Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

107
Amy Coney Barrett show her true feelings for Trump... If looks could k*ll... Does the USAID decision make sense now? (twitter.com)
posted 1 year ago by GDZeus 1 year ago by GDZeus +107 / -0
43 comments share
43 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (43)
sorted by:
▲ 23 ▼
– Bully_Solution 23 points 1 year ago +23 / -0

Huh..so eventually "military is the only way".

permalink save report block reply
▲ 22 ▼
– deleted 22 points 1 year ago +22 / -0
▲ 36 ▼
– Megadeth 36 points 1 year ago +36 / -0

I am not defending her at all, but the left takes similar small, short clips like this and uses them out of context almost religiously. Melania is often the subject.

I wouldn't read a lot into these videos, but certainly don't discourage sharing them since I could be 100% completely fucking wrong :-).

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– seagoatz 18 points 1 year ago +18 / -0

I came here to say the same. They constantly use closeup clips of Melania to make it seem like she hates POTUS.

In this clip, maybe I'm wrong, but it looks like Amy Coney Barrett is looking at someone else, not POTUS.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– MewThat 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

wow...you're right. I paused it and you could easily say she is looking at someone else.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– gigabump3 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

If you look at Kavanaugh face you could say he hates Trump for something too. They're supposed to look unbiased - I think they both did that. Are they compromised? Yes, they were on McConnell's Federalist List - but they don't hate Trump.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SarMega 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

The entire judiciary and military were stone-faced the entire proceedings, to maintain an image of impartiality. The Axis powers have been psyopping the "Groypers" non-stop to get them to backstab Trump. The goal is to get his approval ratings in the toilet so they can assassinate him and people will let it go like they did with JFK.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– hippielouie 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

for all we know...someone nearby was talking trash bout Trump n she didn't like it

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– TrumpWon17 11 points 1 year ago +11 / -0

I see lots of fear coming from them eyes.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Revodude 10 points 1 year ago +10 / -0

Didn’t shake her hand or greet her. She knew she had screwed up.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– MysteryBabylonNoMore 10 points 1 year ago +10 / -0

I'm hearing the AID decision isn't over yet.

https://jonathanturley.org/2025/03/05/down-but-not-out-supreme-court-rules-5-4-against-the-administration-over-hold-on-2-billion-in-usaid-funds/

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– MoLibertyson 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/rep-thomas-massie-demands-congress-cut-usaid-funding/

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– LindyLee 9 points 1 year ago +9 / -0

She needs to be impeached and removed. What a venomous look she gave our POTUS. I hope someone shows him this clip.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– AngelCole 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

She knows she is in trouble otherwise why would she not like President Trump, he put her there.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Fefifofumdrum 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

^ this has the right feel to it....

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– UpwardBound 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

Oh, POTUS passed her up as he was approaching, then greeted Kavanaugh!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– SuckaFree 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

She shouldn't even be there. It's a joint message to Congress and The People, not to the Judiciary Branch, or even the military, for that matter.

S(c)ROTUS and th JCS shouldn't have even been there. They don't clap with everyone else because both groups are supposed to officially remain politically neutral

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DaninElkhart 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

She shouldn't be there because the duplicitous, faithless crank should not be on the Supreme Court.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– ToxicLibertyism 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

She was a DEI pick, pushed by the "republican" party establishment. They demanded Trump pick a woman. Don't believe it?

Trump stated on camera prior to Barrett's selection that {paraphrased} "...I don't know who the pick will be yet, but I know it will be a woman." It infuriated me when he said that, and from that moment I knew for certain that whoever was getting that SCOTUS seat was going to be an establishment POS pick.

Barrett is a demonstration of the power of Senate confirmation. McConnell and the senate wanted a woman for party optics. Trump was corralled into selecting a candidate that could pass senate confirmation- that's how we ended up with that turkey on the bench; McConnell and the US senate.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– NeverStopBelieving 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Don’t forget those Afopted kids from killerys Haiti project !

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0
▲ 8 ▼
– TBone_92A1 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

They said on Fox last night, that Alito and Thomas haven't attended these and SOTU speeches in 10 years.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– TBone_92A1 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I thought Thomas was at the first one, as well.

Clipping your toenails was a much better use of your time!!!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Joys1Daughter 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Thanks...was wondering about that..

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Lonegunman65 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

If this is true and not taken out of context, she needs to be impeached. With that kind of disgust, there’s no way she can be impartial (as all judges should be) when it comes to her presiding over any case involving Trump.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Marius 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

That book deal she got right after taking her seat just screams compromised. Then she quickly decides that since she is new on the bench she can't rule on the Pennsylvania case during the 2020 election. She is completely worthless!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– stormymonday 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

I am glad somebody else caught this I saw it last night and said she gave him the stink eye,

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– GDZeus [S] 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

https://x.com/ChuckCallesto/status/1897342665630577049

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– BigDaddy1reboot 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Maybe she got her USAid money cut????

She will be irrelevant soon. Trump will get to appoint more Justices.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– MeanoReno 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Too many back SC nomination picks by Republicans over the years. Reagan’s pick of Sandra Day O’Connor, Bush’s pick with Robert’s and Trump’s pick of Barrett. All of these picks sucked big time.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– MudDog 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

i don't see it

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– winn 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

A servent of Rome big mad at Monroe Doctrine? A higher loyalty? Plot twist! Wonder if she belongs to any 'brotherhoods' or 'orders'...well in her case I suppose it would be 'sisterhoods', or do they now allow women into those things?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– ThomasMaker 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Talk about misreading someones emotions..........

She looks terrified and on the verge of crying.

That's not an angry face, it's a petrified one...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Dudemanfoo 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I would go to Thomas and say "Thomas... who makes you look like a libtard.... let's get THAT guy when you retire"

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– joanofsnark 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

TBH to me it looks like she is unhappy with being skipped over. May or may not have been intentionally. I tend to think with the Boss man there is very little unintentional so he may have been sending a message she wasn’t happy to receive. She might just hate him but that is something to explore too before we go full pitchforks. If however it turns out she is indeed part of the deep state grinder then I will gladly buy the beer for the pitchforks sharpening party. JS

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– bubble_bursts 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

She was not even looking at Trump. This kind of stuff is so idiotic

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– xchainlinkx 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Remember when Trump put her in SCOTUS in the first place? I'm tired of Trump putting in poisonous snakes in power.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Emgaisagiang 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Wow!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 7 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 8wn6p (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy