My guess. The nuanced reasoning behind advanced psychological and information Warfare would take considerable time to process even if you had all the data in front of you. The big picture is looking good so I'm not troubled by small incongruencies. Many moves in master chess make no sense to the novice.
If the military has it all! You use the same compromised actor to push your new narrative and you put them front and center! Rember the people trust them everyone else is considered as a conspiracy theorist! All those that are guilty were put into submission! What makes a good movie; great actors! My special moment was during the plandemic when Trump mentioned the deep state, Fauci gagged!
You all remember shortly after 2020-21 we were talking about how the white house (and most of DC was a literal ghost town, DC was abandoned? And then all those videos showing kids being rescued, and then we saw a video about all those rooms in the White House “explosions”, flashing lights corresponding with the explosions. Am I hallucinating this “memory” ???
just like the JFK files Im sure the evidence supports other countries involvement and could start wars- Im guessing Julian Assange has similar info that could start wars. But as JA once said “if wars can be started with lies, peace can be started with truth” Truth shall set us free!
What have we known? That Tucker makes these assertions. But should we now substitute "Trust TUCKER" for any of the other trusts in the Q drops?
Tucker has his views, not to mention that he may well be playing a role. We should investigate things and not simply accept one man's opinion as fact.
What's curious is that Tucker lifted the story about Pompeo 'seeking to assassinate Assange' from a bunch of leftist, anti-trump journalists who made the original assertions....
The Pompeo situation (for lack of a better word) is one of the more confusing elements when reconciling the Q drops with the news.
As most of you remember, Q mentioned more than once to "Trust Kansas", seemingly in reference to Mike Pompeo. The most direct reference was Q drop 950: https://qanon.pub/?q=kansas#950
However, I don't believe it was ever conclusively verified that Q did indeed want us to trust Pompeo. And while we can use the "disinfo necessary" line to play fast and loose with interpreting Q on almost anything, I do believe we should apply that statement most aggressively when it comes to personnel for reasons I hope are obvious.
There is also a Q drop that appears to implicate Pompeo. While Q references Hillary Clinton ("Down she goes") in drop 1129, Q also references an article linking Pompeo to an undisclosed ownership of a Chinese-linked company without comment: https://qanon.pub/?q=pompeo#1129
One could interpret that as Clinton simply retaliating against Pompeo for not taking her advice by planting that story, but as far as I know, Pompeo's link to a CCP-owned company has never been disproven.
Lastly, I would posit that there's a possibility that "Kansas" does not reference Pompeo at all. In drop 1122, Q gives us a list of 5 people to "trust" and 4 are referenced directly by name except for 1 ("Trust Kansas"): https://qanon.pub/?q=kansas#1122
I realize the "Wray" line will raise many an eyebrow but regardless, I find it very interesting that Q wouldn't simply call out Pompeo's name if we were supposed to trust him.
The question then of course is what/whom is Q actually referring to when they say "Kansas"?
3
a
: a property interest held by one person for the benefit of another
b
: a combination of firms or corporations formed by a legal agreement
especially : one that reduces or threatens to reduce competition
Trump hired so many losers.
Intentionally.
But why tho
Billions from israelis
My guess. The nuanced reasoning behind advanced psychological and information Warfare would take considerable time to process even if you had all the data in front of you. The big picture is looking good so I'm not troubled by small incongruencies. Many moves in master chess make no sense to the novice.
If the military has it all! You use the same compromised actor to push your new narrative and you put them front and center! Rember the people trust them everyone else is considered as a conspiracy theorist! All those that are guilty were put into submission! What makes a good movie; great actors! My special moment was during the plandemic when Trump mentioned the deep state, Fauci gagged!
What about trust Kansas?
I guess we won't know who the BHs/WHs till the movie is over & we see the credits.
We don't know if pompy stompy is kansas
Kansas was his USSS call sign.
Tucker makes these allegations, but the story he is repeating was put out there by leftist anti-trump 'journalists' on yahoo.com.
Previous posts about this topic go in to that. Here is one.
Pompeo, Assange and The Evil Pompeo Narrative - Where Did It Start? Are You Paying Attention?
This is why the game we are asked to play is dangerous
Not sure but my first thought is to watch the destruction of the whitehouse. Too much evil took place there to keep it.
