Just one thing I have been wondering about. So, Q and Trump have been saying that they have it all.
But when it comes to the big names, like the Clintons - how much would really be needed for something like public arrests and really putting any of those people in jail? They have been in the public eye as movers and shakers for decades, a lot of people voted for them when it's somebody like Bill Clinton or Obama, or anybody else who needs to get their seat by voters. Now even when a lot of those votes may have come from cheating, there still probably are still some millions of voters who did vote for them and would not be willing to admit they chose badly, and because of that still see "their" president or governor or senator or whatever as the good guy, especially as "their" good guy (or gal) and somebody they would be willing to even go on barricades for.
So, how MUCH of evidence would those voters and supporters need before they'd be willing to turn against people they have considered "theirs", or at the very least just let it be if those people will end up in jail, instead of rioting or otherwise causing more unrest than Trump and others are willing to risk? The point is to heal your system, not start a civil war for the sake of revenge, right?
I am assuming that at least some of them, maybe a lot of them, may be just let go, at least apparently, even if there may be some punishments that are not obvious on the surface, and at the very least some sort of restraints that make it hard or impossible for them to keep on meddling. They will be allowed to make deals, and we will get announcements of retiring, stepping out of the public eye and concentrating on family or writing an autobiography or something, which then will maybe never get published, and maybe some news items through the following years about investigations into their crimes, and drippings of news about their shenanigans in order to diminish their influence and take away their supporters, but nothing really big, like those arrests and them actually ending in jail.
This is not after all fiction. We live in the real world, and in the real world realpolitik is unfortunately something that has to be taken seriously if you want things to keep on working. So while I am hoping to see at least some arrests, I will not be too surprised if we don't get all that many of them.
Hang in there,fren. With DJT's team in place,with Pam Bondi, Kash Patel and others, the tsunami is starting to gain momentum.
Let's patiently wait to see where the first arrests are targeted. There's the Epstein list, the Diddy list, various fraud offences for stealing public money ect.
Let's patiently wait to see how the "normies" are introduced to the events of certain arrests to get them accustomed to how the process of these arrests progress to normalise the "normies", so as this action becomes to be seen as completely necessary and not alarming as in the sense of a "Rogue Government"
The information about the crimes the "normies" will hear for the first time will be alarming and disturbing enough. If they have been acclimatised to the legal process it will help them to cope. They will see why these situations are happening and why they are required.
Perhaps observation of judges prior to removal will stop future impediment. Seems idiots can make a mess unless neutered. Let them dig. The Supremes are just off stage. lol
It'll be interesting to see if certain Judges are removed so as the legal process can proceed without the typical left wing clown show to try to discredit the process.
Even if Q has video tape of The Clinton's doing atrocities to children, some on the left will simply say, "that's nothing more that AI." Whatever proof Q has in his possession, it must be complete, whole, and pure evidence.
I don't think all arrests will be made public. While I would enjoy the perp walk and humiliation of those demons, that isn't the point and what you say is true. As long as they're taken down and quietly removed, our society will benefit....
Yeah but " most transparent administration ever " should not hide it and the people would benefit more from full declass. We need jarring news to help break their hypnosis. Each shock will remove another shard or armor protecting them from reality.
Good point
I voted for the Bush when he was running against Gore, first time I voted. I was sure Gore was going to destroy our way of life. In the end Bush was as bad or worse. If he went to to prison for his crimes I would not shed any tears or post in any defense.
I think a Rommel death would be needed for some, Democrats love their criminals and would start hyperbolic reactions and civil unrest if their heros go down.
Gore amd bush all part of the same movie. Neither would have been good.
You wouldn't be here otherwise. But there presumably were a lot of people who voted for somebody like Bush not because they were voting against Gore, but because they genuinely thought Bush was what they wanted, and would be, and to their mind, was, a good president.
And then there are people like many Obama voters, the ones who thought they were making history, and may never be willing to admit that their historical first black president might actually have been a really bad choice. Just because he was historical, and black, and it might be bad for blacks if he turned out to be a criminal and a cheat who maybe never really was eligible because he actually was born as a foreigner or some other reason. So because that would be bad, they refuse to admit it might be possible, and will fight tooth and nail to defend their choice to vote for him.
I believed bush was good. Boy was i wrong guys. We won't get fooled again.
Excellent point. I post, therefore I am awake.
I think the shine is off blacks
Part of the dilemma as well is that some of the highest profile figures that have quite publicly committed obvious crimes - such as the Cuntons - may be willing to talk/negotiate on spilling the beans about the real global shadow government; such manoeuvres must be inconceivably tricky.
I know a lot of these people and they’re still asleep. Some even attend my church.
