Pompeo's lawyer called Tucker Carlson to tell him to back off on JFK story
(www.youtube.com)
🤬 CABAL SCUMBAGS 😡
Comments (41)
sorted by:
Praying for Tucker's protection! 🙏
Yes. Tucker is really getting there. He may be getting close to realizing the intel agencies are run by the synagogue of satan. A public figure that goes there really needs prayer protection.
Tucker — “or maybe there are countries involved”
I can but give this doc my highest recommendation —
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kzz9Md0d76Y
.
BIG TIME!!!!!!!!!
Imo based on what hes saying, Mossad and CIA killed jfk
The JFK files, investigation, should have been released to the public a few years ago. Someone is holding them back. I think Trump had the chance and didn't but i am not certain of that thought.
Public view on the CIA and FBI needs to be majority negative before releasing information to have public outcry to end those agencies for good.
Maybe this will help wake up the normies.
The FBI and the Anti-Defamation League In the news ADL's penetration of the FBI and negative consequences for human rights activism
Documents
The following files were obtained by Freedom of Information Act from the FBI. https://www.israellobby.org/ADL/
The shadow government has been there long time...
Once someone said "you only got one shot at integrity."
...
That whole podcast is a good one.
Truth hurts somedays
The truth can hurt, when you've been believing bullshit...
#1 in West Point class and resorts to fascist commie operation Gladio methods. Sad. Scary. He aint no White Hat.
...still a clown.
Trump told judge Napolitano (according to him) "if you saw what those files contained you wouldn't release them either" https://youtu.be/hoC5P8dJUpQ
Idk how that could square with what Tucker is saying... interesting thing going on here
Because it would end 3 things. 1) The CIA - 2) Our relations with Isrehell - 3) Trumps life
I don’t think members of congress should use expensive lawyers, they should use the free lawyers we all have to use too.
I support using the person from their district with the lowest income....kinda even things out a bit. I prefer the person is not a lawyer, only govt high school education.
isnt he the one who wanted to ki!! assange?
That was exactly my thought. He is not a good guy.
Yes, he did...
Pompeo is a Zionist shill and was head of CIA. Of course he doesn’t want us to know Mossad and CIA involvement in JFKs assassination and the overthrow of this country
I am not an American citizen, but according to the latest antisemitism bill that got huge support among Rinos and Dinos, I tend to believe that all your representatives are shills for a foreign country.
They see the writing on the wall and are trying to stop the backlash. They are only waking up the masses.
What do you mean by that?
Pompeo is a murderous tool
I thought we liked him at one point? Like when he was posting Chess pics and we thought it was comms etc. I cant keep up lol
Yeah, we’ve learned a lot since then
what happened? must have missed it lol is he not a double agent tho?
We did, but he turned pretty fast.
Evidence?
I don't think Pompeo is a a criminal, I still trust Kansas. Tucker appears to be a good guy but for me the jury is still out on him.
There's a reason why Tucker's being warned off and I think it's probably for his own safety. Also there's a time and a season for everything, it could be that it's just not time yet. Remember isreal is being saved for last and if it's true that they were involved with JFK right now with the current climate it can put a lot of innocent people in harms way the US college campuses are really volatile right now.
Q said trust Kansas and until Q says otherwise that's what I'm going to do.
We need to use logic and reason in our thinking not emotions and sentiment.
So…we are not liking Pompeo because “CIA”
But we suddenly love Tucker—despite him also coming from THE FARM.
This all reeks of info release / controlled distraction. 🤔
I don’t put faith in any of it. (Munch crunch crunch 🐸🍿)
Covering for his clown brethren. “Don’t dare tell the public the truth that the clowns have been choosing the United States President, even if we have to kill one and install their replacement.”
The story on Pompeo seeking to have Assange killed came to Tucker second or third hand. Obviously Carlson considers it to be fact.
Let's do a little cursory digging.
