Yup. I’ve seen the attacks and doubts everywhere. But as Q said about Flynn, we protect patriots. We were in a psyop war for decades and he literally wrote a book and told us how to play the game.
Funny how Nikki Haley talks..... We have no Defense treaty with either of them. What planet is she from?..... Nikki return to Mars. They are transmitting for your return to lead a great battle there.
It wouldn't matter since defense treaties are against the constitution, and the principles upon which our Republic was established. No entangling alliances was the principle and George Washington set the example.
Government doesn't have the legitimate authority to make a treaty that is in opposition to the constitution. If they do it, it is stolen power, or usurped power. It doesn't matter how long ago it was put in place, either. All laws (or Treaties) passed that are repugnant to the constitution are null and void.
You might want to learn more about legitimate power, the constitution, and the meaning of usurped.
The short answer tends to be the quixotic view,but nevertheless is: “No, a treaty can’t override the Constitution, especially the first eight amendments in the Bill of Rights or the Constitution’s other specific exceptions to federal authority. The treaty has the force only of a statute, not of a super-constitution.” Of course, this is under the Constitution as originally understood. How well does a Kamal Harris or a Imran Omar know this? Then you have all the 'evil-doers'. How well do you expect them to abide by this?
But the full answer is more complicated. This is because the Founding-Era evidence does suggest that the Constitution enables the federal government to acquire significant—although not unlimited—additional power by entering into treaties.
This is what NATO is. Also, remember the Trans-Pacific Trade Act (the one that would have really f-ed up our constitutional rights, but Trump dismantled it before it was signed into law?
Of course, evil politicians will try and don't care one iota about our rights as an American, so we need to watch our backs.
I have been studying the Constitution, the principles upon which our Republic was established, and the intentions the Founding Fathers had in regards to the Republic they established since I realized in the Gulf War my President had lied to us about our reasons for going to war. I questioned my oath, and what it was I had pledged myself to defending. I decided I would educate myself to know exactly what I was defending. 32 years later, one thing is 100% clear to me. They never intended the Federal Government to have any increase of power than the Constitution limited it to possessing. Not even by treaty.
Quite right and absolutely agree with you. Here's more. Could it be that there is very wide practice of the oath of office is not being taken by public officials? There seems to be a widespread issue with this. Secondly, there's all those take the oath of office view it like Bush Jr. said about the constitution....."It's just a piece of paper".
If they take it, I am sure the majority just pay it lip service. If that is the case, but they took it, they will undergo judgement in a court they cannot escape. If they didn't, we, The people, will eventually hold them to account, and still they will end up in that inescapable Court for judgement.
More food for thought. Every single elected or appointed government servant is required to obey the Constitution. If they act outside of the limited powers granted, they are answerable to We, The people. We can call for a Grand Jury, we can Quo Warranto them, we can recall them, and, as a last resort, we can eliminate them. Government serves us, not the other way around.
In the Founders day, any act of treason was punishable by death. That was because individual rights and liberty were to be protected at all costs. Today, our rights and liberties are treated as trivial, and subject to government control. Another example of usurpation of power/authority.
Well thank you Mike Flynn, couldn't Said it better myself.
if two groups if unbelievers want to destroy each other I'm not gonna help either of them. And if Israel wants to recall Hamas they can end it today. Deep state wants blood, land and probably oil.
He seems to have multiple personality disorder, he sounds good on this one. “Q is a psyop”, not so much. Maybe he should do the 24 hr rule on posting, think before speaking.
Having lots of people shoot at you gives you focus, and a real sense of what is important and what isn't,you say. (Perhaps for a season) Following God by obeying his Word (the Lord Jesus Christ) does that (times a thousand) and (remains a lifetime), without the need of a war.
Yeh, because there was never ANY Wars or directed massacres by God in the Bible, right? (Hint: there were both)
It's dipshit comments like that...the holier than thou crap from the "I'm more Christian than you are" types... is one of the many reasons I don't go to church anymore.
Get off your soapbox, handshake....people here are smarter than that.
Your response truncates any reasonable debate and I have been known to carry on the debate in spite of knowing the obdurate nature of the apostates-no more no how. Goodnight and good luck..
I think the topic of a murderous, vengeful Jew god is what truncates any reasonable response. People get real dumb real fast when the iron age Cannanite war god Yahweh is involved.
Yep, God told the Israelites to go kill the Cannanites.
They said “No”.
So God said “go die in the desert”.
Then Joshua came along and they started stacking bodies.
Cannanites were an evil people.
There is a time for everything.
Even stacking bodies.
Are you?..smarter than that? He isn't holier than thou, not by a stretch.
Is this a spiritual war? Good and evil? Love and hate? Who are the sources of each? There is joy and peace in Believing according to the bible. So his statement is spot on.
YOU'VE JUST GOT TO LOVE MIKE FLYNN.
We love our 5G General don’t we?
Yes. But we have some doubters out there and that's why I posted this reply.
Yup. I’ve seen the attacks and doubts everywhere. But as Q said about Flynn, we protect patriots. We were in a psyop war for decades and he literally wrote a book and told us how to play the game.
Thanks for putting that out there. God bless.
BAM!
AND .. that's why he's a General & she's a birdbrain.
she still wants us to help the Nazi's in Ukraine.
I have a feeling she doesn't give a rat's ass about the ukies, she just wants to continue her kickbacks and laundering operation.
Wow! That was great.
He even added Ukraine.
