Can confirm. They just killed my Mom with Chemo. Every week or two. She didn't eat for over a month, just drugs.
I begged her to try ivermectin and fenbendazole but she had total faith in the docs, wouldn't consider it. She was a nurse. My vaxxmaxed.fam attacked me for even suggesting it. "If there was a cure the docs would know, you want to give her stuff from GD Amazon!?!? You think you know more than the docs!?!? Fucking conspiracy theorist nutcase!!!"
The ER staff even fucked up the pain meds repeatedly at the end, she was shaking in pain. Staff didn't care until I threatened to get her meds from home. "It's not on the chart sir, I could lose my job sir." Bitch, idgaf, GET THE FUCKING MEDS OR I WILL, SHE HAS A FUCKING PRESCRIPTION!!
It was like watching a train wreck in slow motion, in the cab, two feet from the brake pedal, tied to a chair. I had the meds in my pocket.
I'm so sorry you had to go through this. It's criminal how brainwashed people are, ESPECIALLY the ones who are supposed to know more about medicine than us. It's criminal. I have lost 2 friends to cancer this past year that I tried to encourage to go the route of iver/fenben.
I know people that by the grace of God survived chemo and their cancer is in remission, but they are well aware NOW of the iver/fenben and would never do it the way they did it before
Lost my Mom in a similar fashion to yours just over a year ago. She was 63 years old and I miss her everyday.
In her last 6 months, she finally gave in to my pestering and decided to try Fenbendazole. Prior to trying it, she had gone two weeks without a bowel movement. After a few days of the protocol, her bowels became active again. A few days after that, full blown parasitic worms (I am dead serious, saw them myself) started to pass through her. That lasted a couple days until it stopped and things returned to normal.
Over the next few weeks after passing those, she miraculously started to feel better and better, even getting to the point where she could walk around our block with little fatigue. I was so excited and couldn’t believe what was happening, along with my family.
On our next visit to the doctor, they told her she needed to start a new oral chemo and to stop the fenben. We begged her not to and to stick with what we were doing. She took the doctors route and stopped the fenben. 3 weeks later, her bowels shut down again. 4 weeks later she was dead.
I pray for you friend. And I pray one day along with others in this movement we’ll be able to honor the legacy of the ones we’ve lost with cures we know exist. I took the slings and arrows of getting called “crazy” by friends and family with pride, and I hope you did too. Time and truth are on our side, stay strong.
I've been in the hospital twice for major surgery in the last eight years. In that time, I met exactly three people that knew what they were doing,
and gave a damn - two nurses, and one orderly. (All over the age of 35.) The rest acted either as if I were an annoyance, or they just got off the boat.
My sister's a doctor (actual MD, not like 'Dr.' Jill), and she still buys into the notion the clot shots are safe. The indoctrination is strong within the system.
That's a difficult path to suffer through. "I was only following orders" while wearing scrubs and holding some kind of medical license. Something similar happened with my mom, too: had to fight my sister who rushed her into hospice to get those sweet pain-killing opioids ... when mom was awake for long enough she managed to get off and enjoy the last year of her life with a lot less of my sister, of the drugs and of the suffering. Sorry you had to go through that. I wouldn't wish it on anyone, although so many of us are witnesses.
I was in the same boat a few years ago with my mom. May yours rest in peace. God bless all cancer victims, they've all been murdered and justice can't come soon enough.
That was what woke me up to big pharma. They diagnosed my f-i-l with small cell lung cancer and gave him 3 months to live. He never quit smoking and lived 5 yrs and 8 months. I knew something was off even if I couldn't point at exactly what.
Only 10-20% of even heavy smokers get lung cancer or even COPD. What is up with that?? A CAUSE should cause a majority to get it, right?!?
"I knew something was off even if I couldn't point at exactly what."
Well they try to scare a person to death! And push them into invasive and harmful treatments which are worse than the disease, if it is a disease . . .
God Bless your f-i-l.
I do not want to be an ostrich with my head in the sand, so I evaluate what they say against what others say and other treatments.
I believe: cancer can be cured, it is not a death sentence, but Heaven Help us figuring it all out! STRESS is the biggest problem to begin with!
Nicotine is not the villain they have made it out to be, it has numerous health benefits. Check out the list of chemical additives in cigarettes. Yes, it can be addictive but so is caffeine, which also has numerous health benefits. Personally I can't wait for RFK Jr to take all these agencies to task. I started on low dose nicotine patches when I learned about its benefits for Covid, and I would go to war if you tried to take my coffee away.
Yes, and I think the smoke itself is probably not the best for your lungs, but the added chemicals are most likely the worst part of smoking. Do you notice when something may be good for you big pharma or government comes out saying it is bad, for instance nicotine, caffeine, ivermectin, vitamins, meat etc. and then they come out with these ridiculous food pyramids that promote junk food and pharmaceuticals that keep you sick and/or cause more problems than than they treat. Our whole system is created to make and keep us sick and dependent.
I'm in trouble then, I eat them both. Sometimes together. There is some scientific evidence that eating Neu5Ge containing foods cause us to make antibodies to it (think beef) also i only eat ham and bacon that is uncured ie, no nitrates. Eating can be complicated when you consider all the bastardization that has occurred in our food supply. Eating home grown/prepared foods is always best. I worked with a naturopath physician in the 70's and have been a proponent of natural foods and medicine since then. It is a difficult life choice though when you are bombarded with fast food, chemicals in shampoos, toothpaste, water, food etc. One of the worst things to happen is the sedentary lifestyle that technology has wreaked upon us. Sorry you can see this is somewhat of a soap box for me.
