An 'Application' to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was accepted as a Writ of Mandamus through the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.
This Writ of Mandamus (Application) is something Justice Thomas can rule on independently, or he can forward it to the whole of the Supreme Court.
The applicant is asking that Florida's 2022 General Election (with a 2020 option) be set aside and held anew. There is also room for the 2020 election cycle to be set aside as well, since the evidence shows the same uncertified and uncertifiable equipment was used in both election cycles.
The same evidence proves that the whole of the elections throughout the country were vulnerable to the same fraud, which allows Justice Thomas, or the whole of the Supreme Court, to set aside the results of the entire country for both the 2020 and the 2022 election cycles
So if JT rules independently can the losing side appeal to the SC? Or is it final?
This setup gives a lot of power to one man, and I would think that if he chooses to set aside the elections there will be too many people pissed off. So, this can't be the plan, in my opinion.
Bigger problem is, the supreme court doesn't like to set too much precedent if it doesn't have to. The fact that he was so willing to take it up Means one of two things:
The evidence is so clear that it is plain on its face constitutionally what it means, so he wants to make it known what is supposed to happen.
The evidence is clear against what we believe to be accurate as far as a technicality of the law, he wants to jump to it and get it cleared up.
In the past, the supreme court has made it very clear that they do not want to be the ones to Determine the results of an election. That has been the direction of most suits asking them to overturn given x election.
I think of all the cases that have come to them about elections so far, this has been a fairly clear-cut one. With reasonable requests. it provides a fact of law that does not overturn an election per se, And allows for a very clean remedy to the issue period that is the kind of stuff that the Supreme Court likes period
The very existence of FISA and the justices participation in the administration of general warrants disqualifies these traitors from any pretense of credibility.
That statement is assinine on its face. If you have a problem with FISA, which I doubt you even knew existed until the last few years, why haven't you been petitioning it's removal since 1978 when it was enacted by Congress?
Or, preferably why not challenge its existence through the courts and get it ruled unconstitutional? They would do it you know, if it was in fact, unconstitutional.
On one hand if DJT is validated and it's proven he won - wondering how that ultimately plays out?
Does Bidet and crew get immediately yanked out?
If DJT is the legitimate president, what about all the MAGA peeps that won, are they suddenly invalidated - because if there was cheating against one, there was cheating for ALL.
Seems like an awfully convoluted mess to sort out in that regard.
I'd love for Boss to get back in and clean up Ukraine, prevent WW3 and war with Iran because the current direction is really not good for anyone at all...
Avoid hyperbole, your statements seems to encompass the entire US court system, which is grossly inaccurate.
The primary issue is with several key federal and some lower court judges who are getting 90% of media attention, so of course it would seem 90% of the system was bad when in actuality it isn't that many.
Well sir, if it applies to the Supreme Court then what hope in the rest do you have ? Perhaps you haven't been a victim like those in J6, or the meme guys or well, our President. Fbi, doj and the rest of the alphabets corrupt.
A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump. The system is what
has them all, it's like sitting in a giant stomach of acid, waiting to be dissolved and absorbed. We've been brainwashed into thinking its noble.
Ok, yeah, so you really don't understand how it works. And you may be the one brainwashed, but don't lump others in with your lump.
Its ok, but i would advise you to read up on how the structure of the Judicial REALLY works. Knowing generalities and platitudes will get you exactly as far as the mess we are now in.
Comprehension and a working knowledge of the Judicial system is worth the time, and is 1/3 of the Constitutional govt. Worth the time, trust me.
President Trump did say he would return before the 2024...
Praying Hard on this tonight, as it truly is ALL in the Lord's Hands.
Wow 🙏🙏🙏🙏 praying for Clarence, continue to protect & guide him. May his courage double and his words be guided by You.
Lord please continue to guide the righteous,
Like Brunsen , I’m afraid it’s going nowhere.
I'm hoping someone can clarify it to be honest !
THAT would be something …
https://www.georgiarecord.com/election-integrity/2023/10/24/breaking-11th-circuit-emergency-writ-accepted-to-hear-case-to-invalidate-fraudulent-2020-2022-elections-justice-clarence-thomas-to-rule/
An 'Application' to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was accepted as a Writ of Mandamus through the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.
This Writ of Mandamus (Application) is something Justice Thomas can rule on independently, or he can forward it to the whole of the Supreme Court.
The applicant is asking that Florida's 2022 General Election (with a 2020 option) be set aside and held anew. There is also room for the 2020 election cycle to be set aside as well, since the evidence shows the same uncertified and uncertifiable equipment was used in both election cycles.