You all remember shortly after 2020-21 we were talking about how the white house (and most of DC was a literal ghost town, DC was abandoned? And then all those videos showing kids being rescued, and then we saw a video about all those rooms in the White House “explosions”, flashing lights corresponding with the explosions. Am I hallucinating this “memory” ???
You are not hallucinating. I remember the same thing.
https://youtu.be/o54qez7-2jI
Here’s the light flashes
I do remember that! I also remember how the inauguration was extremely somber feeling
https://x.com/sacchetti2024/status/1357426198331203591?s=46
Here’s a video from 2021 showing how they shut the lights off every night at 11
Scour the swamp.
Those are some deep allegations against Pompeo. Man he was a super villain if that’s true.
Just remember where these allegations came from: from leftist, anti-trump 'journalists' who posted their articles on Yahoo.com.
Previous post: Pompeo, Assange and The Evil Pompeo Narrative - Where Did It Start? Are You Paying Attention?
What is the significance of the viewing stand construction?
Maybe on November 6 the gallows will be installed and the military tribunals will begin. Quick walk from the Oval Office to the gallows.
just like the JFK files Im sure the evidence supports other countries involvement and could start wars- Im guessing Julian Assange has similar info that could start wars. But as JA once said “if wars can be started with lies, peace can be started with truth” Truth shall set us free!
DISCLAIMER - X account is fake news
We've known this for a while now.
What have we known? That Tucker makes these assertions. But should we now substitute "Trust TUCKER" for any of the other trusts in the Q drops?
Tucker has his views, not to mention that he may well be playing a role. We should investigate things and not simply accept one man's opinion as fact.
What's curious is that Tucker lifted the story about Pompeo 'seeking to assassinate Assange' from a bunch of leftist, anti-trump journalists who made the original assertions....
The Pompeo situation (for lack of a better word) is one of the more confusing elements when reconciling the Q drops with the news.
As most of you remember, Q mentioned more than once to "Trust Kansas", seemingly in reference to Mike Pompeo. The most direct reference was Q drop 950: https://qanon.pub/?q=kansas#950
However, I don't believe it was ever conclusively verified that Q did indeed want us to trust Pompeo. And while we can use the "disinfo necessary" line to play fast and loose with interpreting Q on almost anything, I do believe we should apply that statement most aggressively when it comes to personnel for reasons I hope are obvious.
There is also a Q drop that appears to implicate Pompeo. While Q references Hillary Clinton ("Down she goes") in drop 1129, Q also references an article linking Pompeo to an undisclosed ownership of a Chinese-linked company without comment: https://qanon.pub/?q=pompeo#1129
"http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/382714-clinton-advised-pompeo-to-stop-the-purge-of-state-dept📁
Then….
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/382765-pompeo-failed-to-disclose-ownership-in-business-connected-to-china📁
Down She Goes…..
Q"
One could interpret that as Clinton simply retaliating against Pompeo for not taking her advice by planting that story, but as far as I know, Pompeo's link to a CCP-owned company has never been disproven.
Lastly, I would posit that there's a possibility that "Kansas" does not reference Pompeo at all. In drop 1122, Q gives us a list of 5 people to "trust" and 4 are referenced directly by name except for 1 ("Trust Kansas"): https://qanon.pub/?q=kansas#1122
"TRUST SESSIONS. TRUST WRAY. TRUST KANSAS. TRUST HOROWITZ. TRUST HUBER. Q"
I realize the "Wray" line will raise many an eyebrow but regardless, I find it very interesting that Q wouldn't simply call out Pompeo's name if we were supposed to trust him.
The question then of course is what/whom is Q actually referring to when they say "Kansas"?
3 a : a property interest held by one person for the benefit of another b : a combination of firms or corporations formed by a legal agreement especially : one that reduces or threatens to reduce competition
I don't see anything to do with Tucker Carlson, I only see a picture with a circle of viewing stand.
MuckeyDuck can't see the Tuck
How does this jive with "Trust Kansas?" Is he playing a role?
I'm confused. The title of this post and the linked tweet/post do not appear to be linked. Perhaps the OP or someone else can educate me.
This is old...
I'm surprised we're not getting much out if Tucker lately 🤔
Waiting for that epic Assange interview...
Wonder why he's been so low key lately?
Pompeo is asshoe.
Pompeo Asshole