Look up Rene Caisse a Canadian nurse who cured hundreds of "uncurable" Cancer patients in the 1920-30s using an herbal preparation she named Essiac which was her last name spelled backwards. Of course the Government shut her down. There is an old video of her somewhere. You can buy the herbs, but have to be prepared a specific way. You can google her exact recipe and how to prepare and store if you are interested.
When my kids were teens, their science teacher told them radon being emitted from the ground causes lung cancer, not cigarettes. I never looked into that but found it interesting.
I don't claim that cigarettes do nothing to the lungs, but I no longer believe they "cause" "lung cancer".
Modern medicine is just so lazy. How can a "cause" affect only 10-20% of those exposed to that cause? And the disease also occurs in some who were never exposed to that cause?
I know their are genetic and immune factors. But a CAUSE of a disease CAUSES it in only 10-20%?? How can that be considered a cause?!?
Germanische Heilkunde has something going for it. The Psychological backgrounds i.e. trauma causing a conflict resolution phase is interesting. And in that respect the body can be aided in healing.
It taught me, we think we are strong, yet we are more vulnerable than we think. A clean conscious, correctness and transparency goes a long way.
And this is what mostly ails our societies too, especially government. Bad habits/ morals => disease. Hence, the gathering of the crows to pick the dead bodies.
Fellow frogs: we are far gone already. Fortunately, we have a chance at healing.
I would be most grateful for any non-doxing info about your experience with the method and outcomes!!
We are left on our own to navigate almost incomprehensible info in order to find out what is best for us. I mean, if we are not on top of our game, traditional medicine like chemotherapy can literally kill us . . .
"certain aspects" I also believe can be helpful, and your experience and observations would be most appreciated! Thanks fren!
Germanische Heilkunde identifies the nature of the trauma, and where it shows up as a symptom. This can be made visible with iris-scopy or spiritual iris-scopy (for lack of a better term) if the X-ray is not available.
So, although, I have not faced anything coming close to cancer, the same principle applies. and it took me 9 years to get it sorted out after suffering from it since my 8th year.
identity the trauma
identify the symptoms
resolve no.1
alleviate or better yet, help body heal after acceptance.
This process is greatly enhanced by the tool: Human Design, as it allows you to see how to be correct with yourself. Seeing it is one, implementing it in this world, especially for reflectors, is a great challenge. Personally, I never faced something like cancer, so, I am not sure if my example is of such note.
However, It cured my incapacitating migraines that inhibited my vision, thinking, and upset my stomach, intestines.
We all know big pharma and other corrupt entitles want us sick. If this guy's theory was true, they wouldn't be poisoning us physically. It would all be based on psychologically damaging us.
I know the Q movement involves both Christian’s and others. Yet any faith in good is to serve others and help others. When I goto places these days it is not about serving others , it is more like others are a nuisance or hindrance.
Healing involves love. If one is suffering from cancer or anything and they are treated as a hindrance or obstacle it will quicken their death and misery.
Find one who is in pain and still has the ability to serve others — I bet their pain is less severe when serving others.
USA and Western Cultures have forgotten this in a large scale. Being meek is not a weakness.
I keep the Essiac herbs on hand and mix them myself, I take low dose prophylactically as well as the Ivermectin 2-3 times a month. I am not sure about the efficacy of the capsules.
Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer's work on the German New Medicine (GNM) does not appear to be based on conventional scientific methodologies like double-blind studies. Here's a detailed examination based on available information:
Lack of Double-Blind Studies: There is no record in the provided text or known through general research that Hamer conducted any double-blind studies. The German New Medicine is largely based on Hamer's personal observations, case studies, and anecdotal evidence rather than controlled clinical trials.
Methodology:
Observation and Case Studies: Hamer's approach was primarily observational. He reviewed thousands of medical records and CT scans from cancer patients, linking emotional shocks to specific brain lesions and subsequent organ diseases. This method does not involve the rigorous control needed for scientific validation.
Lack of Peer-Reviewed Research: The text indicates Hamer presented his findings as a post-doctoral thesis at the University of Tübingen, but there's no mention of this work going through peer-reviewed scientific scrutiny or being published in reputable scientific journals.
Scientific Rigor:
Confirmation Bias: Hamer's methodology could be prone to confirmation bias, where he might have only noted cases that supported his theory, ignoring or not accounting for cases that contradicted it.
Absence of Control Groups: Without control groups, placebo effects, or systematic blinding, Hamer's claims lack the scientific rigor needed to substantiate his theories in the eyes of the scientific and medical community.
External Validation: The document mentions that Hamer's discoveries were "analyzed by hundreds of specialists," but there's no indication these analyses were formal, peer-reviewed validations. Instead, the narrative suggests a more informal or personal review by those who might have been sympathetic to his views.
Persecution and Lack of Acceptance: The text describes Hamer's struggles with the medical establishment, including losing his medical license, which further indicates his methods and conclusions did not align with or were not accepted by conventional medical science standards.
In summary, while Hamer's work is fervently outlined and based on his personal observations and experiences, it does not resemble traditional scientific methods such as double-blind studies. His approach lacks the systematic, controlled, and replicable nature required for scientific validation in modern medicine. Instead, his work is more aligned with alternative or holistic views of medicine, which often do not adhere to the rigorous standards of scientific methodology.
