NEW: Previously Unseen and Astonishing 9/11 Video 'Kept Private' for 20 Years - Slow-Motion Footage Reveals Something Truly Stra...
An astonishing 9/11 video that was ‘kept private’ on YouTube for 20 years emerged on the platform showing the September
Not to be skeptical of this, but this same thing has to be confirmed from all the other angles of that plane hitting. The fact that this video was "hidden" for so long also raises suspicion and we siply cannot rule out editing. We need to think critically here.
This is odd. I'm pretty sure I saw this video a year or two ago. At the time, someone said that the voices and people screaming were added in, too.
I saw this a number of years ago and it appears authentic.
In fact, it's an excellent perspective of the approach and impact and natural reactions of witnesses.
Except the slow mow video shows the plane disappearing with no damage to the building until the explosion happens.
It's either 1) edited so that it is made to look like CGI, or 2) real.
Way too many other coincidences and unexplainable anomalies to believe one way or the other, which is exactly what the Deep State loves. Another JFK conspiracy that can last, and last and last.
MPEG compression artifacts most likely
That is not what happened and viewing many other videos of the impact and the testimony of thousands of witnesses, prove a passenger jet flew directing into the South Tower. The zoom on this video completely blurred out the impact zone.
The size and nature of the explosion are another story. The delay is very similar to bunker buster bombs as is the ferocity and power of the explosion. Total pulverization of tons of concrete, instantaneously, with the debris being ejected out the entry side of the impact. That is impossible with anything other than high explosives. Fuel does melt steel beams AND has very little kinetic energy upon ignition.
https://youtu.be/hiAfzCV7wkU?t=46
Depleted Uranium warheads are radioactive, too.
They’ve proven time and again that the fuel burning temperatures were no where near what it takes to melt steel. Even if it was a viable thing, the buildings disintegrating in demolition fashion is absurd. The beams would have melted in an assymetrical fashion, causing a tilted partial collapse of one side of the building. The fact that two buildings fell in the exact same demolition fashion makes it doubly absurd. And don’t even get me started on building seven. That just fell in sympathy to it’s two big brothers.
The most compelling case for controlled demolition can be found among the architects who can show that a structural steel building-even heavily damaged by fire- will not collapse. If a fire can collapse a structural steel building, everything know about architecture and engineering skyscrapers completely goes out the window. If I can find the video on Rumble I’ll post here.
The most compelling case is military grade thermite dust covering 10 square blocks. That’s the biggest smoking gun there is.
That too. https://rumble.com/v3c3s6e-experienced-architect-explains-911-wtc-collapses.html
I just completely disagree with your statements. That's all I can say. I've seen and read just as much information to suggest different conclusions.
OK... so who is Dov Zakheim and how does his central role in the 9/11 plot support my theory.
Explain how he was:
Pentagon Comptroller that stole the $2.3 Trillion
Sat on the board at Raytheon, makers of bunker buster bombs
Was CEO of Securacom, the security company that took over the WTC right after the 1993 Bombing
Board member of Systems Planning Corporation, makers of the Flight Termination System, designed to TAKEOVER and LAND hijacked airliners ( how Ironic )
Had contract with US Air Force to retrofit 36 Boeing 767's into fueling platforms, out of Macdill AFB in Tampa
Signed the PNAC, which called for a 'Pearl Harbor' like event to springboard US Military intervention in the Mideast
Oh.... and he's a dual-citizen to Israel and 100% MOSSAD and his parents were from UKRAINE
so.... CGI, in light of this smoking gun and the all the videos and witnesses, is a rather silly disinfo theory, in my humble opinion.
All great info. Thanks. I was aware of that. So, it is plausible that rather than pull off the incredibly difficult task of having unqualified hijackers actually hijack a plane with box cutters and then fly complicated jets on extremely difficult flight patterns (that pilots have claimed were very difficult for experienced pilots)... instead, create the illusion of planes hitting the towers--and land the real planes and transition them as explained in your notes above. This way, he gets the planes to add to his inventory. And he gets the causes of the explosions that were actually placed by the Mossad (not to mention the Mossad wiring the entirety of the towers for controlled demolition).
they were drones
Of course, no serious person believes those planes were controlled by competent pilots, let alone amateurs
CGI theory spits right in the face of every person that witnessed the impact of what appeared to be a passenger jet and it ignores everything about HOW IT IS POSSIBLE retrofitted, remotely piloted, high explosive drones impacted both towers.
