I agree that this bill goes no where. It wont even be brought to the floor.
What is important for the Patriot cause is that attention on this bill brings into focus the larger play that includes the lawfare against President Trump. How all of this is for political purposes, how all of it meshes together and encompasses the entire rat machine from President to DoJ, the courts, State prosecutors, law enforcement, outside law firms and NGOs and the entirety of the Federal police state apparatus.
So is Emerald a doomer or is she simply bringing the continuity of their actions to light for the normies and tying it all together in a bow?
I think the deeper goal of this lawfare is far bigger than this pointless bill. I think it has to do with VP selection.
They hope to leverage Trump into selecting a Cabal puppet handler. Nikki seems to be the fore-runner for the Team-Zionists and was recently seen grinning like an idiot with Netanyahu.
Far more important than this bill is how Trump responds to this. I am sure he will reject Nikki, and then the pain doubles.
So is Emerald a doomer or is she simply bringing the continuity of their actions to light for the normies and tying it all together in a bow?
If it was just from this tweet, I wouldnt say anything, but she has been on my feed and on my radar for being the most obnoxious doomer. Probably has a role in waking someone up, but definitely not for us.
It's disturbing that people who tell the truth are called doomers. We seem to be uncomfortable with truth. Why is that?
What did she say that was false?
It's very possible that the bill passes, then Trump's conviction is over turned, but the law will remain. Could that be the plan? Get the criminals to outlaw themselves in the future? We don't know, do we?
20But as for you, ye thought evil against me; but God meant it unto good, to bring to pass, as it is this day, to save much people alive. 21Now therefore fear ye not: I will nourish you, and your little ones. And he comforted them, and spake kindly unto them.
Whatever they pass cannot be for the current nominees on either side. That would be targeting.
In the same way raising the presidential salary and allowing the current president to have it could be seen as grifting. When they raised to the presidential salary from $200,000 to 400,000 a year the current president could not collect it. Much in the same way they targeted him for prosecution, and now even CNN says it was wrong.
I've seen the suggestion that egregiousness of this verdict will likely expand Supreme Court's coming ruling on Presidential Immunity. Since these charges are from 2017, they could fall under the scope of their ruling.
I'm still trying to wrap my head around how a payment made after Trump was elected in 2016 and multiple years before he announced his candidacy for 2020 could be election interference.
Not only that, but this is the first time ever that a state prosecutor has charged violations of federal election laws as a direct or predicate state crime. Probably because state prosecutors have no business charging federal election laws.
Wake me up when this Bill goes anywhere
Emerald Robison has become an insufferable doomer lately.
I agree that this bill goes no where. It wont even be brought to the floor.
What is important for the Patriot cause is that attention on this bill brings into focus the larger play that includes the lawfare against President Trump. How all of this is for political purposes, how all of it meshes together and encompasses the entire rat machine from President to DoJ, the courts, State prosecutors, law enforcement, outside law firms and NGOs and the entirety of the Federal police state apparatus.
So is Emerald a doomer or is she simply bringing the continuity of their actions to light for the normies and tying it all together in a bow?
I think the deeper goal of this lawfare is far bigger than this pointless bill. I think it has to do with VP selection.
They hope to leverage Trump into selecting a Cabal puppet handler. Nikki seems to be the fore-runner for the Team-Zionists and was recently seen grinning like an idiot with Netanyahu.
Far more important than this bill is how Trump responds to this. I am sure he will reject Nikki, and then the pain doubles.
If it was just from this tweet, I wouldnt say anything, but she has been on my feed and on my radar for being the most obnoxious doomer. Probably has a role in waking someone up, but definitely not for us.
Exactly.
It's disturbing that people who tell the truth are called doomers. We seem to be uncomfortable with truth. Why is that?
What did she say that was false?
It's very possible that the bill passes, then Trump's conviction is over turned, but the law will remain. Could that be the plan? Get the criminals to outlaw themselves in the future? We don't know, do we?
Genesis 50:20-21
20But as for you, ye thought evil against me; but God meant it unto good, to bring to pass, as it is this day, to save much people alive. 21Now therefore fear ye not: I will nourish you, and your little ones. And he comforted them, and spake kindly unto them.
Bill would be unconstitutional.
As was the patriot act.
Whatever they pass cannot be for the current nominees on either side. That would be targeting.
In the same way raising the presidential salary and allowing the current president to have it could be seen as grifting. When they raised to the presidential salary from $200,000 to 400,000 a year the current president could not collect it. Much in the same way they targeted him for prosecution, and now even CNN says it was wrong.
Thank you for the explanation.
And who exactly do you think is going to stop them from doing exactly that?
Is this the "insurrection" bill?
Thr courts will overturn the conviction.
Its 11:59, and 59 seconds.
I've seen the suggestion that egregiousness of this verdict will likely expand Supreme Court's coming ruling on Presidential Immunity. Since these charges are from 2017, they could fall under the scope of their ruling.
I'm still trying to wrap my head around how a payment made after Trump was elected in 2016 and multiple years before he announced his candidacy for 2020 could be election interference.
Not only that, but this is the first time ever that a state prosecutor has charged violations of federal election laws as a direct or predicate state crime. Probably because state prosecutors have no business charging federal election laws.
Wouldn't it have to pass with a 2/3rds majority to change Constitutional law?