You've fallen for the establishment deception. You haven't asked the right question.
The right question is: -> Why hasn't the establishment attempted to prove or disprove Hamer's theories that have been available to them for over 50 years?
They'd be the least expensive "trials" conceivable. Right? All they need to do is interview people with specific dis-eases and see if there's a correlation between what he suggests are the causes and the dis-ease.
This is one of the most basic deceptive strategies. When they know they can't disprove something, they suppress, bury and ignore it. And then turnaround and say "none of your licenses, bonded (and bought and paid for) 'experts' have confirmed this yet. What they don't tell you is, that none of their 'experts" have even TRIED to confirm it. I can assure you quite confidently that they have not...and will not....as long as the same people in charge of the medical establishment stay in power.
They've spent TRILLIONS on all kinds of different medical research - chemicals, toxins, carcinogens, molds, genetics, pesticides, foods, blabbity blah blah blah. TRILLIONS. All wrong. And they've spend ZERO on Dr. Hamer's work.
Why? Because you are living in the "Age of Materialism", in turbo overdrive since 1880 (~1500 ad inception). The establishment are the materialists. And they're effectively wrong about everything. Hence the absolute madness on display in our world, least of all, the medical world.
Dis-ease is the result of discordant feelings - disharmonious emotions. As Dr. Hamer found, these are initiated by the "Conflict Shock"'; the unwanted, negative life event/situation that initiates the process. The difference between those who get the dis-ease and those who don't, is directly related to their ability to move on, to forgive and forget - which Dr. Hamer called "Conflict Resolution". Conflict resolution = a return to harmonious feelings. Remaining "conflict active" means a perpetuation of disharmonious feelings...which leads to debilitating dis-eases.
And if you care to learn the truth about this, I'd recommend not relying on any of the "establishment experts" for confirmation. We're decades away from that. They would trillions if they admitted Dr. Hamer was right. Nor would I recommend you BELIEVE me...or anybody else for that matter.
You can prove this to yourself. Look back on your life, dis-eases you've had, and examine how you fell into RESISTANCE (fear or judgment) of some kind in the days/weeks/months before your dis-ease symptoms started. Then have a look at the "conflict theme" that Dr. Hamer associated with the dis-ease; loss, separation, worry, fear, self-judgment, anger, etc. and you'll being to see how simple it all really is.
Germs, genes, toxins, carcinogens, diets, etc. All unproven nonsense. Because first cause isn't "material", it's "metaphysical". Dis-ease (disharmony) in the mind leads to dis-ease (disharmony) in the body.
Reality is simple and clear. The materialists would have you believe otherwise. Once you know, they can't deceive you ever again with their deliberately withheld "stamp of approval" that you're looking for. Not only would they lose trillions, but they'd also lose your trust. And that's the very last thing they can afford to lose. Because when they do, the masses will stop giving their power away to "them" (experts and authorities). The very "power" they rely upon to prey upon their slaves....
I have a question for you, does conventional scientific methodology have to be necessary in this modern world? This isn't to try to make an entire argument against the ideas you've posted, more or less a divergent thought.
"Lack of double-blind studies" under controlled settings are difficult to organize and hard to come by through online searches, combing through literature databases. These clinicians, researchers, field technicians, MD examiners, PHD theorists most of the time have to be funded through grants or other political entities. A lofty goal of proving a claim of some cancer research, yeah, no that's a hard pass for just about any normie doing this without any type of self gain or using their own capital, time, for rewards other than to simply help people. Getting a high enough population size to where statistical data is significant is time consuming to filter out the grander population at large. It's also very rare you see one clinician self-report their own journals/case files, as their own journals won't even see the light of day under established medical databases of scientific rigor.
To this day, the only self-reported journal with a clinician's own case files that I've ever seen was regarding vitamin C. And I think these case files went back to the 1940s-1960s.
Lack of peer-review research : maybe no one is scrutinizing previous research because there is no money to support these endeavors. There's thousands of medical literature out there for hypotheses to treat cancer, but where's the follow up? There seems to always to be "future considerations" or "further trials" for any of these hypotheses. It seems to always be "well, it could work, but we don't know. there's not enough data even though our n=200 in theory sounds reasonable. more trials need to be repeated." For the life of me, I've yet to see follow up papers to repeat trials. Conventional science for the most part, just leaves the data as is, seemingly with no one wanting to further expand on concepts.
Scientific rigor : for thousands of years, before modern science, we've had "scientists" unbeknownst in our own local communities. They weren't called scientists. A nice simple term would be farmers and ranchers. These awesome folks were able to develop hypotheses that relate to selecting between dominant and recessive genes in their agricultural products based on the results they get from their harvest. Is this type of rigor the same as modern rigor? Is one farmer's want to grow taller stocks of corn, or more corn in their stock, or more bushels in their acres, different colors of corn, or soil management, or whatever have you the same type of rigor? Are these farmers getting together and talking shop amongst themselves on how each others are getting good crops?
Basically, what i'm trying to get at is: anecdotes are just as good as the conventional methodology. Anecdotes is what helps farmers and ranchers grow sustainable food for us, as these folks surely talk amongst themselves and experiment themselves. I'm sure alot of these folks even went to agriculture school, to even get themselves familiarize with new theory. But it's still just theory, where are the practical reports of result findings? It's quite in the result of their crops of what they're theorizing on.
