You're welcome, good work on also spreading the word of this blatant effort to steal away an election in live time. This definitely needs to spreaded around.
Why is someone “typing” the numbers? Where are the numbers coming from? Are these numbers tied to actual results? Or is it just whatever someone “types”? Are there any live “real” numbers at all?
Click on a county to see how many precincts. A county I never heard of in upper upper CA had 62. San Diego County had over two thousand.
As votes come in and are counted. The precincts report batches up to the county and the counties report batches up to the state. Thousands of precincts. Dozens of counties doing multple counts a day.
Election results posted on Election Night are semi-official results based on the in-person ballots cast at voting locations on Election Day, any early voted ballots cast in person prior to Election Day, and any vote-by-mail ballots received and processed prior to Election Day.
The complete tally of votes is never finished on Election Night as vote-by-mail ballots postmarked on or before Election Day and received within seven days after the election, as well as any provisional ballots cast, must still be counted. These ballots are always counted during the official canvass period in the 30 days after Election Day.
While media outlets and others may “call” an election contest, or candidates may “concede” to their opponent, on Election Night or the in days following, these calls and concessions are based on the semi-official results and not the final election results. The election results are never final until the Secretary of State has compiled the official statewide results after all county elections officials have reported their official canvass of the votes.
Colorado requires mail in ballots to arrive at the election office by Election Day to be counted. This election week and election months thing is bullshit.
The numbers don't even make no sense after the cheat, 7% calculates up to about a thousand votes for Schiff after Garvey lost more than 15%. Quite the sloppy fraud I ever seen being committed in live time.
The other option was Adam Schiff, democrats were voting for Garvey because Schiff is a pencil neck.
Voters were allowed to cross vote for this primary.
California’s New Electoral Reforms: How Did They Work?
The other reform is a new “top two” primary system that combines all candidates on a single ballot for all voters, with the two candidates who receive the most votes, regardless of party, advancing to the fall election.
This graphic is showing the top 4 vote getters. The total number of candidates was like 25.
Add up the totals of the top 4. It's over 3.6 million votes. Look at the total votes it's only 3.2 million votes.
So it seems we do have hundreds of thousands of extra votes.
There's also something weird with this video the total number of votes doesn't change. But "AFTER" the top 4 have like 2.9 million votes and with the other 20 candidates that sounds about right.
If this was a typo, there would have been a 900,000 point gain for Garvey at some point, before they took it away. I dare they go back and find that typo.
I am willing to bet every vote Garvey got was accumulated in small batches throughout the night. You will not find a typo that gave Garvey 900,000 votes.
So that means they want us to believe there was a series of typos that all went to Garvey"s benefit?
If that is the case, how many typos were made in Garvey's favor that accumulated to 900,000.
Lets see the math.
Coincidental all the typos were for one candidate.
This tweet shows Orange County reporting 1,039,044 votes for Garvey.
when it should have been 103,904.
I believe it was an error in orange county where they gave Garvey, 1,039,044 votes instead of 103,904. Maybe maybe not I am not 100% but that’s what it looks like.
How else can we investigate this claim.
It seems the original video is using the NY Times election results. Don't know if we could find snapshots of that during the day. Also it would be interesting to see if other sites showed these same numbers, that could narrow it down if the error originated with the NY Times or not.
unfortunately, although we've been told that the white hats "got this" re the election, nothing has changed and the rats continue to steal in front of our noses......
This makes me so angry and physically ill! Thieves and thugs run the elections in our nation. When will justice be done Lord? How long must we suffer this injustice?
Saw that myself and it wasn't a typo. As for MJTruthUltra, I followed the guy on X for awhile, but had to stop due to him constantly DM'ing me about the end of currency and how I needed to talk to him about my crypto investments.
Someone must have copied his account because I've never received a DM from him, but did receive one from Catherine Herridge on X and knew it was fake...big accounts don't do this, only crypto & porn.
Reminds me of the past days where I trusted in the establishment so deeply that I would go out of my way to come up with reasons for myself to explain anything really weird, but later realised these are the "glitches in the matrix". The right glitch will wake you up.
If Garvey were to beat him in the primary by a million votes, there's no way they can justify Adam Schiff winning in November. They had to make the primary close now to make a Schiff win in November feasible.
This is such a dishonest rebuttal. "You're just asleep and brainwashed".
It seems like a lot of people just conclude that everything is bullshit with no evidence.
2020 was evidently stolen. The research was done on that. Same with COVID. People have spent hundreds of hours looking into the discrepancies on these.
Not so with this case, however. At least not yet. And so it seems to me to be wholly inappropriate to act like we have the same level of knowledge on this being stolen as 2020, and to then conclude that anyone who doesn't just "see" how obvious it is must be brainwashed and still asleep.
