
Is there a part 1?
There are many parts.... thread on Twitter
https://twitter.com/PunishDem1776/status/1699164020694012052?t=2KbdtLXSjCrMXOHBhMRaVQ&s=19
Col. Tony Shaffer Intel officer was following the 19 terrorist till August 2020, as was abruptly stopped with no explanation by Deputy As General Jamie Gorlick. Gorlick was appointed to the 9-11 commission, Col Shaffer wanted to testify since he was the one following the terrorist for 2 years prior. Gorlick prohibited Shaffer from testifying to the commission. Gorlicks reward for being a team player was a four year appointment to the New York Federal Reserve, Shaffer got the shaft. Shaffer has a book outlining the whole story about the terrorist, he also explains the reason Canada doesn't like the USA today is the terrorist spent time in Canada, the US kept it from them, therefore the bad blood between Countries ever since.
Interesting. I’ll have to read his book ‘cause this is news to me. The more information, the better.
I was working in the media at the time of 9/11. What a PILAVA that time was. What I remember, which made me pissed off with the US, was Bush Jr saying at the onset, something along the lines of the planes took off from Canada and thereby Canadian planes attacked New York. As if CANADA had anything that could attack the US! L’il Bushy then went on to say that if any one went against what he said about the planes, than they were against the US. He almost declared war on Canada! Thank God that Chrétien gave him the finger and effectively called him a liar and told him to f-off, which made L’il Bushy reverse his nonsense. Whatever anyone says about Chrétien, he had a big pair of kahoonas! I was very proud, for the first and only time, of Chrétien that day.
9/11 was fishy to me, even being as Asleep as I was. Way to many lies and cover-ups. I saw a heck of a lot of misdirection then, and if I commented on it, was reprimanded for not being emotional enough/“sensitive to the feelings of the New Yorkers” by the Execs at the company, and persecuted by their nepotism toadies, my fellow employees. It began, again, a dark time in my life.
They had the Patriot Act typed up and ready to go before the smoke even cleared.
I was just a teen and I didn't buy the story. Wtc7 was too unbelievable. The squibs on wtc1 and 2 were suspicious. Grew up watching controlled demolitions on cable tv.
Jets may be fragile but a skyscrapers are massively heavy. Its not outside the realm of reason that a single point of weakness could lead to cascading failure .
Considering the structural integrity of the Twin Towers…it is totally outside the realm. Do your research…
Watch at least a little bit of the linked video. You'll see why that's not possible.
you know what, it is possible, and if that was the case, how does it weaken the part of the building below where the plane hit?