I think if it is, then we need to see the victims being rescued. Did you all see Union Boss Daggett’s mansion in NJ on an X post? They guys are rolling in the dough!
Here: https://x.com/nypost/status/1841547850888413490?s=61
If what he says is true, how could that possibly be kept under wraps? How could so many regular working men be aware of this without any of them telling anyone?
You're retarded if you think that is enough for thousands of people to across the country to ignore children's screams from inside shipping containers.
The guy in his video is completely full of shit, and he's pulling this all out of his ass... He's clearly not a longshoreman, doesn't know why they're striking, and doesn't have ANY idea how the port works...
There is a ZERO percent chance the longshoremen are striking because they are knowingly fighting human trafficking. They stated their demands clearly, and has absolutely nothing to do with cargo. Not even a little bit. It's more about automation and better profit sharing than anything else. You can read these demands yourself for christ sake...
You have to understand that these workers are regular men and women with families, children, and grandchildren of their own. If ANY significant number of them had ANY clear evidence of children being trafficked in containers (recordings of screams, ANYTHING AT ALL...) it would’ve made both independent and mainstream headline news immediately, it would be all over every single social media platform. It's not only unlikely that the strike is caused by the longshoremen being aware and upset with child trafficking, but it's literally impossible for that to be the reason.
I’m not denying the fact that trafficking is happening through the ports. But to suggest that thousands and thousands of longshoremen know about it, are upset enough to be going on strike about it, and are still somehow silently complicit is akin to claiming ALL Walmart employees are aware that Walmart has secret tunnels... Even your niece, who works back in electronics, she's complicit...
On the other hand, even if the strike has nothing to do with this, it does beg the question; surely longshoremen must have heard of,and some heard (personally), right?
Seriously think about it, does the claim even make sense? No. It doesn't. They're all so upset and bothered by the children screaming inside the containers that they'll... You know... Go on strike and claim it's about other shit..
They went so far as to write out their demands in a formal letter, make it public so you and I can read it right now... and then you think they wrote fake demands???.. Even though it's secretly about screaming coming from inside the containers, they wrote and published that it's actually about profit sharing and automation???? That's weird, how would that work out?
It's a union, and unions are inherently socialist. So. Probably most of them did, yes. Why does that matter? The strike still has nothing to do with kids.
No. It's about them wanting more money for the work they do.
We dont need to try to shoehorn pedophilia into every single thing that happens.
Unless someone want to go up to all the longshoremen who are striking and ask them why they've sat around with their thumbs up their asses all this time, instead of, oh, I don't know, telling anyone about all these children they've witnessed being trafficked, or trying to save them themselves, or doing anything other than demanding more money to keep helping traffick children...
So, if what is being claimed here is true (it's not), then how many thousands and thousands of little innocent kids are dying right now, being stuck in those shipping containers that are waiting to be offloaded/onloaded, after running out of food and water or being trapped in the heat?
Consider the shipping container portion of “The Sound of Freedom”.
I think if it is, then we need to see the victims being rescued. Did you all see Union Boss Daggett’s mansion in NJ on an X post? They guys are rolling in the dough! Here: https://x.com/nypost/status/1841547850888413490?s=61
If what he says is true, how could that possibly be kept under wraps? How could so many regular working men be aware of this without any of them telling anyone?
my thoughts exactly.
So... these workers are just la dee dah working away while children are screaming in the containers and NOBODY ever did anything about it? Come on...
If you're drugged and duct-taped, you don't make any sounds.
If that's the case, then this video is false for a different reason.
Point out your plotholes elsewhere!!
(SIimpsons reference).
Two hundred grand a year
Not worth it...
You're retarded if you think that is enough for thousands of people to across the country to ignore children's screams from inside shipping containers.
Really stupid take.
Weird claim. Top comments seem to make sense here.
Exactly, one video would have validated everything and sent shock waves.
This is just he said -- she said.
If so,this could be another boom/declass.
For sure. If this is found to be true, its YUGER than YUGE
Hillary = evergreen
Wow
It's not a secret to smuggle people in containers.
The guy in his video is completely full of shit, and he's pulling this all out of his ass... He's clearly not a longshoreman, doesn't know why they're striking, and doesn't have ANY idea how the port works...
There is a ZERO percent chance the longshoremen are striking because they are knowingly fighting human trafficking. They stated their demands clearly, and has absolutely nothing to do with cargo. Not even a little bit. It's more about automation and better profit sharing than anything else. You can read these demands yourself for christ sake...
You have to understand that these workers are regular men and women with families, children, and grandchildren of their own. If ANY significant number of them had ANY clear evidence of children being trafficked in containers (recordings of screams, ANYTHING AT ALL...) it would’ve made both independent and mainstream headline news immediately, it would be all over every single social media platform. It's not only unlikely that the strike is caused by the longshoremen being aware and upset with child trafficking, but it's literally impossible for that to be the reason.
I’m not denying the fact that trafficking is happening through the ports. But to suggest that thousands and thousands of longshoremen know about it, are upset enough to be going on strike about it, and are still somehow silently complicit is akin to claiming ALL Walmart employees are aware that Walmart has secret tunnels... Even your niece, who works back in electronics, she's complicit...
Don't distract yourself with bs... This is BS.
Ehh.. makes sense.
On the other hand, even if the strike has nothing to do with this, it does beg the question; surely longshoremen must have heard of,and some heard (personally), right?
I wonder what the actual situation is.
It shouldn't be too hard to find eyewitnesses to the screaming for interview?
One can hope.
And there won't be one... Wonder why.
Seriously think about it, does the claim even make sense? No. It doesn't. They're all so upset and bothered by the children screaming inside the containers that they'll... You know... Go on strike and claim it's about other shit..
They went so far as to write out their demands in a formal letter, make it public so you and I can read it right now... and then you think they wrote fake demands???.. Even though it's secretly about screaming coming from inside the containers, they wrote and published that it's actually about profit sharing and automation???? That's weird, how would that work out?
Makes sense.
I posted this for discussion. Looks like mission success.
I still wonder what the situation on the ground really is.
At this point, I'm not convinced that anything we are fed is straight.
The union boss has a huge mansion, drives a Bentley, and made a video with threats sure to damage collective bargaining in the US.
The timing of this and the switch over to the new uniform transfer interest rate.
The timing of this against the Diddy revelations.
I tend to question everything.
So they aren’t demanding a 77% raise and end to port automation?
People wanting a wage that has kept up with real inflation is not a crime.
Who said it was as a crime?
Did they endorse Dems?
It's a union, and unions are inherently socialist. So. Probably most of them did, yes. Why does that matter? The strike still has nothing to do with kids.
No. It's about them wanting more money for the work they do.
We dont need to try to shoehorn pedophilia into every single thing that happens.
Unless someone want to go up to all the longshoremen who are striking and ask them why they've sat around with their thumbs up their asses all this time, instead of, oh, I don't know, telling anyone about all these children they've witnessed being trafficked, or trying to save them themselves, or doing anything other than demanding more money to keep helping traffick children...
So, if what is being claimed here is true (it's not), then how many thousands and thousands of little innocent kids are dying right now, being stuck in those shipping containers that are waiting to be offloaded/onloaded, after running out of food and water or being trapped in the heat?
Would not be surprised. Union sponsored human trafficking.
But a 77% pay increase can have them look the other way? I call BS.
Make sense!!! WOW