When I say I was being kind with my comment, its not an understatement.
He assumes that someone actually types out the numbers constantly instead of using a script in this day and age
Second, he further assumes that whoever is typing this is actually typing all the numbers from scratch each time, instead of just entering the updates
Third, he assumes that we were born yesterday and we did not see the exact same shenanigans in 2020 and now the repetition of the same playbook.
And further he thinks we have forgotten that these kind of "innocent mistakes" predominantly affects the right negatively
He demonstrates that his position is precarious by qualifying with "Without looking at the details" and "This is not an official count"
And by saying "This is not the official count" he pushes the idea that errors in unofficial counts have no impact on the collective psyche of the people watching them.
Every single one of these actually screams "Shill" and yet, here I was gently pointing out we are falling into the matrix trap, in the hopes that he is not a shill and it was a honestly misguided attempt at "being unbiased".
And now you jump in full steam ahead, knowing full well all these factors calling it a "dishonest rebuttal". Anyone who has been through 2020 and does not recognise the exact same playbook IS asleep and brainwashed.
The research was done on that.
Do you know why people did research on that? Because they ignored the media that dismissed every single glitch we saw as an honest mistake and tried to make us look like the crazies. AND YET, tough patriots ignored it, dug in and analysed it, and stringed together sequence of glitches - each crazy sounding on its own - together, to paint a full picture.
And you have the audacity to come here and push the same crap ?
Am reminded of the many hours spent watching those nine cameras watching Arizona's Maricopa County gold standard forensic audits and recounts sponsored by the AZ Senate. As blind as they are, these old eyes have witnessed a lot.
u/#pepedetective
Yeah, and with one simple dismissive comment, the original commenter just disrespected everyone who did that and many other things like that. We pored through the election data feeds, I even wrote scripts to crunch those numbers, and other Anons watched other cameras and did thousands of public record lookups to confirm all kinds of reports that were coming in.
You did good man, I suspected that person was a shill as much I wanted to think it was someone uninformed but when you think about it. It's rather unlikely in a situation like this.
There were over 450,000 more votes recorded for all Senate candidates than recorded for all Presidential candidates. That seems to be a high number who skipped the first race on the ballot.
or it's an indication of a mistake. See my other comments. People on twitter are saying there was a screw up in Orange Count typed in 7 digits for Garvey, when it should have been 6.
Shoutout to our own Anon u/ZeKaiser who reported this: https://greatawakening.win/p/17shvx4DaR/i-am-literally-seeing-live-cheat/
Just like that, the truth spreads around like a wildfire.
Yes...I read your post and was encouraged to see others reporting it
Thank you patriot!
You're welcome, good work on also spreading the word of this blatant effort to steal away an election in live time. This definitely needs to spreaded around.
Should have a re-vote after something occurs like this. Completely untrustworthy and Californians should be outraged and protesting this.
the greatest trick the dems ever pulled was that ~25% of the population can have more than a 50% majority
Why would there be any part of this system that requires human entry of data?
Only way dems can "win"
Right?! And if there are manual entries, it should never be one person typing one number.
More attention needs to be paid to this . It’s happening right across the country
They are not typos. They are evidence that they rigged the election.
Why is someone “typing” the numbers? Where are the numbers coming from? Are these numbers tied to actual results? Or is it just whatever someone “types”? Are there any live “real” numbers at all?
If you can type it, you can count paper ballots by hand.
Results are reported by county, but each county has different precincts.
Here's the county map in CA. https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/map
Click on a county to see how many precincts. A county I never heard of in upper upper CA had 62. San Diego County had over two thousand.
As votes come in and are counted. The precincts report batches up to the county and the counties report batches up to the state. Thousands of precincts. Dozens of counties doing multple counts a day.
Here's info on the counting
https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/upcoming-elections/california-vote-counting-process
Every number you see is a preliminary number.
Nothing is official yet
https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/upcoming-elections/california-vote-counting-process
Election results posted on Election Night are semi-official results based on the in-person ballots cast at voting locations on Election Day, any early voted ballots cast in person prior to Election Day, and any vote-by-mail ballots received and processed prior to Election Day.
The complete tally of votes is never finished on Election Night as vote-by-mail ballots postmarked on or before Election Day and received within seven days after the election, as well as any provisional ballots cast, must still be counted. These ballots are always counted during the official canvass period in the 30 days after Election Day.
While media outlets and others may “call” an election contest, or candidates may “concede” to their opponent, on Election Night or the in days following, these calls and concessions are based on the semi-official results and not the final election results. The election results are never final until the Secretary of State has compiled the official statewide results after all county elections officials have reported their official canvass of the votes.
Colorado requires mail in ballots to arrive at the election office by Election Day to be counted. This election week and election months thing is bullshit.