The same evidence proves that the whole of the elections throughout the country were vulnerable to the same fraud, which allows Justice Thomas, or the whole of the Supreme Court, to set aside the results of the entire country for both the 2020 and the 2022 election cycles
The 11th Circuit also covers Georgia.
So if JT rules independently can the losing side appeal to the SC? Or is it final?
This setup gives a lot of power to one man, and I would think that if he chooses to set aside the elections there will be too many people pissed off. So, this can't be the plan, in my opinion.
The SC will fail as usual to uphold the law.
I thought the point was to fail at this level since “the only way is the military.”
Any way you slice it. There’s going to be a lot of people unhappy.
If it was done any other way. Like revealing what happened to the Children.
Once the righteous Anger fades. We’d still likely end up with very unhappy people. As people’s differences start rearing their heads once again
Bigger problem is, the supreme court doesn't like to set too much precedent if it doesn't have to. The fact that he was so willing to take it up Means one of two things:
The evidence is so clear that it is plain on its face constitutionally what it means, so he wants to make it known what is supposed to happen.
The evidence is clear against what we believe to be accurate as far as a technicality of the law, he wants to jump to it and get it cleared up.
In the past, the supreme court has made it very clear that they do not want to be the ones to Determine the results of an election. That has been the direction of most suits asking them to overturn given x election.
I think of all the cases that have come to them about elections so far, this has been a fairly clear-cut one. With reasonable requests. it provides a fact of law that does not overturn an election per se, And allows for a very clean remedy to the issue period that is the kind of stuff that the Supreme Court likes period
The court has no interest in justice, But keeping the status quo intact.
Who are you talking about, specifically?
SCOTUS isn't some ruling council that can push edicts from on high. Are you sure you understand what they are allowed to do Constitutionally?
So far they have been fantastic the last few years. A couple rulings that seem to have not gone our way were, in fact ruled correctly for the cases.
They can't just make stuff up, or go off on tangents, or stuff not specifically related to the cases presented.
The very existence of FISA and the justices participation in the administration of general warrants disqualifies these traitors from any pretense of credibility.
That statement is assinine on its face. If you have a problem with FISA, which I doubt you even knew existed until the last few years, why haven't you been petitioning it's removal since 1978 when it was enacted by Congress?
Or, preferably why not challenge its existence through the courts and get it ruled unconstitutional? They would do it you know, if it was in fact, unconstitutional.
Anyone have info on when this goes before Thomas?
On one hand if DJT is validated and it's proven he won - wondering how that ultimately plays out?
Does Bidet and crew get immediately yanked out?
If DJT is the legitimate president, what about all the MAGA peeps that won, are they suddenly invalidated - because if there was cheating against one, there was cheating for ALL.
Seems like an awfully convoluted mess to sort out in that regard.
I'd love for Boss to get back in and clean up Ukraine, prevent WW3 and war with Iran because the current direction is really not good for anyone at all...
Commence liberal Rrrreeeee!!!!ing in 3, 2, 1......
Laughs while topping off magazines...
Good reason for the military to step in i suppose
Military is the only way.
Not injecting this hopium just yet
48-hour rule in effect - need time to learn about emergency writs
and to take into account all the ways this might not mean what we think, i.e., justice being done (for Trump, no less)
We know better
Interesting.
Thus can come down to one judge? Sad we almost have no one in the courts we can trust. Legal system totally compromised and useless.
Avoid hyperbole, your statements seems to encompass the entire US court system, which is grossly inaccurate.
The primary issue is with several key federal and some lower court judges who are getting 90% of media attention, so of course it would seem 90% of the system was bad when in actuality it isn't that many.
Well sir, if it applies to the Supreme Court then what hope in the rest do you have ? Perhaps you haven't been a victim like those in J6, or the meme guys or well, our President. Fbi, doj and the rest of the alphabets corrupt.
A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump. The system is what has them all, it's like sitting in a giant stomach of acid, waiting to be dissolved and absorbed. We've been brainwashed into thinking its noble.
Ok, yeah, so you really don't understand how it works. And you may be the one brainwashed, but don't lump others in with your lump.
Its ok, but i would advise you to read up on how the structure of the Judicial REALLY works. Knowing generalities and platitudes will get you exactly as far as the mess we are now in.
Comprehension and a working knowledge of the Judicial system is worth the time, and is 1/3 of the Constitutional govt. Worth the time, trust me.
Exactly....this is DOA the minute she filed.
Did not look like it went anywhere, not sure it' was supposed to.