I just think it's a little ridiculous these days to dismiss anecdotal claims. If it's n+1 to a dataset, a result, a good protocol of experimentation, result finding, then it has sound logical repeatable possibility. But with modern conventional means, it's impossible to find repeatability for any normie without a university grade lab, lab equipment, and source to unsellable chemical compounds to the general public without credentials. Only repeatability is the function of economics, the cost, the availability, and the convenience of sourcing is capable to possibly confirm or deny any new grand claim.
That's why ivermectin, fenbendazole, methylene blue, vitamin c, chlorine dioxide, hydroxychloroquine, or whatever alternative treatment out there is being purported into the structure of our latest age of the "great awakening" Because these stuff is repeatable! The hardest part is trying to read people's own stories to see if their own methodology checks out for logical connections. Reading through the bullshit, if you will. But no one wants to do that. Only a select few who have their own determination and will power will. IE: facebook groups about cancer research. They have something to lose, or have already something to lose, and within their own will power choose to learn more about it themselves and try to restructure thinking processes within their own communities of what else may be possible.
I don't know, I wonder where the switch to scientific fervor had to be purely under controlled rigor? Somewhere along the line, there was a divergence between classical antiquity of thought (eat this willow bark, it'll help clear your headaches! aka aspirin) vs requiring everything needing to be controlled? I think, even in the realm of medicine, a healthy (pun very much intended) moderation in modern convention vs classical antiquity is just as good. Prolly big pharma only supporting papers that reach out to mainstream dogma being the complete divergence of these schools of thought, rather than a symbiotic convergence of the two.
I've got to know what some people consider to be hilly billy, rural folk stateside. Some of these folk live up to their late 80-90s with enough energy to even do gardening outside! I've listened to their treatment protocols, asked them what compounds they've done, how it's done, and by golly, they swear by it. I don't just sit there and let my own prejudices make me narrowminded, I just ask enough questions to connect logical connections that they don't necessarily know how to articulate.
Just because someone isn't a credentialed doctor, doesn't mean that they can't do their own homework in trying to learn more about the specifics of a field. Time is a person's own freedom. For some people to say "oh you're not credentialed, how dare you do your own research" Fuck outta here with that, we have the library of alexandria at our literal fingertips through cellphones, keyboards and computers. Ancient greeks would be salivating to see what possible knowledge can be learned.
In my humble opinion, cancers are caused by parasites! These mfs have lied to us about everything! White Hats used Covid plandemic to inject into our mindset that all disease are parasitic, with the introduction of 'horse paste'. Q referenced that they would either need to come clean or be exposed! Knowingly, will be prosecuted or eliminated! Doctors who have knowingly gone along with the deception to enrich themselves need to face justice! In my country, they all died from Super Cancers! Many people have been mutilated or were actually allowed to die for financial gain! When the truth is finally understood, many will not be able to walk the streets!
Are you aware of practitioners of GNM within the U.S.? And have you known cases of healing using GNM? I read the linked pdf, but it is rather general and seems difficult to apply with only the PDF as a guide.
He acknowledges many healing modalities, and includes information that sounds a lot like GNM, but concentrates on simple diet changes that appear to heal everything, with time and discipline. Has great explanations of specific diseases and conditions, including cancer, if you use the search bar on the page. I've been on his protocol for almost a year, and I've experienced many benefits. I started it trying to reverse type 1 diabetes, and while that hasn't happened yet, the improvements are enough to keep me on it.
If you're interested in alternatives to allopathic medicine, I suggest giving him a look. Hope it helps. Cheers!
Most people die from the treatment, not the cancer.
Can confirm. They just killed my Mom with Chemo. Every week or two. She didn't eat for over a month, just drugs.
I begged her to try ivermectin and fenbendazole but she had total faith in the docs, wouldn't consider it. She was a nurse. My vaxxmaxed.fam attacked me for even suggesting it. "If there was a cure the docs would know, you want to give her stuff from GD Amazon!?!? You think you know more than the docs!?!? Fucking conspiracy theorist nutcase!!!"
The ER staff even fucked up the pain meds repeatedly at the end, she was shaking in pain. Staff didn't care until I threatened to get her meds from home. "It's not on the chart sir, I could lose my job sir." Bitch, idgaf, GET THE FUCKING MEDS OR I WILL, SHE HAS A FUCKING PRESCRIPTION!!
It was like watching a train wreck in slow motion, in the cab, two feet from the brake pedal, tied to a chair. I had the meds in my pocket.
RIP Mom.
I'm so sorry you had to go through this. It's criminal how brainwashed people are, ESPECIALLY the ones who are supposed to know more about medicine than us. It's criminal. I have lost 2 friends to cancer this past year that I tried to encourage to go the route of iver/fenben.
Thank you.
I read somewhere that Dr. McCullough said it's gonna get WAY worse very soon.
I know people that by the grace of God survived chemo and their cancer is in remission, but they are well aware NOW of the iver/fenben and would never do it the way they did it before
A fair % of those who were chemoed and/or radiated would NEVER do it again, even if they were certain that not doing it would result in death.
I hear that a lot from survivors too.
Most docs wouldn't take it themselves either. They just give it to their patients.
Lost my Mom in a similar fashion to yours just over a year ago. She was 63 years old and I miss her everyday.
In her last 6 months, she finally gave in to my pestering and decided to try Fenbendazole. Prior to trying it, she had gone two weeks without a bowel movement. After a few days of the protocol, her bowels became active again. A few days after that, full blown parasitic worms (I am dead serious, saw them myself) started to pass through her. That lasted a couple days until it stopped and things returned to normal.