(Disclaimer: the following comment is peppered with sarcasm. See if you can tell where.....)
The Guardian published a story on this.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2021/sep/27/senior-cia-officials-trump-discussed-assassinating-julian-assange
But here is where the narrative originates: Yahoo News
https://news.yahoo.com/kidnapping-assassination-and-a-london-shoot-out-inside-the-ci-as-secret-war-plans-against-wiki-leaks-090057786.html
Let's take a peek at the sauces:
Zach Dorfman, Sean D. Naylor and Michael Isikoff
Michael Isikoff
Formerly Chief Investigative Correspondent for Yahoo News.
2010-2014 NBC News correspondent
Newsweek (2001 onwards at least)
Wikiguff
Here is his article: https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-s-intel-officials-probe-ties-between-trump-adviser-and-kremlin-175046002.html
To cap it off,
Author: Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin's War on America and the Election of Donald Trump
So... Isokoff was involved in establishing the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax, either directly or indirectly. But I'm sure he is legit and has nothing to do with the Deep State or propaganda.
I don't know about you, but I trust Yahoo News completely, and I'm certain they are not part of the MSM propaganda machine, and anyway, what possible motive might they have for attacking and discrediting Pompeo, who Trump obviously trusted a LOT as CIA director and Sec. of State?
Zach Dorfman
National security correspondent for Yahoo News and former Carnegie Council Senior Fellow.
Trump related article: https://www.carnegiecouncil.org/media/series/ethics-online/president-trumps-dangerous-foreign-policy-know-nothingism-and-the-lessons-of-nixon-and-kennedy
Dorfman's profile at Muckrack
https://muckrack.com/zach-dorfman
I see no reason to doubt that Dorfman would provide anything but totally legit news....
Sean D. Naylor
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_Naylor
here is a sample of his reports on Yahoo. Take a peek, and make up your own mind whether you think this guy is fully on the up-and-up, a true patriot, and not a member of the propaganda machine. I for one am confident that he's completely trustworthy and would have zero motive for discrediting trusted Trump official Pompeo.
Right? I mean, surely....
So, how could there possibly be any reason for these patriotic, honest journalists to smear Pompeo?
Note that (reportedly) in 2017, Pompeo described Wikileaks as a “non-state hostile intelligence service.”
BUT OG anons will recall that Q was very clear that the Q team had Assange in their control and that Wikileaks had been infiltrated by the Clowns (C_A).
u/#q1595
Before anons turn their backs on Pompeo, shouldn't we first investigate where this story comes from? Or should we just go with it because Tucker told us so, and Tucker can't be wrong, right? Pompeo MUST be evil and bad and Trump MUST have made a big mistake in appointing him at CIA for a year and then worked with him as Secretary of State to accomplish such useless initiatives as the Abrahamic Accords, etc.
And Q: Trust Kansas. Must be disinfo, right?
Because (heads up: my final sarcasm) I have a funny feeling about Pompeo. I just don't trust him. He must be deep state.... And Trump screwed up, obviously....
u/#q950
I remember when everyone here was using pompeo tweets as q-proofs. Even had significant effort time stamps etc.
A senator, who voted against the FISA bill and Omnibus Bill said Pompeii would be a good VP forDJT.
I almost stopped listening..
But his reasoning was that Pompeii knows how/who to fight in the swamp.
Maybe if he has an explosive charge inserted in his nasal cavity...
Otherwise I do not rust him!
Oh, Kansas. What are we to believe? Disinformation necessary but unsettling.
There HAS to be a word for this (leave a reply if you know what it is):
Where something is blatantly wrong, illegal or evil and the evil deed is ignored completely for some strawman argument - and you sit there in shock at the utter audacity of the situation, wondering how the hell the elephant in the room is being ignored.
Mass formation psychosis? It's way more than simply "gaslighting" - it's a definite pattern or some kind of nlp technique... Right? The more ridiculous the lie? What's it called, besides total bs?