One more thing, the flight manifests of every flight raise a number of red flags. That is a different story, tho.
I feel the plan had to be retrofitted with explosives, if it even was there but I do not know one way or the other for sure because I did not see it with my own eyes. Could all those people there just come on tv or the internet and confirm what they saw, I mean they can be paid off as well but that is a lot to keep a secret. What would it be worth to you to keep quiet? 5 million? 10 million? Threats of your family?
You're asking all the right questions. CGI disinfo is rooted in denying the reality of what happened, including the witnesses and evidence.
lol smh
https://archive.searchvoat.co/v/Conspiracy/2251906
Oh my god stop talking Bush shill.
Wings disappeared. The building would've ripped them off, the public would've seen them drop to the ground, nothing...
Exactly
I saw the whole plane disappear... into the South Tower.
Not if the plane was retrofitted and designed specifically for that very purpose, with leading edges of wings comprised of depleted uranium and titanium. This would also account for the extremely high radiation readings at Ground Zero. Also, one of the engines landed on the sidewalk. When the numbers were checked, it was the wrong engine for UA175. Answer: retrofitted with higher performance engine, and that would explain the increased velocity.
The buildings were brought down in a controlled demolition. Controlled demolitions begin with a weakening the structure. The opportunity to compromise the impact zones is not in doubt.
Too heavy to fly, then (depleted uranium), or a COMPLETELY REBUILT wing attached to an existing plane. (Still unbelievable.) Titanium is stronger and heavier than aluminum and lighter but not as strong as the structural steel beams, if for no other reason the SHEER MASS of the beams. Building still would have won: giant cheese grater. Building would have been really damaged, but would have still been standing.
You'd also have SO INCREDIBLY changed the flight characteristics of the planes that even a computer wouldn't have been able to maneuver it. Heavier leading edges would have given the plane a nose-down tendency that would likely have kept the vehicle from takeoff ... and much less able to handle significant air maneuvers. You'd need millions of simulations and analytical data to back up the flight model and you'd have needed true-to-build flight time to prove it.
Buildings were structurally compromised in addition to being impacted. Period.
wrong..
except for the part about the building being weakened for controlled demo.. gee... you don't think the impact zones were weakened during that time, do you?
period.. end of story.
Not wrong.
I have relevant experience in both aircraft structures and structural steel / wide-flange beams ... as well as general certification testing of flight components and the manufacture of turbine-type engines used in aircraft and missile propulsion.
I may not know the exact truth of precisely what happened that day any more than anyone else, but I'm certainly not "in the dark" about these theories. Logic always prevails.
I mentioned the building would have been affected, but would have still stood.
The LIE is nearly over, but the STORY is far from over.
Also: https://steemit.com/conspiracy/@budz82/9-11-and-the-israeli-bomb-expert-infiltrated-art-groups-gelatin-demo-wiring-team-and-e-team-sol-gel-team
planes didn't take down the buildings
we agree on that
I know all about E-Team and the B-Thing
Ok. As long as we're in agreement on something important ..........
Fake video "kept private" until advancements in CGI technology made a realistic video with a plane crashing into the tower possible. If this video was real it would have surfaced 22 years ago. FAKE NEWS!
I've seen this video, though.
not buying the CGI angle, either.
Where are all the airplane parts in the debris? No engines, no tail, no seats, no wings, no nothing. It is almost as if no airplanes crashed into the towers. I guess you are free to believe the MSM narrative - "it all got burnt up in the fire".
It does however, look very much like a controlled demolition where all support columns were weakened ahead of time and then blown out by timed charges. The buildings fell straight down just like they do in a controlled demolition. People on the scene reported hearing/seeing a series of "explosions" before the towers came down.