Over the next few weeks after passing those, she miraculously started to feel better and better, even getting to the point where she could walk around our block with little fatigue. I was so excited and couldn’t believe what was happening, along with my family.
On our next visit to the doctor, they told her she needed to start a new oral chemo and to stop the fenben. We begged her not to and to stick with what we were doing. She took the doctors route and stopped the fenben. 3 weeks later, her bowels shut down again. 4 weeks later she was dead.
I pray for you friend. And I pray one day along with others in this movement we’ll be able to honor the legacy of the ones we’ve lost with cures we know exist. I took the slings and arrows of getting called “crazy” by friends and family with pride, and I hope you did too. Time and truth are on our side, stay strong.
I've been in the hospital twice for major surgery in the last eight years. In that time, I met exactly three people that knew what they were doing, and gave a damn - two nurses, and one orderly. (All over the age of 35.) The rest acted either as if I were an annoyance, or they just got off the boat.
My sister's a doctor (actual MD, not like 'Dr.' Jill), and she still buys into the notion the clot shots are safe. The indoctrination is strong within the system.
And outside it.
Sadly, a modern doctor's livelihood is based on reputation. They are in a position where they can never admit they were wrong.
Oh they admit that they're wrong. Just not to us.
The ER staff was fresh off the boat.
Thank you. Sorry for your losses, blessing to you too. Hopefully we'll see a better world soon.
I'm glad I at least made sure she got pain meds. Med staff sure didn't give a fuck. The egos in ALL medicine are unparalleled, not just docs.
🫡
That's a difficult path to suffer through. "I was only following orders" while wearing scrubs and holding some kind of medical license. Something similar happened with my mom, too: had to fight my sister who rushed her into hospice to get those sweet pain-killing opioids ... when mom was awake for long enough she managed to get off and enjoy the last year of her life with a lot less of my sister, of the drugs and of the suffering. Sorry you had to go through that. I wouldn't wish it on anyone, although so many of us are witnesses.
Thank you. Sorry for your loss.
I was in the same boat a few years ago with my mom. May yours rest in peace. God bless all cancer victims, they've all been murdered and justice can't come soon enough.
Thank you.
And yes, almost every cancer death is a homicide.
But there's BIG money in it...
That was what woke me up to big pharma. They diagnosed my f-i-l with small cell lung cancer and gave him 3 months to live. He never quit smoking and lived 5 yrs and 8 months. I knew something was off even if I couldn't point at exactly what.
Only 10-20% of even heavy smokers get lung cancer or even COPD. What is up with that?? A CAUSE should cause a majority to get it, right?!?
"I knew something was off even if I couldn't point at exactly what."
Well they try to scare a person to death! And push them into invasive and harmful treatments which are worse than the disease, if it is a disease . . .
God Bless your f-i-l.
I do not want to be an ostrich with my head in the sand, so I evaluate what they say against what others say and other treatments.
I believe: cancer can be cured, it is not a death sentence, but Heaven Help us figuring it all out! STRESS is the biggest problem to begin with!
Nicotine is not the villain they have made it out to be, it has numerous health benefits. Check out the list of chemical additives in cigarettes. Yes, it can be addictive but so is caffeine, which also has numerous health benefits. Personally I can't wait for RFK Jr to take all these agencies to task. I started on low dose nicotine patches when I learned about its benefits for Covid, and I would go to war if you tried to take my coffee away.
OH yes!
^^^THIS^^^
Just like our food. It’s the poison inside, not tobacco per se.
Yes, and I think the smoke itself is probably not the best for your lungs, but the added chemicals are most likely the worst part of smoking. Do you notice when something may be good for you big pharma or government comes out saying it is bad, for instance nicotine, caffeine, ivermectin, vitamins, meat etc. and then they come out with these ridiculous food pyramids that promote junk food and pharmaceuticals that keep you sick and/or cause more problems than than they treat. Our whole system is created to make and keep us sick and dependent.
Yes like the article dementia linked to bacon and steak. Lol
I'm in trouble then, I eat them both. Sometimes together. There is some scientific evidence that eating Neu5Ge containing foods cause us to make antibodies to it (think beef) also i only eat ham and bacon that is uncured ie, no nitrates. Eating can be complicated when you consider all the bastardization that has occurred in our food supply. Eating home grown/prepared foods is always best. I worked with a naturopath physician in the 70's and have been a proponent of natural foods and medicine since then. It is a difficult life choice though when you are bombarded with fast food, chemicals in shampoos, toothpaste, water, food etc. One of the worst things to happen is the sedentary lifestyle that technology has wreaked upon us. Sorry you can see this is somewhat of a soap box for me.
Look up Rene Caisse a Canadian nurse who cured hundreds of "uncurable" Cancer patients in the 1920-30s using an herbal preparation she named Essiac which was her last name spelled backwards. Of course the Government shut her down. There is an old video of her somewhere. You can buy the herbs, but have to be prepared a specific way. You can google her exact recipe and how to prepare and store if you are interested.
When my kids were teens, their science teacher told them radon being emitted from the ground causes lung cancer, not cigarettes. I never looked into that but found it interesting.
I don't claim that cigarettes do nothing to the lungs, but I no longer believe they "cause" "lung cancer".
Modern medicine is just so lazy. How can a "cause" affect only 10-20% of those exposed to that cause? And the disease also occurs in some who were never exposed to that cause?
