Am I missing something? Viewing that clip I didn’t see a moment where Hegseth said he is okay violating a person’s human rights. What he said is the United States would not cede its military decision making to international bodies.
u/xchainlinkx has a habit of attacking people Trump chooses. He's had a hard on for Elon and now he's getting stiff over Hegseth. Normal people would just watch the show and let things play out. But u/xchainlinkx seems to think he knows more than Trump and the White Hats. Makes me wonder which side he's on.
First, I do wish everyone being delegated authority from President Trump had the gift of bluntness and directness that Tom Homan has. What we have to keep in mind is Homan has decades of experience dealing with the DS sharks who want to hand us over to a one world government.
Second, if you watch the entire line of questioning from Senator King he tries several times to get Hegseth to say he is okay with violating the Geneva Conventions. Hegseth doesn’t take the bait, he says he opposes torture and recognizes the Geneva Conventions have been incorporated into U.S. Law.
I guess we could ask ourselves how far we personally would be willing to go if we had captured someone who had killed, raped or tortured our loved one and was keeping another one captive and we needed to know where.
Seriously. How far would you go to save your spouse or child or friend?
Maybe after 5 years of Democrats literally fucking us in the ass we should ask if the enemies of rights and liberties would respect those conventions if they had power.
Maybe stop with the high and mighty and ask how close we came to total annihilation.
Violating one person's rights in order to extract information to protect another person's or a whole country of person's human rights is the predicament. How far can and should one go to save the many or the few?
So you are equating the human rights of a murderer (the right to not be waterboarded) with the human rights of the victim (the right to not be murdered)?
The murderer put himself in the position of facing waterboarding by choices of behavior. The victim did not.
If you have methods at your disposal that could have resulted in the rescue of the victim, but you choose not to use them because you are “better than that,” do you bear any measure of guilt if the victim ends up murdered?
🤔
You are making the grand assumption that the person you have in your possession actually is a guilty party that has harmed you or yours and/or that they have information that may help you stop additional harm, then you may be right.
But, if the captive is some innocent man on the street you've snatched who has done no wrong against you, and you don't know for sure that he is guilty, is it OK to torture, terrorize or butcher him in egregious ways until he either succumbs or you determine he wasn't the perpetrator and/or has no valuable information?
Am I missing something? Viewing that clip I didn’t see a moment where Hegseth said he is okay violating a person’s human rights. What he said is the United States would not cede its military decision making to international bodies.
How silly. It was a loaded question. There is no 'simple' answer.
u/xchainlinkx has a habit of attacking people Trump chooses. He's had a hard on for Elon and now he's getting stiff over Hegseth. Normal people would just watch the show and let things play out. But u/xchainlinkx seems to think he knows more than Trump and the White Hats. Makes me wonder which side he's on.
What is the point of the Great Awakening if we are not allowed to criticize others? What is the point if we are to blindly just follow other idols?
First, I do wish everyone being delegated authority from President Trump had the gift of bluntness and directness that Tom Homan has. What we have to keep in mind is Homan has decades of experience dealing with the DS sharks who want to hand us over to a one world government.
Second, if you watch the entire line of questioning from Senator King he tries several times to get Hegseth to say he is okay with violating the Geneva Conventions. Hegseth doesn’t take the bait, he says he opposes torture and recognizes the Geneva Conventions have been incorporated into U.S. Law.
I would want him in my corner in the event of an attack.
I guess we could ask ourselves how far we personally would be willing to go if we had captured someone who had killed, raped or tortured our loved one and was keeping another one captive and we needed to know where.
Seriously. How far would you go to save your spouse or child or friend?
Whatever it took, period !
The Law of War allows retribution killings I believe....
Vengeance belongs to the Lord. However sometimes we should probably arrange the meeting.
Maybe after 5 years of Democrats literally fucking us in the ass we should ask if the enemies of rights and liberties would respect those conventions if they had power.
Maybe stop with the high and mighty and ask how close we came to total annihilation.
If you are the enemy you forfeit human rights.
Violating one person's rights in order to extract information to protect another person's or a whole country of person's human rights is the predicament. How far can and should one go to save the many or the few?
So you are equating the human rights of a murderer (the right to not be waterboarded) with the human rights of the victim (the right to not be murdered)? The murderer put himself in the position of facing waterboarding by choices of behavior. The victim did not. If you have methods at your disposal that could have resulted in the rescue of the victim, but you choose not to use them because you are “better than that,” do you bear any measure of guilt if the victim ends up murdered? 🤔
You are making the grand assumption that the person you have in your possession actually is a guilty party that has harmed you or yours and/or that they have information that may help you stop additional harm, then you may be right.
But, if the captive is some innocent man on the street you've snatched who has done no wrong against you, and you don't know for sure that he is guilty, is it OK to torture, terrorize or butcher him in egregious ways until he either succumbs or you determine he wasn't the perpetrator and/or has no valuable information?
That is the moral dilemma.
How far did Jesus go to save the world?
Human rights is just kike speak for Jewish rights because jews don't view non jews as human. We're goyim which is less than human
Um “ACYN” is a scum liberal account, isn’t it?
Some crimes are of such scale that no technique should be outlawed to stop it.
Don’t do the crime if you don’t want to be waterboarded.
Anyone that tortures someone knowingly unwarranted should suffer the same torture.
There, fixed. No further policy making is needed.
Somethings we just do not need to know about. So if water boarding saves innocent lives I do not want to know about it.
Hegseth thinks the Guantanamo prisoners carried out 9/11. Unimpressed.
Waterboarding doesn't violate humans rights.
Good! Water board away. Geneva conv does not apply to non signatories, or non uniformed terrorists. So who Fukin cares?
Who defines what a "non-uniformed terrorist" is? Would your opinion stand if the J6 prisoners were classified as such by our government?
Do you have the same handle on Reddit?