During my tenure as a truther, I always look at what the MSM is trying to get you to believe. Then I head 180 degrees (in the opposite direction) to search for the truth. In most cases, you will find that the MSM has lied and that they want you to believe that you are a crazy conspiracy theorist. They traffic in fear, isolation and fabricated consensus to make you think that you are the crazy one.
With the advancements in CGI and AI we don't really know what is true anymore. But given my research into 911 and what structural engineers and pilots have both said - I do not believe that planes brought the towers down or impacted the Pentagon either. YMMV. God bless.
You're wrong. Engine found on sidewalk w/ many plane parts.
MANY plane parts were found
I agree 100%
That engine was NOT a match for the alleged airplane that it came from.
of course not.. but where did it come from?
It was from a plane that NEVER WAS Flight175
I recall Col. Proudy claiming the engine was 'dumped' there and that was the ONLY explanation for the mismatched serial numbers... That's where you got that information, isn't it?
And then he went on to spread lies that the attacks were CGI, part of Operation Blue Beam.
Proudy is 100% spook and is the original SOURCE for the CGI psyop.
Where'd they find this engine? What kind of shape was it in? Could it have been "planted" after the fact, during all the confusion?
you should know that already...
it's been 22 years.
I know both narratives. The fake one, it was planted. And the real one, it went through the WTC and landed on the sidewalk.
And people always glaze over, or just aren’t aware of the biggest smoking gun of the whole event- military grade thermite dust covered the whole ten block area. No reason for it to be there unless it was used in a demolition.
Look, they found a perfectly intact passport of one of the hijackers on the ground next to the WTC. Proof positive the jihadis did this as advertised. What could be more compelling? LOL
You mean that couldn’t have been a passport from any ol person? They determined it must have come from the “plane” that just went through the building? 😂
"I have the best video of a plane hitting the towers but I'll keep it hidden for 20 years to make sure I don't make any money off it or that people don't understand what happened that day."
I think it's more logical to assume the world trade centers fell the same way building 7 fell... planned demolition. Plane highjacking narrative was added to cover up the truth.
NO AIRPLANE
This is quite compelling. https://rumble.com/v3gzqpo-911-a-compilation-of-complications-with-what-theyre-telling-us.html
This could be a fake tape to convince people there was a plane. I don't see a lot of people looking at it. Also, people would scream if they just saw the explosion, let alone a plane.
Seen this yesterday and honestly at first glance I thought for sure it was real. There has to be a video pro out there that can download it from utube and see if it is real or been fakes( maybe that is not possible) i did see the slow motion. I want to watch again on my big monitor. The video floating around from the other side clearly shows no plane but I am thinking the plane is behind the tower. I do not know. I am sure more will come out about this.
I am one to be very cautious of the more salacious evidence that 9/11 was a deep state hit job because the deep state uses "deboonking" of these types of videos to discredit the fact that literally every other piece of evidence points to an inside job. regardless, I do think there is a societal shift right now where many of the normies are starting to do their own research and will at a minimum come to the conclusion that there's fuckery going on with the MSM version of the story.
Hidden in secret on YouTube 😂 for 20 years
Private - still shows the original upload date
For all you commenters who did NOT watch the video slowed down version... The plane image disappears close to impact and the building has no impact effects for a few seconds. So this is obviously a video that a plane has been added to (it HAS been edited), and the story it was suppressed for twenty years likely bs. On the anniversary of 9-11 they are once again trying to convince people of the plane narrative or at least get people to waste their attention and time arguing about it.
Look HERE, not THERE. What are they trying to keep us from paying attention to elsewhere? The trials? The election fraud?
NYC is filled with security cameras everywhere. Wouldn't we have an endless amount of security footage showing incoming aircraft? Maybe those cameras are pointed down at the ground, but I would expect that there's still many of them that have a view of the sky.
The flash is present. It is in every video. Synchronization marker.
There was a plane people actually saw before the explosion? Hmmm
Some people claimed to have seen "a winged aircraft" but it didn't resemble a plane.
Possibly a large, winged, cruise missile.
There is no way past,
"The Nose Out Shot."
<[]~
Blue Beam Technology
no. jurassic park technology. very simple stuff.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/2ynY9D0sfusP/