I know their are genetic and immune factors. But a CAUSE of a disease CAUSES it in only 10-20%?? How can that be considered a cause?!?
Yeah, I agree. It's a lazy blame.... 10 to 20 percent isn't a convincing percent for me either.
THIS
Absolutely true!
Germanische Heilkunde has something going for it. The Psychological backgrounds i.e. trauma causing a conflict resolution phase is interesting. And in that respect the body can be aided in healing.
It taught me, we think we are strong, yet we are more vulnerable than we think. A clean conscious, correctness and transparency goes a long way.
And this is what mostly ails our societies too, especially government. Bad habits/ morals => disease. Hence, the gathering of the crows to pick the dead bodies.
Fellow frogs: we are far gone already. Fortunately, we have a chance at healing.
I believe stress and trauma are understood as "causing" disease by docs, too?
It is the diagnosis and treatment where they jump the tracks . . .
Have you experience with the Heilkunde methods?
Personally, no, though in reality, certain aspects if it, I have practiced myself with great healing consequences.
I would be most grateful for any non-doxing info about your experience with the method and outcomes!!
We are left on our own to navigate almost incomprehensible info in order to find out what is best for us. I mean, if we are not on top of our game, traditional medicine like chemotherapy can literally kill us . . .
"certain aspects" I also believe can be helpful, and your experience and observations would be most appreciated! Thanks fren!
Germanische Heilkunde identifies the nature of the trauma, and where it shows up as a symptom. This can be made visible with iris-scopy or spiritual iris-scopy (for lack of a better term) if the X-ray is not available.
So, although, I have not faced anything coming close to cancer, the same principle applies. and it took me 9 years to get it sorted out after suffering from it since my 8th year.
This process is greatly enhanced by the tool: Human Design, as it allows you to see how to be correct with yourself. Seeing it is one, implementing it in this world, especially for reflectors, is a great challenge. Personally, I never faced something like cancer, so, I am not sure if my example is of such note.
However, It cured my incapacitating migraines that inhibited my vision, thinking, and upset my stomach, intestines.
thank you!
your successful battle over so many years is encouraging
We all know big pharma and other corrupt entitles want us sick. If this guy's theory was true, they wouldn't be poisoning us physically. It would all be based on psychologically damaging us.
Rat poison and mustard gas are called " treatment and therapy ". They love to tell us how to think and speak. Luciferians invert.
I know the Q movement involves both Christian’s and others. Yet any faith in good is to serve others and help others. When I goto places these days it is not about serving others , it is more like others are a nuisance or hindrance.
Healing involves love. If one is suffering from cancer or anything and they are treated as a hindrance or obstacle it will quicken their death and misery.
Find one who is in pain and still has the ability to serve others — I bet their pain is less severe when serving others.
USA and Western Cultures have forgotten this in a large scale. Being meek is not a weakness.
https://qagg.news/?q=%23%23735&q2=
Did anyone even read the article?
– Bones – lack of self-esteem, inferiority complex;
– Uterus – a sentiment of sexual inferiority;
– The small intestine – excess of anger impossible to restrain;
– Prostate – quarrel on the side of sexuality;
– Thyroid – feeling of helplessness, lack of control;
– Lung – fear of death; trauma of choking; strong fear of a certain person;
– Skin – lack of integrity; corruptible man, spineless;
– Testicles, ovaries – a valuable loss, which cannot be recovered; death of someone close;
– Pancreas – conflict with the family members; a conflict of anxiety type with the family members, inheritance issues;
– The Inner ear – the sentiment of impossibility to find something, to find a vital information;
– Lymphatic glands – the loss of self-worth ,associated with the location;
– The left bosom – conflict which endangers the child, the home, the family;
– The right bosom – conflict with her partner or rival people;
– The rectum – the fear of being useless;
– Mouth – failure of dealing with certain issues, situations;
– Stomach – the feeling that you swallowed too much against your will;
– Oesophagus – the acute desire to deny something, not to swallow something (of course, metaphorically);
– Heart – frustration connected with children;
– Cervix – deep and persistent frustration;
– Adrenal glands – you are headed in a direction in which you refuse to go;
– Liver – you feel the life in danger, the fear of running out of food, without money;
– Melanoma – the feeling of dirt, defilement, smudge;
– Renal cortex – wandering, wrong direction;
– Bladder – ugly conflict, dirty tricks;
– Ducts of the mammary glands – conflict due to separation.
Heart failure is the most common cause of death. So, uh, I guess the most common emotional issue in the world is frustration connected with children.
This seems lame and lacks evidence.
Thanks for taking the time to look into it and respond.
Regarding the heart, I read it differently. IF the conflict is parent child is manifests thus and so.
Also discusses overwork, overwhelming stress . . .
https://learninggnm.com/SBS/documents/heart.html#Heart_Pump
I keep the Essiac herbs on hand and mix them myself, I take low dose prophylactically as well as the Ivermectin 2-3 times a month. I am not sure about the efficacy of the capsules.
Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer's work on the German New Medicine (GNM) does not appear to be based on conventional scientific methodologies like double-blind studies. Here's a detailed examination based on available information:
Lack of Double-Blind Studies: There is no record in the provided text or known through general research that Hamer conducted any double-blind studies. The German New Medicine is largely based on Hamer's personal observations, case studies, and anecdotal evidence rather than controlled clinical trials.