Great explanation of how they have changed Election Day into election month and have several options to insert or delete votes along the way.
The numbers don't even make no sense after the cheat, 7% calculates up to about a thousand votes for Schiff after Garvey lost more than 15%. Quite the sloppy fraud I ever seen being committed in live time.
It's not fraud.
Or let met put this another way.
Do you think people are more excited to vote for Steve Garvey or Donald Trump.
Because if these 900,000 votes are real Garvey got waaaaaay more support than Donald Trump.
The other option was Adam Schiff, democrats were voting for Garvey because Schiff is a pencil neck.
Voters were allowed to cross vote for this primary.
California’s New Electoral Reforms: How Did They Work?
The other reform is a new “top two” primary system that combines all candidates on a single ballot for all voters, with the two candidates who receive the most votes, regardless of party, advancing to the fall election.
https://www.ppic.org/publication/californias-new-electoral-reforms-how-did-they-work/
Yes, but Democratic voters had other democratic choices to vote for if they didn't like. Adam Schiff.
California is a pretty blue state these days. I don't see 900,000 voters making that shift.
The numbers don't make sense "before the cheat"
This graphic is showing the top 4 vote getters. The total number of candidates was like 25.
Add up the totals of the top 4. It's over 3.6 million votes. Look at the total votes it's only 3.2 million votes.
So it seems we do have hundreds of thousands of extra votes.
There's also something weird with this video the total number of votes doesn't change. But "AFTER" the top 4 have like 2.9 million votes and with the other 20 candidates that sounds about right.
Weird how the "glitches" only go in one direction.
One day election , paper ballots. ID REQUIRED.
THIS is the way!! ☝️
Sean Hannity has entered the chat (no offense kek)
But will anything actually happen?
I mean, it’s a repeat of every past election since at least 2012.
When are people going to truly wake up?
If this was a typo, there would have been a 900,000 point gain for Garvey at some point, before they took it away. I dare they go back and find that typo.
I am willing to bet every vote Garvey got was accumulated in small batches throughout the night. You will not find a typo that gave Garvey 900,000 votes.
So that means they want us to believe there was a series of typos that all went to Garvey"s benefit?
If that is the case, how many typos were made in Garvey's favor that accumulated to 900,000.
Lets see the math.
Coincidental all the typos were for one candidate.
The only typo was in the original algorithm that wasn't strong enough to stop Garvey from running away with it.
AND that they are so regularly retarded at data entry
yet only seem to fail when doing the data entry on the red guy, the blue guy's data entry was perfect, requiring no correction.
Apparently there was a typo in Orange County.
https://x.com/memeplops/status/1765726008353735087?s=20
People say there is a community note that will start appearing for this.
Here's another tweet where the math works out
https://x.com/sssdddsda/status/1765485829021913225?s=20
This tweet shows Orange County reporting 1,039,044 votes for Garvey. when it should have been 103,904.
How else can we investigate this claim. It seems the original video is using the NY Times election results. Don't know if we could find snapshots of that during the day. Also it would be interesting to see if other sites showed these same numbers, that could narrow it down if the error originated with the NY Times or not.
Checking the Orange County vote.
DecisionDesk is said to be good site for election results.
As of early this afternoon EST, they have 400K total votes in Orange County.
https://results.decisiondeskhq.com/2024/Primaries/California/
Steve Garvey GOP 177,011 44.0%
Adam Schiff DEM 88,346 22.0%
....
Total 402,144
You can check the CA official page, and they also have Orange county votes over 400K, but no where near a million https://electionresults.sos.ca.gov/returns/status
Well, this isn’t promising for November
unfortunately, although we've been told that the white hats "got this" re the election, nothing has changed and the rats continue to steal in front of our noses......
This makes me so angry and physically ill! Thieves and thugs run the elections in our nation. When will justice be done Lord? How long must we suffer this injustice?
Have faith fren...🙏
Saw that myself and it wasn't a typo. As for MJTruthUltra, I followed the guy on X for awhile, but had to stop due to him constantly DM'ing me about the end of currency and how I needed to talk to him about my crypto investments.
Someone must have copied his account because I've never received a DM from him, but did receive one from Catherine Herridge on X and knew it was fake...big accounts don't do this, only crypto & porn.
It was a damn successful fake account as I remember it having ~150k subscribers or more when I told him to F off.
Wow...
Right in front of God and everybody. They're at it again.
A 900K typo is pretty easy to understand.
Without looking at the details, say you meant type 117349
But instead you type 1173490
Hitting both 9 and 0 instead of 9.
that could into a huge error, I'm this case it's 1,056,141
This is not an official count. Counts will get confirmed in a few days.
