Mar-a-Lago Judge’s Stark Ruling: Jury Sees Secret Files or Trump Wins
Jay Paul/ReutersThe MAGA-friendly federal judge who keeps siding with Donald Trump in his Mar-a-Lago classified records case has forced prosecutors to make a stark choice: allow jurors to see a huge trove of national secrets or let him go.U.S. District Jud...
"The MAGA friendly judge" aka the judge who goes by the Constitution. 🙄🤬
God bless President Donald Trump, his wife, family, legal team, friends, Q followers, the Voters that support Trump, the Military that supports the Constitution and Trump, Law Enforcement that too supports the Constitution and Trump, most of all Trumps security team and their families too, God Bless America, Bless the missing children and you the reader Too.🙏
God bless you, Moosemeadow!
And you, too Moosemeadow!
TL;DR: Jack Smith must allow jurors to read documents the gov is using to charge PDJT under the Espionage Act or allow the claim of them being covered under the Presidential Records Act to stand. If trial gets before a jury, judge could dismiss charges with prejudice under previous ruling that called Constitutionality of Espionage Act as "vague", thereby making any further charges as they relate to the documents null via double jeopardy - or - the jury gets to see the records (putting them into the public record) and decide for themselves whether or not PDJT having them violated the Espionage Act or if they should be covered under the Presidential Records Act.
Warning: Link in title goes to a Yahoo article with obvious left-tard point of view.
Read Judge Canon's two-page order: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652.407.0.pdf
If he doesn't let the jury see the documents, the case is thrown out. If he does let the jury see the documents, the entire Russia,Russia,Russia crap of Crossfire Hurricane will be public knowledge and the traitorous activities of Obama and the previous administration will be on full display. "How do you present evidence"? You force your enemy to put it on display so MSM cannot say it is misinformation. BOY, AM I BEGINNING TO LOVE THIS MOVIE!!!!
Upvoted but personally I'm reserving this level of youthful exuberance for the end of the movie
We got a looooonnnngggg way to go, folks
THIS^^^
Judge Cannon has put Ol' Smithy in a VERY PRECARIOUS SITUATION and the Appellate Court CANNOT rule UNTIL Judge Cannon rules...WOWZA!!!!!!
Besides, PDJT is showing the world how corrupt the judicial system is in ALL THE COURTS INCLUDING LOCAL/STATE/FEDERAL!!!!!
Taking bets that there will be a VERY DEEP HOUSE CLEANING OF THE US GOVERNMENT!!!
Anybody need a GOOD JOB and willing to work to get this country back on track?
::: hand rubbing intensifies :::
Those documents are not part of this case and the public doesn't necessarily see things a jury sees. I'm pretty sure things especially like photos can be sure to a jury, but not necessarily released. (think gruesome crime photos)
Crossfire Hurricane ended in 2017. Most of the docs are from after that. See below.
I don't know what the judge is up to, but look at document 29. Even if you had TS clearance, you may not be able to see this document
So why does the judge think the jury needs to see this? Would jurors get to read these up close?
It's Top Secret, the next classification mark is redacted in itself.
SI = Special Intelligence (intelligence from intercepted communications)
TK = TALENT-KEYHOLE (intelligence from satellite collection)
NOFORN = No Foreign Nationals
ORCON = Originator Controlled
1 TOP SECRET//NOFORN//SPECIAL HANDLING Document dated May 3, 2018, concerning White House intelligence briefing related to various foreign countries
2 TOP SECRET//SI//NOFORN//SPECIAL HANDLING Document dated May 9, 2018, concerning White House intelligence briefing related to various foreign countries
3 TOP SECRET//SJ//NOFORN//FISA Undated document concerning military capabilities of a fore ign co untry and the United States, with handwritten annotation in black marker
4 TOP SEC RET//SPECIAL HANDLING Document dated May 6. 2019, concerning White House intelligence briefing related to fore ign cou ntries, including military activities and planning of foreign countries
5 TOP SECRET//[redacted]/[redacted]//ORCON/NOFORN Document dated June 2020 concerning nuclear capabilities of a foreign country
6 TOP SECRET//SPECIAL HANDUNG Document dated June 4, 2020, co ncerning White House intelligence briefing related to various foreign cou ntries
7 SECRET//NOFORN Document dated October 21, 2018, concerning communications with a leader of a foreign country
8 SECRET//REL TO USA, FVEY Document dated October 4, 2019, concerning military capabilities of a fo reign country
9 TOP SECRET//[redacted]/[ redacted)//ORCON/NOFORN/FISA Undated document concerning military attacks by a foreign country
10 TOP SECRET//TK//NOFORN Document dated November 2017 concerning military capabilities of a foreign country
11 No marking Undated document concerning military contingency planning of the United States
12 SECRET//REL TO USA, FVEY Pages of undated document concerning projected regional military capabilities of a foreign country and the United States
13 TOP SECRET//SJ/fK//NOFORN Undated document concerning military capabilities of a foreign country and the United States
14 SECRET// ORCON/NOFORN Document dated January 2020 concerning military options of a foreign country and potential effects on United States interests
15 SECRETllORCON/NOFORN Document dated February 2020 concerning policies in a fore ign country
16 SECRET//ORCON/NOFORN Document dated December 2019 concerning foreign country support of terrorist acts against United States interests