This reminds me of the time during the last election when Chris KrispieKream was calling for war with Russia. Fatass isn’t eligible.
I’m still with Flynn. Haven’t faltered on that front. Fight like a Flynn they say.
Having lots of people shoot at you every day gives you focus and a real sense of what is important and what is not.
He didn't just face palm her, he shoved her off the back of the stage!
That one did me heart good.
Haley can kiss my ass.
Israel should have been abandoned like yesterday
Owned
DUUUUDE!!
Funny how Nikki Haley talks..... We have no Defense treaty with either of them. What planet is she from?..... Nikki return to Mars. They are transmitting for your return to lead a great battle there.
It wouldn't matter since defense treaties are against the constitution, and the principles upon which our Republic was established. No entangling alliances was the principle and George Washington set the example.
What do think NATO is? You might reread the part in the Constitution about contracts and treaties. They're valid.
Government doesn't have the legitimate authority to make a treaty that is in opposition to the constitution. If they do it, it is stolen power, or usurped power. It doesn't matter how long ago it was put in place, either. All laws (or Treaties) passed that are repugnant to the constitution are null and void.
You might want to learn more about legitimate power, the constitution, and the meaning of usurped.
The short answer tends to be the quixotic view,but nevertheless is: “No, a treaty can’t override the Constitution, especially the first eight amendments in the Bill of Rights or the Constitution’s other specific exceptions to federal authority. The treaty has the force only of a statute, not of a super-constitution.” Of course, this is under the Constitution as originally understood. How well does a Kamal Harris or a Imran Omar know this? Then you have all the 'evil-doers'. How well do you expect them to abide by this?
But the full answer is more complicated. This is because the Founding-Era evidence does suggest that the Constitution enables the federal government to acquire significant—although not unlimited—additional power by entering into treaties.
This is what NATO is. Also, remember the Trans-Pacific Trade Act (the one that would have really f-ed up our constitutional rights, but Trump dismantled it before it was signed into law?
Of course, evil politicians will try and don't care one iota about our rights as an American, so we need to watch our backs.
I have been studying the Constitution, the principles upon which our Republic was established, and the intentions the Founding Fathers had in regards to the Republic they established since I realized in the Gulf War my President had lied to us about our reasons for going to war. I questioned my oath, and what it was I had pledged myself to defending. I decided I would educate myself to know exactly what I was defending. 32 years later, one thing is 100% clear to me. They never intended the Federal Government to have any increase of power than the Constitution limited it to possessing. Not even by treaty.
Quite right and absolutely agree with you. Here's more. Could it be that there is very wide practice of the oath of office is not being taken by public officials? There seems to be a widespread issue with this. Secondly, there's all those take the oath of office view it like Bush Jr. said about the constitution....."It's just a piece of paper".
If they take it, I am sure the majority just pay it lip service. If that is the case, but they took it, they will undergo judgement in a court they cannot escape. If they didn't, we, The people, will eventually hold them to account, and still they will end up in that inescapable Court for judgement.
More food for thought. Every single elected or appointed government servant is required to obey the Constitution. If they act outside of the limited powers granted, they are answerable to We, The people. We can call for a Grand Jury, we can Quo Warranto them, we can recall them, and, as a last resort, we can eliminate them. Government serves us, not the other way around.
In the Founders day, any act of treason was punishable by death. That was because individual rights and liberty were to be protected at all costs. Today, our rights and liberties are treated as trivial, and subject to government control. Another example of usurpation of power/authority.
Well thank you Mike Flynn, couldn't Said it better myself.
if two groups if unbelievers want to destroy each other I'm not gonna help either of them. And if Israel wants to recall Hamas they can end it today. Deep state wants blood, land and probably oil.
Who’s Nikki Haley?
The fact that she even compares Ukraine (Not a NATO member) to Israel (Our #1 ally) tells me all I need to know about what side she is on.
He seems to have multiple personality disorder, he sounds good on this one. “Q is a psyop”, not so much. Maybe he should do the 24 hr rule on posting, think before speaking.
Having lots of people shoot at you gives you focus, and a real sense of what is important and what isn't,you say. (Perhaps for a season) Following God by obeying his Word (the Lord Jesus Christ) does that (times a thousand) and (remains a lifetime), without the need of a war.
Yeh, because there was never ANY Wars or directed massacres by God in the Bible, right? (Hint: there were both)
It's dipshit comments like that...the holier than thou crap from the "I'm more Christian than you are" types... is one of the many reasons I don't go to church anymore.
Get off your soapbox, handshake....people here are smarter than that.
Your response truncates any reasonable debate and I have been known to carry on the debate in spite of knowing the obdurate nature of the apostates-no more no how. Goodnight and good luck..
Who the fuck asked you? There were zero chains pulled in your direction.
I think the topic of a murderous, vengeful Jew god is what truncates any reasonable response. People get real dumb real fast when the iron age Cannanite war god Yahweh is involved.
Yep, God told the Israelites to go kill the Cannanites. They said “No”. So God said “go die in the desert”. Then Joshua came along and they started stacking bodies. Cannanites were an evil people. There is a time for everything. Even stacking bodies.
Are you?..smarter than that? He isn't holier than thou, not by a stretch.
Is this a spiritual war? Good and evil? Love and hate? Who are the sources of each? There is joy and peace in Believing according to the bible. So his statement is spot on.
Handshake says what?
He is THE Prince of Peace afterall...