California has paper ballots
Reminds me of the past days where I trusted in the establishment so deeply that I would go out of my way to come up with reasons for myself to explain anything really weird, but later realised these are the "glitches in the matrix". The right glitch will wake you up.
You can call this "trusting the establishment" which is a way of framing the argument as something else.
But if you know how elections work, this doesn't make much sense as "a steal."
I mean Steve Garvey was one of the winners today. I don't see a benefit
Edit
I guess my point is yes you can easily make a typo that adds an extra digit I do it all time on my phone.
There's no benefit to it and if this was the plan it's super risky and fruitless.
You can easily double check this. Because the ballots exist. And you could check hot many votes came in during that period.
Here is a more detailed breakdown of your comment: https://greatawakening.win/p/17si0UgDpR/x/c/4ZA06MaQAOA
Please show us the 900,000 point instantaneous jump in Garvey's vote count prior to them removing them.
Look at Garveys votes now.
Look at Haley's votes.
Look at Trump's votes
Garvey has 1,342,948 according to
https://elections2024.thehill.com/primaries/california/
That just about matches Trump's 1.1 million plus Haley's 250,000.
Other wise, Garvey would have 2.2 million votes if you gave him another 900,000. Where would they have come from?
The benefit if Garvey beat Schiff by a million votes? It means Schiff would be voted out of office in November.
That's a whole separate election, so pulling this stunt did not gain you anything.
My question is what would be the benefit to the people who pulled the stunt off? Nothing. Garvey is going to be on the ballot anyway.
If Garvey were to beat him in the primary by a million votes, there's no way they can justify Adam Schiff winning in November. They had to make the primary close now to make a Schiff win in November feasible.
Why is the Garvey campaign not screaming about this?
It's not like this is some obscure race?
This is such a dishonest rebuttal. "You're just asleep and brainwashed".
It seems like a lot of people just conclude that everything is bullshit with no evidence.
2020 was evidently stolen. The research was done on that. Same with COVID. People have spent hundreds of hours looking into the discrepancies on these.
Not so with this case, however. At least not yet. And so it seems to me to be wholly inappropriate to act like we have the same level of knowledge on this being stolen as 2020, and to then conclude that anyone who doesn't just "see" how obvious it is must be brainwashed and still asleep.
When I say I was being kind with my comment, its not an understatement.
He assumes that someone actually types out the numbers constantly instead of using a script in this day and age
Second, he further assumes that whoever is typing this is actually typing all the numbers from scratch each time, instead of just entering the updates
Third, he assumes that we were born yesterday and we did not see the exact same shenanigans in 2020 and now the repetition of the same playbook.
And further he thinks we have forgotten that these kind of "innocent mistakes" predominantly affects the right negatively
He demonstrates that his position is precarious by qualifying with "Without looking at the details" and "This is not an official count"
And by saying "This is not the official count" he pushes the idea that errors in unofficial counts have no impact on the collective psyche of the people watching them.
Every single one of these actually screams "Shill" and yet, here I was gently pointing out we are falling into the matrix trap, in the hopes that he is not a shill and it was a honestly misguided attempt at "being unbiased".
And now you jump in full steam ahead, knowing full well all these factors calling it a "dishonest rebuttal". Anyone who has been through 2020 and does not recognise the exact same playbook IS asleep and brainwashed.
Do you know why people did research on that? Because they ignored the media that dismissed every single glitch we saw as an honest mistake and tried to make us look like the crazies. AND YET, tough patriots ignored it, dug in and analysed it, and stringed together sequence of glitches - each crazy sounding on its own - together, to paint a full picture.
And you have the audacity to come here and push the same crap ?
Am reminded of the many hours spent watching those nine cameras watching Arizona's Maricopa County gold standard forensic audits and recounts sponsored by the AZ Senate. As blind as they are, these old eyes have witnessed a lot. u/#pepedetective
Yeah, and with one simple dismissive comment, the original commenter just disrespected everyone who did that and many other things like that. We pored through the election data feeds, I even wrote scripts to crunch those numbers, and other Anons watched other cameras and did thousands of public record lookups to confirm all kinds of reports that were coming in.
Not to mention the lawfare. It all looks connected to those with eyes to see and experiential truth to share.
You did good man, I suspected that person was a shill as much I wanted to think it was someone uninformed but when you think about it. It's rather unlikely in a situation like this.
https://greatawakening.win/p/17si0UgDpR/x/c/4ZA0P2VMhx3
Show us the point where Garvey's votes increased by 900,000 votes. Come on man, show us.
Nice post.
Thanks fren!
There were over 450,000 more votes recorded for all Senate candidates than recorded for all Presidential candidates. That seems to be a high number who skipped the first race on the ballot.
or it's an indication of a mistake. See my other comments. People on twitter are saying there was a screw up in Orange Count typed in 7 digits for Garvey, when it should have been 6.