9th Circuit: Covid MRNA shots ruled NOT a vaccine
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
Comments (42)
sorted by:
A soft boom starts the snowball rolling.
135,000 US personal injury lawyers ---- just became anti-vax
I made a meme about that in 2021….
https://files.catbox.moe/rx18us.jpeg
avalanche i hope.
"they" knew it....that is why they changed the definition of a vaccine
so in this ruling are they officially recognizing that it doesnt fit the new definition, either? (it doesn't)
does that mean we can officially revert back to the real definition now?
Apparently that is how they ruled, because the article cited that MRNA jabs are not traditional vaccines.
so can they quit calling us anti-vaxxers now?
Thank you LAUSD employees! You set the wheels of justice rolling.
WE...
...have always had the power to do whatever was right , we were just hypnotized to forget.
i forgot about this.
They CHANGED the medical definition of a vaccine to shoe horn mRNA in. Propaganda was STRONGLY used.
When they change the language be wary of what’s coming.
Who is "us" ?
Come on, let us go down, and there confound their language, that everyone perceive not another’s speech. ---Genesis 11:7 -- 1599 Geneva
“Us” is most likely referring to the divine council.
I don't know either , but I do know who uses this tactic today.
Yes. The 3 big "tells" warning me off mRNA were: the altered definition, EUA w.out liability for pharma and mostly that no previous trials using mRNA had ever made it past the animal trails to human trials because the critters all died.
Exactly! And THEN they tried to tell us we MUST take it - I'm an ornery southern woman. Nope - no one TELLS me what I must do - specially not some idiot bureaucrat.
Everyone in the medical profession should have been aware of these red flags flapping in their face.
Wow, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals (Pasadena, Portland, San Francisco and Seattle) , aka, the most liberal court of appeals in the country slammed the vaxx. This is big!
They are using a guideline by the Supreme Court’s century-old ruling in Jacobson v. Massachusetts. This case upheld the state’s right to enforce smallpox vaccinations due to their proven effectiveness in preventing disease spread. In contrast, the mRNA COVID-19 shots do not offer such public health benefits, thus failing the criteria established by Jacobson.
Exactly!
Bioweapon is a much more accurate description.
This is a Conspiracy theory comment. But it has been determined from many that it came from the Bio Lab in Whuan, so is it really?
Url without the tracking tag: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/06/breaking-9th-circuit-court-appeals-rules-mrna-covid/
33 page court documents 📄 https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/22-55908.pdf
It is like creating a problem and then charging people to fix the problem.
false. its like creating a problem and then charging people to make the problem worse.
i used to know a mechanic that lived by this rule.
Hope will stop the mass murderers
Let the Commercials begin😂🤣😂
There is another twist in this crazy movie that no one saw coming. Also, Judge Nelson pointed out that the mandate was inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s century-old ruling in Jacobson v. Massachusetts. This case upheld the state’s right to enforce smallpox vaccinations due to their proven effectiveness in preventing disease spread. In contrast, the mRNA COVID-19 shots do not offer such public health benefits, thus failing the criteria established by Jacobson.
Meaning it doesn't come from a "vaca"?
Make cowpox great again ?
😁 I think it never was once you look at the data. Smallpox went up in certain parts of the country after they started injecting cow puss in people.
Beats a plague of frogs from their point of view.☠
Competition between the Strongman Leaders and the Alchemist / religious manipulators has always been a thing. We peasants , the 90% , have to stay on our toes.
What they did sounds silly when you word it that way. Agreed.
Which is why they changed the definition of “vaccine” to fit their narrative.
This may open up a path to lawsuits for every former AD veteran who was forced out due to these shots.
They wouldn't have the authority, if there weren't laws mandating vaccines. Once you pull something into the legal system, then that thing becomes subject to definition under the law.
That is good and bad - "marriage" , for example, got eventually redefined to something it wasn't once it got pulled into the legal system.