17 TOP SECRET//[redacted]/TK//ORCON/IMCON/NOFORN Document dated January 2020 concerning military capabilities of a foreign country
18 SECRET//NOFORN Docum ent dated March 2020 concerning military operations against United States forces and others
19 SECRET//FORMERL Y RESTRICTED DATA Undated document concerning nuclear weaponry of the United States
20 TOP SECRET// (redacted]//ORCON/NOFORN Undated document concerning tirneline and deta il s of attack in a foreign country
21 SECRET//NOFORN Undated document concerning military capabilities of foreign countries
22 TOP SECRET// [redacted]//RSEN/ORCON/NOFORN Document dated August 2019 concerning regional military activity of a foreign country
23 TOP SECRET//SPECIAL HANDLING Document dated August 30, 2019, concerning White House intelligence briefing related to various fore ign countries, with handwritten annotation in black marker
24 TOP SECRET//HCS-P/S1//ORCON-USGOV/NOFORN Undated document concerning military activity of a foreign country
25 TOP SECRET//HCS-P/SV/ORCON-USGOV/NOFORN Document dated October 24, 2019, concerning military activity of foreign countries and the United States
26 TOP SE CRET// [redacted] //ORC ON/NOFORN/FISA Document dated November 7, 2019, concerning military activity of foreign countries and the United States
27 TOP SECRET//S1/fK//NOFORN Document dated November 20 19 concerning military activity of foreign countries
28 TOP SECRET// SPECIAL HANDLING Document dated October 18, 2019, concerning White House intelligence briefing related to various foreign countries 36
29 TOP SECRET//[redacted ]/Sl/fK//ORCON/NOFORN Document dated Oct ober 18, 2019, concerning military capabilities of a foreign country
30 TOP SECRET// [redacted]//ORCON/NOFORN/FJSA Document dated October 15, 2019, concerning military activity in a foreign country
31 TOP SECRET//SJ/TK//NOFO RN Document dated February 2017 concerning military activity of a fo rei gn country
32 TOPSECRET//NOFORN Presentation concerning military activity in a foreign country
The next classification mark that is redacted: could that be "Q clearance"?
No.
Because we know which document that is. It's number 19
19 SECRET//FORMERLY RESTRICTED DATA Undated document concerning nuclear weaponry of the United States
This has been described in court documents AND that category of FORMERLY RESTRICTED DATA means it's department of energy stuff and Q Clearance from the department of energy.
https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2015/03/f20/CTI%20Training-RD-FRD%20Briefing%20for%20OGA%20persons%20with%20access-03-03-2015.pdf
Yahoo is so retarded
I bet 100 bucks the author Jose is an illegal or anchor baby.
Very unprofessional. For example, "Trump and two lackeys". The whole thing reads like something from an editorial at a left wing journal, full of language assigning guilt and skullduggery to Trump rather than a factual reporting of the case.
Immature, like a fifteen year old wrote it.
Went straight to the comments, TDS is strong there.
Yes they are, but in this case they published that article verbatim from The Daily Beast. It even looks like a Yahoo smear job. Like minds I guess.
US v. Reynolds has entered the chat...
u/#q6
I also can't help but think this ties into Obama's visit. Isn't it theorized that some of these documents are Obama's?? #341 implies it.
u/#q341
Event Horizon/ Space Force / Declass
Prosecutor given a Hobson’s Choice or as my grandmother would have said, “Damned if you do and damned if you don’t”.
He will just appeal.
If it gets to trial, no appeal if dismissed or PDJT found innocent - That's double jeopardy, fren. Judge's order is forcing Smith to reveal the evidence and make it public record or else he has to admit the charges are bogus and docs are covered under the Presidential Records Act.
It all boils down to a judge's order
If it were a different judge, it would be a different order, and a different level of fuckery would be afoot
So much hangs by a single thread
Nerve wracking
But it’s not a different judge. It’s a trap for the DS, masterfully set by PDJT. Everything we’re seeing is planned to turn the Hobson choice back on the DS. Even the inability to post the appeal bond in NY and the GA decision to let Fani off the hook are both traps for the DS if you look past the appearance of defeat. Don’t let this wrack your nerves.
I like your take..
Neither of those being a trap for DS is easy to perceive
we'll have to see what happens
Yes we’ll have to see what happens, but remember that Trump/Q has control of events. This judge didn’t get this case by luck. Trump has set the DS up for failure, even though publicly he needs to appear to lose to.
Was going to post this last night but couldn't find another source except the Daily Beast, no other news source had this information, unless they got it from DB, so thought best to wait and see if it was true. Just thought it was weird no other news agency had their own reporting of it.
Secret courts, secret search warrants, secret evidence, It's time for some secret revolution.
The secret file: “Be sure to drink your ovaltine”
It's almost like the whole system is having a computer glitch or something. Like everything they're doing is built around the assumption that they will never be out of power and that their political opponents might get their hands on the same powers that they're giving themselves to persecute their opposition.
Perhaps it's something to do with the cabal being full of narcissists. They don't believe the can lose. It's a major weakness.
We more constitutional judges in this country.
Yes, we more do!