Sadly, I’m not even sure the crimes against children will wake them up.
if the punishment is hidden and to “keep things moving along” how will that dissuade future generations of parasites from taking their place? When someone was tarted feathered in the past it wasn’t in private. It was in public so that the public would see the wretched filth and scorn them. Additionally, these parasites families all must be shamed as well. They’ve all profited from the most heinous of crimes.
If they show proof of crimes against children, i believe those who aren’t pedophiles, perverts will be all in for even high profile persons to be arrested, tried and punished. Perhaps, unbeknownst to us, these people have already been dispatched and they have body doubles. We already see that criminality runs in families: the Bushes, Chelsea Clinton’s misappropriation of the Clinton Foundation funds, Soros’s sons-Alex met multiple times with Mexican drug cartels, met many times in the WH with Joe Biden (WHY?), in bed with Huma Abedin-HRC associate who per Anthony Weiner’s laptop perpetrated multiple crimes on children with HRC.
Som of them or most of them should be let go your kidding right? NO NO NO. They should not be let go if you let them go you end up with the same problems in 4 years dont you get that. To stop this ever happening again you need to put them all behind bars.
What about Hillary they have only one time mentioned crimes against children. This needs to come out to arrest most of them because almost all of them are guilty in one form or another.
What would it take? In a word… Frazzlerip. There are tapes of everyone of them
How can you prove a video like frazzledrip is not AI? AI has really made you have to question everything.
It is rumored to be old analog tape. Analog, as opposed to digital, is almost impossible to fake. It is the same reason Trump has re-wired Gitmo courtrooms with Analog only for streaming.
that would do it
I thought the social security and Medicare fraud would be enough certainly for those who cared about those people are that age today.
Lots of people don't want to see because seeing will make them feel uncomfortable, and so prefer to keep thinking that things have been just fine before because that scares them less. And you presumably have a lot of those people, and you need to keep on working with those people. Again, realpolitik. You can't force them to change, or to see, that has to come from the inside, and if it happens at all it will happen very slowly, and they will keep on denying what is put on front of them no matter how much evidence you pile there.
Until maybe on some later date those who can change will suddenly start thinking that yes, that is what they have thought themselves for a long time, and why nobody did anything before...
Again, this is real life, not fiction. In fiction you might get mass awakenings just by exposing things in public, but that is not guaranteed in real life because in real life people in general are scared of change, even if the change seems to be towards something better. And even in the worst dictatorships you have people who have been content with what has been because they personally had comfortable enough lives, and would prefer to keep the status quo because of that.
And western countries have not been even close to the worst kind of dictatorships, even if we have been constantly sliding closer to that during the last decades. So there is a lot of resistance against changing anything about the system.
And we have to deal with that. We can't wake up everybody, and have to find ways to keep those resisters content enough that they will not become a problem when it comes to this change. If we are lucky it might turn out that those resisters are after all small enough a group, at least the fanatical part of them, that they are not a big problem for Trump and his successors when it comes to managing the change and they can do everything without much of a risk, but it's also possible that they have to keep up some appearances, like letting some of the crooks go with only a slap on the wrist, in order to keep on making the needed bigger changes in the system.
I agree, I don’t think it’s gonna be crazy like we hope. I believe the last 8 or so years was to change the country while avoiding a civil war.
Perhaps that's why Podesta is listed as a marker. He's a "nobody" in the scheme of thngs, yet he was a "somebody" in the larger picture. Like most large scale operations of this sort... start with the "lower" members of the totem pole and work your way to the top.
In this case, you start with your Podestas and show the normies what they did, then move up the ladder to the next one, etc. By the time you get to the Clintons and Obamas the level of shock to the normies will be less, and they will be more accepting... sure, there will be those kicking and screaming, but there will be a lot more who will have woken up!
That's why the trials must be public, and the evidence unassailable. Even those who love the image of Hillary Clinton, as one example, will recoil and disavow her when the truths of Benghazi and Haiti are revealed: ordering the killings of Americans, stealing children and worse.
Many sheep will reject, but the red pill will force them to reluctantly open their minds.
I have to respectfully disagree. I lived through the OJ Simpson trial. The evidence WAS unassailable, but the "Dream Team" of his lawyers and PR (Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, et. al), always in front of the cameras, every day, poked holes in the process, witnesses, evidence (if the glove don't fit, you must acquit!). So, with that whole media circus in mind, I would like to see the arrests made public but not the trials.
You beat me to the media being complicit in the positive marketing of all these criminals. If the main stream media is actually neutered then facts will be broadcast and more minds will learn truth.
Much to happen!!
Tribunals..not civilian courts
Exactly.