Methodology: Observation and Case Studies: Hamer's approach was primarily observational. He reviewed thousands of medical records and CT scans from cancer patients, linking emotional shocks to specific brain lesions and subsequent organ diseases. This method does not involve the rigorous control needed for scientific validation.
Lack of Peer-Reviewed Research: The text indicates Hamer presented his findings as a post-doctoral thesis at the University of Tübingen, but there's no mention of this work going through peer-reviewed scientific scrutiny or being published in reputable scientific journals.
Scientific Rigor: Confirmation Bias: Hamer's methodology could be prone to confirmation bias, where he might have only noted cases that supported his theory, ignoring or not accounting for cases that contradicted it.
Absence of Control Groups: Without control groups, placebo effects, or systematic blinding, Hamer's claims lack the scientific rigor needed to substantiate his theories in the eyes of the scientific and medical community.
External Validation: The document mentions that Hamer's discoveries were "analyzed by hundreds of specialists," but there's no indication these analyses were formal, peer-reviewed validations. Instead, the narrative suggests a more informal or personal review by those who might have been sympathetic to his views.
Persecution and Lack of Acceptance: The text describes Hamer's struggles with the medical establishment, including losing his medical license, which further indicates his methods and conclusions did not align with or were not accepted by conventional medical science standards.
In summary, while Hamer's work is fervently outlined and based on his personal observations and experiences, it does not resemble traditional scientific methods such as double-blind studies. His approach lacks the systematic, controlled, and replicable nature required for scientific validation in modern medicine. Instead, his work is more aligned with alternative or holistic views of medicine, which often do not adhere to the rigorous standards of scientific methodology.
You've fallen for the establishment deception. You haven't asked the right question.
The right question is: -> Why hasn't the establishment attempted to prove or disprove Hamer's theories that have been available to them for over 50 years?
They'd be the least expensive "trials" conceivable. Right? All they need to do is interview people with specific dis-eases and see if there's a correlation between what he suggests are the causes and the dis-ease.
This is one of the most basic deceptive strategies. When they know they can't disprove something, they suppress, bury and ignore it. And then turnaround and say "none of your licenses, bonded (and bought and paid for) 'experts' have confirmed this yet. What they don't tell you is, that none of their 'experts" have even TRIED to confirm it. I can assure you quite confidently that they have not...and will not....as long as the same people in charge of the medical establishment stay in power.
They've spent TRILLIONS on all kinds of different medical research - chemicals, toxins, carcinogens, molds, genetics, pesticides, foods, blabbity blah blah blah. TRILLIONS. All wrong. And they've spend ZERO on Dr. Hamer's work.
Why? Because you are living in the "Age of Materialism", in turbo overdrive since 1880 (~1500 ad inception). The establishment are the materialists. And they're effectively wrong about everything. Hence the absolute madness on display in our world, least of all, the medical world.
Dis-ease is the result of discordant feelings - disharmonious emotions. As Dr. Hamer found, these are initiated by the "Conflict Shock"'; the unwanted, negative life event/situation that initiates the process. The difference between those who get the dis-ease and those who don't, is directly related to their ability to move on, to forgive and forget - which Dr. Hamer called "Conflict Resolution". Conflict resolution = a return to harmonious feelings. Remaining "conflict active" means a perpetuation of disharmonious feelings...which leads to debilitating dis-eases.
And if you care to learn the truth about this, I'd recommend not relying on any of the "establishment experts" for confirmation. We're decades away from that. They would trillions if they admitted Dr. Hamer was right. Nor would I recommend you BELIEVE me...or anybody else for that matter.
You can prove this to yourself. Look back on your life, dis-eases you've had, and examine how you fell into RESISTANCE (fear or judgment) of some kind in the days/weeks/months before your dis-ease symptoms started. Then have a look at the "conflict theme" that Dr. Hamer associated with the dis-ease; loss, separation, worry, fear, self-judgment, anger, etc. and you'll being to see how simple it all really is.
Germs, genes, toxins, carcinogens, diets, etc. All unproven nonsense. Because first cause isn't "material", it's "metaphysical". Dis-ease (disharmony) in the mind leads to dis-ease (disharmony) in the body.
Reality is simple and clear. The materialists would have you believe otherwise. Once you know, they can't deceive you ever again with their deliberately withheld "stamp of approval" that you're looking for. Not only would they lose trillions, but they'd also lose your trust. And that's the very last thing they can afford to lose. Because when they do, the masses will stop giving their power away to "them" (experts and authorities). The very "power" they rely upon to prey upon their slaves....
I have a question for you, does conventional scientific methodology have to be necessary in this modern world? This isn't to try to make an entire argument against the ideas you've posted, more or less a divergent thought.
"Lack of double-blind studies" under controlled settings are difficult to organize and hard to come by through online searches, combing through literature databases. These clinicians, researchers, field technicians, MD examiners, PHD theorists most of the time have to be funded through grants or other political entities. A lofty goal of proving a claim of some cancer research, yeah, no that's a hard pass for just about any normie doing this without any type of self gain or using their own capital, time, for rewards other than to simply help people. Getting a high enough population size to where statistical data is significant is time consuming to filter out the grander population at large. It's also very rare you see one clinician self-report their own journals/case files, as their own journals won't even see the light of day under established medical databases of scientific rigor.
To this day, the only self-reported journal with a clinician's own case files that I've ever seen was regarding vitamin C. And I think these case files went back to the 1940s-1960s.
