The thing about electromagnets are that they need a source of electricity, thus "electro". You need to have an input to get an output.
Due to the nature of..well, everything I guess, the energy you put in has some amount of loss.
One of the problems surrounding the idea of perpetual energy is that there's no real way to recapture the energy that was lost.
For example, when you charge a battery bank, a certain amount of that energy put into it is lost. When you then charge something using that battery bank, that energy also suffers loss.
Therefore, a major problem and hurdle to overcome with that idea (push/pull electromagnets for perpetual energy) is that eventually, without feeding those magnets energy again, they will stop working.
When it comes to car batteries and EV regenerative braking, we can mitigate or outright generate energy to store in the batteries, but still need another source to get us moving.
When it comes to pumping enough energy into an electromagnet to move something as large and heavy as a car, I wouldn't even begin to pretend to understand the required mathematics or science but what I do know is that there will likely be a greater number of failure rates at some point in the chain, whether that's from insufficient or too much energy or even as simple as the required energy to maintain said electromagnets generating so much heat that something breaks somewhere, possibly even causing the battery to fail itself.
There is also the difficulty of ensuring that electromagnetism can't also damage other components; this is also another hurdle. Tuning could be an issue.
All that said, I'd truly love to move on to newer, better and less destructive battery solutions. Graphene batteries seem pretty promising on that front.
EVs clearly ain't it, at least not the way they've been made.
John Trump, Uncle to The Donald, was a high ranking scientist who was given the role of reviewing Tesla's blueprints and notebooks etc.
I strongly suspect that Uncle John, filtered out the stuff that would benefit Humanity and passed this on to what we call White Hats, while keeping it out of the hands of our favourite Black Hats.
Pretty much nonsense. In order for a generator to generate current (i.e., power) it must operate against the resistance of counter-currents induced in the windings. This requires mechanical power to continue the rotation. In matters of energy conversion, you don't get anything for free.
That kind of perpetual motion is unimportant to the quest. We do that with superconductive currents. The quest is for a source of perpetual power, and that IS impossible.
The energy I have been thinking about is just enough to reverse or rotate a magnet. The actual driving force is the push and pull of the magnets. I said electro-magnetic, but it doesn't necessarily have to be an electro-magnet. Just some method mechanical or electrical to reverse and/or turn off the polarity to create directional spin.
What I really image might be possible is multiple magnets aligned in a rotary type of engine. Where the magnets act on a large cam drive shaft.
I have thought magnesium tape batteries would be a good initial solution for EVs. Easy enough to keep a spare in the trunk/ jockey box & it seemed from what I recall looking at, that they would supply far more power for the weight. Also they could be exchanged like a propane tank & have the oxidized tapes renewed.
Use tesla towers pulling power out the ionosphere. cars would have antennas tuned to the frequency of what the tower is. Batteries would be there to just maintain power but would always be charging no matter it's location. As long as it's within tower range. I'm sure we've already had this technology in the past but other corporations did their job to snuff competition
The thing about electromagnets are that they need a source of electricity, thus "electro". You need to have an input to get an output.
Due to the nature of..well, everything I guess, the energy you put in has some amount of loss.
One of the problems surrounding the idea of perpetual energy is that there's no real way to recapture the energy that was lost.
For example, when you charge a battery bank, a certain amount of that energy put into it is lost. When you then charge something using that battery bank, that energy also suffers loss.
Therefore, a major problem and hurdle to overcome with that idea (push/pull electromagnets for perpetual energy) is that eventually, without feeding those magnets energy again, they will stop working.
When it comes to car batteries and EV regenerative braking, we can mitigate or outright generate energy to store in the batteries, but still need another source to get us moving.
When it comes to pumping enough energy into an electromagnet to move something as large and heavy as a car, I wouldn't even begin to pretend to understand the required mathematics or science but what I do know is that there will likely be a greater number of failure rates at some point in the chain, whether that's from insufficient or too much energy or even as simple as the required energy to maintain said electromagnets generating so much heat that something breaks somewhere, possibly even causing the battery to fail itself.
There is also the difficulty of ensuring that electromagnetism can't also damage other components; this is also another hurdle. Tuning could be an issue.
All that said, I'd truly love to move on to newer, better and less destructive battery solutions. Graphene batteries seem pretty promising on that front.
EVs clearly ain't it, at least not the way they've been made.
Insert Nikola Tesla technology
It’s more interesting if you know the connection to Trump and Tesla.
Absolutely!!
Yep, so many people don’t know who John Trump is.
What's the connection?
John Trump, Uncle to The Donald, was a high ranking scientist who was given the role of reviewing Tesla's blueprints and notebooks etc.
I strongly suspect that Uncle John, filtered out the stuff that would benefit Humanity and passed this on to what we call White Hats, while keeping it out of the hands of our favourite Black Hats.
John G Trump is the connection.
Interesting story. What happened to the Tesla Artefacts after his death?
Did Tesla invent a Time Machine? Is DJT a time traveler?
The rabbit hole is immense.
I need to pick up more literature on Nikola Tesla. Very interesting person, and very interesting to read about.
Pretty much nonsense. In order for a generator to generate current (i.e., power) it must operate against the resistance of counter-currents induced in the windings. This requires mechanical power to continue the rotation. In matters of energy conversion, you don't get anything for free.
Sunlight is free.
The solar system actually debunks the myth that perpetual motion is impossible.
man-made perpetual motion might be impossible…
But the sun is not eternal. It might well be eternal for all of humanity, but the sun will eventually die.
That kind of perpetual motion is unimportant to the quest. We do that with superconductive currents. The quest is for a source of perpetual power, and that IS impossible.
Electricity is frequency
Not electrostatics. Not direct current. Read up on electricity.
The energy I have been thinking about is just enough to reverse or rotate a magnet. The actual driving force is the push and pull of the magnets. I said electro-magnetic, but it doesn't necessarily have to be an electro-magnet. Just some method mechanical or electrical to reverse and/or turn off the polarity to create directional spin.
What I really image might be possible is multiple magnets aligned in a rotary type of engine. Where the magnets act on a large cam drive shaft.
There is never enough torque to do anything meaningful
I have thought magnesium tape batteries would be a good initial solution for EVs. Easy enough to keep a spare in the trunk/ jockey box & it seemed from what I recall looking at, that they would supply far more power for the weight. Also they could be exchanged like a propane tank & have the oxidized tapes renewed.
It was a very interesting concept.
Use tesla towers pulling power out the ionosphere. cars would have antennas tuned to the frequency of what the tower is. Batteries would be there to just maintain power but would always be charging no matter it's location. As long as it's within tower range. I'm sure we've already had this technology in the past but other corporations did their job to snuff competition