Tim Walz: “There’s no guarantee to free speech”
(twitter.com)
Comments (43)
sorted by:
If there is no guarantee on free speech then there is no guarantee on anything.
Funny how he contradicts himself in just one sentence... "...no guarantee of free speech... in a democracy."
Good thing we're not a democracy then
Exactly.
"Our democracy" - this is doublespeak. He is speaking in code, he means tyrannical rule by him and his confreres.
This why we have a 2nd Amendment in the Bill of Rights.
Haha can somebody fact check that idiot? It’s a republic and it’s the 1st amendment with the 2nd to protect it. So yes free speech is guaranteed!
18 USC 241/242:
Of course, Katani Jackson does not know what a woman is, because she ain't biologist, Tampton Tim is no Constitutional scholar .....
So, what SHOULD happen to those who engage in behavior as outlined in 18 USC 241/242?
One has to wonder whether Tampon Tim has either lost his mind, is totally controlled by WH to perform because he is already under a sentence of death in order to save whatever it is he is allowed to save.
Survey Says!!! ❌❌❌
u/#trumpwrong
The First Amendment says Tampax can piss off...
u/#correct
Someone shove a Tampax up Walz because he's a right leaky cunt.
O Day 1 Trump will be busy but should immediately release all J6 hostages imprisoned by this illegitimate regime of traitors
They'll just get around that pesky constitution by not having it be an act of congress, but of the courts, of federal agencies, and by working hand in hand with the media to curate what you're allowed to say on their platforms.
Chevron...deliver us from evil
There's no guarantee to get away with molesting boys forever either you rotten-yam faced hipposhit.
Hey Tim, lick my bawls.
See that Tim? That's free speech.
Careful, he may just try to lick'em!
Don't threaten him with a good time
There is only free speech, not my problem if you don't like it.
Only for THEE but not for WE the people. The tables are about to be turned.
What a twit.
That’s why the second comes after the first.
Many feel the Second Amendment should be first; and should read more like "The right of law-abiding People to keep and bear arms and ammunition shall not be infringed, limited, removed, revoked, or reduced in any way, by anyone, at any time."
This God-given human right to self protection should come first in the Bill of Rights because without it, none of the other rights have any permanency or weight.
They'll just modify "law abiding" and take your weapons. That's why that term is not used in the Constitution
Maybe, maybe not
I don't need a violent felon having the same access to firearms as the good people trying to protect themselves from him, who are law abiding
I believe that's how the supreme court sees it also. The key is to watch how they manipulate the law to expand who they want to remove rights away from. You can be a convicted felon and your 4th amendment rights remain in place unless you're on parole. It's a very delicate balance
Wow! They really think they can get away with saying this stuff!!! That should scare everyone.
Treason much?
Didn't Barry say it was legal for the CIA to disseminate misinformation to the American public?
First off, it's a republic, get that CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC.
Oh that’s rich. From the party of lies.
Wrong. And yet he is free to say it.
"hate speech" = "speech I hate"
Tampon Tool Tim
Hate speech and misinformation are only okay when they do it.
“The error seems not sufficiently eradicated, that the operations of the mind, as well as the acts of the body, are subject to the coercion of the laws. But our rulers can have authority over such natural rights only as we have submitted to them. The rights of conscience we never submitted, we could not submit. We are answerable for them to our God. The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. ... Was the government to prescribe to us our medicine and diet, our bodies would be in such keeping as our souls are now. Thus in France the emetic was once forbidden as a medicine, and the potatoe as an article of food.” ~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President
“The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts as are only injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods, or no God. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.” ~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President
“Our legislators are not sufficiently apprized of the rightful limits of their power; that their true office is to declare and enforce only our natural rights and duties, and to take none of them from us. No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another; and this is all from which the laws ought to restrain him; every man is under the natural duty of contributing to the necessities of the society; and this is all the laws should enforce on him; and, no man having a natural right to be the judge between himself and another, it is his natural duty to submit to the umpirage of an impartial third. When the laws have declared and enforced all this, they have fulfilled their functions, and the idea is quite unfounded, that on entering into society we give up any natural right.” ~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President Letter to Francis W. Gilmer (27 June 1816); The Writings of Thomas Jefferson edited by Ford, vol. 10, p. 32.
Yeah, you kid fucker there is.
Free speech has no qualifications on it. Right to bear arms "shall not be infringed" So now we know their platform. Destroy the first and second amendment.
Those are just prelude
Isn't that pretty high up on the amendments? Sort of like the first one?
Saying there is no free speech is misinformation itself.
Just HIS guarantee to free speech.
Marxism. We are living through the times Senator McCarthy warned us about, may he rest in peace.
100% false. As a matter of fact, there is no such thing as hate speech.