Lack of peer-review research : maybe no one is scrutinizing previous research because there is no money to support these endeavors. There's thousands of medical literature out there for hypotheses to treat cancer, but where's the follow up? There seems to always to be "future considerations" or "further trials" for any of these hypotheses. It seems to always be "well, it could work, but we don't know. there's not enough data even though our n=200 in theory sounds reasonable. more trials need to be repeated." For the life of me, I've yet to see follow up papers to repeat trials. Conventional science for the most part, just leaves the data as is, seemingly with no one wanting to further expand on concepts.
Scientific rigor : for thousands of years, before modern science, we've had "scientists" unbeknownst in our own local communities. They weren't called scientists. A nice simple term would be farmers and ranchers. These awesome folks were able to develop hypotheses that relate to selecting between dominant and recessive genes in their agricultural products based on the results they get from their harvest. Is this type of rigor the same as modern rigor? Is one farmer's want to grow taller stocks of corn, or more corn in their stock, or more bushels in their acres, different colors of corn, or soil management, or whatever have you the same type of rigor? Are these farmers getting together and talking shop amongst themselves on how each others are getting good crops?
Basically, what i'm trying to get at is: anecdotes are just as good as the conventional methodology. Anecdotes is what helps farmers and ranchers grow sustainable food for us, as these folks surely talk amongst themselves and experiment themselves. I'm sure alot of these folks even went to agriculture school, to even get themselves familiarize with new theory. But it's still just theory, where are the practical reports of result findings? It's quite in the result of their crops of what they're theorizing on.
I just think it's a little ridiculous these days to dismiss anecdotal claims. If it's n+1 to a dataset, a result, a good protocol of experimentation, result finding, then it has sound logical repeatable possibility. But with modern conventional means, it's impossible to find repeatability for any normie without a university grade lab, lab equipment, and source to unsellable chemical compounds to the general public without credentials. Only repeatability is the function of economics, the cost, the availability, and the convenience of sourcing is capable to possibly confirm or deny any new grand claim.
That's why ivermectin, fenbendazole, methylene blue, vitamin c, chlorine dioxide, hydroxychloroquine, or whatever alternative treatment out there is being purported into the structure of our latest age of the "great awakening" Because these stuff is repeatable! The hardest part is trying to read people's own stories to see if their own methodology checks out for logical connections. Reading through the bullshit, if you will. But no one wants to do that. Only a select few who have their own determination and will power will. IE: facebook groups about cancer research. They have something to lose, or have already something to lose, and within their own will power choose to learn more about it themselves and try to restructure thinking processes within their own communities of what else may be possible.
I don't know, I wonder where the switch to scientific fervor had to be purely under controlled rigor? Somewhere along the line, there was a divergence between classical antiquity of thought (eat this willow bark, it'll help clear your headaches! aka aspirin) vs requiring everything needing to be controlled? I think, even in the realm of medicine, a healthy (pun very much intended) moderation in modern convention vs classical antiquity is just as good. Prolly big pharma only supporting papers that reach out to mainstream dogma being the complete divergence of these schools of thought, rather than a symbiotic convergence of the two.
I've got to know what some people consider to be hilly billy, rural folk stateside. Some of these folk live up to their late 80-90s with enough energy to even do gardening outside! I've listened to their treatment protocols, asked them what compounds they've done, how it's done, and by golly, they swear by it. I don't just sit there and let my own prejudices make me narrowminded, I just ask enough questions to connect logical connections that they don't necessarily know how to articulate.
Just because someone isn't a credentialed doctor, doesn't mean that they can't do their own homework in trying to learn more about the specifics of a field. Time is a person's own freedom. For some people to say "oh you're not credentialed, how dare you do your own research" Fuck outta here with that, we have the library of alexandria at our literal fingertips through cellphones, keyboards and computers. Ancient greeks would be salivating to see what possible knowledge can be learned.
Thanks.
Chiropractic, acupuncture, etc. -- you are no longer deemed crazy to try those out.
"his methods and conclusions did not align with or were not accepted by conventional medical science standards"
that is the point though . . .
could it be part of the cures that are out there?
In my humble opinion, cancers are caused by parasites! These mfs have lied to us about everything! White Hats used Covid plandemic to inject into our mindset that all disease are parasitic, with the introduction of 'horse paste'. Q referenced that they would either need to come clean or be exposed! Knowingly, will be prosecuted or eliminated! Doctors who have knowingly gone along with the deception to enrich themselves need to face justice! In my country, they all died from Super Cancers! Many people have been mutilated or were actually allowed to die for financial gain! When the truth is finally understood, many will not be able to walk the streets!
Are you aware of practitioners of GNM within the U.S.? And have you known cases of healing using GNM? I read the linked pdf, but it is rather general and seems difficult to apply with only the PDF as a guide.
That is what I am looking for. Thought maybe someone had some direct experience to relate.
I've talked about Darko Velcek's self healing protocol, suggesting it in comments a few times here. You can find it at https://darkovelcek.wordpress.com/introduction/
He acknowledges many healing modalities, and includes information that sounds a lot like GNM, but concentrates on simple diet changes that appear to heal everything, with time and discipline. Has great explanations of specific diseases and conditions, including cancer, if you use the search bar on the page. I've been on his protocol for almost a year, and I've experienced many benefits. I started it trying to reverse type 1 diabetes, and while that hasn't happened yet, the improvements are enough to keep me on it.
If you're interested in alternatives to allopathic medicine, I suggest giving him a look. Hope it helps. Cheers!